“BOT+TOD”轨道交通投融资模式初探——以佛山市地铁二号线为例

近年来,我国城市轨道交通进入快速发展阶段,城市轨道交通的快速发展需要巨大的资金支撑,传统城市轨道交通投融资方式已经难以为继。本文从城市轨道交通TOD发展模式出发,分析"BOT+TOD"投融资模式的特点及其总体方案,并且以佛山市地铁二号线为例,提出"BOT+TOD"的具体实施路径与操作方法,为市政公用基础设施投融资体制改革、创新轨道交通投融资模式、土地管理制度的改革提供借鉴。通过此创新投融资模式在我国城市轨道交通中的成功运用,改善融资困难局面,促进我国城市轨道交通持续快速发展。     

论扩大城市基础设施的资金来源

一、城市基础设施投融资存在的问题 (一)资金来源有限 目前城市基础设施建设的资金来源主要是城市建设维护税、市政公用设施配套费、出租车牌有偿使用费、排水设施有偿使用费等.尽管收费项目较多,但这些资金与建设所需要的投入相比是杯水车薪.     

乡村振兴背景下农村文化基础设施投融资机制创新研究

"十一五"以来,各类农村文化基础设施建设取得了显著改善,但由于投入资金主要依靠财政支出,融资渠道较窄,预计未来资金缺口较大。为此,在实施乡村振兴战略过程中,需要对农村文化基础设施投融资机制进行创新。农村文化基础设施投融资机制的创新内容包括建立和完善农村文化基础设施建设标准和评价体系、投融资主体征信体系、投融资金融支持体系、建设基金体系、投融资政府和社会资本合作项目规范、农民和村集体财产确权和流转制度、投融资部门协调和监督管理制度、文化基础设施运营管理制度、投融资财政投融资稳定增长机制和财政激励机制以及投融资保障机制。     

论城市基础设施建设中引入社会资本的模式及制度

正近些年,中央和地方各级政府相继颁布出台一系列鼓励和支持社会资本进入基础设施领域的政策、法规和办法。特别是十八届三中全会以来,"加快发展民营经济"、"鼓励社会资本特别是民间投资以特许经营等方式参与基础设施建设运营",已成为当前经济体制改革的重头戏。笔者基于对城市基础设施投融资模式及其发展的深入研究,特别是在"基础设施建设融资方式"、"基础设施行业扩     

政府对市政公用行业监管方式改革研究

正市政公用行业是城市政府管理的,为城镇居民提供必需产品或普遍服务的行业,主要包括供水、排水、污水处理、供气、供热、公共交通、垃圾处理以及园林绿化等。从广义上看,城市基础设施和市政工程建设也属于这个范畴。市政公用行业的自然垄断性质     

摆正位置,转变职能 深化改革,促进发展

十四大以来,天津市在往宅建设、市政公用基础设施建设、重点项目和大型公建建设、城市环境综合整治、滨海新区基础设施建设等方面取得了显著的成绩,主要得益于四条经验: 一、围绕全市总体战略目标,摆正城建工作位置,为全市经济发展和改善人民生活服务。     

经营城市的现代理念与制度基础

近年流行的经营城市理念,属中国城市化理论范畴,包括市政设施产权或经营权、土地使用权、公共设施冠名权等多项内容.但是,由于土地是城市公共产品的载体,以及城市土地资源不可再生的特征和土地资产在城市资产中所占的绝对份额决定,经营城市土地始终是经营城市的核心内容.经营城市理念认为,城市是政府经营性的公共资源,城市政府以业主的身份将城区的土地、基础设施、公用服务设施等资源及资本推向市场,通过城市资本运营,实现城市投入产出的良性循环,以加快中国城市化进程.     

浅析政府投融资平台的建设及运行

政府投融资平台建设是以地方财政作为支撑,建立地方金融机构,集聚各种资金、资本进入本地区,促进地区金融业发展。投融资平台已经成为各地区政府创新投融资体制机制,推动经济发展的有效方式。     

试论我国城市建设的社会商品经济运行机制

城市建设,这是一个常被人们各自理解的范畴。现今中国行政管理体制下的城市建设,是指市政基础设施与房地产业。这里着重研究城市市政基础设施,也涉及房地产。城市市政基础设施主要包含:城市供水、供热、     

新常态下我国发行市政债券研究--兼论饶会林教授城市建设投融资思想

当前我国在进入经济新常态的同时,新型城镇化所需要的大量市政建设资金成为亟须解决的问题。笔者基于对已故饶会林教授城市建设投融资思想的回顾,认为目前在我国发行市政债券既具有必要性也具有可行性。为推动我国市政债券市场的发展,笔者提出要借鉴国际经验进行诸多制度建设和完善。要明确市政债券的法律地位,建立市政债券保险制度,完善市政债券信用评级制度、信息披露制度和财务报告制度。     

Social capital contested

The purpose in this paper is to specify certain basic ways of conceptualising social capital (SC) in order to bring out the contested character of it. The paper starts by touching on the origins of the concept. This is followed by a critical overview of the views of P. Bourdieu, J.S. Coleman, A. Portes and R. Putnam, and an attempt is made to show the fragmentation of the different approaches, which in itself creates difficulties for the meaningful utilisation of SC in social-scientific research. The adoption of the SC concept by international organisations and national governments has fanned, it is claimed, its ideological use. If the notion of SC is to be salvaged, because there is something useful to it, it is therefore necessary to overcome the evident confusion and fragmentation.     

Social capital,human capital,and career success in public relations in Taiwan

This study examined the degree to which demographic, human capital, and social capital variables can predict career success for public relations practitioners in Taiwan. Social capital includes two dimensions: social trust and social network. Human capital includes education, rank, career tenure, and motivation. Public relations practitioners (150) from 16 agencies in Taiwan were interviewed in 2006. Social capital explained the significant variance in subjective career success. As for human capital, motivation negatively predicted job comfort, but positively predicted challenge and task significance. Career tenure and rank in the agency positively predicted autonomy, while only age and professional tenure predicted objective success. This study also revealed that the longer the practitioners stay in the business, the more the sense of autonomy, financial rewards, and support they have. Combined with the results of objective career success, career tenure is the best predictor for career success among all the variables in human capital. Since gender does not predict career success, we may infer that public relations practice in Taiwan does not seem hostile to women.     

Social capital and nonprofit leaders

The concept of social capital seems to be a very compatible, useful, and important one for nonprofit organizations. Nonprofits must sustain and enhance the original social capital with which they were formed and broaden it into a variety of key areas. Nonprofits and their leaders must foster social capital in order to recruit and develop board members, raise philanthropic support, develop strategic partnerships, engage in advocacy, enhance community relations, and create a shared strategic vision and mission within the organization and its employees. Nonprofit executives have a pivotal role in carrying out these functions, but they do so through relationships and networks with others. These activities are time‐consuming and demanding, and they require planning. This article provides a focused literature analysis on the concept of social capital as it applies to nonprofit management and leadership. The author views the literature with respect to definitions of social capital and the way nonprofits generate and mobilize social capital in order to achieve organizational goals. The author also cites methods for measuring social capital.     

Social capital and public goods

Previous literature suggests positive relationships between social capital, pro-social behavior and subsequent economic development. We analyze the relationship between social networks and trust (two measures of social capital) and self-reported charitable contributions of time and/or money (pro-social behavior) using data collected from two ethnically distinct, low-income neighborhoods. We find that large social networks are positively related to charitable contributions, but that the effects of trust are less robust. We also find that social networks that are more geographically dispersed tend to be larger. Our results indicate that the social capital in a neighborhood is more important than ethnicity, ethnic diversity, or other demographic information in understanding public goods contributions.