The sensitivity of robust unit root tests

The power properties of the rank-based Dickey–Fuller (DF) unit root test of Granger and Hallman [C. Granger and J. Hallman, Nonlinear transformations of integrated time series, J. Time Ser. Anal. 12 (1991), pp. 207–218] and the range unit root tests of Aparicio et al. [F. Aparicio, A. Escribano, and A. Siplos, Range unit root (RUR) tests: Robust against non-linearities, error distributions, structural breaks and outliers, J. Time Ser. Anal. 27 (2006), pp. 545–576] are considered when applied to near-integrated time series processes with differing initial conditions. The results obtained show the empirical powers of the tests to be generally robust to smaller deviations of the initial condition of the time series from its underlying deterministic component, particularly for more highly stationary processes. However, dramatic decreases in power are observed when either the mean or variance of the deviation of the initial condition is increased. The robustness of the rank- and range-based unit root tests and their higher power results relative to the seminal DF test have both been noted previously in the econometrics literature. These results are questioned by the findings of the present paper.     

More powerful modifications of unit root tests allowing structural change

It is well known that more powerful variants of Dickey–Fuller unit root tests are available. We apply two of these modifications, on the basis of simple maximum statistics and weighted symmetric estimation, to Perron tests allowing for structural change in trend of the additive outlier type. Local alternative asymptotic distributions of the modified test statistics are derived, and it is shown that their implementation can lead to appreciable finite sample and asymptotic gains in power over the standard tests. Also, these gains are largely comparable with those from GLS-based modifications to Perron tests, though some interesting differences do arise. This is the case for both exogenously and endogenously chosen break dates. For the latter choice, the new tests are applied to the Nelson–Plosser data.     

Ratio tests of a unit root

Based on the maximal invariant principle, we derive two ratio tests (locally best invariant test and point optimal test) for a unit root and compare them with previously proposed ratio tests. We also show that our ratio tests tend to have better powers than the Dickey-Fuller test and the modified Dickey-Fuller test.     

Bootstrapping unit root tests with covariates

We consider the bootstrap method for the covariates augmented Dickey–Fuller (CADF) unit root test suggested in Hansen (1995 Hansen, B. E. (1995). Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing: Using covariates to increase power. \ Econometric Theory 11:1148–1171.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) which uses related variables to improve the power of univariate unit root tests. It is shown that there are substantial power gains from including correlated covariates. The limit distribution of the CADF test, however, depends on the nuisance parameter that represents the correlation between the equation error and the covariates. Hence, inference based directly on the CADF test is not possible. To provide a valid inferential basis for the CADF test, we propose to use the parametric bootstrap procedure to obtain critical values, and establish the asymptotic validity of the bootstrap CADF test. Simulations show that the bootstrap CADF test significantly improves the asymptotic and the finite sample size performances of the CADF test, especially when the covariates are highly correlated with the error. Indeed, the bootstrap CADF test offers drastic power gains over the conventional unit root tests. Our testing procedures are applied to the extended Nelson and Plosser data set.     

A comparison of alternative unit root tests

In this paper we evaluate the performance of three methods for testing the existence of a unit root in a time series, when the models under consideration in the null hypothesis do not display autocorrelation in the error term. In such cases, simple versions of the Dickey-Fuller test should be used as the most appropriate ones instead of the known augmented Dickey-Fuller or Phillips-Perron tests. Through Monte Carlo simulations we show that, apart from a few cases, testing the existence of a unit root we obtain actual type I error and power very close to their nominal levels. Additionally, when the random walk null hypothesis is true, by gradually increasing the sample size, we observe that p-values for the drift in the unrestricted model fluctuate at low levels with small variance and the Durbin-Watson (DW) statistic is approaching 2 in both the unrestricted and restricted models. If, however, the null hypothesis of a random walk is false, taking a larger sample, the DW statistic in the restricted model starts to deviate from 2 while in the unrestricted model it continues to approach 2. It is also shown that the probability not to reject that the errors are uncorrelated, when they are indeed not correlated, is higher when the DW test is applied at 1% nominal level of significance.     

On the finite sample performance of exogeneity tests of revankar, revankar and hartley and wu-hausman

In this paper we compare the performance of the exogeneity tests of Revankar, Revankar and Hartley and Wu-Hausman for the cases of two and three included endogenous variables. The distribution and power functions are evaluated using the conditional distributions given in Kariya and Hodoshima. Our results indicate that the Revankar's test is the most powerful for large values of the concentration parameter and the Revankar and Hartley test is the most powerful for small values of the concentration parameter.     

Robust unit root tests with autoregressive errors

ABSTRACT

This article presents a new test for unit roots based on least absolute deviation estimation specially designed to work for time series with autoregressive errors. The methodology used is a bootstrap scheme based on estimating a model and then the innovations. The resampling part is performed under the null hypothesis and, as it is customary in bootstrap procedures, is automatic and does not rely on the calculation of any nuisance parameter. The validity of the procedure is established and the asymptotic distribution of the statistic proposed is proved to converge to the correct distribution. To analyze the performance of the test for finite samples, a Monte Carlo study is conducted showing a very good behavior in many different situations.     

Bounded integrated processes and unit root tests

In the framework of integrated processes, the problem of testing the presence of unknown boundaries which constrain the process to move within a closed interval is considered. To analyze this problem, the concept of bounded integrated process is introduced, thus allowing to formally define boundary conditions for I(1) processes. A new class of tests, which are based on the rescaled range of the process, is introduced in order to test the null hypothesis of no boundary conditions. The limit distribution of the test statistics involved can be expressed in terms of the distribution of the range of Brownian functionals, while the power properties are obtained by deriving some asymptotic results for I(1) processes with boundary conditions. Both theoretical and simulation investigations show that range-based tests outperform standard unit root tests significantly when used to detect the presence of boundary conditions. A previous draft of the paper (Cavaliere, 2000) was presented at the 8th World Congress of the Econometric Society, Seattle, 11–16 August 2000. I wish sincerely to thank: Martin Jacobsen for his patience in discussing weak convergence to regulated Brownian motions and his valuable suggestions; the Department of Theoretical Statistics of the University of Copenhagen whose hospitality is gratefully acknowledged; Tommaso Proietti for important suggestions; Silvano Bordignon and partecipants at the CIdE seminar, University of Padua, June 2000; two anonymous referees. Partial financial support from 60% M.U.R.S.T. research grants is acknowledged.     

Bayesian tests for unit root and multiple breaks

A Bayesian approach is considered for identifying sources of nonstationarity for models with a unit root and breaks. Different types of multiple breaks are allowed through crash models, changing growth models, and mixed models. All possible nonstationary models are represented by combinations of zero or nonzero parameters associated with time trends, dummy for breaks, or previous levels, for which Bayesian posterior probabilities are computed. Multiple tests based on Markov chain Monte Carlo procedures are implemented. The proposed method is applied to a real data set, the Korean GDP data set, showing a strong evidence for two breaks rather than the usual unit root or one break.     

Effect of neglected deterministic seasonality on unit root tests

Whenever deterministic seasonality is ignored, the distribution of the Dickey-Fuller test is shifted to the left, with lower dispersion at the same time. When accounting for serial correlation, the distortions become less predictable. A Monte Carlo study confirms that the (augmented) Dickey-Fuller test without seasonal dummies is oversized and has little power at the same time, due to the need of lag augmentation. The effect of neglecting seasonal deterministics on the KPSS test for stationarity depends on the way the long-run variance is estimated. This is a shorter version of a working paper containing additional experimental evidence and the proofs of the propositions. The working paper is available online under http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/~deme/ends_urt.pdf.     

Performance of seasonal unit root tests for monthly data

This paper uses Monte Carlo simulations to analyze the performance of several seasonal unit root tests for monthly time series. The tests are those of Dickey, Hasza and Fuller (DHF), Hylleberg, Engle, Granger and Yoo (HEGY), and Osborn, Chui, Smith and Birchenhall (OCSB). The unit root test of Dickey and Fuller (DF) is also considered. The results indicate that users have to be particularly cautious when applying the monthly version of the HEGY test. In general, the DHF and OCSB tests are preferable in terms of size and power, but these procedures may impose invalid restrictions. An empirical illustration is undertaken for UK two-digit industrial production indicators.     

Generalized fixed‐T panel unit root tests

Panel data unit root tests, which can be applied to data that do not have many time series observations, are based on very restrictive error and deterministic component specification assumptions. In this paper, we develop a new, doubly modified estimator, based on which we propose a panel unit root test that allows for multiple structural breaks, linear and nonlinear trends, heteroscedasticity, serial correlation, and error cross‐section heterogeneity, when the number of time series observations is finite. The test has the additional perk that it is invariant to the initial condition.     

Phillips-Perron-type unit root tests in the nonlinear ESTAR framework

Summary In this paper, we propose Phillips-Perron type, semi-parametric testing procedures to distinguish a unit root process from a mean-reverting exponential smooth transition autoregressive one. The limiting nonstandard distributions are derived under very general conditions and simulation evidence shows that the tests perform better than the standard Phillips-Perron or Dickey-Fuller tests in the region of the null. We would like to thank conference participants of the Pfingsttagung 2005 in Münster for their helpful comments.     

Double unit root tests for cross-sectionally dependent panel data

This paper proposes various double unit root tests for cross-sectionally dependent panel data. The cross-sectional correlation is handled by the projection method [P.C.B. Phillips and D. Sul, Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence, Econom. J. 6 (2003), pp. 217–259; H.R. Moon and B. Perron, Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors, J. Econom. 122 (2004), pp. 81–126] or the subtraction method [J. Bai and S. Ng, A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration, Econometrica 72 (2004), pp. 1127–1177]. Pooling or averaging is applied to combine results from different panel units. Also, to estimate autoregressive parameters the ordinary least squares estimation [D.P. Hasza and W.A. Fuller, Estimation for autoregressive processes with unit roots, Ann. Stat. 7 (1979), pp. 1106–1120] or the symmetric estimation [D.L. Sen and D.A. Dickey, Symmetric test for second differencing in univariate time series, J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 5 (1987), pp. 463–473] are used, and to adjust mean functions the ordinary mean adjustment or the recursive mean adjustment are used. Combinations of different methods in defactoring to eliminate the cross-sectional dependency, integrating results from panel units, estimating the parameters, and adjusting mean functions yields various available tests for double unit roots in panel data. Simple asymptotic distributions of the proposed test statistics are derived, which can be used to find critical values of the test statistics.

We perform a Monte Carlo experiment to compare the performance of these tests and to suggest optimal tests for a given panel data. Application of the proposed tests to a real data, the yearly export panel data sets of several Latin–American countries for the past 50 years, illustrates the usefulness of the proposed tests for panel data, in that they reveal stronger evidence of double unit roots than the componentwise double unit root tests of Hasza and Fuller [Estimation for autoregressive processes with unit roots, Ann. Stat. 7 (1979), pp. 1106–1120] or Sen and Dickey [Symmetric test for second differencing in univariate time series, J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 5 (1987), pp. 463–473].     

The accuracy of normal approximation in a heterogeneous panel data unit root test

Tests for unit roots in panel data have become very popular. Two attractive features of panel data unit root tests are the increased power compared to time-series tests, and the often well-behaved limiting distributions of the tests. In this paper we apply Monte Carlo simulations to investigate how well the normal approximation works for a heterogeneous panel data unit root test when there are only a few cross sections in the sample. We find that the normal approximation, which should be valid for large numbers of cross-sectional units, works well, at conventional significance levels, even when the number of cross sections is as small as two. This finding is valuable for the applied researcher since critical values will be easy to obtain and p-values will be readily available.     

Likelihood ratio type unit root tests for ar(1)models with nonconsecutive observations

For the nonconsecutively observed or missing data situation likelihood ratio type unit root tests in AR(1)models containing an intercept or both an intercept and a time trend are proposed and are shown to have the same limiting distributions as the likelihood ratio tests for the complete data case as tabulated by Dickey and Fuller(1981). Some simulation results on our tests in finite samples under A–B sampling schemes are also presented.     

Local power of panel unit root tests allowing for structural breaks

The asymptotic local power of least squares–based fixed-T panel unit root tests allowing for a structural break in their individual effects and/or incidental trends of the AR(1) panel data model is studied. Limiting distributions of these tests are derived under a sequence of local alternatives, and analytic expressions show how their means and variances are functions of the break date and the time dimension of the panel. The considered tests have nontrivial local power in a N^?1/2 neighborhood of unity when the panel data model includes individual intercepts. For panel data models with incidental trends, the power of the tests becomes trivial in this neighborhood. However, this problem does not always appear if the tests allow for serial correlation in the error term and completely vanishes in the presence of cross-section correlation. These results show that fixed-T tests have very different theoretical properties than their large-T counterparts. Monte Carlo experiments demonstrate the usefulness of the asymptotic theory in small samples.     

Performance of unit root tests in unbalanced panels: experimental evidence

This paper is about the validity of established panel unit root tests applied to panels in which the individual time series are of different lengths, a case often encountered in practice. Most of the tests considered work well under various types of cross-correlation which is true for both, their application in balanced as well as in unbalanced panels. A Monte Carlo study reveals that in unbalanced panels, procedures involving the computation of individual $p$ -values for each cross-section unit (or the combination thereof) are mostly superior to those relying on a pooled Dickey–Fuller regression framework. As the former are able to consider each unit separately, they do not require cutting back the “longer” time series so as to obtain the smallest “balanced” quadrangle which in turn means that no potentially valuable information is lost.     

Comparison of robust tests for genetic association analysis incorporating uncertain genotype

Genome-wide association studies are effective in investigating the loci related with complex diseases. Sometimes, the genotype is not exactly decoded and only genotype probability is obtained. In this case, F-test based on imputed genotype is usually used for the association analysis. Simulations show that existing methods such as the dosage test have poor performance when the genetic model is misspecified. In this study, we develop a robust test to detect the association of a disease and genetic loci while the genotype is uncertain and the genetic model is unknown.