Reconfiguration of dominating sets

We explore a reconfiguration version of the dominating set problem, where a dominating set in a graph G is a set S of vertices such that each vertex is either in S or has a neighbour in S. In a reconfiguration problem, the goal is to determine whether there exists a sequence of feasible solutions connecting given feasible solutions s and t such that each pair of consecutive solutions is adjacent according to a specified adjacency relation. Two dominating sets are adjacent if one can be formed from the other by the addition or deletion of a single vertex. For various values of k, we consider properties of \(D_k(G)\), the graph consisting of a node for each dominating set of size at most k and edges specified by the adjacency relation. Addressing an open question posed by Haas and Seyffarth, we demonstrate that \(D_{\varGamma (G)+1}(G)\) is not necessarily connected, for \(\varGamma (G)\) the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set in G. The result holds even when graphs are constrained to be planar, of bounded tree-width, or b-partite for \(b \ge 3\). Moreover, we construct an infinite family of graphs such that \(D_{\gamma (G)+1}(G)\) has exponential diameter, for \(\gamma (G)\) the minimum size of a dominating set. On the positive side, we show that \(D_{n-\mu }(G)\) is connected and of linear diameter for any graph G on n vertices with a matching of size at least \(\mu +1\).     

On maximum Wiener index of trees and graphs with given radius

Let G be a connected graph of order n. The long-standing open and close problems in distance graph theory are: what is the Wiener index W(G) or average distance \(\mu (G)\) among all graphs of order n with diameter d (radius r)? There are very few number of articles where were worked on the relationship between radius or diameter and Wiener index. In this paper, we give an upper bound on Wiener index of trees and graphs in terms of number of vertices n, radius r, and characterize the extremal graphs. Moreover, from this result we give an upper bound on \(\mu (G)\) in terms of order and independence number of graph G. Also we present another upper bound on Wiener index of graphs in terms of number of vertices n, radius r and maximum degree \(\Delta \), and characterize the extremal graphs.     

On the complete width and edge clique cover problems

A complete graph is the graph in which every two vertices are adjacent. For a graph \(G=(V,E)\), the complete width of G is the minimum k such that there exist k independent sets \(\mathtt {N}_i\subseteq V\), \(1\le i\le k\), such that the graph \(G'\) obtained from G by adding some new edges between certain vertices inside the sets \(\mathtt {N}_i\), \(1\le i\le k\), is a complete graph. The complete width problem is to decide whether the complete width of a given graph is at most k or not. In this paper we study the complete width problem. We show that the complete width problem is NP-complete on \(3K_2\)-free bipartite graphs and polynomially solvable on \(2K_2\)-free bipartite graphs and on \((2K_2,C_4)\)-free graphs. As a by-product, we obtain the following new results: the edge clique cover problem is NP-complete on \(\overline{3K_2}\)-free co-bipartite graphs and polynomially solvable on \(C_4\)-free co-bipartite graphs and on \((2K_2, C_4)\)-free graphs. We also give a characterization for k-probe complete graphs which implies that the complete width problem admits a kernel of at most \(2^k\) vertices. This provides another proof for the known fact that the edge clique cover problem admits a kernel of at most \(2^k\) vertices. Finally we determine all graphs of small complete width \(k\le 3\).     

Perfect graphs involving semitotal and semipaired domination

Let G be a graph with vertex set V and no isolated vertices, and let S be a dominating set of V. The set S is a semitotal dominating set of G if every vertex in S is within distance 2 of another vertex of S. And, S is a semipaired dominating set of G if S can be partitioned into 2-element subsets such that the vertices in each 2-set are at most distance two apart. The semitotal domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{t2}(G)\) is the minimum cardinality of a semitotal dominating set of G, and the semipaired domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G)\) is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of G. For a graph without isolated vertices, the domination number \(\gamma (G)\), the total domination \(\gamma _t(G)\), and the paired domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr}(G)\) are related to the semitotal and semipaired domination numbers by the following inequalities: \(\gamma (G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{t2}(G) \le \gamma _t(G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{pr}(G)\) and \(\gamma (G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{t2}(G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G) \le \gamma _\mathrm{pr}(G) \le 2\gamma (G)\). Given two graph parameters \(\mu \) and \(\psi \) related by a simple inequality \(\mu (G) \le \psi (G)\) for every graph G having no isolated vertices, a graph is \((\mu ,\psi )\)-perfect if every induced subgraph H with no isolated vertices satisfies \(\mu (H) = \psi (H)\). Alvarado et al. (Discrete Math 338:1424–1431, 2015) consider classes of \((\mu ,\psi )\)-perfect graphs, where \(\mu \) and \(\psi \) are domination parameters including \(\gamma \), \(\gamma _t\) and \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr}\). We study classes of perfect graphs for the possible combinations of parameters in the inequalities when \(\gamma _\mathrm{t2}\) and \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}\) are included in the mix. Our results are characterizations of several such classes in terms of their minimal forbidden induced subgraphs.     

On the coefficients of the independence polynomial of graphs

An independent set of a graph G is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. Let \(i_k = i_k(G)\) be the number of independent sets of cardinality k of G. The independence polynomial \(I(G, x)=\sum _{k\geqslant 0}i_k(G)x^k\) defined first by Gutman and Harary has been the focus of considerable research recently, whereas \(i(G)=I(G, 1)\) is called the Merrifield–Simmons index of G. In this paper, we first proved that among all trees of order n,  the kth coefficient \(i_k\) is smallest when the tree is a path, and is largest for star. Moreover, the graph among all trees of order n with diameter at least d whose all coefficients of I(G, x) are largest is identified. Then we identify the graphs among the n-vertex unicyclic graphs (resp. n-vertex connected graphs with clique number \(\omega \)) which simultaneously minimize all coefficients of I(G, x), whereas the opposite problems of simultaneously maximizing all coefficients of I(G, x) among these two classes of graphs are also solved respectively. At last we characterize the graph among all the n-vertex connected graph with chromatic number \(\chi \) (resp. vertex connectivity \(\kappa \)) which simultaneously minimize all coefficients of I(G, x). Our results may deduce some known results on Merrifield–Simmons index of graphs.     

Paired-domination number of claw-free odd-regular graphs

A paired-dominating set of a graph G is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching, while the paired-domination number is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set in the graph, denoted by \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\). Let G be a connected \(\{K_{1,3}, K_{4}-e\}\)-free cubic graph of order n. We show that \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{10n+6}{27}\) if G is \(C_{4}\)-free and that \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{n}{3}+\frac{n+6}{9(\lceil \frac{3}{4}(g_o+1)\rceil +1)}\) if G is \(\{C_{4}, C_{6}, C_{10}, \ldots , C_{2g_o}\}\)-free for an odd integer \(g_o\ge 3\); the extremal graphs are characterized; we also show that if G is a 2 -connected, \(\gamma _{pr}(G) = \frac{n}{3} \). Furthermore, if G is a connected \((2k+1)\)-regular \(\{K_{1,3}, K_4-e\}\)-free graph of order n, then \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{n}{k+1} \), with equality if and only if \(G=L(F)\), where \(F\cong K_{1, 2k+2}\), or k is even and \(F\cong K_{k+1,k+2}\).     

Algorithmic aspects of <Emphasis Type="Italic">b</Emphasis>-disjunctive domination in graphs

For a fixed integer \(b>1\), a set \(D\subseteq V\) is called a b-disjunctive dominating set of the graph \(G=(V,E)\) if for every vertex \(v\in V{\setminus }D\), v is either adjacent to a vertex of D or has at least b vertices in D at distance 2 from it. The Minimum b-Disjunctive Domination Problem (MbDDP) is to find a b-disjunctive dominating set of minimum cardinality. The cardinality of a minimum b-disjunctive dominating set of G is called the b-disjunctive domination number of G, and is denoted by \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\). Given a positive integer k and a graph G, the b-Disjunctive Domination Decision Problem (bDDDP) is to decide whether G has a b-disjunctive dominating set of cardinality at most k. In this paper, we first show that for a proper interval graph G, \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\) is equal to \(\gamma (G)\), the domination number of G for \(b \ge 3\) and observe that \(\gamma _{b}^{d}(G)\) need not be equal to \(\gamma (G)\) for \(b=2\). We then propose a polynomial time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality b-disjunctive dominating set of a proper interval graph for \(b=2\). Next we tighten the NP-completeness of bDDDP by showing that it remains NP-complete even in chordal graphs. We also propose a \((\ln ({\varDelta }^{2}+(b-1){\varDelta }+b)+1)\)-approximation algorithm for MbDDP, where \({\varDelta }\) is the maximum degree of input graph \(G=(V,E)\) and prove that MbDDP cannot be approximated within \((1-\epsilon ) \ln (|V|)\) for any \(\epsilon >0\) unless NP \(\subseteq \) DTIME\((|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)})\). Finally, we show that MbDDP is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree \(\max \{b,4\}\).     

Algorithm complexity of neighborhood total domination and $$(\rho ,\gamma _{nt})$$-graphs

A neighborhood total dominating set, abbreviated for NTD-set D, is a vertex set of G such that D is a dominating set with an extra property: the subgraph induced by the open neighborhood of D has no isolated vertex. The neighborhood total domination number, denoted by \(\gamma _{nt}(G)\), is the minimum cardinality of a NTD-set in G. In this paper, we prove that NTD problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and split graphs. Then we give a linear-time algorithm to determine \(\gamma _{nt}(T)\) for a given tree T. Finally, we characterize a constructive property of \((\gamma _{nt},2\gamma )\)-trees and provide a constructive characterization for \((\rho ,\gamma _{nt})\)-graphs, where \(\gamma \) and \(\rho \) are domination number and packing number for the given graph, respectively.     

The minimum vulnerability problem on specific graph classes

Suppose that each edge e of an undirected graph G is associated with three nonnegative integers \(\mathsf{cost}(e)\), \(\mathsf{vul}(e)\) and \(\mathsf{cap}(e)\), called the cost, vulnerability and capacity of e, respectively. Then, we consider the problem of finding \(k\) paths in G between two prescribed vertices with the minimum total cost; each edge e can be shared without any cost by at most \(\mathsf{vul}(e)\) paths, and can be shared by more than \(\mathsf{vul}(e)\) paths if we pay \(\mathsf{cost}(e)\), but cannot be shared by more than \(\mathsf{cap}(e)\) paths even if we pay the cost for e. This problem generalizes the disjoint path problem, the minimum shared edges problem and the minimum edge cost flow problem for undirected graphs, and it is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, we study the problem from the viewpoint of specific graph classes, and give three results. We first show that the problem is NP-hard even for bipartite outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, graphs with pathwidth two, complete bipartite graphs, and complete graphs. We then give a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm for bounded treewidth graphs. Finally, we give a fixed-parameter algorithm for chordal graphs when parameterized by the number \(k\) of required paths.     

Neighbor product distinguishing total colorings

A total-[k]-coloring of a graph G is a mapping \(\phi : V (G) \cup E(G)\rightarrow \{1, 2, \ldots , k\}\) such that any two adjacent elements in \(V (G) \cup E(G)\) receive different colors. Let f(v) denote the product of the color of a vertex v and the colors of all edges incident to v. A total-[k]-neighbor product distinguishing-coloring of G is a total-[k]-coloring of G such that \(f(u)\ne f(v)\), where \(uv\in E(G)\). By \(\chi ^{\prime \prime }_{\prod }(G)\), we denote the smallest value k in such a coloring of G. We conjecture that \(\chi _{\prod }^{\prime \prime }(G)\le \Delta (G)+3\) for any simple graph with maximum degree \(\Delta (G)\). In this paper, we prove that the conjecture holds for complete graphs, cycles, trees, bipartite graphs and subcubic graphs. Furthermore, we show that if G is a \(K_4\)-minor free graph with \(\Delta (G)\ge 4\), then \(\chi _{\prod }^{\prime \prime }(G)\le \Delta (G)+2\).     

Neighbor sum distinguishing total coloring of graphs with bounded treewidth

A proper total k-coloring \(\phi \) of a graph G is a mapping from \(V(G)\cup E(G)\) to \(\{1,2,\dots , k\}\) such that no adjacent or incident elements in \(V(G)\cup E(G)\) receive the same color. Let \(m_{\phi }(v)\) denote the sum of the colors on the edges incident with the vertex v and the color on v. A proper total k-coloring of G is called neighbor sum distinguishing if \(m_{\phi }(u)\not =m_{\phi }(v)\) for each edge \(uv\in E(G).\) Let \(\chi _{\Sigma }^t(G)\) be the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number of a graph G. Pil?niak and Wo?niak conjectured that for any graph G, \(\chi _{\Sigma }^t(G)\le \Delta (G)+3\). In this paper, we show that if G is a graph with treewidth \(\ell \ge 3\) and \(\Delta (G)\ge 2\ell +3\), then \(\chi _{\Sigma }^t(G)\le \Delta (G)+\ell -1\). This upper bound confirms the conjecture for graphs with treewidth 3 and 4. Furthermore, when \(\ell =3\) and \(\Delta \ge 9\), we show that \(\Delta (G) + 1\le \chi _{\Sigma }^t(G)\le \Delta (G)+2\) and characterize graphs with equalities.     

Algorithms for connected <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-centdian problem on block graphs

We consider the facility location problem of locating a set \(X_p\) of p facilities (resources) on a network (or a graph) such that the subnetwork (or subgraph) induced by the selected set \(X_p\) is connected. Two problems on a block graph G are proposed: one problem is to minimizes the sum of its weighted distances from all vertices of G to \(X_p\), another problem is to minimize the maximum distance from each vertex that is not in \(X_p\) to \(X_p\) and, at the same time, to minimize the sum of its distances from all vertices of G to \(X_p\). We prove that the first problem is linearly solvable on block graphs with unit edge length. For the second problem, it is shown that the set of Pareto-optimal solutions of the two criteria has cardinality not greater than n, and can be obtained in \(O(n^2)\) time, where n is the number of vertices of the block graph G.     

The (vertex-)monochromatic index of a graph

A tree T in an edge-colored (vertex-colored) graph H is called a monochromatic (vertex-monochromatic) tree if all the edges (internal vertices) of T have the same color. For \(S\subseteq V(H)\), a monochromatic (vertex-monochromatic) S-tree in H is a monochromatic (vertex-monochromatic) tree of H containing the vertices of S. For a connected graph G and a given integer k with \(2\le k\le |V(G)|\), the k -monochromatic index \(mx_k(G)\) (k -monochromatic vertex-index \(mvx_k(G)\)) of G is the maximum number of colors needed such that for each subset \(S\subseteq V(G)\) of k vertices, there exists a monochromatic (vertex-monochromatic) S-tree. For \(k=2\), Caro and Yuster showed that \(mc(G)=mx_2(G)=|E(G)|-|V(G)|+2\) for many graphs, but it is not true in general. In this paper, we show that for \(k\ge 3\), \(mx_k(G)=|E(G)|-|V(G)|+2\) holds for any connected graph G, completely determining the value. However, for the vertex-version \(mvx_k(G)\) things will change tremendously. We show that for a given connected graph G, and a positive integer L with \(L\le |V(G)|\), to decide whether \(mvx_k(G)\ge L\) is NP-complete for each integer k such that \(2\le k\le |V(G)|\). Finally, we obtain some Nordhaus–Gaddum-type results for the k-monochromatic vertex-index.     

Equitable colorings of Cartesian products of square of cycles and paths with complete bipartite graphs

A graph G is said to be equitably k-colorable if the vertex set of G can be divided into k independent sets for which any two sets differ in size at most one. The equitable chromatic number of G, \(\chi _{=}(G)\), is the minimum k for which G is equitably k-colorable. The equitable chromatic threshold of G, \(\chi _{=}^{*}(G)\), is the minimum k for which G is equitably \(k'\)-colorable for all \(k'\ge k\). In this paper, the exact values of \(\chi _{=}^{*}(G\Box H)\) and \(\chi _{=}(G\Box H)\) are obtained when G is the square of a cycle or a path and H is a complete bipartite graph.     

On zero-sum $$\mathbb {Z}_{2j}^k$$-magic graphs

Let \(G = (V,E)\) be a finite graph and let \((\mathbb {A},+)\) be an abelian group with identity 0. Then G is \(\mathbb {A}\)-magic if and only if there exists a function \(\phi \) from E into \(\mathbb {A} - \{0\}\) such that for some \(c \in \mathbb {A}, \sum _{e \in E(v)} \phi (e) = c\) for every \(v \in V\), where E(v) is the set of edges incident to v. Additionally, G is zero-sum \(\mathbb {A}\)-magic if and only if \(\phi \) exists such that \(c = 0\). We consider zero-sum \(\mathbb {A}\)-magic labelings of graphs, with particular attention given to \(\mathbb {A} = \mathbb {Z}_{2j}^k\). For \(j \ge 1\), let \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) be the smallest positive integer c such that G is zero-sum \(\mathbb {Z}_{2j}^c\)-magic if c exists; infinity otherwise. We establish upper bounds on \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) when \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) is finite, and show that \(\zeta _{2j}(G)\) is finite for all r-regular \(G, r \ge 2\). Appealing to classical results on the factors of cubic graphs, we prove that \(\zeta _4(G) \le 2\) for a cubic graph G, with equality if and only if G has no 1-factor. We discuss the problem of classifying cubic graphs according to the collection of finite abelian groups for which they are zero-sum group-magic.     

On the algorithmic aspects of strong subcoloring

A partition of the vertex set V(G) of a graph G into \(V(G)=V_1\cup V_2\cup \cdots \cup V_k\) is called a k-strong subcoloring if \(d(x,y)\ne 2\) in G for every \(x,y\in V_i\), \(1\le i \le k\) where d(x, y) denotes the length of a shortest x-y path in G. The strong subchromatic number is defined as \(\chi _{sc}(G)=\text {min}\{ k:G \text { admits a }k\)-\(\text {strong subcoloring}\}\). In this paper, we explore the complexity status of the StrongSubcoloring problem: for a given graph G and a positive integer k, StrongSubcoloring is to decide whether G admits a k-strong subcoloring. We prove that StrongSubcoloring is NP-complete for subcubic bipartite graphs and the problem is polynomial time solvable for trees. In addition, we prove the following dichotomy results: (i) for the class of \(K_{1,r}\)-free split graphs, StrongSubcoloring is in P when \(r\le 3\) and NP-complete when \(r>3\) and (ii) for the class of H-free graphs, StrongSubcoloring is polynomial time solvable only if H is an induced subgraph of \(P_4\); otherwise the problem is NP-complete. Next, we consider a lower bound on the strong subchromatic number. A strong set is a set S of vertices of a graph G such that for every \(x,y\in S\), \(d(x,y)= 2\) in G and the cardinality of a maximum strong set in G is denoted by \(\alpha _{s}(G)\). Clearly, \(\alpha _{s}(G)\le \chi _{sc}(G)\). We consider the complexity status of the StrongSet problem: given a graph G and a positive integer k, StrongSet asks whether G contains a strong set of cardinality k. We prove that StrongSet is NP-complete for (i) bipartite graphs and (ii) \(K_{1,4}\)-free split graphs, and it is polynomial time solvable for (i) trees and (ii) \(P_4\)-free graphs.     

Sparse multipartite graphs as partition universal for graphs with bounded degree

For graphs G and H, let \(G\rightarrow (H,H)\) signify that any red/blue edge coloring of G contains a monochromatic H as a subgraph. Denote \(\mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)=\{H:|V(H)|=n,\Delta (H)\le \Delta \}\). For any \(\Delta \) and n, we say that G is partition universal for \(\mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)\) if \(G\rightarrow (H,H)\) for every \(H\in \mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)\). Let \(G_r(N,p)\) be the random spanning subgraph of the complete r-partite graph \(K_r(N)\) with N vertices in each part, in which each edge of \(K_r(N)\) appears with probability p independently and randomly. We prove that for fixed \(\Delta \ge 2\) there exist constants r, B and C depending only on \(\Delta \) such that if \(N\ge Bn\) and \(p=C(\log N/N)^{1/\Delta }\), then asymptotically almost surely \(G_r(N,p)\) is partition universal for \(\mathcal {H}(\Delta ,n)\).     

Upper bounds of proper connection number of graphs

A total weighting of a graph G is a mapping \(\phi \) that assigns a weight to each vertex and each edge of G. The vertex-sum of \(v \in V(G)\) with respect to \(\phi \) is \(S_{\phi }(v)=\sum _{e\in E(v)}\phi (e)+\phi (v)\). A total weighting is proper if adjacent vertices have distinct vertex-sums. A graph \(G=(V,E)\) is called \((k,k')\)-choosable if the following is true: If each vertex x is assigned a set L(x) of k real numbers, and each edge e is assigned a set L(e) of \(k'\) real numbers, then there is a proper total weighting \(\phi \) with \(\phi (y)\in L(y)\) for any \(y \in V \cup E\). In this paper, we prove that for any graph \(G\ne K_1\), the Mycielski graph of G is (1,4)-choosable. Moreover, we give some sufficient conditions for the Mycielski graph of G to be (1,3)-choosable. In particular, our result implies that if G is a complete bipartite graph, a complete graph, a tree, a subcubic graph, a fan, a wheel, a Halin graph, or a grid, then the Mycielski graph of G is (1,3)-choosable.     

On the difference of two generalized connectivities of a graph

The concept of k-connectivity \(\kappa '_{k}(G)\) of a graph G, introduced by Chartrand in 1984, is a generalization of the cut-version of the classical connectivity. Another generalized connectivity of a graph G, named the generalized k-connectivity \(\kappa _{k}(G)\), mentioned by Hager in 1985, is a natural generalization of the path-version of the classical connectivity. In this paper, we get the lower and upper bounds for the difference of these two parameters by showing that for a connected graph G of order n, if \(\kappa '_k(G)\ne n-k+1\) where \(k\ge 3\), then \(0\le \kappa '_k(G)-\kappa _k(G)\le n-k-1\); otherwise, \(-\lfloor \frac{k}{2}\rfloor +1\le \kappa '_k(G)-\kappa _k(G)\le n-k\). Moreover, all of these bounds are sharp. Some specific study is focused for the case \(k=3\). As results, we characterize the graphs with \(\kappa '_3(G)=\kappa _3(G)=t\) for \(t\in \{1, n-3, n-2\}\), and give a necessary condition for \(\kappa '_3(G)=\kappa _3(G)\) by showing that for a connected graph G of order n and size m, if \(\kappa '_3(G)=\kappa _3(G)=t\) where \(1\le t\le n-3\), then \(m\le {n-2\atopwithdelims ()2}+2t\). Moreover, the unique extremal graph is given for the equality to hold.     

On minimally 2-connected graphs with generalized connectivity $$\kappa _{3}=2$$

For \(S\subseteq G\), let \(\kappa (S)\) denote the maximum number r of edge-disjoint trees \(T_1, T_2, \ldots , T_r\) in G such that \(V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S\) for any \(i,j\in \{1,2,\ldots ,r\}\) and \(i\ne j\). For every \(2\le k\le n\), the k-connectivity of G, denoted by \(\kappa _k(G)\), is defined as \(\kappa _k(G)=\hbox {min}\{\kappa (S)| S\subseteq V(G)\ and\ |S|=k\}\). Clearly, \(\kappa _2(G)\) corresponds to the traditional connectivity of G. In this paper, we focus on the structure of minimally 2-connected graphs with \(\kappa _{3}=2\). Denote by \(\mathcal {H}\) the set of minimally 2-connected graphs with \(\kappa _{3}=2\). Let \(\mathcal {B}\subseteq \mathcal {H}\) and every graph in \(\mathcal {B}\) is either \(K_{2,3}\) or the graph obtained by subdividing each edge of a triangle-free 3-connected graph. We obtain that \(H\in \mathcal {H}\) if and only if \(H\in \mathcal {B}\) or H can be constructed from one or some graphs \(H_{1},\ldots ,H_{k}\) in \(\mathcal {B}\) (\(k\ge 1\)) by applying some operations recursively.