A Monte Carlo simulation study of two-sided tolerance intervals in balanced one-way random effects model for non-normal errors

Recently, Ong and Mukerjee [Probability matching priors for two-sided tolerance intervals in balanced one-way and two-way nested random effects models. Statistics. 2011;45:403–411] developed two-sided Bayesian tolerance intervals, with approximate frequentist validity, for a future observation in balanced one-way and two-way nested random effects models. These were obtained using probability matching priors (PMP). On the other hand, Krishnamoorthy and Lian [Closed-form approximate tolerance intervals for some general linear models and comparison studies. J Stat Comput Simul. 2012;82:547–563] studied closed-form approximate tolerance intervals by the modified large-sample (MLS) approach. We compare the performances of these two approaches for normal as well as non-normal error distributions. Monte Carlo simulation methods are used to evaluate the resulting tolerance intervals with regard to achieved confidence levels and expected widths. It turns out that PMP tolerance intervals are less conservative for data with large number of classes and small number of observations per class and the MLS procedure is preferable for smaller sample sizes.     

Levene type tests for the ratio of two scales

Tests for the equality of variances are of interest in many areas such as quality control, agricultural production systems, experimental education, pharmacology, biology, as well as a preliminary to the analysis of variance, dose–response modelling or discriminant analysis. The literature is vast. Traditional non-parametric tests are due to Mood, Miller and Ansari–Bradley. A test which usually stands out in terms of power and robustness against non-normality is the W50 Brown and Forsythe [Robust tests for the equality of variances, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69 (1974), pp. 364–367] modification of the Levene test [Robust tests for equality of variances, in Contributions to Probability and Statistics, I. Olkin, ed., Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1960, pp. 278–292]. This paper deals with the two-sample scale problem and in particular with Levene type tests. We consider 10 Levene type tests: the W50, the M50 and L50 tests [G. Pan, On a Levene type test for equality of two variances, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 63 (1999), pp. 59–71], the R-test [R.G. O'Brien, A general ANOVA method for robust tests of additive models for variances, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74 (1979), pp. 877–880], as well as the bootstrap and permutation versions of the W50, L50 and R tests. We consider also the F-test, the modified Fligner and Killeen [Distribution-free two-sample tests for scale, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71 (1976), pp. 210–213] test, an adaptive test due to Hall and Padmanabhan [Adaptive inference for the two-sample scale problem, Technometrics 23 (1997), pp. 351–361] and the two tests due to Shoemaker [Tests for differences in dispersion based on quantiles, Am. Stat. 49(2) (1995), pp. 179–182; Interquantile tests for dispersion in skewed distributions, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 28 (1999), pp. 189–205]. The aim is to identify the effective methods for detecting scale differences. Our study is different with respect to the other ones since it is focused on resampling versions of the Levene type tests, and many tests considered here have not ever been proposed and/or compared. The computationally simplest test found robust is W50. Higher power, while preserving robustness, is achieved by considering the resampling version of Levene type tests like the permutation R-test (recommended for normal- and light-tailed distributions) and the bootstrap L50 test (recommended for heavy-tailed and skewed distributions). Among non-Levene type tests, the best one is the adaptive test due to Hall and Padmanabhan.     

Comment on “Exact Bayesian variable sampling plans for the exponential distribution with progressive hybrid censoring”

Lin et al. [Exact Bayesian variable sampling plans for the exponential distribution with progressive hybrid censoring, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81 (2011), pp. 873–882] claimed to have derived exact Bayesian sampling plans for exponential distributions with progressive hybrid censoring. We comment on the accuracy of the design parameters of their proposed sampling plans and the associated Bayes risks given in tables of Lin et al. [Exact Bayesian variable sampling plans for the exponential distribution with progressive hybrid censoring, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81 (2011), pp. 873–882]. Counter-examples to their claim are provided.     

Some factors affecting statistical power of approximate tests in the linear mixed model for longitudinal data

Different longitudinal study designs require different statistical analysis methods and different methods of sample size determination. Statistical power analysis is a flexible approach to sample size determination for longitudinal studies. However, different power analyses are required for different statistical tests which arises from the difference between different statistical methods. In this paper, the simulation-based power calculations of F-tests with Containment, Kenward-Roger or Satterthwaite approximation of degrees of freedom are examined for sample size determination in the context of a special case of linear mixed models (LMMs), which is frequently used in the analysis of longitudinal data. Essentially, the roles of some factors, such as variance–covariance structure of random effects [unstructured UN or factor analytic FA0], autocorrelation structure among errors over time [independent IND, first-order autoregressive AR1 or first-order moving average MA1], parameter estimation methods [maximum likelihood ML and restricted maximum likelihood REML] and iterative algorithms [ridge-stabilized Newton-Raphson and Quasi-Newton] on statistical power of approximate F-tests in the LMM are examined together, which has not been considered previously. The greatest factor affecting statistical power is found to be the variance–covariance structure of random effects in the LMM. It appears that the simulation-based analysis in this study gives an interesting insight into statistical power of approximate F-tests for fixed effects in LMMs for longitudinal data.     

A note on fiducial generalized pivots for in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA with random effects

The paper deals with generalized confidence intervals for the between-group variance in one-way heteroscedastic (unbalanced) ANOVA with random effects. The approach used mimics the standard one applied in mixed linear models with two variance components, where interval estimators are based on a minimal sufficient statistic derived after an initial reduction by the principle of invariance. A minimal sufficient statistic under heteroscedasticity is found to resemble its homoscedastic counterpart and further analogies between heteroscedastic and homoscedastic cases lead us to two classes of fiducial generalized pivots for the between-group variance. The procedures suggested formerly by Wimmer and Witkovský [Between group variance component interval estimation for the unbalanced heteroscedastic one-way random effects model, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 73 (2003), pp. 333–346] and Li [Comparison of confidence intervals on between group variance in unbalanced heteroscedastic one-way random models, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 36 (2007), pp. 381–390] are found to belong to these two classes. We comment briefly on some of their properties that were not mentioned in the original papers. In addition, properties of another particular generalized pivot are considered.     

On confidence regions of semiparametric nonlinear reproductive dispersion models

This article investigates the confidence regions for semiparametric nonlinear reproductive dispersion models (SNRDMs), which is an extension of nonlinear regression models. Based on local linear estimate of nonparametric component and generalized profile likelihood estimate of parameter in SNRDMs, a modified geometric framework of Bates and Wattes is proposed. Within this geometric framework, we present three kinds of improved approximate confidence regions for the parameters and parameter subsets in terms of curvatures. The work extends the previous results of Hamilton et al. [in Accounting for intrinsic nonlinearity in nonlinear regression parameter inference regions, Ann. Statist. 10, pp. 386–393, 1982], Hamilton [in Confidence regions for parameter subset in nonlinear regression, Biometrika, 73, pp. 57–64, 1986], Wei [in On confidence regions of embedded models in regular parameter families (a geometric approch), Austral. J. Statist. 36, pp. 327–338, 1994], Tang et al. [in Confidence regions in quasi-likelihood nonlinear models: a geometric approach, J. Biomath. 15, pp. 55–64, 2000b] and Zhu et al. [in On confidence regions of semiparametric nonlinear regression models, Acta. Math. Scient. 20, pp. 68–75, 2000].     

The beta-Weibull geometric distribution

We propose a new distribution, the so-called beta-Weibull geometric distribution, whose failure rate function can be decreasing, increasing or an upside-down bathtub. This distribution contains special sub-models the exponential geometric [K. Adamidis and S. Loukas, A lifetime distribution with decreasing failure rate, Statist. Probab. Lett. 39 (1998), pp. 35–42], beta exponential [S. Nadarajah and S. Kotz, The exponentiated type distributions, Acta Appl. Math. 92 (2006), pp. 97–111; The beta exponential distribution, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (2006), pp. 689–697], Weibull geometric [W. Barreto-Souza, A.L. de Morais, and G.M. Cordeiro, The Weibull-geometric distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81 (2011), pp. 645–657], generalized exponential geometric [R.B. Silva, W. Barreto-Souza, and G.M. Cordeiro, A new distribution with decreasing, increasing and upside-down bathtub failure rate, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 54 (2010), pp. 935–944; G.O. Silva, E.M.M. Ortega, and G.M. Cordeiro, The beta modified Weibull distribution, Lifetime Data Anal. 16 (2010), pp. 409–430] and beta Weibull [S. Nadarajah, G.M. Cordeiro, and E.M.M. Ortega, General results for the Kumaraswamy-G distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. (2011). DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2011.562504] distributions, among others. The density function can be expressed as a mixture of Weibull density functions. We derive expansions for the moments, generating function, mean deviations and Rénvy entropy. The parameters of the proposed model are estimated by maximum likelihood. The model fitting using envelops was conducted. The proposed distribution gives a good fit to the ozone level data in New York.     

Tests of fit for the Laplace distribution based on correcting moments of entropy estimators

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we first consider the entropy estimators introduced by Vasicek [A test for normality based on sample entropy. J R Statist Soc, Ser B. 1976;38:54–59], Ebrahimi et al. [Two measures of sample entropy. Stat Probab Lett. 1994;20:225–234], Yousefzadeh and Arghami [Testing exponentiality based on type II censored data and a new cdf estimator. Commun Stat – Simul Comput. 2008;37:1479–1499], Alizadeh Noughabi and Arghami [A new estimator of entropy. J Iran Statist Soc. 2010;9:53–64], and Zamanzade and Arghami [Goodness-of-fit test based on correcting moments of modified entropy estimator. J Statist Comput Simul. 2011;81:2077–2093], and the nonparametric distribution functions corresponding to them. We next introduce goodness-of-fit test statistics for the Laplace distribution based on the moments of nonparametric distribution functions of the aforementioned estimators. We obtain power estimates of the proposed test statistics with Monte Carlo simulation and compare them with the competing test statistics against various alternatives. Performance of the proposed new test statistics is illustrated in real cases.     

Spherical radial approximation for nested mixed effects models

We consider a likelihood approximation in generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMM) with multilevel nested random effects. Likelihood evaluation in such models is difficult, hindered by the need for high dimensional integration, where the dimension is proportional to the number of units per level and the number of random effects per unit. Various integration approaches have been proposed, including the penalized quasi-likelihood method, Laplace approximation, quadrature approximation, simulation, and MCMC algorithms. We propose a new quadrature approximation method, which is based on the spherical radial integration approach of Monahan and Genz (J Am Stat Assoc 92:664–674 1997), and at the same time takes advantage of the hierarchical structure of the integration. Our new hierarchical spherical radial method has a time complexity that is linear in the number of units per level and the number of random effects per unit, in contrast to the exponential complexity of the adaptive Gaussian quadrature method of Pinheiro and Chao (J Comput Graph Stat 15:58–81 2006) for the same problem. Using a spline approximation, the generalized additive mixed models (GAMM) are GLMMs with two levels of nested random effects. We apply our method to estimation of GAMMs. We compare it with competing methods through simulations and apply our method to analyze virologic and immunologic responses in an AIDS clinical trial. An R package is written and available at http://?users.?wpi.?edu/?~jgagnon/?software.?html.     

Generating data from improper distributions: application to Cox proportional hazards models with cure

Cure rate models are survival models characterized by improper survivor distributions which occur when the cumulative distribution function, say F, of the survival times does not sum up to 1 (i.e. F(+∞)<1). The first objective of this paper is to provide a general approach to generate data from any improper distribution. An application to times to event data randomly drawn from improper distributions with proportional hazards is investigated using the semi-parametric proportional hazards model with cure obtained as a special case of the nonlinear transformation models in [Tsodikov, Semiparametric models: A generalized self-consistency approach, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 65 (2003), pp. 759–774]. The second objective of this paper is to show by simulations that the bias, the standard error and the mean square error of the maximum partial likelihood (PL) estimator of the hazard ratio as well as the statistical power based on the PL estimator strongly depend on the proportion of subjects in the whole population who will never experience the event of interest.     

Bootstrapping stochastic regression models under homoskedasticity: wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap

We investigate by simulation how the wild bootstrap and pairs bootstrap perform in t and F tests of regression parameters in the stochastic regression model, where explanatory variables are stochastic and not given and there exists no heteroskedasticity. The wild bootstrap procedure due to Davidson and Flachaire [The wild bootstrap, tamed at last, Working paper, IER#1000, Queen's University, 2001] with restricted residuals works best but its dominance is not strong compared to the result of Flachaire [Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 49 (2005), pp. 361–376] in the fixed regression model where explanatory variables are fixed and there exists heteroskedasticity.     

Comments on ‘Life prediction under random censorship’

We point out and comment on the confusions, deficiencies and errors of Wang [Life prediction under random censorship, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 78 (2008), pp. 1033–1044].     

Robust methods of estimation of regression coefficients 1

Recently, cumulative residual entropy (CRE) has been found to be a new measure of information that parallels Shannon's entropy (see Rao et al. [Cumulative residual entropy: A new measure of information, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 50(6) (2004), pp. 1220–1228] and Asadi and Zohrevand [On the dynamic cumulative residual entropy, J. Stat. Plann. Inference 137 (2007), pp. 1931–1941]). Motivated by this finding, in this paper, we introduce a generalized measure of it, namely cumulative residual Renyi's entropy, and study its properties. We also examine it in relation to some applied problems such as weighted and equilibrium models. Finally, we extend this measure into the bivariate set-up and prove certain characterizing relationships to identify different bivariate lifetime models.     

The marked empirical process to test nonlinear time series against a large class of alternatives when the random vectors are nonstationary and absolutely regular

In this paper, we propose a method for testing absolutely regular and possibly nonstationary nonlinear time-series, with application to general AR-ARCH models. Our test statistic is based on a marked empirical process of residuals which is shown to converge to a Gaussian process with respect to the Skohorod topology. This testing procedure was first introduced by Stute [Nonparametric model checks for regression, Ann. Statist. 25 (1997), pp. 613–641] and then widely developed by Ngatchou-Wandji [Weak convergence of some marked empirical processes: Application to testing heteroscedasticity, J. Nonparametr. Stat. 14 (2002), pp. 325–339; Checking nonlinear heteroscedastic time series models, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 133 (2005), pp. 33–68; Local power of a Cramer-von Mises type test for parametric autoregressive models of order one, Compt. Math. Appl. 56(4) (2008), pp. 918–929] under more general conditions. Applications to general AR-ARCH models are given.     

A combined test for differences in scale based on the interquantile range

A class of tests due to Shoemaker (Commun Stat Simul Comput 28: 189–205, 1999) for differences in scale which is valid for a variety of both skewed and symmetric distributions when location is known or unknown is considered. The class is based on the interquantile range and requires that the population variances are finite. In this paper, we firstly propose a permutation version of it that does not require the condition of finite variances and is remarkably more powerful than the original one. Secondly we solve the question of what quantile choose by proposing a combined interquantile test based on our permutation version of Shoemaker tests. Shoemaker showed that the more extreme interquantile range tests are more powerful than the less extreme ones, unless the underlying distributions are very highly skewed. Since in practice you may not know if the underlying distributions are very highly skewed or not, the question arises. The combined interquantile test solves this question, is robust and more powerful than the stand alone tests. Thirdly we conducted a much more detailed simulation study than that of Shoemaker (1999) that compared his tests to the F and the squared rank tests showing that his tests are better. Since the F and the squared rank test are not good for differences in scale, his results suffer of such a drawback, and for this reason instead of considering the squared rank test we consider, following the suggestions of several authors, tests due to Brown–Forsythe (J Am Stat Assoc 69:364–367, 1974), Pan (J Stat Comput Simul 63:59–71, 1999), O’Brien (J Am Stat Assoc 74:877–880, 1979) and Conover et al. (Technometrics 23:351–361, 1981).     

A variable selection proposal for multiple linear regression analysis

Variable selection in multiple linear regression models is considered. It is shown that for the special case of orthogonal predictor variables, an adaptive pre-test-type procedure proposed by Venter and Steel [Simultaneous selection and estimation for the some zeros family of normal models, J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 45 (1993), pp. 129–146] is almost equivalent to least angle regression, proposed by Efron et al. [Least angle regression, Ann. Stat. 32 (2004), pp. 407–499]. A new adaptive pre-test-type procedure is proposed, which extends the procedure of Venter and Steel to the general non-orthogonal case in a multiple linear regression analysis. This new procedure is based on a likelihood ratio test where the critical value is determined data-dependently. A practical illustration and results from a simulation study are presented.     

Statistical diagnostics for nonlinear regression models based on scale mixtures of skew-normal distributions

The purpose of this paper is to develop diagnostics analysis for nonlinear regression models (NLMs) under scale mixtures of skew-normal (SMSN) distributions introduced by Garay et al. [Nonlinear regression models based on SMSN distributions. J. Korean Statist. Soc. 2011;40:115–124]. This novel class of models provides a useful generalization of the symmetrical NLM [Vanegas LH, Cysneiros FJA. Assessment of diagnostic procedures in symmetrical nonlinear regression models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 2010;54:1002–1016] since the random terms distributions cover both symmetric as well as asymmetric and heavy-tailed distributions such as the skew-t, skew-slash, skew-contaminated normal distributions, among others. Motivated by the results given in Garay et al. [Nonlinear regression models based on SMSN distributions. J. Korean Statist. Soc. 2011;40:115–124], we presented a score test for testing the homogeneity of the scale parameter and its properties are investigated through Monte Carlo simulations studies. Furthermore, local influence measures and the one-step approximations of the estimates in the case-deletion model are obtained. The newly developed procedures are illustrated considering a real data set.     

Improved estimation for Poisson INAR(1) models

We consider the first-order Poisson autoregressive model proposed by McKenzie [Some simple models for discrete variate time series. Water Resour Bull. 1985;21:645–650] and Al-Osh and Alzaid [First-order integer valued autoregressive (INAR(1)) process. J Time Ser Anal. 1987;8:261–275], which may be suitable in situations where the time series data are non-negative and integer valued. We derive the second-order bias of the squared difference estimator [Weiß. Process capability analysis for serially dependent processes of Poisson counts. J Stat Comput Simul. 2012;82:383–404] for one of the parameters and show that this bias can be used to define a bias-reduced estimator. The behaviour of a modified conditional least-squares estimator is also studied. Furthermore, we access the asymptotic properties of the estimators here discussed. We present numerical evidence, based upon Monte Carlo simulation studies, showing that the here proposed bias-adjusted estimator outperforms the other estimators in small samples. We also present an application to a real data set.     

Residual-based CUSUM of squares test for Poisson integer-valued GARCH models

This study considers the problem of testing for a parameter change in integer-valued time series models in which the conditional density of current observations is assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. As a test, we consider the CUSUM of the squares test based on the residuals from INGARCH models and find that the test converges weakly to the supremum of a Brownian bridge. A simulation study demonstrates its superiority to the residual and standardized residual-based CUSUM tests of Kang and Lee [Parameter change test for Poisson autoregressive models. Scand J Statist. 2014;41:1136–1152] and Lee and Lee [CUSUM tests for general nonlinear inter-valued GARCH models: comparison study. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2019;71:1033–1057.] as well as the CUSUM of squares test based on standardized residuals.