Classification into two normal populations with a common mean and unequal variances

The problem of classification into two univariate normal populations with a common mean is considered. Several classification rules are proposed based on efficient estimators of the common mean. Detailed numerical comparisons of probabilities of misclassifications using these rules have been carried out. It is shown that the classification rule based on the Graybill-Deal estimator of the common mean performs the best. Classification rules are also proposed for the case when variances are assumed to be ordered. Comparison of these rules with the rule based on the Graybill-Deal estimator has been done with respect to individual probabilities of misclassification.     

An estimator of the common mean of two normal populations

In this paper we consider the estimation of the common mean of two normal populations when the variances are unknown. If it is known that one specified variance is smaller than the other, then it is possible to modify the Graybill-Deal estimator in order to obtain a more efficient estimator. One such estimator is proposed by Mehta and Gurland (1969). We prove that this estimator is more efficient than the Graybill-Deal estimator under the condition that one variance is known to be less than the other.     

Bounds for the variance of the graybill-deal estimator of the common mean of two normal distributions

In this note we derive sharp lower and upper bounds for the variance of the Graybill-Deal estimator of the common mean of two normal distributions with unknown variances when the sample sizes are not necessarily equal. We also derive similar bounds for the variance of the Brown-Cohen (1974) T _a(1) class of unbiased es-timators to which the Graybill-Deal estimator belongs. Further, we illustrate the sharpness of the bounds by numerical computations in the case of the Graybill-Deal estimator.     

A note on the common mean of two normal populations with order restricted variances

Consider the problem of estimating the common mean of two normal populations when the order of the unknown variances is known. In this article we have constructed a simple improved estimator which is better than the usual Graybill-Deal estimator in terms of stochastic domination.     

Unbiased estimation of the variance of the Graybill-Deal estimator of the common mean of several normal populations

An identity for the chi-squared distribution is used to derive an unbiased estimator of the variance of the familiar Graybill-Deal (1959) estimator of the common mean of several normal populations with possibly different unknown variances. This result appears to be new. It is observed that the unbiased estimator is a convergent series whose suitable truncation allows unbiased estimation up to any desired degree of accuracy.     

Risk performance of a pre-test estimator for normal variance with the Stein-variance estimator under the LINEX loss function

In this paper, we derive the exact formula of the risk function of a pre-test estimator for normal variance with the Stein-variance (PTSV) estimator when the asymmetric LINEX loss function is used. Fixing the critical value of the pre-test to unity which is a suggested critical value in some sense, we examine numerically the risk performance of the PTSV estimator based on the risk function derived. Our numerical results show that although the PTSV estimator does not dominate the usual variance estimator when under-estimation is more severe than over-estimation, the PTSV estimator dominates the usual variance estimator when over-estimation is more severe. It is also shown that the dominance of the PTSV estimator over the original Stein-variance estimator is robust to the extension from the quadratic loss function to the LINEX loss function.     

OPTIMAL CRITICAL VALUES FOR A PRELIMINARY TEST IN POOLING MEANS

Given two random samples from normal populations with the same known variance, the experimenter wishes to estimate the mean of the fist population. Whether to pool the two samples or not is made to depend on the result of a preliminary normal test. The bias and mean square error of the pre-test estimator are presented. Based on two different criteria, a minimax regret and a minimum expected regret ones, the optimal critical values for the pre-test are given. The minimax regret value is unique (about 1.37), while the alternative values vary depending on the mean and precision included in the prior distribution.     

The exact risk performance of a pre-test estimator in a heteroskedastic linear regression model under the balanced loss function

We examine the risk of a pre-test estimator for regression coefficients after a pre-test for homoskedasticity under the Balanced Loss Function (BLF). We show analytically that the two stage Aitken estimator is dominated by the pre-test estimator with the critical value of unity, even if the BLF is used. We also show numerically that both the two stage Aitken estimator and the pre-test estimator can be dominated by the ordinary least squares estimator when “goodness of fit” is regarded as more important than precision of estimation.     

THE OPTIMAL CRITICAL VALUE OF A PRE-TEST FOR AN INEQUALITY RESTRICTION IN A MIS-SPECIFIED REGRESSION MODEL

Optimal critical values are derived for a pre-test of an inequality restriction in a model where relevant regressors are unwittingly omitted. The criterion adopted is either that of the minimum average relative risk, or that of the mini-max regret. The latter approach yields an optimal critical value which is sensitive to the degree of model mis-specification, while the former criterion always leads to the choice of the unrestricted estimator.     

Optimal estimation for finite population mean in two-phase sampling

Using two-phase sampling scheme, we propose a general class of estimators for finite population mean. This class depends on the sample means and variances of two auxiliary variables. The minimum variance bound for any estimator in the class is provided (up to terms of ordern ⁻¹). It is also proved that there exists at least a chain regression type estimator which reaches this minimum. Finally, it is shown that other proposed estimators can reach the minimum variance bound, i.e. the optimal estimator is not unique.     

Empirical Bayes estimation for the mean of the selected normal population when there are additional data

ABSTRACT

This paper is concerned with the problem of estimation for the mean of the selected population from two normal populations with unknown means and common known variance in a Bayesian framework. The empirical Bayes estimator, when there are available additional observations, is derived and its bias and risk function are computed. The expected bias and risk of the empirical Bayes estimator and the intuitive estimator are compared. It is shown that the empirical Bayes estimator is asymptotically optimal and especially dominates the intuitive estimator in terms of Bayes risk, with respect to any normal prior. Also, the Bayesian correlation between the mean of the selected population (random parameter) and some interested estimators are obtained and compared.     

A new estimator combining the ridge regression and the restricted least squares methods of estimation

It is well-known in the literature on multicollinearity that one of the major consequences of multicollinearity on the ordinary least squares estimator is that the estimator produces large sampling variances, which in turn might inappropriately lead to exclusion of otherwise significant coefficients from the model. To circumvent this problem, two accepted estimation procedures which are often suggested are the restricted least squares method and the ridge regression method. While the former leads to a reduction in the sampling variance of the estimator, the later ensures a smaller mean square error value for the estimator. In this paper we have proposed a new estimator which is based on a criterion that combines the ideas underlying these two estimators. The standard properties of this new estimator have been studied in the paper. It has also been shown that this estimator is superior to both the restricted least squares as well as the ordinary ridge regression estimators by the criterion of mean sauare error of the estimator of the regression coefficients when the restrictions are indeed correct. The conditions for superiority of this estimator over the other two have also been derived for the situation when the restrictions are not correct.     

Estimation of the scale parameter after a pre-test for homogeneity in a mis-specified regression model

The risk properties of estimators of the scale parameter after a pre-test for homogeneity of the error variances in the two sample linear regression model has received quite an amount of attention in the literature. This literature typically assumes normal disturbances and a properly specified model. In this paper we consider that both equations may be mis-specified by the omission of relevant regressors and that the error distributions may belong to a wider class than the normal distribution. We derive and analyse the exact risk (under quadratic loss) of the pre-test estimator of the scale parameter for the first sub-sample.     

Risk behavior of a pre-test estimator for normal variance with the Stein-type estimator

In this paper, we examine the risk behavior of a pre-test estimator for normal variance with the Stein-type estimator. The one-sided pre-test is conducted for the null hypothesis that the population variance is equal to a specific value, and the Stein-type estimator is used if the null hypothesis is rejected. A sufficient condition for the pre-test estimator to dominate the Stein-type estimator is shown.     

Minimum,maximum, and average spherical prediction variances for central composite and box-behnken designs

Single value design optimality criteria are often considered when selecting a response surface design. An alternative to a single value criterion is to evaluate prediction variance properties throughout the experimental region and to graphically display the results in a variance dispersion graph (VDG) (Giovannitti-Jensen and Myers (1989)). Three properties of interest are the spherical average, maximum, and minimum prediction variances. Currently, a computer-intensive optimization algorithm is utilized to evaluate these prediction variance properties. It will be shown that the average, maximum, and minimum spherical prediction variances for central composite designs and Box-Behnken designs can be derived analytically. These three prediction variances can be expressed as functions of the radius and the design parameters. These functions provide exact spherical prediction variance values eliminating the implementation of extensive computing involving algorithms which do not guarantee convergence. This research is concerned with the theoretical development of these analytical forms. Results are presented for hyperspherical and hypercuboidal regions.     

EXACT FINITE-SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF A PRE-TEST ESTIMATOR IN RIDGE REGRESSION

This paper discusses a pre-test regression estimator which uses the least squares estimate when it is “large” and a ridge regression estimate for “small” regression coefficients, where the preliminary test is applied separately to each regression coefficient in turn to determine whether it is “large” or “small.” For orthogonal regressors, the exact finite-sample bias and mean squared error of the pre-test estimator are derived. The latter is less biased than a ridge estimator, and over much of the parameter space the pre-test estimator has smaller mean squared error than least squares. A ridge estimator is found to be inferior to the pre-test estimator in terms of mean squared error in many situations, and at worst the latter estimator is only slightly less efficient than the former at commonly used significance levels.     

Risk of a homoscedasticity pre-test estimator of the regression scale under LINEX loss

In this paper we consider the risk of an estimator of the error variance after a pre-test for homoscedasticity of the variances in the two-sample heteroscedastic linear regression model. This particular pre-test problem has been well investigated but always under the restrictive assumption of a squared error loss function. We consider an asymmetric loss function — the LINEX loss function — and derive the exact risks of various estimators of the error variance.     

Tests for Comparing Mark-Specific Hazards and Cumulative Incidence Functions

It is of interest in some applications to determine whether there is a relationship between a hazard rate function (or a cumulative incidence function) and a mark variable which is only observed at uncensored failure times. We develop nonparametric tests for this problem when the mark variable is continuous. Tests are developed for the null hypothesis that the mark-specific hazard rate is independent of the mark versus ordered and two-sided alternatives expressed in terms of mark-specific hazard functions and mark-specific cumulative incidence functions. The test statistics are based on functionals of a bivariate test process equal to a weighted average of differences between a Nelson-Aalen-type estimator of the mark-specific cumulative hazard function and a nonparametric estimator of this function under the null hypothesis. The weight function in the test process can be chosen so that the test statistics are asymptotically distribution-free. Asymptotically correct critical values are obtained through a simple simulation procedure. The testing procedures are shown to perform well in numerical studies, and are illustrated with an AIDS clinical trial example. Specifically, the tests are used to assess if the instantaneous or absolute risk of treatment failure depends on the amount of accumulation of drug resistance mutations in a subject's HIV virus. This assessment helps guide development of anti-HIV therapies that surmount the problem of drug resistance.     

Minimaxity of empirical bayes estimators of the means of independent normal variables with unequal variances

The problem of simultaneous estimation of normal means is considered when variances are unequal and the loss is sum of squared errors. Minimaxity or non-minimaxity of empirical Bayes estimators is investigated when the common prior distribution is given by normal one with mean 0. Minimaxity results for the case when the loss is a weighted sum of squared errors is also given. Monte Carlo simulation results are given to compare the risk behavior of the empirical Bayes estimator with those of other minimax ones.     

Testing hypotheses about the common mean of two normal populations

Two simple tests which allow for unequal sample sizes are considered for testing hypothesis for the common mean of two normal populations. The first test is an exact test of size a based on two available t-statistics based on single samples made exact through random allocation of α among the two available t-tests. The test statistic of the second test is a weighted average of two available t-statistics with random weights. It is shown that the first test is more efficient than the available two t-tests with respect to Bahadur asymptotic relative efficiency. It is also shown that the null distribution of the test statistic in the second test, which is similar to the one based on the normalized Graybill-Deal test statistic, converges to a standard normal distribution. Finally, we compare the small sample properties of these tests, those given in Zhou and Mat hew (1993), and some tests given in Cohen and Sackrowitz (1984) in a simulation study. In this study, we find that the second test performs better than the tests given in Zhou and Mathew (1993) and is comparable to the ones given in Cohen and Sackrowitz (1984) with respect to power..