A fourth order rotatable design in four dimensions

Patel and Arap Koske (1985) gave the necessary and sufficient conditions for a set of points to form a rotatable design of order four, A set of 256 points for four factors which satisfies these conditions is given in this paper.     

On fourth order rotatable designs

Recently, Draper and Herzberg posed some open problems on fourth order rotatable designs. It has been attempted to settle these open problems.     

A fourth order rotatable design in three dimensions

The necessary and sufficient conditions for a set of points to form a rotatable design of order four have been given by Patel and Arapkoske (1985). One such set of 104 points for three factors which satisfies these conditions is given in this paper.     

Fourth order rotatability

Fourth order rotatable designs are discussed. A general k, design moment inequality is given. The variance function for two-factor designs is derived, and plotted for a specific design. A minimum point set requirement for two-factor designs is established, thus enabling one to form an infinity of such designs. Some difficulties in obtaining deLigns for k>2 are described. Some questions are posed for future work.     

Construction of fourth order rotatable designs with estimation of corresponding response surface

This paper provides the reader with a method of selectinga set of points which would form a rotatable design of order four . A fourth order response surface has been fitted and the variance function for the estimated response has been worked out.     

A measure of robust slope-rotatability for second-order response surface experimental designs

In response surface methodology, rotatability and slope-rotatability are natural and highly desirable properties for second-order regression models. In this paper a measure of robust slope-rotatability for second-order response surface designs with a general correlated error structure is developed and illustrated with different examples for autocorrelated error structure.     

A measure and a graphical method for evaluating slope rotatability in response surface designs

A measure for evaluating slope rotatability over all directions in response surface designs, is proposed. This measure is used to form slope variance dispersion graph evaluating the overall slope rotatability and the slope estimation capability of an experimental design throughout the region of interest. This graph allows for an easy comparison of competing designs.     

On D-optimal robust second order slope-rotatable designs

Das and Park (2006) introduced slope-rotatable designs overall directions for correlated observations which is known as A-optimal robust slope-rotatable designs. This article focuses D-optimal slope-rotatable designs for second-order response surface model with correlated observations. It has been established that robust second-order rotatable designs are also D-optimal robust slope-rotatable designs. A class of D-optimal robust second-order slope-rotatable designs has been derived for special correlation structures of errors.     

Symmetry in mixture experiments

Two types of symmetry can arise when the proportions of mixture components are constrained by upper and lower bounds. These two types of symmetry are shown to be useful for blocking first-order designs, as well as for finding the centroid of the experimental region. Orthogonal blocking of first-order mixture designs provides a method of including process variables in the mixture experiment, with the mixture terms orthogonal to the process factors. Symmetric regions are used to develop spherical and rotatable response surface designs for mixtures. The central composite design and designs based on the icosahedron and the dodecahedron are given for four-component mixtures. The uniform shell designs are three-level designs when applied to mixture experiments.     

Robust first-order rotatable lifetime improvement experimental designs

Experimental designs are widely used in predicting the optimal operating conditions of the process parameters in lifetime improvement experiments. The most commonly observed lifetime distributions are log-normal, exponential, gamma and Weibull. In the present article, invariant robust first-order rotatable designs are derived for autocorrelated lifetime responses having log-normal, exponential, gamma and Weibull distributions. In the process, robust first-order D-optimal and rotatable conditions have been derived under these situations. For these lifetime distributions with correlated errors, it is shown that robust first-order D-optimal designs are always robust rotatable but the converse is not true. Moreover, it is observed that robust first-order D-optimal and rotatable designs depend on the respective error variance–covariance structure but are independent from these considered lifetime response distributions.     

Response Surface Designs Where Levels of Some Factors are Difficult to Change

This article considers response surface designs in which the number of levels of some of the factors are constrained. Two general types of designs are examined: CUBE designs and STAR designs. The specific factor levels are chosen to give variance contours with a high level of sphericity, thus providing designs that are close to rotatable.     

On group divisible response surface (GDRS) designs

In this paper some experimental situations are identified corresponding to which suitable response surface designs do not exist. A class of response surface designs is introduced to cope with these situations. Their analysis with and without blocking and methods of construction is discussed.     

Experimental design for response surface gradient estimation

In this paper, a new experimental design and gradient estimation procedure is presented for Phase I response surface optimization. The design is motivated by basic principles of differential calculus, which imply that if a point in Rⁿ has been reached by exactly minimizing a function along a given direction, then the gradient of the function at that point must be orthogonal to the search direction followed. While exact line search is not required for the new design to be effective, this principle implies that the dimension of the gradient estimation procedure may often be reduced from n to n-1 variables, and the experimenter is able to concentrate experimental effort within the most productive region around the center of the design. The new design and gradient estimation procedures are presented, and bias and variance properties are derived. The effectiveness of the new design is shown to depend on the experimenter's ability to terminate line search within a near-stationary region of the line search function A simple heuristic is presented which indicates whether the new design should be used at a given experimental region.     

On some DS-optimal designs in spherical regions

For polynomial regression over spherical regions the d-th order D_s-optimal designs for the λ-th order models are derived for 1 ≤ λ ≤ d ≤ 4. Efficiencies of these designs with respect to the λ-th order D-optimal designs are obtained. The effects of estimating addtional parameters due to an m-th order model (d ≥ m >>λ) on the efficiencies are investigated.     

An investigation of first-order and second-order designs for extrapolation outside a hypersphere

Methods for selecting a first-order or second-order rotatable response surface design when both variance and bias error exist are applied to a situation in which it is desired to extrapolate the fitted model in all directions outside of a sphere within which all the experiments are to be made. The extrapolation region is a spherical shell.     

On D-optimal robust designs for lifetime improvement experiments

Locating the optimal operating conditions of the process parameters is critical in a lifetime improvement experiment. For log-normal lifetime distribution with compound error structure (i.e., symmetry, inter-class and intra-class correlation error structures), we have developed methods for construction of D-optimal robust first order designs. It is shown that D-optimal robust first order designs are always robust first order rotatable but the converse is not always true.     

Testing for order among K populations: theory and examples

Testing for stochastic order among K populations is a common and important problem in statistical practice. It arises in the analysis of both planned experiments and observational studies. The authors develop a new nonparametric test for order among K populations that can accommodate any stochastic ordering. The test is based on a maximally selected chi‐bar‐square statistic. The authors find its limiting distribution and use simulations to derive critical values. Three important examples are used to illustrate the applicability of the general method. The authors find that the new tests outperform the existing methods in many practical cases. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 38: 97–115; 2010 © 2009 Statistical Society of Canada     

Response surface methodology in quality improvement

Recent work has lead to development of robust parameter design which alleviates criticisms of the Taguchi approach. A dual response surface approach is discussed and illustrated.     

On Second-Order A-, D- and E-Minimax Designs for Estimating Slopes in Extrapolation and Restricted Interpolation Regions

Summary

The concepts of D-, A- and E-minimax optimality criteria of designs for estimating the slopes of a response surface are considered for situations where the region of interest may not be identical to the experimental region. Optimal second-order designs are derived for the situation where the experimental region and the region of interest are both hyperspherical with a common centre. The dependence of the optimal design on the relative sizes of the regions is investigated. Further, the perfomance of designs optimal for one region in estimating slopes in other regions is also examined.     

A NEW MEASURE OF ROTATABILITY OF RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS

This paper proposes a new measure of rotatability of a response surface design. It is based on a comparison between the design moments of a given design and the design moments of a rotatable design closest to the given design in the least squares sense. This measure is easier to calculate than Khur?s measure. An alternative easier non-geometrical way of deriving Khuri's measure is also presented. Both measures are calculated to illustrate some designs considered by Khuri.