An improved ranked set two‐sample mann‐whitney‐wilcoxon test

The authors present an improved ranked set two‐sample Mann‐Whitney‐Wilcoxon test for a location shift between samples from two distributions F and G. They define a function that measures the amount of information provided by each observation from the two samples, given the actual joint ranking of all the units in a set. This information function is used as a guide for improving the Pitman efficacy of the Mann‐Whitney‐Wilcoxon test. When the underlying distributions are symmetric, observations at their mode(s) must be quantified in order to gain efficiency. Analogous results are provided for asymmetric distributions.     

Exact inference for multivariate ordered alternatives

In this paper we discuss three types of ordered alternatives ordered location, stochastic ordering and quadrant dependence. We prove that quadrant dependence is the more general among the three. Then we consider a conditional tests for the equality of c distributions against quadrant dependence in a multivariate setup. An exact simultaneous testing procedure based on dependent conditional tests is presented. Two applications to real data are also given.     

An optimal sign test for one-sample bivariate location model using an alternative bivariate ranked-set sample

The aim of this paper is to find an optimal alternative bivariate ranked-set sample for one-sample location model bivariate sign test. Our numerical and theoretical results indicated that the optimal designs for the bivariate sign test are the alternative designs with quantifying order statistics with labels {((r+1)/2, (r+1)/2)}, when the set size r is odd and {(r/2+1, r/2), (r/2, r/2+1)} when the set size r is even. The asymptotic distribution and Pitman efficiencies of these designs are derived. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the power of the proposed optimal designs. Illustration using real data with the Bootstrap algorithm for P-value estimation is used.     

Testing for ordered alternatives by combining independent distribution-free block statistics

A class of distribution-free tests for ordered alternatives in a block design is presented. On each block a distribution-free statistic is selected, and a weighted sum of these statistics is then formed. A procedure for selecting the weighting constants which maximize the asymptotic relative efficiency is presented. The improvement in the efficiency of the weighted sum of block statistics over the unweighted sum is considered and proves interesting. Some attention is also given to the idea of using different types of statistics on different blocks.     

Distribution- free test for slope in linear regression model with replications

Some distribution-free methods are suggested in the paper for testing the hypothesis about the slope parameter in a one-sample linear regression model with multiple observations at each level of independent variable. Asymptotic relative efficiencies of these tests are discussed, and the tests are compared with their nonparametric competitors.     

Rank tests for the k-sample problem with restricted alternatives

An asymptotically maximin most powerful rank test among somewhere asymptotically most powerful linear rank tests with scores generating function cf> is derived for each of the simple order alternative, the simple loop alternative and the simple tree alternative in the k-sample problem. The comparisons of the tests obtained with the rank analogues of the Bartholomew's xv tests are made in terms of local asymptotic relative efficiency. It is found that our tests are better than the rank analogues of the xk tests. Furthermore, the asymptotic equivalence of the ranking by the pooled sample to the ranking in pairs are discuss¬ed and the tests which are asymptotically equivalent to ours are given.     

Bayesian inference on multiply sequential order statistics from heterogeneous exponential populations with GLR test for homogeneity

In this article, sequential order statistics (SOS) coming from heterogeneous exponential distributions are considered. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimates of parameters are derived on the basis of multiple SOS samples. Admissibility of the Bayes estimates are discussed and proved by the well-known Blyth’s lemma. Based on the available data, confidence intervals and highest posterior density credible sets are obtained. The generalized likelihood ratio (GLRT) and the Bayesian tests (under the “0 ? K” loss function) are derived for testing homogeneity of the exponential populations. It is shown that the GLRT in this case is scale invariant. Some guidelines for deriving the uniformly most powerful scale-invariant test (if exists) are also given.     

Asymptotic Comparison Between Constant-stress Testing and Step-stress Testing for Type-I Censored Data from Exponential Distribution

By running the life tests at higher stress levels than normal operating conditions, accelerated life testing quickly yields information on the lifetime distribution of a test unit. The lifetime at the design stress is then estimated through extrapolation using a regression model. In constant-stress testing, a unit is tested at a fixed stress level until failure or the termination time point of the test, while step-stress testing allows the experimenter to gradually increase the stress levels at some pre-fixed time points during the test. In this article, the optimal k-level constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests are compared for the exponential failure data under Type-I censoring. The objective is to quantify the advantage of using the step-stress testing relative to the constant-stress one. A log-linear relationship between the mean lifetime parameter and stress level is assumed and the cumulative exposure model holds for the effect of changing stress in step-stress testing. The optimal design point is then determined under C-optimality, D-optimality, and A-optimality criteria. The efficiency of step-stress testing compared to constant-stress testing is discussed in terms of the ratio of optimal objective functions based on the information matrix.     

Tests for homogeneity of risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data

ABSTRACT

Correlated bilateral data arise from stratified studies involving paired body organs in a subject. When it is desirable to conduct inference on the scale of risk difference, one needs first to assess the assumption of homogeneity in risk differences across strata. For testing homogeneity of risk differences, we herein propose eight methods derived respectively from weighted-least-squares (WLS), the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) estimator, the WLS method in combination with inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, and the test statistics based on their log-transformation, the modified Score test statistic and Likelihood ratio test statistic. Simulation results showed that four of the tests perform well in general, with the tests based on the WLS method and inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation always performing satisfactorily even under small sample size designs. The methods are illustrated with a dataset.     

Testing equality of two intercepts for the parallel regression model with non sample prior information

This paper proposes tests for equality of intercepts of two simple regression models when non sample prior information is available on the equality of two slopes. For three different scenarios on the values of the slope, namely (i) unknown (unspecified), (ii) known (specified), and (iii) suspected, we derive the unrestricted test (UT), restricted test (RT), and pre-test test (PTT) for testing the equality of intercepts. The test statistics, their sampling distributions, and power functions of the tests are obtained. Comparison of power function and size of the tests reveals that the PTT has a reasonable dominance over the UT and RT.     

Estimation of the intercept parameter for linear regression model with uncertain non-sample prior information

This paper considers alternative estimators of the intercept parameter of the linear regression model with normal error when uncertain non-sample prior information about the value of the slope parameter is available. The maximum likelihood, restricted, preliminary test and shrinkage estimators are considered. Based on their quadratic biases and mean square errors the relative performances of the estimators are investigated. Both analytical and graphical comparisons are explored. None of the estimators is found to be uniformly dominating the others. However, if the non-sample prior information regarding the value of the slope is not too far from its true value, the shrinkage estimator of the intercept parameter dominates the rest of the estimators.