Sequential confidence intervals for the number of cells in a multinomial population

A two-sided sequential confidence interval is suggested for the number of equally probable cells in a given multinomial population with prescribed width and confidence coefficient. We establish large-sample properties of the fixed-width confidence interval procedure using a normal approximation, and some comparisons are made. In addition, a simulation study is carried out in order to investigate the finite sample behaviour of the suggested sequential interval estimation procedure.     

Lower confidence bounds for percentiles of weibull and birnbaum-saunders distributions

Approximate lower confidence bounds on percentiles of the Weibull and the Birnbaum-Saunders distributions are investigated. Asymptotic lower confidence bounds based on Bonferroni's inequality and the Fisher information are discussed, and parametric bootstrap methods to provide better bounds are considered. Since the standard percentile bootstrap method typically does not perform well for confidence bounds on quantiles, several other bootstrap procedures are studied via extensive computer simulations. Results of the simulations indicate that the bootstrap methods generally give sharper lower bounds than the Bonferroni bounds but with coverages still near the nominal confidence level. Two illustrative examples are also presented, one for tensile strength of carbon micro-composite specimens and the other for cycles-to-failure data.     

Pseudo‐empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for complex surveys

The authors show how an adjusted pseudo‐empirical likelihood ratio statistic that is asymptotically distributed as a chi‐square random variable can be used to construct confidence intervals for a finite population mean or a finite population distribution function from complex survey samples. They consider both non‐stratified and stratified sampling designs, with or without auxiliary information. They examine the behaviour of estimates of the mean and the distribution function at specific points using simulations calling on the Rao‐Sampford method of unequal probability sampling without replacement. They conclude that the pseudo‐empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals are superior to those based on the normal approximation, whether in terms of coverage probability, tail error rates or average length of the intervals.     

Clustering confidence sets

In this article, we present a novel approach to clustering finite or infinite dimensional objects observed with different uncertainty levels. The novelty lies in using confidence sets rather than point estimates to obtain cluster membership and the number of clusters based on the distance between the confidence set estimates. The minimal and maximal distances between the confidence set estimates provide confidence intervals for the true distances between objects. The upper bounds of these confidence intervals can be used to minimize the within clustering variability and the lower bounds can be used to maximize the between clustering variability. We assign objects to the same cluster based on a min–max criterion and we separate clusters based on a max–min criterion. We illustrate our technique by clustering a large number of curves and evaluate our clustering procedure with a synthetic example and with a specific application.     

Simultaneous upper confidence bounds for distances from the best two-parameter exponentlal distribution

Consider k independent exponential distributions possibly with different location parameters and a common scale parameter. If the best population is defined to be the one having the largest mean or equivalently having the largest location parameter, we then derive a set of simultaneous upper confidence bounds for all distances of the means from the largest one. These bounds not only can serve as confidence intervals for all distances from the largest parameter but they also can be used to identify the best population. Relationships to ranking and selection procedures are pointed out. Cases in which scale parameters are known or unknown and samples are complete or type II censored are considered. Tables to implement this procedure are given.     

On confidence bounds for one-parameter exponential families

There exist various methods for providing confidence intervals for unknown parameters of interest on the basis of a random sample. Generally, the bounds are derived from a system of non-linear equations. In this article, we present a general solution to obtain an unbiased confidence interval with confidence coefficient 1 ? α in one-parameter exponential families. Also we discuss two Bayesian credible intervals, the highest posterior density (HPD) and relative surprise (RS) credible intervals. Standard criteria like the coverage length and coverage probability are used to assess the performance of the HPD and RS credible intervals. Simulation studies and real data applications are presented for illustrative purposes.     

Jackknife variances and confidence intervals of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator

In the situation of stratified 2×2 tables, consitency of two different jackknife variances of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator is discussed in the case of increasing sample sizes, but a fixed number of strata. Different principles for constructing confidence limits for the common odds ratio are investigated from a theoretical point of view with regard to the position and the length of the resulting intervals. Monte Carlo experiments compare the finite sample performance of the consistent jackknife variance with that of other noniterative variance estimators. In addition, the properties of these variance estimators are investigated when used for confidence interval estimation.     

Lower confidence bounds as precision measure for truncated processes

Process capability index C_p has been the most popular one used in the manufacturing industry to provide numerical measures on process precision. For normally distributed processes with automatic fully inspections, the inspected processes follow truncated normal distributions. In this article, we provide the formulae of moments used for the Edgeworth approximation on the precision measurement C_p for truncated normally distributed processes. Based on the developed moments, lower confidence bounds with various sample sizes and confidence levels are provided and tabulated. Consequently, practitioners can use lower confidence bounds to determine whether their manufacturing processes are capable of preset precision requirements.     

Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the mean of a population containing many zero values

If a population contains many zero values and the sample size is not very large, the traditional normal approximation‐based confidence intervals for the population mean may have poor coverage probabilities. This problem is substantially reduced by constructing parametric likelihood ratio intervals when an appropriate mixture model can be found. In the context of survey sampling, however, there is a general preference for making minimal assumptions about the population under study. The authors have therefore investigated the coverage properties of nonparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the population mean. They show that under a variety of hypothetical populations, these intervals often outperformed parametric likelihood intervals by having more balanced coverage rates and larger lower bounds. The authors illustrate their methodology using data from the Canadian Labour Force Survey for the year 2000.     

Distribution-dependent and distribution-free confidence intervals for the variance

Finding an interval estimation procedure for the variance of a population that achieves a specified confidence level can be problematic. If the distribution of the population is known, then a distribution-dependent interval for the variance can be obtained by considering a power transformation of the sample variance. Simulation results suggest that this method produces intervals for the variance that maintain the nominal probability of coverage for a wide variety of distributions. If the underlying distribution is unknown, then the power itself must be estimated prior to forming the endpoints of the interval. The result is a distribution-free confidence interval estimator of the population variance. Simulation studies indicate that the power transformation method compares favorably to the logarithmic transformation method and the nonparametric bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method for moderately sized samples. However, two applications, one in forestry and the other in health sciences, demonstrate that no single method is best for all scenarios.     

On lower confidence bounds for pcs in truncated location parameter models

We are concerned with deriving lower confidence bounds for the probability of a correct selection in truncated location-parameter models. Two cases are considered according to whether the scale parameter is known or unknown. For each case, a lower confidence bound for the difference between the best and the second best is obtained. These lower confidence bounds are used to construct lower confidence bounds for the probability of a correct selection. The results are then applied to the problem of seleting the best exponential populationhaving the largest truncated location-parameter. Useful tables are provided for implementing the proposed methods.     

An improved score-type confidence interval for stratified risk differences involving rare events

A stratified analysis of the differences in proportions has been widely employed in epidemiological research, social sciences, and drug development. It provides a useful framework for combining data across strata to produce a common effect. However, for rare events with incidence rates close to zero, popular confidence intervals for risk differences in a stratified analysis may not have appropriate coverage probabilities that approach the nominal confidence levels and the algorithms may fail to produce a valid confidence interval because of zero events in both the arms of a stratum. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of certain methods commonly employed to construct confidence intervals for stratified risk differences when the response probabilities are close to a boundary value of zero or one. Additionally, we propose an improved stratified Miettinen–Nurminen confidence interval that exhibits a superior performance over standard methods while avoiding computational difficulties involving rare events. The proposed method can also be employed when the response probabilities are close to one.     

A program to calculate bootstrap confidence intervals for the process capability index Cpk

Franklin and Wasserman (1991) introduced the use of Bootstrap sampling procedures for deriving nonparametric confidence intervals for the process capability index, C_pk, which are applicable for instances when at least twenty data points are available. This represents a significant reduction in the usually recommended sample requirement of 100 observations (see Gunther 1989). To facilitate and encourage the use of these procedures. a FORTRAN program is provided for computation of confidence intervals for C_pk. Three methods are provided for this calculation including the standard method, the percentile confidence interval, and the biased - corrected percentile confidence interval.     

Two stage fixed width confidence intervals for the common location parameter of several exponential distributins

Two stage sampling schemes are introduced for use in estimating the common location parameter (guarantee time) of two or more exponential distributions with a confidence interval of prespecified width whose coverage probability is at least a given nominal value. Exact expressions for all moments of order r ≥ 1 of the associated two stage sample sizes and for the actual coverage probabilities are derived. The performance of the procedures in a variety of two population, moderate fixed sample size cases is examined via numerical studies involving both exact calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. No new tables are needed to implement any of the proposed methods. A modified two stage procedure is recommended for practical use     

Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies

Tmax is the time associated with the maximum serum or plasma drug concentration achieved following a dose. While Tmax is continuous in theory, it is usually discrete in practice because it is equated to a nominal sampling time in the noncompartmental pharmacokinetics approach. For a 2-treatment crossover design, a Hodges-Lehmann method exists for a confidence interval on treatment differences. For appropriately designed crossover studies with more than two treatments, a new median-scaling method is proposed to obtain estimates and confidence intervals for treatment effects. A simulation study was done comparing this new method with two previously described rank-based nonparametric methods, a stratified ranks method and a signed ranks method due to Ohrvik. The Normal theory, a nonparametric confidence interval approach without adjustment for periods, and a nonparametric bootstrap method were also compared. Results show that less dense sampling and period effects cause increases in confidence interval length. The Normal theory method can be liberal (i.e. less than nominal coverage) if there is a true treatment effect. The nonparametric methods tend to be conservative with regard to coverage probability and among them the median-scaling method is least conservative and has shortest confidence intervals. The stratified ranks method was the most conservative and had very long confidence intervals. The bootstrap method was generally less conservative than the median-scaling method, but it tended to have longer confidence intervals. Overall, the median-scaling method had the best combination of coverage and confidence interval length. All methods performed adequately with respect to bias.     

Sample-size requirements for confidence bounds of prescribed precision on multivariate normal quantiles

The problem of setting confidence bounds on a central multivariate normal quantile is considered. It is shown that for the setting of exact confidence bounds of specified closeness to the quantile,the required minimum size of a normal sample is large and rises rapidly with the number of variates considered.     

The graphical advantages of finite interval confidence band procedures

When presented as graphical illustrations, regression surface confidence bands for linear statistical models quickly convey detailed information about analysis results. A taut confidence band is a compact set of curves which are estimation candidates for the unobservable, fixed regression curve. The bounds of the band are usually plotted with the estimated regression curve and may be overlaid by a scatter-plot of the data to provide an integrated visual impression. Finite-interval confidence bands offer the advantages of clearer interpretation and improved efficiency and avoid visual ambiguities inherent to infinite-interval bands. The definitive characteristic of a finite-interval confidence band is that it is only necessary to plot it over a finite interval in order to visually communicate all its information. In contrast, visual representations of infinite-interval bands are not fully informative and can be misleading. When an infinite-interval band is plotted, and therefore truncated, substantial information given by its asymptotic behavior is lost. Many curves that are clearly within the plotted portion of the infinite interval confidence band eventually cross a boundary. In practice, a finite-interval band can always be easily obtained from any infinite-interval band. This article focuses on interpretational considerations of symmetric confidence bands as graphical devices.     

Using adaptive weighted least squares to reduce the lengths of confidence intervals

The author proposes an adaptive method which produces confidence intervals that are often narrower than those obtained by the traditional procedures. The proposed methods use both a weighted least squares approach to reduce the length of the confidence interval and a permutation technique to insure that its coverage probability is near the nominal level. The author reports simulations comparing the adaptive intervals to the traditional ones for the difference between two population means, for the slope in a simple linear regression, and for the slope in a multiple linear regression having two correlated exogenous variables. He is led to recommend adaptive intervals for sample sizes superior to 40 when the error distribution is not known to be Gaussian.     

Constructing quantile confidence intervals using extended simple random sample in finite populations

This paper constructs quantile confidence intervals based on extended simple random sample (SRS) from a finite population, where ranks of population units are all known. Extended simple random sample borrows additional information from unmeasured observations in the population by conditioning on the population ranks of the measured units in SRS. The confidence intervals are improved using Rao-Blackwell theorem over the conditional distribution of sample ranks given the measured sample units. Empirical evidence shows that the proposed confidence intervals have shorter lengths than confidence intervals constructed from an SRS sample.