Regression Analysis of Length‐biased and Right‐censored Failure Time Data with Missing Covariates

Length‐biased and right‐censored failure time data arise from many fields, and their analysis has recently attracted a great deal of attention. Two examples of the areas that often produce such data are epidemiological studies and cancer screening trials. In this paper, we discuss regression analysis of such data in the presence of missing covariates, for which no established inference procedure seems to exist. For the problem, we consider the data arising from the proportional hazards model and propose two inverse probability weighted estimation procedures. The asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators are established, and the extensive simulation study conducted for the evaluation of the proposed methods suggests that they work well for practical situations.     

Evaluating bias correction in weighted proportional hazards regression

Often in observational studies of time to an event, the study population is a biased (i.e., unrepresentative) sample of the target population. In the presence of biased samples, it is common to weight subjects by the inverse of their respective selection probabilities. Pan and Schaubel (Can J Stat 36:111–127, 2008) recently proposed inference procedures for an inverse selection probability weighted (ISPW) Cox model, applicable when selection probabilities are not treated as fixed but estimated empirically. The proposed weighting procedure requires auxiliary data to estimate the weights and is computationally more intense than unweighted estimation. The ignorability of sample selection process in terms of parameter estimators and predictions is often of interest, from several perspectives: e.g., to determine if weighting makes a significant difference to the analysis at hand, which would in turn address whether the collection of auxiliary data is required in future studies; to evaluate previous studies which did not correct for selection bias. In this article, we propose methods to quantify the degree of bias corrected by the weighting procedure in the partial likelihood and Breslow-Aalen estimators. Asymptotic properties of the proposed test statistics are derived. The finite-sample significance level and power are evaluated through simulation. The proposed methods are then applied to data from a national organ failure registry to evaluate the bias in a post-kidney transplant survival model.     

Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data

Left-truncated data often arise in epidemiology and individual follow-up studies due to a biased sampling plan since subjects with shorter survival times tend to be excluded from the sample. Moreover, the survival time of recruited subjects are often subject to right censoring. In this article, a general class of semiparametric transformation models that include proportional hazards model and proportional odds model as special cases is studied for the analysis of left-truncated and right-censored data. We propose a conditional likelihood approach and develop the conditional maximum likelihood estimators (cMLE) for the regression parameters and cumulative hazard function of these models. The derived score equations for regression parameter and infinite-dimensional function suggest an iterative algorithm for cMLE. The cMLE is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. The limiting variances for the estimators can be consistently estimated using the inverse of negative Hessian matrix. Intensive simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the cMLE. An application to the Channing House data is given to illustrate the methodology.     

Ensemble Approaches to Estimating the Population Mean with Missing Response

We propose new ensemble approaches to estimate the population mean for missing response data with fully observed auxiliary variables. We first compress the working models according to their categories through a weighted average, where the weights are proportional to the square of the least‐squares coefficients of model refitting. Based on the compressed values, we develop two ensemble frameworks, under which one is to adjust weights in the inverse probability weighting procedure and the other is built upon an additive structure by reformulating the augmented inverse probability weighting function. The asymptotic normality property is established for the proposed estimators through the theory of estimating functions with plugged‐in nuisance parameter estimates. Simulation studies show that the new proposals have substantial advantages over existing ones for small sample sizes, and an acquired immune deficiency syndrome data example is used for illustration.     

On estimation of linear transformation models with nested case–control sampling

Nested case–control (NCC) sampling is widely used in large epidemiological cohort studies for its cost effectiveness, but its data analysis primarily relies on the Cox proportional hazards model. In this paper, we consider a family of linear transformation models for analyzing NCC data and propose an inverse selection probability weighted estimating equation method for inference. Consistency and asymptotic normality of our estimators for regression coefficients are established. We show that the asymptotic variance has a closed analytic form and can be easily estimated. Numerical studies are conducted to support the theory and an application to the Wilms’ Tumor Study is also given to illustrate the methodology.     

Relative risk regression for current status data in case‐cohort studies

We propose using the weighted likelihood method to fit a general relative risk regression model for the current status data with missing data as arise, for example, in case‐cohort studies. The missingness probability is either known or can be reasonably estimated. Asymptotic properties of the weighted likelihood estimators are established. For the case of using estimated weights, we construct a general theorem that guarantees the asymptotic normality of the M‐estimator of a finite dimensional parameter in a class of semiparametric models, where the infinite dimensional parameter is allowed to converge at a slower than parametric rate, and some other parameters in the objective function are estimated a priori. The weighted bootstrap method is employed to estimate the variances. Simulations show that the proposed method works well for finite sample sizes. A motivating example of the case‐cohort study from an HIV vaccine trial is used to demonstrate the proposed method. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 39: 557–577; 2011. © 2011 Statistical Society of Canada     

A class of partially linear single‐index survival models

The authors define a class of “partially linear single‐index” survival models that are more flexible than the classical proportional hazards regression models in their treatment of covariates. The latter enter the proposed model either via a parametric linear form or a nonparametric single‐index form. It is then possible to model both linear and functional effects of covariates on the logarithm of the hazard function and if necessary, to reduce the dimensionality of multiple covariates via the single‐index component. The partially linear hazards model and the single‐index hazards model are special cases of the proposed model. The authors develop a likelihood‐based inference to estimate the model components via an iterative algorithm. They establish an asymptotic distribution theory for the proposed estimators, examine their finite‐sample behaviour through simulation, and use a set of real data to illustrate their approach.     

Outlier-detection tests and robust estimators based on signs of residuals

The asymptotic structure of a vector of weighted sums of signs of residuals, in the general linear model, is studied. The vector can be used as a basis for outlier-detection tests, or alternatively, setting the vector to zero and solving for the parameter yields a class of robust estimators which are analogues of the sample median. Asymptotic results for both estimates and tests are obtained. The question of optimal weights is investigated, and the optimal estimators in the case of simple linear regression are found to coincide with estimators introduced by Adichie.     

The proportional hazards model with covariate measurement error

The proportional hazards regression model is commonly used to evaluate the relationship between survival and covariates. Covariates are frequently measured with error. Substituting mismeasured values for the true covariates leads to biased estimation. Hu et al. (Biometrics 88 (1998) 447) have proposed to base estimation in the proportional hazards model with covariate measurement error on a joint likelihood for survival and the covariate variable. Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation (NPMLE) was used and simulations were conducted to assess the asymptotic validity of this approach. In this paper, we derive a rigorous proof of asymptotic normality of the NPML estimators.     

Analysis of error-prone survival data under additive hazards models: measurement error effects and adjustments

Covariate measurement error occurs commonly in survival analysis. Under the proportional hazards model, measurement error effects have been well studied, and various inference methods have been developed to correct for error effects under such a model. In contrast, error-contaminated survival data under the additive hazards model have received relatively less attention. In this paper, we investigate this problem by exploring measurement error effects on parameter estimation and the change of the hazard function. New insights of measurement error effects are revealed, as opposed to well-documented results for the Cox proportional hazards model. We propose a class of bias correction estimators that embraces certain existing estimators as special cases. In addition, we exploit the regression calibration method to reduce measurement error effects. Theoretical results for the developed methods are established, and numerical assessments are conducted to illustrate the finite sample performance of our methods.     

Local likelihood with time-varying additive hazards model

The authors propose the local likelihood method for the time-varying coefficient additive hazards model. They use the Newton-Raphson algorithm to maximize the likelihood into which a local polynomial expansion has been incorporated. They establish the asymptotic properties for the time-varying coefficient estimators and derive explicit expressions for the variance and bias. The authors present simulation results describing the performance of their approach for finite sample sizes. Their numerical comparisons show the stability and efficiency of the local maximum likelihood estimator. They finally illustrate their proposal with data from a laryngeal cancer clinical study.     

Estimation of the error distribution in a varying coefficient regression model

This paper deals with the estimation of the error distribution function in a varying coefficient regression model. We propose two estimators and study their asymptotic properties by obtaining uniform stochastic expansions. The first estimator is a residual-based empirical distribution function. We study this estimator when the varying coefficients are estimated by under-smoothed local quadratic smoothers. Our second estimator which exploits the fact that the error distribution has mean zero is a weighted residual-based empirical distribution whose weights are chosen to achieve the mean zero property using empirical likelihood methods. The second estimator improves on the first estimator. Bootstrap confidence bands based on the two estimators are also discussed.     

An estimating equation for parametric shared frailty models with marginal additive hazards

Summary.  Multivariate failure time data arise when data consist of clusters in which the failure times may be dependent. A popular approach to such data is the marginal proportional hazards model with estimation under the working independence assumption. In some contexts, however, it may be more reasonable to use the marginal additive hazards model. We derive asymptotic properties of the Lin and Ying estimators for the marginal additive hazards model for multivariate failure time data. Furthermore we suggest estimating equations for the regression parameters and association parameters in parametric shared frailty models with marginal additive hazards by using the Lin and Ying estimators. We give the large sample properties of the estimators arising from these estimating equations and investigate their small sample properties by Monte Carlo simulation. A real example is provided for illustration.     

A note on the asymptotic relative efficiency of estimators from the additive hazards model

In this note, the asymptotic variance formulas are explicitly derived and compared between the parametric and semiparametric estimators of a regression parameter and survival probability under the additive hazards model. To obtain explicit formulas, it is assumed that the covariate term including a regression coefficient follows a gamma distribution and the baseline hazard function is constant. The results show that the semiparametric estimator of the regression coefficient parameter is fully efficient relative to the parametric counterpart when the survival time and a covariate are independent, as in the proportional hazards model. Relative to a more realistic case of the parametric additive hazards model with a Weibull baseline, the loss of efficiency of the semiparametric estimator of survival probability is moderate.     

Proportional hazards regression in the presence of missing study eligibility information

We consider the study of censored survival times in the situation where the available data consist of both eligible and ineligible subjects, and information distinguishing the two groups is sometimes missing. A complete-case analysis in this context would use only subjects known to be eligible, resulting in inefficient and potentially biased estimators. We propose a two-step procedure which resembles the EM algorithm but is computationally much faster. In the first step, one estimates the conditional expectation of the missing eligibility indicators given the observed data using a logistic regression based on the complete cases (i.e., subjects with non-missing eligibility indicator). In the second step, maximum likelihood estimators are obtained from a weighted Cox proportional hazards model, with the weights being either observed eligibility indicators or estimated conditional expectations thereof. Under ignorable missingness, the estimators from the second step are proven to be consistent and asymptotically normal, with explicit variance estimators. We demonstrate through simulation that the proposed methods perform well for moderate sized samples and are robust in the presence of eligibility indicators that are missing not at random. The proposed procedure is more efficient and more robust than the complete case analysis and, unlike the EM algorithm, does not require time-consuming iteration. Although the proposed methods are applicable generally, they would be most useful for large data sets (e.g., administrative data), for which the computational savings outweigh the price one has to pay for making various approximations in avoiding iteration. We apply the proposed methods to national kidney transplant registry data.     

A novel weighted likelihood estimation with empirical Bayes flavor

We propose a novel approach to estimation, where a set of estimators of a parameter is combined into a weighted average to produce the final estimator. The weights are chosen to be proportional to the likelihood evaluated at the estimators. We investigate the method for a set of estimators obtained by using the maximum likelihood principle applied to each individual observation. The method can be viewed as a Bayesian approach with a data-driven prior distribution. We provide several examples illustrating the new method and argue for its consistency, asymptotic normality, and efficiency. We also conduct simulation studies to assess the performance of the estimators. This straightforward methodology produces consistent estimators comparable with those obtained by the maximum likelihood method. The method also approximates the distribution of the estimator through the “posterior” distribution.     

Additive hazards regression with censoring indicators missing at random

In this article, the authors consider a semiparametric additive hazards regression model for right‐censored data that allows some censoring indicators to be missing at random. They develop a class of estimating equations and use an inverse probability weighted approach to estimate the regression parameters. Nonparametric smoothing techniques are employed to estimate the probability of non‐missingness and the conditional probability of an uncensored observation. The asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators are derived. Simulation studies show that the proposed estimators perform well. They motivate and illustrate their methods with data from a brain cancer clinical trial. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 38: 333–351; 2010 © 2010 Statistical Society of Canada     

A New Estimator for Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Model in Presence of Collinearity

We propose a new approach to estimate the parameters of the Cox proportional hazards model in the presence of collinearity. Generally, a maximum partial likelihood estimator is used to estimate parameters for the Cox proportional hazards model. However, the maximum partial likelihood estimators can be seriously affected by the presence of collinearity since the parameter estimates result in large variances.

In this study, we develop a Liu-type estimator for Cox proportional hazards model parameters and compare it with a ridge regression estimator based on the scalar mean squared error (MSE). Finally, we evaluate its performance through a simulation study.     

Least squares estimation of varying‐coefficient hazard regression with application to breast cancer dose‐intensity data

To enhance modeling flexibility, the authors propose a nonparametric hazard regression model, for which the ordinary and weighted least squares estimation and inference procedures are studied. The proposed model does not assume any parametric specifications on the covariate effects, which is suitable for exploring the nonlinear interactions between covariates, time and some exposure variable. The authors propose the local ordinary and weighted least squares estimators for the varying‐coefficient functions and establish the corresponding asymptotic normality properties. Simulation studies are conducted to empirically examine the finite‐sample performance of the new methods, and a real data example from a recent breast cancer study is used as an illustration. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 37: 659–674; 2009 © 2009 Statistical Society of Canada     

A Likelihood Based Estimating Equation for the Clayton–Oakes Model with Marginal Proportional Hazards

Multivariate failure time data arise when data consist of clusters in which the failure times may be dependent. A popular approach to such data is the marginal proportional hazards model with estimation under the working independence assumption. In this paper, we consider the Clayton–Oakes model with marginal proportional hazards and use the full model structure to improve on efficiency compared with the independence analysis. We derive a likelihood based estimating equation for the regression parameters as well as for the correlation parameter of the model. We give the large sample properties of the estimators arising from this estimating equation. Finally, we investigate the small sample properties of the estimators through Monte Carlo simulations.