Pitman Closeness of Order Statistics to Population Quantiles

In this article, Pitman closeness of sample order statistics to population quantiles of a location-scale family of distributions is discussed. Explicit expressions are derived for some specific families such as uniform, exponential, and power function. Numerical results are then presented for these families for sample sizes n = 10,15, and for the choices of p = 0.10, 0.25, 0.75, 0.90. The Pitman-closest order statistic is also determined in these cases and presented.     

On Pitman's measure of closeness of k-records

Pitman closeness of both the upper and lower k-record statistics to the population quantiles of a location–scale family of distributions is studied. For the population median, the Pitman-closest k-record is also determined. In the case of symmetric distributions, the Pitman closeness probabilities of k-record statistics are shown to be distribution-free, and explicit expressions are also derived for these probabilities. Exact expressions are derived for the required probabilities for uniform and exponential distributions. Numerical results are given for these families and also the Pitman-closest k-record is determined.     

A note on Pitman's measure of closeness with balanced loss function

In this note, we consider the problem of estimating an unknown parameter θ in the sense of the Pitman's measure of closeness (PMC) using the balanced loss function (BLF). We show that the PMC comparison of estimators under the BLF can be reduced to the PMC comparison under the usual absolute error loss. The Pitman-closest estimators of the location and scale parameters under BLF are also characterized. Illustrative examples are given to show the broad range applications of the obtained results.     

Comparison of preliminary test estimators based on generalized order statistics from proportional hazard family using Pitman measure of closeness

In this article, based on generalized order statistics from a family of proportional hazard rate model, we use a statistical test to generate a class of preliminary test estimators and shrinkage preliminary test estimators for the proportionality parameter. These estimators are compared under Pitman measure of closeness (PMC) as well as MSE criteria. Although the PMC suffers from non transitivity, in the first class of estimators, it has the transitivity property and we obtain the Pitman-closest estimator. Analytical and graphical methods are used to show the range of parameter in which preliminary test and shrinkage preliminary test estimators perform better than their competitor estimators. Results reveal that when the prior information is not too far from its real value, the proposed estimators are superior based on both mentioned criteria.     

Pitman comparisons of predictors of censored observations from progressively censored samples for exponential distribution

On the basis of a progressively censored sample, Basak et al. [On some predictors of times to failure of censored items in progressively censored samples. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2006;50:1313 –1337] considered the problem of predicting the unobserved censored units at various stages of progressive censoring. They then discussed several different point predictors of these censored units and compared them with respect to mean square prediction error. In this work, we use the Pitman closeness (PC) criterion to compare the maximum likelihood, best linear unbiased, best linear equivariant, and conditional median predictors (CMPs) of these progressively censored units. Next, we compare all these with respect to the median unbiased predictor in terms of PC. Numerical computations are then performed to compare all these predictors. By comparing our results to those of Basak et al. (2006), we note that our findings in the sense of PC are similar to theirs in which the CMP competes well when compared to all other predictors.     

Robust Bayesian prediction under a general linear-exponential posterior risk function and its application in finite population

We consider robust Bayesian prediction of a function of unobserved data based on observed data under an asymmetric loss function. Under a general linear-exponential posterior risk function, the posterior regret gamma-minimax (PRGM), conditional gamma-minimax (CGM), and most stable (MS) predictors are obtained when the prior distribution belongs to a general class of prior distributions. We use this general form to find the PRGM, CGM, and MS predictors of a general linear combination of the finite population values under LINEX loss function on the basis of two classes of priors in a normal model. Also, under the general ε-contamination class of prior distributions, the PRGM predictor of a general linear combination of the finite population values is obtained. Finally, we provide a real-life example to predict a finite population mean and compare the estimated risk and risk bias of the obtained predictors under the LINEX loss function by a simulation study.     

Pitman closeness,monotonicity and consistency of best linear unbiased and invariant estimators for exponential distribution under Type II censoring

Comparisons of best linear unbiased estimators with some other prominent estimators have been carried out over the last 50 years since the ground breaking work of Lloyd [E.H. Lloyd, Least squares estimation of location and scale parameters using order statistics, Biometrika 39 (1952), pp. 88–95]. These comparisons have been made under many different criteria across different parametric families of distributions. A noteworthy one is by Nagaraja [H.N. Nagaraja, Comparison of estimators and predictors from two-parameter exponential distribution, Sankhyā Ser. B 48 (1986), pp. 10–18], who made a comparison of best linear unbiased (BLUE) and best linear invariant (BLIE) estimators in the case of exponential distribution. In this paper, continuing along the same lines by assuming a Type II right censored sample from a scaled-exponential distribution, we first compare BLUE and BLIE of the exponential mean parameter in terms of Pitman closeness (nearness) criterion. We show that the BLUE is always Pitman closer than the BLIE. Next, we introduce the notions of Pitman monotonicity and Pitman consistency, and then establish that both BLUE and BLIE possess these two properties.     

Restricted estimation and testing of hypothesis in linear measurement errors models

ABSTRACT

In this article, the linear models with measurement error both in the response and in the covariates are considered. Following Shalabh et al. (2007 Shalabh, Garg, G., Misra, N. (2007). Restricted regression estimation in measurement error models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52:1149–1166.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2009 Shalabh, Garg, G., Misra, N. (2009). Use of prior information in the consistent estimation of regression coefficients in measurement error models. J. Multivariate Anal. 100:1498–1520.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we propose several restricted estimators for the regression coefficients. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the restricted estimators are established. Furthermore, we also discuss the superiority of the restricted estimators to unrestricted estimators under Pitman closeness criterion. We also develop several variance estimators and establish their asymptotic distributions. Wald-type statistics are constructed for testing the linear restrictions. Finally, Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to illustrate the finite-sample properties of the proposed estimators.     

Unbiasedness of two-stage estimation and prediction procedures for mixed linear models

The traditional method for estimating or predicting linear combinations of the fixed effects and realized values of the random effects in mixed linear models is first to estimate the variance components and then to proceed as if the estimated values of the variance components were the true values. This two-stage procedure gives unbiased estimators or predictors of the linear combinations provided the data vector is symmetrically distributed about its expected value and provided the variance component estimators are translation-invariant and are even functions of the data vector. The standard procedures for estimating the variance components yield even, translation-invariant estimators.     

Simultaneous equivariant estimation of the parameters of linear models

Consider a family of distributions which is invariant under a group of transformations. In this paper, we define an optimality criterion with respect to an arbitrary convex loss function and we prove a characterization theorem for an equivariant estimator to be optimal. Then we consider a linear model Y=Xβ+ε, in which ε has a multivariate distribution with mean vector zero and has a density belonging to a scale family with scale parameter σ. Also we assume that the underlying family of distributions is invariant with respect to a certain group of transformations. First, we find the class of all equivariant estimators of regression parameters and the powers of σ. By using the characterization theorem we discuss the simultaneous equivariant estimation of the parameters of the linear model.     

Predicting random effects with an expanded finite population mixed model

Prediction of random effects is an important problem with expanding applications. In the simplest context, the problem corresponds to prediction of the latent value (the mean) of a realized cluster selected via two-stage sampling. Recently, Stanek and Singer [Predicting random effects from finite population clustered samples with response error. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99, 119–130] developed best linear unbiased predictors (BLUP) under a finite population mixed model that outperform BLUPs from mixed models and superpopulation models. Their setup, however, does not allow for unequally sized clusters. To overcome this drawback, we consider an expanded finite population mixed model based on a larger set of random variables that span a higher dimensional space than those typically applied to such problems. We show that BLUPs for linear combinations of the realized cluster means derived under such a model have considerably smaller mean squared error (MSE) than those obtained from mixed models, superpopulation models, and finite population mixed models. We motivate our general approach by an example developed for two-stage cluster sampling and show that it faithfully captures the stochastic aspects of sampling in the problem. We also consider simulation studies to illustrate the increased accuracy of the BLUP obtained under the expanded finite population mixed model.     

Bayesian pitman closeness

The present article brings in the notion of Posterior Pitman Closeness (PPC) in contrast to the usual Pitman Closeness (PC) criterion. Unlike the PC criterion, the PPC criterion does not suffer from lack of transitivity. Also, a posterior median is usually a posterior Pitman closest estimator of the parameter of interest. Examples are provided to illustrate these ideas. Also, some multivariate analogs of these results are presented.     

Two-sample Pitman closeness comparison under progressive Type-II censoring

In this paper, we consider two problems concerning two independent progressively Type-II censored samples. We first consider the Pitman closeness (PC) of order statistics from two independent progressively censored samples to a specific population quantile. We then consider the point prediction of a future progressively censored order statistic and discuss the determination of the closest progressively censored order statistic from the current sample according to the simultaneous closeness probabilities. For both these problems, explicit expressions are derived for the pertinent PC probabilities, and then special cases are given as examples. For various censoring schemes, we also present numerical results for the standard uniform, standard exponential, and standard normal distributions. Finally, a distribution-free result for the median is obtained.     

Mean square error behavior for prediction in linear regression models

For the problem of individual prediction in linear regression models, that is, estimation of a linear combination of regression coefficients, mean square error behavior of a general class of adaptive predictors is examined.     

Model robust confidence intervals

Confidence intervals are constructed for real-valued parameter estimation in a general regression model with normal errors. When the error variance is known these intervals are optimal (in the sense of minimizing length subject to guaranteed probability of coverage) among all intervals estimates which are centered at a linear estimate of the parameter. When the error variance is unknown and the regression model is an approximately linear model (a class of models which permits bounded systematic departures from an underlying ideal model) then an independent estimate of variance is found and the intervals can then be appropriately scaled.     

Effects of the estimation of covariance matrix parameters in the generalized multivariate linear model

We Consider the generalized multivariate linear model and assume the covariance matrix of the p x 1 vector of responses on a given individual can be represented in the general linear structure form described by Anderson (1973). The effects of the use of estimates of the parameters of the covariance matrix on the generalized least squares estimator of the regression coefficients and on the prediction of a portion of a future vector, when only the first portion of the vector has been observed, are investigated. Approximations are derived for the covariance matrix of the generalized least squares estimator and for the mean square error matrix of the usual predictor, for the practical case where estimated parameters are used.     

A Geometric Examination of Linear Model Assumptions

From a geometric perspective, linear model theory relies on a single assumption, that (‘corrected’) data vector directions are uniformly distributed in Euclidean space. We use this perspective to explore pictorially the effects of violations of the traditional assumptions (normality, independence and homogeneity of variance) on the Type I error rate. First, for several non‐normal distributions we draw geometric pictures and carry out simulations to show how the effects of non‐normality diminish with increased parent distribution symmetry and continuity, and increased sample size. Second, we explore the effects of dependencies on Type I error rate. Third, we use simulation and geometry to investigate the effect of heterogeneity of variance on Type I error rate. We conclude, in a fresh way, that independence and homogeneity of variance are more important assumptions than normality. The practical implication is that statisticians and authors of statistical computing packages need to pay more attention to the correctness of these assumptions than to normality.     

PREDICTION OF THE FINITE POPULATION DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION UNDER GAUSSIAN SUPERPOPULATION MODELS

This article considers optimal prediction of the finite population distribution function under Gaussian superpopulation models, which allows auxiliary prior information to be incorporated into the estimation process. Large sample approximations for the variance of the optimal predictors are derived in some special important cases. A small scale Monte Carlo study illustrates comparisons between the optimal predictor and some others which are proposed in the literature. The conclusion is that the optimal predictor can be considerably more efficient in situations where the normal superpopulation model is adequate.     

Simple principal components

We introduce an algorithm for producing simple approximate principal components directly from a variance–covariance matrix. At the heart of the algorithm is a series of 'simplicity preserving' linear transformations. Each transformation seeks a direction within a two-dimensional subspace that has maximum variance. However, the choice of directions is limited so that the direction can be represented by a vector of integers whenever the subspace can also be represented by vector if integers. The resulting approximate components can therefore always be represented by integers. Furthermore the elements of these integer vectors are often small, particularly for the first few components. We demonstrate the performance of this algorithm on two data sets and show that good approximations to the principal components that are also clearly simple and interpretable can result.     

Modeling nonlinear time series with local mixtures of generalized linear models

The authors consider a novel class of nonlinear time series models based on local mixtures of regressions of exponential family models, where the covariates include functions of lags of the dependent variable. They give conditions to guarantee consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator for correctly specified models, with stationary and nonstationary predictors. They show that consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator still holds under model misspecification. They also provide probabilistic results for the proposed model when the vector of predictors contains only lags of transformations of the modeled time series. They illustrate the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator and the probabilistic properties via Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, they present an application using real data.