Forecasting time series of economic processes by model averaging across data frames of various lengths

This paper presents an extension of mean-squared forecast error (MSFE) model averaging for integrating linear regression models computed on data frames of various lengths. Proposed method is considered to be a preferable alternative to best model selection by various efficiency criteria such as Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Akaike information criterion (AIC), F-statistics and mean-squared error (MSE) as well as to Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and naïve simple forecast average. The method is developed to deal with possibly non-nested models having different number of observations and selects forecast weights by minimizing the unbiased estimator of MSFE. Proposed method also yields forecast confidence intervals with a given significance level what is not possible when applying other model averaging methods. In addition, out-of-sample simulation and empirical testing proves efficiency of such kind of averaging when forecasting economic processes.     

Adaptive order selection for autoregressive models

Autoregressive model is a popular method for analysing the time dependent data, where selection of order parameter is imperative. Two commonly used selection criteria are the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), which are known to suffer the potential problems regarding overfit and underfit, respectively. To our knowledge, there does not exist a criterion in the literature that can satisfactorily perform under various situations. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on forecasting the future values of an observed time series and propose an adaptive idea to combine the advantages of AIC and BIC but to mitigate their weaknesses based on the concept of generalized degrees of freedom. Instead of applying a fixed criterion to select the order parameter, we propose an approximately unbiased estimator of mean squared prediction errors based on a data perturbation technique for fairly comparing between AIC and BIC. Then use the selected criterion to determine the final order parameter. Some numerical experiments are performed to show the superiority of the proposed method and a real data set of the retail price index of China from 1952 to 2008 is also applied for illustration.     

Model averaging procedure for partially linear single-index models

This paper is concerned with model selection and model averaging procedures for partially linear single-index models. The profile least squares procedure is employed to estimate regression coefficients for the full model and submodels. We show that the estimators for submodels are asymptotically normal. Based on the asymptotic distribution of the estimators, we derive the focused information criterion (FIC), formulate the frequentist model average (FMA) estimators and construct proper confidence intervals for FMA estimators and FIC estimator, a special case of FMA estimators. Monte Carlo studies are performed to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over the full model, and over models chosen by AIC or BIC in terms of coverage probability and mean squared error. Our approach is further applied to real data from a male fertility study to explore potential factors related to sperm concentration and estimate the relationship between sperm concentration and monobutyl phthalate.     

Empirical information criteria for time series forecasting model selection

In this article, we propose a new empirical information criterion (EIC) for model selection which penalizes the likelihood of the data by a non-linear function of the number of parameters in the model. It is designed to be used where there are a large number of time series to be forecast. However, a bootstrap version of the EIC can be used where there is a single time series to be forecast. The EIC provides a data-driven model selection tool that can be tuned to the particular forecasting task.

We compare the EIC with other model selection criteria including Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) and Schwarz’s Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The comparisons show that for the M3 forecasting competition data, the EIC outperforms both the AIC and BIC, particularly for longer forecast horizons. We also compare the criteria on simulated data and find that the EIC does better than existing criteria in that case also.     

Forecasting Performance of Information Criteria with Many Macro Series

Stock & Watson (1999) consider the relative quality of different univariate forecasting techniques. This paper extends their study on forecasting practice, comparing the forecasting performance of two popular model selection procedures, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). This paper considers several topics: how AIC and BIC choose lags in autoregressive models on actual series, how models so selected forecast relative to an AR(4) model, the effect of using a maximum lag on model selection, and the forecasting performance of combining AR(4), AIC, and BIC models with an equal weight.     

Model averaging for multivariate multiple regression models

The theories and applications of model averaging have been developed comprehensively in the past two decades. In this paper, we consider model averaging for multivariate multiple regression models. In order to make use of the correlation information of the dependent variables sufficiently, we propose a model averaging method based on Mahalanobis distance which is related to the correlation of the dependent variables. We prove the asymptotic optimality of the resulting Mahalanobis Mallows model averaging (MMMA) estimators under certain assumptions. In the simulation study, we show that the proposed MMMA estimators compare favourably with model averaging estimators based on AIC and BIC weights and the Mallows model averaging estimators from the single dependent variable regression models. We further apply our method to the real data on urbanization rate and the proportion of non-agricultural population in ethnic minority areas of China.     

Model selection: A Lagrange optimization approach

This paper proposes an adaptive model selection criterion with a data-driven penalty term. We treat model selection as an equality constrained minimization problem and develop an adaptive model selection procedure based on the Lagrange optimization method. In contrast to Akaike's information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and most other existing criteria, this new criterion is to minimize the model size and take a measure of lack-of-fit as an adaptive penalty. Both theoretical results and simulations illustrate the power of this criterion with respect to consistency and pointwise asymptotic loss efficiency in the parametric and nonparametric cases.     

PREDICTION-FOCUSED MODEL SELECTION FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS

In order to make predictions of future values of a time series, one needs to specify a forecasting model. A popular choice is an autoregressive time‐series model, for which the order of the model is chosen by an information criterion. We propose an extension of the focused information criterion (FIC) for model‐order selection, with emphasis on a high predictive accuracy (i.e. the mean squared forecast error is low). We obtain theoretical results and illustrate by means of a simulation study and some real data examples that the FIC is a valid alternative to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for selection of a prediction model. We also illustrate the possibility of using the FIC for purposes other than forecasting, and explore its use in an extended model.     

A bayesian method in determining the order of a finite state markov chain

In this paper, we use the Bayesian method in the application of hypothesis testing and model selection to determine the order of a Markov chain. The criteria used are based on Bayes factors with noninformative priors. Com¬parisons with the commonly used AIC and BIC criteria are made through an example and computer simulations. The results show that the proposed method is better than the AIC and BIC criteria, especially for Markov chains with higher orders and larger state spaces.     

Statistical Problem Classes and Their Links to Information Theory

We begin by recalling the tripartite division of statistical problems into three classes, M-closed, M-complete, and M-open and then reviewing the key ideas of introductory Shannon theory. Focusing on the related but distinct goals of model selection and prediction, we argue that different techniques for these two goals are appropriate for the three different problem classes. For M-closed problems we give relative entropy justification that the Bayes information criterion (BIC) is appropriate for model selection and that the Bayes model average is information optimal for prediction. For M-complete problems, we discuss the principle of maximum entropy and a way to use the rate distortion function to bypass the inaccessibility of the true distribution. For prediction in the M-complete class, there is little work done on information based model averaging so we discuss the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and its properties and variants.

For the M-open class, we argue that essentially only predictive criteria are suitable. Thus, as an analog to model selection, we present the key ideas of prediction along a string under a codelength criterion and propose a general form of this criterion. Since little work appears to have been done on information methods for general prediction in the M-open class of problems, we mention the field of information theoretic learning in certain general function spaces.     

Model selection criteria for dual-inflated data

ABSTRACT

Inflated data are prevalent in many situations and a variety of inflated models with extensions have been derived to fit data with excessive counts of some particular responses. The family of information criteria (IC) has been used to compare the fit of models for selection purposes. Yet despite the common use in statistical applications, there are not too many studies evaluating the performance of IC in inflated models. In this study, we studied the performance of IC for data with dual-inflated data. The new zero- and K-inflated Poisson (ZKIP) regression model and conventional inflated models including Poisson regression and zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression were fitted for dual-inflated data and the performance of IC were compared. The effect of sample sizes and the proportions of inflated observations towards selection performance were also examined. The results suggest that the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and consistent Akaike information criterion (CAIC) are more accurate than the Akaike information criterion (AIC) in terms of model selection when the true model is simple (i.e. Poisson regression (POI)). For more complex models, such as ZIP and ZKIP, the AIC was consistently better than the BIC and CAIC, although it did not reach high levels of accuracy when sample size and the proportion of zero observations were small. The AIC tended to over-fit the data for the POI, whereas the BIC and CAIC tended to under-parameterize the data for ZIP and ZKIP. Therefore, it is desirable to study other model selection criteria for dual-inflated data with small sample size.     

On the convergence rate of model selection criteria

The goal of the current paper is to compare consistent and inconsistent model selection criteria by looking at their convergence rates (to be defined in the first section). The prototypes of the two types of criteria are the AIC and BIC criterion respectively. For linear regression models with normally distributed errors, we show that the convergence rates for AIC and BIC are 0(n^-1) and 0((n log n)^-1/2) respectively. When the error distributions are unknown, the two criteria become indistinguishable, all having convergence rate O(n^-1/2). We also argue that the BIC criterion has nearly optimal convergence rate. The results partially justified some of the controversial simulation results in which inconsistent criteria seem to outperform consistent ones.     

基于吉伯斯样本生成器的向量自回归模型选择

内容提要：向量自回归模型是多元时间序列分析中最常用的方法之一。在建立模型的过程中模型选择是非常重要的一个环节,如果候选模型不是很多时,可以通过比较每个模型的准则值如AIC、AICc、BIC或HQ进行模型选择。可是,当存在大量候选模型时,我们无法一一比较每个模型的准则值。为了解决这个问题,本文提出一个基于吉伯斯样本生成器的向量自回归模型选择方法,结果表明应用该方法能够从大量候选模型中准确、高效地确认准则值最小的模型。     

Testing a linear ARMA model against threshold-ARMA models: A Bayesian approach

We introduce a Bayesian approach to test linear autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) models against threshold autoregressive moving-average (TARMA) models. First, the marginal posterior densities of all parameters, including the threshold and delay, of a TARMA model are obtained by using Gibbs sampler with Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Second, reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) method is adopted to calculate the posterior probabilities for ARMA and TARMA models: Posterior evidence in favor of TARMA models indicates threshold nonlinearity. Finally, based on RJMCMC scheme and Akaike information criterion (AIC) or Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the procedure for modeling TARMA models is exploited. Simulation experiments and a real data example show that our method works well for distinguishing an ARMA from a TARMA model and for building TARMA models.     

Focused information criteria for copulas

In this paper, we extend the focused information criterion (FIC) to copula models. Copulas are often used for applications where the joint tail behavior of the variables is of particular interest, and selecting a copula that captures this well is then essential. Traditional model selection methods such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) aim at finding the overall best‐fitting model, which is not necessarily the one best suited for the application at hand. The FIC, on the other hand, evaluates and ranks candidate models based on the precision of their point estimates of a context‐given focus parameter. This could be any quantity of particular interest, for example, the mean, a correlation, conditional probabilities, or measures of tail dependence. We derive FIC formulae for the maximum likelihood estimator, the two‐stage maximum likelihood estimator, and the so‐called pseudo‐maximum‐likelihood (PML) estimator combined with parametric margins. Furthermore, we confirm the validity of the AIC formula for the PML estimator combined with parametric margins. To study the numerical behavior of FIC, we have carried out a simulation study, and we have also analyzed a multivariate data set pertaining to abalones. The results from the study show that the FIC successfully ranks candidate models in terms of their performance, defined as how well they estimate the focus parameter. In terms of estimation precision, FIC clearly outperforms AIC, especially when the focus parameter relates to only a specific part of the model, such as the conditional upper‐tail probability.     

The use of auxiliary variables in capture-recapture modelling: An overview

I review the use of auxiliary variables in capture-recapture models for estimation of demographic parameters (e.g. capture probability, population size, survival probability, and recruitment, emigration and immigration numbers). I focus on what has been done in current research and what still needs to be done. Typically in the literature, covariate modelling has made capture and survival probabilities functions of covariates, but there are good reasons also to make other parameters functions of covariates as well. The types of covariates considered include environmental covariates that may vary by occasion but are constant over animals, and individual animal covariates that are usually assumed constant over time. I also discuss the difficulties of using time-dependent individual animal covariates and some possible solutions. Covariates are usually assumed to be measured without error, and that may not be realistic. For closed populations, one approach to modelling heterogeneity in capture probabilities uses observable individual covariates and is thus related to the primary purpose of this paper. The now standard Huggins-Alho approach conditions on the captured animals and then uses a generalized Horvitz-Thompson estimator to estimate population size. This approach has the advantage of simplicity in that one does not have to specify a distribution for the covariates, and the disadvantage is that it does not use the full likelihood to estimate population size. Alternately one could specify a distribution for the covariates and implement a full likelihood approach to inference to estimate the capture function, the covariate probability distribution, and the population size. The general Jolly-Seber open model enables one to estimate capture probability, population sizes, survival rates, and birth numbers. Much of the focus on modelling covariates in program MARK has been for survival and capture probability in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model and its generalizations (including tag-return models). These models condition on the number of animals marked and released. A related, but distinct, topic is radio telemetry survival modelling that typically uses a modified Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model for auxiliary variables. Recently there has been an emphasis on integration of recruitment in the likelihood, and research on how to implement covariate modelling for recruitment and perhaps population size is needed. The combined open and closed 'robust' design model can also benefit from covariate modelling and some important options have already been implemented into MARK. Many models are usually fitted to one data set. This has necessitated development of model selection criteria based on the AIC (Akaike Information Criteria) and the alternative of averaging over reasonable models. The special problems of estimating over-dispersion when covariates are included in the model and then adjusting for over-dispersion in model selection could benefit from further research.     

Adaptive Order Determination for Constructing Time Series Forecasting Models

In time series modeling consistent criteria like Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) outperform in terms of predictability loss-efficient criteria like Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) when data are generated by a finite-order autoregressive process, and the reverse is true when data are generated by an infinite-order autoregressive process. Since in practice we don’t know the data-generating process, it is useful to have an adaptive criterion that behaves as either a consistent or just as a loss-efficient criterion, whichever performs better. Here we derive such a criterion. Moreover, our criterion is adaptive to effective sample sizes and not sensitive to maximum a priori determined order limits.     

Consistent Bayesian information criterion based on a mixture prior for possibly high-dimensional multivariate linear regression models

In the problem of selecting variables in a multivariate linear regression model, we derive new Bayesian information criteria based on a prior mixing a smooth distribution and a delta distribution. Each of them can be interpreted as a fusion of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Inheriting their asymptotic properties, our information criteria are consistent in variable selection in both the large-sample and the high-dimensional asymptotic frameworks. In numerical simulations, variable selection methods based on our information criteria choose the true set of variables with high probability in most cases.     

MODEL SELECTION FOR PENALIZED SPLINE SMOOTHING USING AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERIA

Two different forms of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) are compared for selecting the smooth terms in penalized spline additive mixed models. The conditional AIC (cAIC) has been used traditionally as a criterion for both estimating penalty parameters and selecting covariates in smoothing, and is based on the conditional likelihood given the smooth mean and on the effective degrees of freedom for a model fit. By comparison, the marginal AIC (mAIC) is based on the marginal likelihood from the mixed‐model formulation of penalized splines which has recently become popular for estimating smoothing parameters. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the use of mAIC for selecting covariates for smoothing in additive models is new. In the competing models considered for selection, covariates may have a nonlinear effect on the response, with the possibility of group‐specific curves. Simulations are used to compare the performance of cAIC and mAIC in model selection settings that have correlated and hierarchical smooth terms. In moderately large samples, both formulations of AIC perform extremely well at detecting the function that generated the data. The mAIC does better for simple functions, whereas the cAIC is more sensitive to detecting a true model that has complex and hierarchical terms.     

Model Selection for Complex Multilevel Latent Class Model

Multilevel latent class analysis is conducive to providing more effective information on both individual and group typologies. However, model selection issues still need further investigation. Current study probed into issue of high-level class numeration for a more complex model using AIC, AIC3, BIC, and BIC*. Data simulation was conducted and its result was verified by empirical data. The result demonstrated that these criteria have a certain inclination relative to sample sizes. Sample size per group plays an evident role in improving accuracy of AIC3 and BIC. The complex model requires more sample size per group to ensure accurate class numeration.