Maximum likelihood estimation,from doubly censored samples,of the mean of a normal distribution with known coeffucient of variation

Let x be a random variable having the normal distribution with mean μ and variance c²μ², where c is a known constant. The maximum likelihood estimation of μ when the lowest r₁ and the highest r₂ sample values censored have been given the asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimator is obtained.     

Linear regression through the origin with constant coefficient of variation for the inverse gaussian distribution

A simple linear regression model with no intercept term for the situation where the response variable obeys an inverse Gaussian distribution and the coefficient of variation is an unknown constant is discussed. Maximum likelihood estimators and the confidence limits of the regression parameter are obtained. Finally uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators of parameters are given.     

A comparison of various estimators of the mean of an inverse gaussian distribution

In this paper we consider the Inverse Gaussian distribution whose variance is proportional to the mean. Assuming that the data are available from IGD(,μ,c,μ ²), and also from its length biased version, simulation studies are presented to compare the MVUE and MLE in terms of their variances and mean square errors from both kinds of data. Some tables and graphs are provided to analyze the comparisons. Finally, some recommendations and conclusions are given when one or both kinds of data are available.     

On estimating a function of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution

The unique minimum variance of unbiased estimator is obtained for analysis functions of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution with either unknown covariance matrix or with covariance matrix of the form σ²v where σ² is unknown.     

On estimation of the mean parameter of a truncated normal disiribution with known coefficient of variation

This paper eals with the proplem on estimating the mean paramerer of a truncated normal distribution with known coefficient of variation. In the previous treatment of this problem most authors have used the sample standared deviation for estimating this parameter. In the present paper we use Gini’s coefficient of mean difference g and obtain the minimum variance unbiased estimate of the mean based on a linear function of the sample mean and g, It is shown that this new estimate has desirable properties for small samples as well as for large samples. We also give a numerical example.     

The exact confidence interval for the scale parameter and the mvue of the laplace distribution

The exact distribution of the sample median, and of the maximum likelihood estimator of the scale parameter of the Laplace distribution is derived. Tables of Teans, variances and the distribution functions of the corresponding dislributions are evaluacted. Exact ,solutions to the problem of confidence interval and hypothesrs testing for the scale paramrter are provided. The minimum variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) of the p.d.f. of the Laplace distribution when the location parameter is known is also given.     

Comparison of point estimators of normal percentiles

There are available several point estimators of the percentiles of a normal distribution with both mean and variance unknown. Consequently, it would seem appropriate to make a comparison among the estimators through some “closeness to the true value” criteria. Along these lines, the concept of Pitman-closeness efficiency is introduced. Essentially, when comparing two estimators, the Pit-man-closeness efficiency gives the “odds” in favor of one of the estimators being closer to the true value than is the other in a given situation. Through the use of Pitman-closeness efficiency, this paper compares (a) the maximum likelihood estimator, (b) the minimum variance unbiased estimator, (c) the best invariant estimator, and (d) the median unbiased estimator within a class of estimators which includes (a), (b), and (c). Mean squared efficiency is also discussed.     

Two new confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation in a normal distribution

In this article we introduce an approximately unbiased estimator for the population coefficient of variation, τ, in a normal distribution. The accuracy of this estimator is examined by several criteria. Using this estimator and its variance, two approximate confidence intervals for τ are introduced. The performance of the new confidence intervals is compared to those obtained by current methods.     

Estimation of the population mean when the coefficient of variation is known

Theory has been developed to provide an optimum estimator of the population mean based on a “mean per unit” estimator and the estimated standard deviation, assuming that the form of the distribution as well as its coefficient of variation (c.v.) are known. Theory has been extended to the case when an estimate of c.v. is available from an independent sample drawn in the past; the case when the form of the distribution is not known is also discussed. It is shown that the relative efficiency of the estimator with respect to “mean per unit estimator” is generally high for normal or near normal populations. For log-normal populations, an increase in efficiency of about 17 percent can be achieved. The results have been illustrated with data from biological populations.     

Umvu estimation for the cumulative hazard function in a pareto distribution of the first kind

The uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator of the cumulative hazard function in the Pareto distribution of the first kind is derived. The variance of the estimator is also obtained in an analytic form, and for some cases its values are compared numerically with mean square errors of the maximum likelihood estimator.     

Approximate maximum likelihood estimation of the mean and standard deviation of the normal distribution based on type ii censored samples

It is known that the maximum likelihood methods does not provide explicit estimators for the mean and standard deviation of the normal distribution based on Type II censored samples. In this paper we present a simple method of deriving explicit estimators by approximating the likelihood equations appropriately. We obtain the variances and covariance of these estimators. We also show that these estimators are almost as eficient as the maximum likelihood (ML) estimators and just as eficient as the best linear unbiased (BLU), and the modified maximum likelihood (MML) estimators. Finally, we illustrate this method of estimation by applying it to Gupta's and Darwin's data.     

On estimation of the PDF and CDF of the Lindley distribution

This article addresses two methods of estimation of the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the Lindley distribution. Following estimation methods are considered: uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) and maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Since the Lindley distribution is more flexible than the exponential distribution, the same estimators have been found out for the exponential distribution and compared. Monte Carlo simulations and a real data analysis are performed to compare the performances of the proposed methods of estimation.     

A note on the randomized response technique

It is pointed out that the usual estimators for the parameters of a randomized response model are not, contrary to popular belief, maximum likelihood estimators.     

The conditional MLE in the two-parameter geometric distribution and its competitors

The conditional maximum likelihood estimator of the shape parameter in the two-parameter geometric distribution is introduced and explored. The estimator is compared with the unconditional maximum likelihood estimator and the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator.     

Efficient estimation of the PDF and the CDF of the inverse Rayleigh distribution

In this paper, we consider the estimation of the probability density function and the cumulative distribution function of the inverse Rayleigh distribution. In this regard, the following estimators are considered: uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator, maximum likelihood (ML) estimator, percentile estimator, least squares estimator and weighted least squares estimator. To do so, analytical expressions are derived for the mean integrated squared error. As the result of simulation studies and real data applications indicate, when the sample size is not very small the ML estimator performs better than the others.     

Estimation of the parameters in a truncated normal distribution

This paper deals with the estimation of the parameters of doubly truncated and singly truncated normal distributions when truncation points are known. We derive, for these families, a necessary and sufficient condition for the maximum likelihood estimator(MLE) to be finite. Furthermore, the probability of the MLE being infinite is positive. A simulation study for single truncation is carried out to compare the modified maximum likelihood estimator, and the mixed estimator.     

A modified likelihood ratio test for the mean direction in the von mises distribution

The likelihood ratio test (LRT) for the mean direction in the von Mises distribution is modified for possessing a common asymptotic distribution both for large sample size and for large concentration parameter. The test statistic of the modified LRT is compared with the F distribution but not with the chi-square distribution usually employed, Good performances of the modified LRT are shown by analytical studies and Monte Carlo simulation studies, A notable advantage of the test is that it takes part in the unified likelihood inference procedures including both the marginal MLE and the marginal LRT for the concentration parameter.