The Nixon years: failed national health reform from both parties

In the November 1991 elections, popular support for national health reform (NHR) enabled Harry Wofford to become a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania. Since then a bevy of congressional proposals to reform America's health care system have emerged, with even national health insurance, or a single payer system, becoming a prominent contender for the first time in 20 years. National health reform is now a regular feature on the evening news. However, this is not the first time that NHR has attracted national attention. As pointed out in the first article in this series (Physician Executive, March-April 1992, page 23), there have been numerous efforts to enact NHR in the U.S. Each has failed because of strident opposition by interest groups, lack of active presidential interest in the specific legislation, and the absence of strong popular interest.     

Truman and the medical profession: replay or lesson for the nineties

This article describes the first serious effort on the part of an American president to enact national health insurance (NHI). President Truman considered his inability to enact NHI the single most important defeat during his presidency. While a variety of factors led to the demise of NHI, three are most notable. The dynamic interplay of these factors, integrated with references to the current accelerating debate over national health reform, will serve as the focus for this seventh article in a series on historical efforts to enact national health reform in the United States.     

National health reform advocates retrench and prepare for Medicare

With the failure of President Truman's efforts to pass compulsory health insurance for all, national health reform (NHR) advocates began to redirect their political attention to a politically powerful group of Americans who were simultaneously vulnerable from a health care point of view--the elderly. This effort culminated in the passage of Medicare under President Johnson. This article will focus on antecedents to passage of Medicare that can be found in the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations. It will also discuss other facets of health reform proposals from the Eisenhower administration. While most proposals never became law, the legislative intent of many of them--outlawing cancellation of policies, a minimum standard health benefit package, establishment of regional health authorities, preference for prepayment plans, and establishment of a reinsurance pool administered by the federal government--is currently under active discussion by the Clinton health reform task forces.     

Efforts to implement national health reform in the United States

Beginning in this issue and carrying forth during the year, the author will trace the history of the development of a national health policy in the United States. In beginning this new feature, Physician Executive recognizes the potential impact of national health reform on physician executives and the need to contribute to informed discussion on the current national health reform debate. In this first article, the authors sets the stage for the series, establishing the historical precedents for national health care reform and some of the groundrules for the articles to follow.     

Constitutional guarantees to health care in Spain

This analysis of the Spanish health care system is one in a series of such studies undertaken by the author, following a grid of factors that influence the delivery and financing of health care. The purpose of the national analyses is to facilitate a comparison of the United States' and other health care systems in terms of anticipated reform of the U.S. system. Analyses of the U.S. and nine other national systems are included in a book that has just been published by the College. Spain and nine additional countries will be studied in a book due for publication later this year. A final book with ten additional national analyses will appear in 1996.     

What will future historians say about the Clinton health reform act

In a series of articles that began in the March-April 1992 issue of Physician Executive, the author has provided historical background on the debate that currently rages on the nature and course of national health reform. In addition to tracing past efforts to expand access to health care for Americans, Dr. Goldfield has provided unique insights into the American political process and into the American psyche. In this final article in the series, Dr. Goldfield provides his personal assessment of what the chances for real reform of the health care delivery system are and his views on what that reform will ultimately look like. He calls himself a skeptic, not a cynic, saying that the likelihood of meaningful change is small, given the numerous proponents of the status quo.     

The impact of health care reform on group practice

Just two years ago, it would have been very difficult to imagine that reform of the health care system would today be a national domestic priority and that Congress would be considering one of the most significant and far-reaching pieces of legislation in the past 50 years. The issue is still in doubt, but it seems clear that, in this session of Congress or the next, legislation of far-reaching consequences will likely be passed. In fact, change on a widespread scale has already begun. During 1993, every state legislature except those of Nevada and Wyoming considered measures that would alter the way medical care is financed and delivered. Of the states that acted, both last year and in recent legislative sessions, eight have passed laws with the ultimate objective of ensuring access to medical care for all citizens. Government, at both the state and federal level, is clearly taking on the health care issue. The impact of reform on physicians, and thus on group practices, will be substantial. This article outlines the current course of health care reform and addresses its specific implications for the management of group practices.     

Computer-based patient records: a building block for health care reform

The fundamental need for better information management capabilities in health care is at risk of being overlooked in the proposals for major national changes aimed at providing health security, controlling costs, enhancing quality, and expanding access for citizens. In addition to these proposed macro changes (e.g., universal access, guaranteed benefit package, national health board, regional health alliances), successful reform will require transformation of health care delivery at the micro level. We must overcome provider-dependent variations in clinical practice patterns, in quality of performance, and in costs of services. We must ensure movement toward appropriate care rather than simple rationing. Individual health care professionals and institutions must acquire and use tools that will enable them to provide their services cost-effectively with consistent results. We must be able to assess and ensure value--i.e., appropriateness, effectiveness, and cost--of health services, apply that knowledge in each and every patient encounter, and track the impact of clinical decisions through an analysis of aggregated databases.     

Effects of medical practice structure on resource use

The drive to national health care reform has made a central issue of variations among physicians in the use of resources to treat similar cases. While much research exists on this issue, little of it concentrates on the impact of practice structure on resource use. In this column, the author comments on that research. This column is intended as a point of ongoing analysis of health services research of importance to physician executives. The column is edited by John Kralewski, PhD, who heads the Institute for Health Services Research at the University of Minnesota.     

Building a vertical provider system

There is probably no geographic area in the United States in which the health care environment is more turbulent than that of Southern California. Long before President Clinton's proposals began serious national debate on health care reform, a massive provider-driven realignment of the system was occurring in that region of the country. Multispecialty medical groups have generally led the way and have acquired ever larger managed care populations through merger and acquisition of other groups and practices. Hospitals, hampered by large fixed capital bases, have struggled to reinvent themselves as cost-effective and primary care-friendly environments in order to be attractive to managed care physicians. Almost ignored in this reconfiguration has been the university teaching hospital. This article discusses one attempt to reconcile contractually an integrated, capitated, and managed care-oriented health care system with an academic medical center in a strategic alliance.     

The consumer choice model: a humane reconstruction of the U.S. health care system

"Consumer choice," "defined contribution health programs," "voucher systems," and "health marts" are variations on a theme: employees buying their own health care. This new approach to health care purchasing, which is designed to minimize the role of employers, is being proposed by an array of economists and by both Republican and Democratic legislators as the best way to address the nation's health care ills. Although enabling national legislation is unlikely to pass soon, the debate will nevertheless change the face of health care in America. The prospect is reminiscent of the debate over "Clinton Care" in 1993--although legislation was never passed, managed care rapidly came to dominate the U.S. health care system. As this reform takes hold, beneficiaries will make their own health plan selections but will have more responsibility and may bear more cost. Providers will have to adapt to new, customer-driven requirements for performance, accountability, and communications but will also find opportunities in a marketplace that they will have a major role in shaping. Physicians, health plans, and insurers should understand how these proposals will transform their role in health care.     

Getting the most for your consulting dollars

Major changes in the health care financing and delivery system have usually been accompanied by an increase in demand within the health care field for consulting services. The passage of Medicare/Medicaid in 1965 is one example. The passage of the DRG-based prospective pricing system in 1983 is another. Both spawned a substantial amount of work, and income, for consulting firms. Now the health care field is engaged in nearly total transformation as the forces of health care reform at the national level are met with myriad adjustments at the local and regional levels. Managed care, already a byword, is being strengthened by a multitude of so-called integrated system initiatives. It is not easy to survive, and the call is out to consultants to save the day, or at least stave off disaster. In the following four articles, Marilyn Kennedy, a member of the ACPE faculty and a consultant herself, gives some advice on how to make the consulting arrangement successful; three physician executives provide a glimpse at consults that have worked, and some that did not work.     

Merging medical groups

One of the trends of the past 10 years that has marked the way physicians practice medicine is growth in the size and complexity of group practice. The reasons for these changes (better patient coverage, within-the-group referral, a larger financial base, a collegial environment, shared overhead, professional management, and packaged negotiation) are clear and are certainly valid. This trend shows few signs of slowing and may be accelerating. Indeed, most of the proposals for national health care reform seem likely to put larger groups at a competitive advantage. We have developed a highly effective procedure that helps improve the efficiency and the success of the merger process.     

The Politics of ‘Social Accountability’ in England and Germany: Democratic Control and Moral Imperatives

This article investigates how politicians in England and Germany approach social accountability during the introduction of markets in the national health care systems. It analyses the discourse among members of parliament during the law making process of the 2012 NHS Health Care Act in England and the 2011 Act for Financing of Statutory Health Insurance in Germany. Generally, the new social accountability reform agenda is attractive to policy makers as it foregrounds public engagement and bottom-up participation (Peters 2001). Social accountability refers to institutional practices that favour participatory and horizontal mechanisms that depart from traditional hierarchical Principal-Agent forms.     

The mandate for investigational cancer therapies

The heated national health care reform debate of the summer of 1993 has now simmered down, but pieces of the debate are still percolating along at the state level. Within the past year, numerous states have introduced bills that would mandate insurance coverage for investigational cancer therapies--in particular high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplant for breast cancer. The problem with these initiatives, well-intended though they may be, is that they threaten to spread unproven technologies at a rapid rate and at the same time miss the opportunity to collect data that would prove the safety and effectiveness of the methods. The author explores these issues and suggests how managed care companies can play a more aggressive role in parrying the threat.     

实行薪点股权分配制的构想

国有企业改革成败与否直接关系到整个国民经济转轨的成败,但20多年的改革,国企尚未摆脱困境,这其中固然有政府转变职能和配套改革滞后的原因,但就企业而言也有其自身创新的不足。加快收入分配制度改革和创新,建立与现代企业制度相适应的收入分配机制是国企改革的重要内容。因此就一种新的分配制度--薪点股权分配制的设计与运作做简单介绍。     

Israel--a health system in transition

Israeli health reform, implemented after many failed attempts throughout the years, represents an attempt to solve problems of politicization, dissatisfaction, unclear roles of government and public organizations, and lack of financial accountability, while maintaining a high quality and universally accessible health system. Despite many favorable aspects, including high quality medical care, near universal insurance coverage, and high availability of services, the health system has attracted criticism since its earliest days. Israel's experience with health reform, based on a version of managed competition, is of interest to other countries considering similar policy decisions.     

Health care reform. Four variables and a theory: an equation for health care

Writings about health care reform currently appearing in all manner of publications often can confuse, rather than clarify, both problems and solutions. One of the strengths of the study of economics is the ability to summarize complex situations in graphic form, and one of the benefits of management theory is to visualize approaches to problems in a broad and well-organized manner. Three recent articles, when combined, suggest a fresh analysis of the problems demanding health care reform in this nation. They are reviewed here and synthesized into a philosophical view that encourages a more positive approach to solutions for the problems. The first article considers an economic theory with striking applications to health care. The second article suggests one management approach for the future for both for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. The third article takes a fresh approach to competition in health care. This review will discuss the economic theory and then apply the management principles to the problem of health care reform confronting the profession and the nation today.     

A conversation on the future of health care

An extensive amount has been written, reported, and spoken on health care reform. It is a time of turmoil and uncertainty in the health care field. There is a great deal of talk at the federal level on reform, but efforts there seem to be at least temporarily stymied. Much is happening at the local and regional level, however, as the health care field itself wrestles with the changes that have already occurred and with the promise of changes that lie ahead. In the following conversation between two fictional physician executives, one with many years experience, the other his junior, some of the issues surrounding health care reform are discussed. Although the specific environment for the conversation is managed care, most physician executives will find themselves somewhere in the conversation. let's eavesdrop as they speak, in the late summer of 1994.