论重大事项社会稳定风险评机制中的社会工作--以房屋拆迁为例

在重大事项社会稳定风险评估的过程中,社会工作有五个恰当的介入时机,在五个方面发挥着主要的作用。针对房屋拆迁过程中容易引发冲突的三大原因,社会工作在介入房屋拆迁的社会稳定风险评估时担当七种角色,发挥调谐与维稳功能。当前社会工作介入社会稳定风险评估机制收到三方面条件的制约,需要政府相关部门和社会工作的业内人士共同努力。     

山西首家社会风险评估所启动运行

<正>2014年5月13日,山西省首家社会稳定风险评估所,在临猗县委办公大楼正式挂牌并启动运行,临猗县委常委、政法委书记仇红学到场揭牌。山西省临猗县社会稳定风险评估所,是在临猗县政法委的直接关怀和领导下,经过不懈努力,由社会第三方筹集组建成立。它标志着临猗县已将建立重大社会决策、重大工程项目顺利实施,保障人民群众合法权益不受侵害,推进科学决策、民主决策、依法决策,     

重大公共政策社会稳定风险评估中风险沟通机制的构建--基于北京市水价调整政策的案例分析

针对重大公共政策社会稳定风险评估（以下简称“稳评”）中利益相关方之间风险沟通不足的问题,引入IRGC的风险治理理念,建立重大公共政策稳评中风险沟通机制的分析框架,将风险沟通作为稳评工作的核心环节并贯穿于政策制定与实施的全过程。为了验证该分析框架的适用性,选取北京市水价调整政策为典型案例,对稳评过程中风险沟通机制的现实运作进行深入剖析和经验总结,并从注重评估工作与风险沟通的全程性、加强多元主体间的协商对话、充分发挥媒体作用等方面,就如何进一步推进和完善重大公共政策稳评机制展开探讨。     

社会稳定风险评估:一项重要的社会管理创新

<正>维护社会稳定,是当代中国一个重大的理论与现实问题。维护社会稳定的根本途径在于建构良好的社会秩序,根本性制度保障在于法治。党的十八大明确要求"建立健全重大决策社会稳定风险评估机制",目的就是要用法治的方式去建构良好的社会秩序,以制度化的方式实现社会的长治久安。充分把握建立重大事项社会稳定风险评估机制的重要意义     

城中村征地安置社会稳定风险识别研究——基于A市240份访谈的内容分析

当前城中村征地安置冲突频发并愈演愈烈,处理不当将会造成难以估量的社会稳定风险。社会稳定风险识别是征地安置风险评估和管理的重要前提工作。本文基于A市240份访谈问卷的内容分析,研究发现当前城中村征地安置主要存在安置房风险、经济风险、延期风险、政策风险、特殊群体风险。安置房风险的概率最大,风险之间形成风险群并会随着时间演进。最后在对风险识别分析的基础上提供政策建议。     

社会风险管理中的公共信息与政府决策

社会风险管理中的公共信息与政府决策表明,公共信息在政府做社会风险决策中具有重要的价值。社会风险决策是社会风险管理中政府根据所获得的各种社会风险公共信息,排除社会风险决策所存在的各种不确定性因素,做出最终决定的过程。社会风险管理中公共信息在社会风险决策中对政府提前预防、有效规避社会风险具有重要的指导意义。充分发挥公共信息在社会风险决策中的重要作用,才能进一步发挥政府在突发社会风险时的决策作用,有效规避社会风险。本文对公共信息在社会风险管理中政府社会风险决策中的价值表现及其运用作了初步探讨。     

我国公共项目投资决策模型研究

我国公共项目依据建设规模可分为中央和地方两个决策层次,决策主体呈多元化。目前,公共项目决策存在决策主体的短视行为,项目决策的标准单一,决策程序不完善以及决策缺乏约束等问题。应该通过明确决策主体,实施多元化的决策标准,执行严格的决策程序,扩大决策参与及建立约束制度来完善公共项目的决策。     

垃圾焚烧及其选址的风险规制

垃圾焚烧以其快速实现垃圾的减量化、资源化而备受各级政府推崇,但对其可能排放致癌物二噁英之担忧,使得民众和专家对垃圾焚烧及其选址争论不休.从风险治理的视角观察,垃圾焚烧及其选址实际上是风险之分配.垃级焚烧作为一种垃圾处理技术,面临着技术上的污染风险和管理上的监管风险.而垃圾焚烧场的选址作为一种公共政策,则面临着环境与健康风险、社会稳定风险.对于这些性质不同的风险,政府应秉持一种开放、审慎、反思的态度,采取不同的因应之道.     

北京市突发事件应对体系的发展回顾与趋势研究

突发事件应对是一个城市安全稳定运行、经济社会和谐发展的重要保障。本文将分析新中国成立以来,北京市经历的从单灾种灾害管理体系的建立和完善,到现代城市突发事件综合应对体系的建立和发展历程,并探讨在未来以防范和控制不确定性公共风险为目标的城市突发事件应对体系中的社会参与、风险评估、公共沟通和法制保障等前瞻性问题。     

非程序决策与创造性思维

一、非程序决策需要思维创造性非程序决策是相对于程序决策而言的。程序决策是指重复出现的一类决策,这类决策因为过去有过反复处理的经验,在长期处理这类问题的实践过程中,逐渐摸索出这类问题的规律性,从而可能制定出一套固定程序,用常规的办法和已确定的规范程序来处理。例如工业企业中的工资、奖金发放办法,原料领取程序等等。与此相反,非程序决策则是指无法用常规的办法和已确定规范的程序来解决的决策,这必须依靠决策者的思维创造性来探索解决     

和谐社会构建与西方社会学社会建设理论

引言社会学与和谐社会社会学是由现代性催生并伴随着工业社会的出现而诞生的一门学科,这门学科在诞生之初确立的主旨和目标,就是致力于社会的秩序和进步。而秩序和进步在具体的经验层面上,就具有均衡、稳定、协调与和谐的意涵。正是从这个意义上说,和谐社会是“社会学”的题中应有之意,既是这门学科理论和实践的根本标的,也是它存在的意义与使命之所在。纵观社会思想史,从秩序、和谐角度讲社会的例证,无论在东方还是西方的典籍中,都不胜枚举。这一进路更是中国传统文化的一大突出特色,和合思想可说是其精髓,其意涵“致广大而尽精微”,影响所…     

The Application of Family Systems Theory to Geriatric Hospital Social Work

Integrating and applying Family Systems Theory principles into the assessment and treatment process of families of hospitalized high risk elderly is an area that has received little attention in health care literature. The multigenerational approach is a model that can be used as a clinical framework for guiding the social workers in developing intervention strategies when working with hospitalized high risk elderly and their families. This approach can be extended to clinical assessment techniques and psychosocial rationales for discharge planning. Three case examples are presented to illustrate how Family Systems Theory can be integrated into social work practice resulting in effective interventions for hospitalized high risk elderly and their families.     

以社会管理科学化促进社会体系均衡与稳定

改革发展进入关键时期,社会体系的均衡与稳定显得尤为重要。掌握社会管理规律、完善社会管理政策法规、充分利用社会管理资源、提升政府管理和服务水平以及提高社会管理科学化水平成为党的执政能力建设与构建社会主义和谐社会的必然要求。提高社会管理科学化,需要进一步加强和完善社会管理格局,发挥其功能与作用;强化服务体系与服务平台建设;促进社会管理环境建设,在实施方式、手段等方面创新。     

Social workers' perspectives on parental engagement when children are at risk in Romanian society

This paper presents the findings of a study that looked at social workers' perspectives on parental engagement in making the difficult choice of either taking the child into care or keeping the family together. The paper first explores the specific context of children at risk in Romanian society and explains that in this middle‐income nation there is an absence of evidence‐based risk assessment tools, which prompts social workers to use their own ‘common sense’ risk assessment indicators. The findings of this small‐scale, non‐representative study on several public non‐voluntary child protection services in Romania suggest that social workers' perceptions of specific dimensions of parental engagement in non‐voluntary child protection may influence service delivery decisions and outcomes.     

Implications for social security policy-making of research in mortality

"The main purpose of this article is to outline the relationship between mortality research and policy-making in social security. Reasons are first discussed as to why more information is needed for social security purposes on how and why mortality varies over time periods and across population groups. There follows a synopsis of the correspondence between the type of policy question asked and the kind of research required to answer it. The paper concludes with a discussion of the incorporation of mortality research into policy models." The geographic focus is on the United States.     

Culture: The Missing Variable in Understanding Social Policy?

This paper questions the intuitive assumption that twentieth-century public welfare states have reflected the wider culture in which they operate. It is argued that the postwar welfare state was a "modernist" project designed to change mass culture. As a result, social policy analysis has tended to ignore the wider culture as both a source and context for welfare. At the beginning of the twenty-first century new patterns of risk and postmodern cultural formations are supporting eclectic policy-making which is more in tune with cultural majorities. This signals the end of the systematic welfare state.     

Child Protection Social Work: Risks of Fears and Fears of Risks – Impossible Tasks from Impossible Goals?

This article examines the relationship between the causes and effects of fear in child protection social workers, and the effects of risk assessment and risk management policies on this area of work. The focus on risk assessment and risk management has become a major area of attention within practice, policy and management of child protection work in the UK in recent years. Concepts of risk as constructed by the media, government and the public are increasingly impacting upon professional practices. This article examines the basis and validity of risk assessments in the social professions field, and particularly within the child protection arena. The article goes on to examine the experiences of fear arising from the risk agenda, which affects frontline workers, managers and child protection agencies. This agenda arises from centrally produced risk assessment frameworks, alongside unrealistic expectations from central government of prediction of risk by the use of current risk assessment tools. Such controlling policies from central government can lead to fear and anxiety in social work professionals of not assessing and eliminating risk, as the government and their employing agencies are expecting them to do. The article also proposes that this risk agenda fails to address a key element in the assessment of risk – how social workers experience threats and stress in their work, and the pressures they can be subject to within it, particularly in relation to violence and threats from parent service users where their children are being investigated for possible child abuse.     

The welfare state as an institutional process

The main objective of this paper is to argue that the origins and formation of the welfare state should be reconsidered as an institutional process embedded in dialectical relations between given historical contingencies and institutional adaptations in response to welfare demands. Such relational processes can be categorized by the three isomorphic convergences of institutional adaptations to the welfare demands: national emergencies, economic challenges and political transitions. Existing accounts for the emergence of the welfare state – universalism, selectivity, and Marxism – are bracketed under a single heading of social control theory for two reasons: first, those three explanations commonly err in believing that an ideological intent is given as predetermined before actual analyses of social policy-making, thereby neglecting the process of institutional reforms; and second, the underlying implication of all three accounts ends in a common target of social policy – how to control welfare demands, and safeguard social stability. By comparing institutional adaptations with social control theory, the paper aims to explain and emphasize the methodological utilities and practical applicability of the institutional process approach in the studies of welfare development.     

Mobility,migration and rights in the European Union: critical reflections on policy and practice

This article assesses developments in European Union (EU) migration policy and practice and their implications for rights regulation in the Union, as revealed in this special issue and the wider literature. It identifies how rights are constituted in the complex and multivalent policy-making field of the EU. The article views rights as constituted in the process of migration governance. This governance analysis puts centre stage an assessment of the links between policy, policy-making and policy's social and political ordering effects. The article argues that the significance of the Union needs to be analysed against different aspects of rights regulation. The article adopts an analytical framework which discriminates between the discursive framing of migrants' rights, the specification of such rights in Union and member state policy, and the shaping of rights by actors in context at the local level. The article concludes that, first, the Union has begun to play a significant role in regulating mobility rights across its territory in ways which can undermine the substantive or normative rights accessible to migrants in practice. Second, its policy and legal role are politically significant as it asserts the role of the EU as a source of regulatory authority over the distribution of rights for citizens and non-citizens within its territory.