The distribution of a federal entitlement: The case of adoption assistance

Adoption assistance entitlements support children whose birth parents cannot care for them. The entitlements are meant to offset the extra cost to adoptive families of raising children whose early adverse experiences leave them with special needs. Unlike other Social Security Act programs, adoption assistance is not federally administered but is administered by states or localities. State-to-state variation in administration of this federal entitlement leads to unequal treatment of similar children. Moreover, although adoption assistance is an entitlement for children, payments made by many states are systematically correlated with the characteristics of adoptive families.     

A limited entitlement for community care: how members use services

The goal of this paper is to show how members of three Social HMOs use a limited entitlement for community-based long-term care to meet their needs and solve their problems. The paper is based on in-home interviews with 48 aged Medicare beneficiaries who joined Social HMOs and are eligible for the entitlement. Members' experiences with case management (called service coordination), benefits for covered services, and cost-sharing requirements are explored. Members (and their informal caregivers) are found to have complex lives, into which community care fits (or does not fit) in varied ways, depending on preferences, experiences with providers, informal care, financial resources, and other factors. The paper provides insights into what kinds of problems people want to solve and how community care systems can be better designed to empower service users to solve them.     

Fathers at work: explaining the gaps between entitlement to leave policies and uptake

ABSTRACT

Why are fathers in Scotland unlikely to use the full range of leave benefits available to them? Taking a capabilities approach allows us to explore the perspective that some fathers may experience an agency gap and thus not have the capabilities to utilise entitlements. This paper addresses the question empirically using a mixed-methods design which includes: analysis of data from the Growing up in Scotland study, 20 in-depth qualitative interviews with fathers of young children working in the public sector in dual-earner couples, as well as an audit of extra-statutory benefits offered to fathers by employers. We argue that the reliance on an extra-statutory leave system in the UK explains at least part of the gap between fathers’ entitlement to and uptake of statutory leave, as such benefits are not routinely available to all parents. The extra-statutory entitlement is more than just a ‘top-up’ to the statutory; it is rather a conversion factor for the take up of statutory entitlement, by fathers. Organisational cultural norms support many employed fathers in taking a couple of weeks leave post-birth, but longer leave duration for fathers is not yet a usual parenting practice in Scotland, particularly lower down the income distribution.     

A fundamental structure of strategy-proof social choice correspondences with restricted preferences over alternatives

I prove that under each strategy-proof and unanimous social choice correspondence, there is at least one agent who is decisive. Because the result is established on a weak requirement on preferences over sets, the existence of a decisive agent is an underlying feature of most strategy-proof and unanimous social choice correspondences. Moreover, I consider a restriction on the space of preferences over alternatives. I prove that circular sets of preferences over alternatives are sufficient for the existence of a decisive agent.     

Weighing the Evidence: A new method for research on restricted information

Greatly increased concern about the confidentiality of social records now jeopardizes the ability of social scientists to conduct research. A new confidential method is described that can facilitate the work of the researcher and also maintain the privacy of the researched. This method is called Weighing the Evidence or, more simply, the WEIGHT method. The WEIGHT method groups social records according to intervals of interest to the researcher and then uses a simple weighing procedure to estimate the incidence and distribution of cases. Two studies—one using simulated data and one using real data on handgun purchases—suggest that the WEIGHT method is characterized by high levels of both reliability and validity. Ten hypothetical cases are described in which the WEIGHT method would make possible research that would other wise be prevented by the confidential nature of the data involved.This project was assisted by a fellowship from the German Marshall Fund. The authors are indebted to the following people for helpful comments and advice: Donald T. Campbell, Elliot Aronson, Meredith Gould, David Harrington, John I. Kitsuse, Thomas F. Pettigrew, Alan Ritch, Robert Rosenthal, M. Brewster Smith, and Candace West.     

Optimality among restricted majority decision rules

When a group of decision makers with common interests faces a dichotomous choice, the task of deciding may be delegated to a committee consisting of a subset of the original group. This procedure is called a restricted majority decision rule. If each member of the original group is characterized by the probability of his deciding correctly, the expected utility from the decision is determined by which members are appointed to the committee. The conditions between enabling the comparison of alternative restricted majority rules are based on the voting profiles of the decision makers. The purpose of the current study is to propose an algorithm for identifying the optimal restricted majority rule amongst all restricted majority rules.I am indebted to Shmuel Nitzan for helpful comments and suggestions. All shortcomings are, of course, entirely my responsibility.     

Order restricted preferences and majority rule

This paper develops the social choice foundations of a restriction that, in different guises, is utilized in a number of economic models; illuminates the key features of these models; and provides a specific class of applications. Order Restriction (on triples) is strictly weaker than Single Peakedness (or Single Cavedness) but strictly stronger than Sen's Value Restriction. It therefore guarantees quasi-transitivity of majority rule. This condition is most useful in models where there is a natural ordering of the individuals, not the alternatives. We show for a class of applications that1) it may be imposed through conditions with meaningful economic interpretations;2) imposing Single Peakedness weakens the usefulness of the models; 3) directly establishing Value Restriction is difficult and has not been done.I thank Bob Anderson for his help over a long period of time. I also thank the participants in many seminars at U.C. Berkeley. All remaining errors are my own.     

A case study

The relationship between social isolation and mental illness has given rise to several hypotheses, particularly those of the “drift” and “breeder” type. The present study is concerned with the relationship between separation from family and admission to a psychiatric hospital, and explores some aspects (area of admission, type of accommodation, readmission, diagnosis and age) of this relationship. Some implications for preventive planning are drawn from the findings.     

A note on restricted majority rules: invariance to rule selection and outcome distinctiveness

Recently, Karotkin (1993) has shown that in the symmetric uncertain dichotomous choice model the set of restricted majority rules (RMRs) is special in the sense that a member of this family of rules is always the worst rule among the potentially optimal weighted majority rules (WMRs). In the current paper we establish two additional special properties of RMRs. First, given a particular configuration of the group members' decisions, the collective choice is invariant to the selection of WMRs if it is invariant to the selection of RMRs. Second, given a particular decision profile, a potentially optimal WMR can result in a distinctive collective choice which is different from the choice of any other potentially optimal WMR, if and only if it is a RMR.     

Strategy-proofness versus efficiency on restricted domains of exchange economies

 Strategy-proofness has been shown to be a strong property, particularly on large domains of preferences. We therefore examine the existence of strategy-proof and efficient solutions on restricted, 2-person domains of exchange economies. On the class of 2-person exchange economies in which agents have homothetic, strictly convex preferences we show, as Zhou (1991) did for a larger domain, that such a solution is necessarily dictatorial. As this proof requires preferences exhibiting high degrees of complementarity, our search continues to a class of linear preferences. Even on this “small” domain, the same negative result holds. These two results are extended to many superdomains, including Zhou’s. Received: 9 June 1995/Accepted: 8 January 1996     

Continuity of social choice functions with restricted coalition algebras

Social choice functions are studied with an infinite population framework that includes algebras over the set of individuals. It is shown that continuous social choice functions are either dictatorial or manipulable. Weak anonymity is shown to be incompatible with continuity and neutrality. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice 4, Caen 2005, and at the First Spain Italy Netherlands Meeting on Game Theory, Maastricht 2005.     

Harsanyi's impartial observer theorem with a restricted domain

In this paper we extend Harsanyi's impartial observer theorem by showing that the large domain of social lotteries can be significantly restricted – it is sufficient that the domain consists only of constant extended lotteries. Received: 27 December 2000/Accepted: 12 September 2001 We thank Simon Grant, Edi Karni, Atsushi Kajii, Ben Polak, Yemima Thompson and John Weymark for their comments and the Israel Institute of Business Research for financial support.     

A case for psychodynamic social work

Abstract

Psychodynamic casework is not as popular in social work theory and practice as it once was. It is considered by some to be impractical, unscientific, and not suitable for those customarily receiving a social work service. Task-centred casework, behavioural approaches, the newer psychotherapies, and family therapy have all taken over as major paradigms of social work method. This is especially so, I think, for the social worker working in a psychiatric setting, where many clients stay only for a short time and where emphasis is placed on assessment and short-term intervention.

In this paper I shall argue that a psychodynamic approach in social work is still relevant; that it is important for its humanizing qualities, for understanding and working with people with severe problems and for, perhaps, helping us to locate the position of social work vis-a-vis other mental health professions. I shall do this by focusing on a particular case I had as a social work student on placement in a psychiatric day hospital.     

Female ejaculation: A case study

This case study provides objective evidence supporting the hypothesis that female ejaculation, a partial, infertile homologue of male ejaculation, exists. A karyotypically normal, multiparous woman suffered for a decade with urinary stress incontinence. During that time she had learned to inhibit an orgastic response which led to bedwetting. Although the liquid produced did not appear to be urine, she falsely concluded that her orgasmic expulsion was a manifestation of urinary incontinence. Using feedback from a Vaginal Myograph, she learned to do Kegel exercises properly, and the urinary stress incontinence soon disappeared. Around this time she became aware of the concept of female ejaculation and its possible association with an erotically sensitive area that could be stimulated through her anterior vaginal wall. Stimulation of this area, the “Grafenberg spot,” produced what she described as orgasm which felt “deeper” than orgasms in response to vulvar stimulation. Such an orgasm was often accompanied by expulsion of liquid from the urethra. Chemical analysis indicated that the expulsion was not urine. It contained prostatic acid phosphatase, an enzyme characteristically found in prostatic secretion.     

Murderous ink: A case of rhetorical killing

A late night call from a terrified and indignant “Loud-Man” leads private investigator Noman into the murky depths of the academic underworld to solve the mysterious death of the organization. No corpse, no solid clues and an elusive motive make life hard for Noman. Gradually it becomes clear that detective Noman is battling with the wily Murderous Ink; a gang of anonymous authors with the power to turn organizational life into dead structures. Inspired by the great francophone detectives, Poirot and Maigret, Noman follows the established “cherchez-la-femme” path and comes face-to-face with the unwittingly well-organized Miss M. In a typically theatrical denouement, Noman reveals how the rhetorical killer was both guilty and innocent at the same time, but leaves the academic world with the task of reconciling itself with a dilemma that will more than likely find Noman with new subtle cases to solve.