Estimation of Causal Effects in Latent Strata with an Encouragement for Response

We consider a new approach to deal with non ignorable non response on an outcome variable, in a causal inference framework. Assuming that a binary instrumental variable for non response is available, we provide a likelihood-based approach to identify and estimate heterogeneous causal effects of a binary treatment on specific latent subgroups of units, named principal strata, defined by the non response behavior under each level of the treatment and of the instrument. We show that, within each stratum, non response is ignorable and respondents can be properly compared by treatment status. In order to assess our method and its robustness when the usually invoked assumptions are relaxed or misspecified, we simulate data to resemble a real experiment conducted on a panel survey which compares different methods of reducing panel attrition.     

Estimating the causal effects in randomized trials for survival data with a cure fraction and non compliance

We consider causal inference in randomized studies for survival data with a cure fraction and all-or-none treatment non compliance. To describe the causal effects, we consider the complier average causal effect (CACE) and the complier effect on survival probability beyond time t (CESP), where CACE and CESP are defined as the difference of cure rate and non cured subjects’ survival probability between treatment and control groups within the complier class. These estimands depend on the distributions of survival times in treatment and control groups. Given covariates and latent compliance type, we model these distributions with transformation promotion time cure model whose parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood. Both the infinite dimensional parameter in the model and the mixture structure of the problem create some computational difficulties which are overcome by an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. We show the estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. Some simulation studies are conducted to assess the finite-sample performance of the proposed approach. We also illustrate our method by analyzing a real data from the Healthy Insurance Plan of Greater New York.     

On the Estimation Accuracy of Causal Effects using Supplementary Variables

This paper focuses on a situation in which a set of treatments is associated with a response through a set of supplementary variables in linear models as well as discrete models. Under the situation, we demonstrate that the causal effect can be estimated more accurately from the set of supplementary variables. In addition, we show that the set of supplementary variables can include selection variables and proxy variables as well. Furthermore, we propose selection criteria for supplementary variables based on the estimation accuracy of causal effects. From graph structures based on our results, we can judge certain situations under which the causal effect can be estimated more accurately by supplementary variables and reliably evaluate the causal effects from observed data.     

Some Results About Standardization for a Non Confounder in Estimators of (log) Relative Risk

Confounding is very fundamental to the design and analysis of studies of causal effects. A variable is not a confounder if it is not a risk factor to disease or if it has the same distribution in the exposed and unexposed population. Whether or not to adjust for a non confounder to improve the precision of estimation has been argued by many authors. This article shows that if C is a non confounder, the pooled and standardized (log) relative risk estimators are asymptotic normal distributions with the mean being the true (log) relative risk, and that the asymptotic variance of the pooled (log) relative risk estimator is less than that of the stratified estimator.     

Semiparametric Estimates of Monetary Policy Effects: String Theory Revisited

We develop flexible semiparametric time series methods for the estimation of the causal effect of monetary policy on macroeconomic aggregates. Our estimator captures the average causal response to discrete policy interventions in a macrodynamic setting, without the need for assumptions about the process generating macroeconomic outcomes. The proposed estimation strategy, based on propensity score weighting, easily accommodates asymmetric and nonlinear responses. Using this estimator, we show that monetary tightening has clear effects on the yield curve and on economic activity. Monetary accommodation, however, appears to generate less pronounced responses from both. Estimates for recent financial crisis years display a similarly dampened response to monetary accommodation.     

The Effect of Treatment Compliance in a Placebo-controlled Trial: Regression with Unpaired Data

The causal effect of a treatment is estimated at different levels of treatment compliance, in a placebo-controlled trial on the reduction of blood pressure. The structural nested mean model makes no direct assumptions on selected treatment compliance levels and placebo prognosis but relies on the randomization assumption and a parametric form for causal effects. It can be seen as a regression model for unpaired data, where pre- and post-randomization covariables are treated differently. The causal parameters are found as solutions to estimating equations involving estimated placebo response and treatment compliance based on base-line covariates for all subjects. Our example considers a linear effect of the percentage of prescribed dose taken on achieved diastolic blood pressure reduction. We propose an exploration of structural model checks. In the example, this reveals an interaction between the causal effect of active dose taken and the base-line body weight of the patient.     

Optimal Block Designs With Interference Effects From Neighboring Units Under a Non Additive Model

Here, the optimality of block design with interference effect from neighboring unit under a general non additive model is investigated, which allows for the presence of interactions among the treatments applied in the adjacent plots. A non additive model with interference × direct effects of treatments is considered as these effects contribute significantly to the response. A class of complete block designs balanced for interference effects from left neighboring unit is shown to be universally optimal for the estimation of direct and interference effects of treatments and two such series of designs have been constructed. Furthermore, considering direct treatment × block non additivity with interference effects, the optimality is studied and the optimal designs are obtained.     

Conditions for Non-confounding and Collapsibility without Knowledge of Completely Constructed Causal Diagrams

In this paper, we discuss several concepts in causal inference in terms of causal diagrams proposed by Pearl (1993 , 1995a , b ), and we give conditions for non-confounding, homogeneity and collapsibility for causal effects without knowledge of a completely constructed causal diagram. We first introduce the concepts of non-confounding, conditional non-confounding, uniform non-confounding, homogeneity, collapsibility and strong collapsibility for causal effects, then we present necessary and sufficient conditions for uniform non-confounding, homegeneity and collapsibilities, and finally we show sufficient conditions for non-confounding, conditional non-confounding and uniform non-confounding.     

用加权调整法对无回答问题进行调整

无回答问题是抽样调查中较难处理的问题之一。无回答偏差是非抽样误差的一个重要来源,本文对无回答的统计影响进行了具体分析,并详细介绍了如何运用加权调整法对无回答偏差进行调整。     

Refusal to Answer Specific Questions in a Survey: A Case Study

It is well known that non ignorable item non response may occur when the cause of the non response is the value of the latent variable of interest. In these cases, a refusal by a respondent to answer specific questions in a survey should be treated sometimes as a non ignorable item non response. The Rasch-Rasch model (RRM) is a new two-dimensional item response theory model for addressing non ignorable non response. This article demonstrates the use of the RRM on data from an Italian survey focused on assessment of healthcare workers’ knowledge about sudden infant death syndrome (that is, a context in which non response is presumed to be more likely among individuals with a low level of competence). We compare the performance of the RRM with other models within the Rasch model family that assume the unidimensionality of the latent trait. We conclude that this assumption should be considered unreliable for the data at hand, whereas the RRM provides a better fit of the data.     

Identification of the Direction of a Causal Effect by Instrumental Variables

This article provides a strategy to identify the existence and direction of a causal effect in a generalized nonparametric and nonseparable model identified by instrumental variables. The causal effect concerns how the outcome depends on the endogenous treatment variable. The outcome variable, treatment variable, other explanatory variables, and the instrumental variable can be essentially any combination of continuous, discrete, or “other” variables. In particular, it is not necessary to have any continuous variables, none of the variables need to have large support, and the instrument can be binary even if the corresponding endogenous treatment variable and/or outcome is continuous. The outcome can be mismeasured or interval-measured, and the endogenous treatment variable need not even be observed. The identification results are constructive, and can be empirically implemented using standard estimation results.     

Direct and Indirect Causal Effects via Potential Outcomes*

Abstract. The use of the concept of ‘direct’ versus ‘indirect’ causal effects is common, not only in statistics but also in many areas of social and economic sciences. The related terms of ‘biomarkers’ and ‘surrogates’ are common in pharmacological and biomedical sciences. Sometimes this concept is represented by graphical displays of various kinds. The view here is that there is a great deal of imprecise discussion surrounding this topic and, moreover, that the most straightforward way to clarify the situation is by using potential outcomes to define causal effects. In particular, I suggest that the use of principal stratification is key to understanding the meaning of direct and indirect causal effects. A current study of anthrax vaccine will be used to illustrate ideas.     

Optimizing a control plan using a structural equation model with an application to statistical process analysis

In the case where non-experimental data are available from an industrial process and a directed graph for how various factors affect a response variable is known based on a substantive understanding of the process, we consider a problem in which a control plan involving multiple treatment variables is conducted in order to bring a response variable close to a target value with variation reduction. Using statistical causal analysis with linear (recursive and non-recursive) structural equation models, we configure an optimal control plan involving multiple treatment variables through causal parameters. Based on the formulation, we clarify the causal mechanism for how the variance of a response variable changes when the control plan is conducted. The results enable us to evaluate the effect of a control plan on the variance of a response variable from non-experimental data and provide a new application of linear structural equation models to engineering science.     

A Bayesian nonparametric causal model

Typically, in the practice of causal inference from observational studies, a parametric model is assumed for the joint population density of potential outcomes and treatment assignments, and possibly this is accompanied by the assumption of no hidden bias. However, both assumptions are questionable for real data, the accuracy of causal inference is compromised when the data violates either assumption, and the parametric assumption precludes capturing a more general range of density shapes (e.g., heavier tail behavior and possible multi-modalities). We introduce a flexible, Bayesian nonparametric causal model to provide more accurate causal inferences. The model makes use of a stick-breaking prior, which has the flexibility to capture any multi-modalities, skewness and heavier tail behavior in this joint population density, while accounting for hidden bias. We prove the asymptotic consistency of the posterior distribution of the model, and illustrate our causal model through the analysis of small and large observational data sets.     

Doubly Robust Inference for the Distribution Function in the Presence of Missing Survey Data

Item non‐response in surveys occurs when some, but not all, variables are missing. Unadjusted estimators tend to exhibit some bias, called the non‐response bias, if the respondents differ from the non‐respondents with respect to the study variables. In this paper, we focus on item non‐response, which is usually treated by some form of single imputation. We examine the properties of doubly robust imputation procedures, which are those that lead to an estimator that remains consistent if either the outcome variable or the non‐response mechanism is adequately modelled. We establish the double robustness property of the imputed estimator of the finite population distribution function under random hot‐deck imputation within classes. We also discuss the links between our approach and that of Chambers and Dunstan. The results of a simulation study support our findings.     

Decomposition of the main effects and interaction term by using orthogonal polynomials in multiple non symmetrical correspondence analysis

The multiple non symmetric correspondence analysis (MNSCA) is a useful technique for analyzing a two-way contingency table. In more complex cases, the predictor variables are more than one. In this paper, the MNSCA, along with the decomposition of the Gray–Williams Tau index, in main effects and interaction term, is used to analyze a contingency table with two predictor categorical variables and an ordinal response variable. The Multiple-Tau index is a measure of association that contains both main effects and interaction term. The main effects represent the change in the response variables due to the change in the level/categories of the predictor variables, considering the effects of their addition, while the interaction effect represents the combined effect of predictor categorical variables on the ordinal response variable. Moreover, for ordinal scale variables, we propose a further decomposition in order to check the existence of power components by using Emerson's orthogonal polynomials.     

Study Design in Causal Models

The causal assumptions, the study design and the data are the elements required for scientific inference in empirical research. The research is adequately communicated only if all of these elements and their relations are described precisely. Causal models with design describe the study design and the missing‐data mechanism together with the causal structure and allow the direct application of causal calculus in the estimation of the causal effects. The flow of the study is visualized by ordering the nodes of the causal diagram in two dimensions by their causal order and the time of the observation. Conclusions on whether a causal or observational relationship can be estimated from the collected incomplete data can be made directly from the graph. Causal models with design offer a systematic and unifying view to scientific inference and increase the clarity and speed of communication. Examples on the causal models for a case–control study, a nested case–control study, a clinical trial and a two‐stage case–cohort study are presented.     

THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS IN PRINCIPAL CAUSAL EFFECT ESTIMATION WHEN TREATMENT RECEIVED DEPENDS ON A KEY COVARIATE

Motivated by a potential-outcomes perspective, the idea of principal stratification has been widely recognized for its relevance in settings susceptible to posttreatment selection bias such as randomized clinical trials where treatment received can differ from treatment assigned. In one such setting, we address subtleties involved in inference for causal effects when using a key covariate to predict membership in latent principal strata. We show that when treatment received can differ from treatment assigned in both study arms, incorporating a stratum-predictive covariate can make estimates of the "complier average causal effect" (CACE) derive from observations in the two treatment arms with different covariate distributions. Adopting a Bayesian perspective and using Markov chain Monte Carlo for computation, we develop posterior checks that characterize the extent to which incorporating the pretreatment covariate endangers estimation of the CACE. We apply the method to analyze a clinical trial comparing two treatments for jaw fractures in which the study protocol allowed surgeons to overrule both possible randomized treatment assignments based on their clinical judgment and the data contained a key covariate (injury severity) predictive of treatment received.     

Signed directed acyclic graphs for causal inference

Summary.  Formal rules governing signed edges on causal directed acyclic graphs are described and it is shown how these rules can be useful in reasoning about causality. Specifically, the notions of a monotonic effect, a weak monotonic effect and a signed edge are introduced. Results are developed relating these monotonic effects and signed edges to the sign of the causal effect of an intervention in the presence of intermediate variables. The incorporation of signed edges in the directed acyclic graph causal framework furthermore allows for the development of rules governing the relationship between monotonic effects and the sign of the covariance between two variables. It is shown that when certain assumptions about monotonic effects can be made then these results can be used to draw conclusions about the presence of causal effects even when data are missing on confounding variables.     

The Effects of Detrending in Granger Causality Tests

Nonstationary time series are frequently detrended in empirical investigations by regressing the series on time or a function of time. The effects of the detrending on the tests for causal relationships in the sense of Granger are investigated using quarterly U.S. data. The causal relationships between nominal or real GNP and M1, inferred from the Granger–Sims tests, are shown to depend very much on, among other factors, whether or not series are detrended. Detrending tends to remove or weaken causal relationships, and conversely, failure to detrend tends to introduce or enhance causal relationships. The study suggests that we need a more robust test or a better definition of causality.