A two sample ordered alternative test for means and variances

A two sample test of likelihood ratio type is proposed, assuming normal distribution theory, for testing the hypothesis that two samples come from identical normal populations versus the alternative that the populations are normal but vary in mean value and variance with one population having a smaller mean and smaller variance than the other. The small sample and large sample distribution of the proposed statistic are derived assuming normality. Some computations are presented which show the speed of convergence of small sample critical values to their asymptotic counterparts. Comparisons of local power of the proposed test are made with several potential competing tests. Asymptotics for the test statistic are derived when underlying distributions are not necessarily normal.     

An Automatic Test for the Umbrella Alternatives

The paper proposes a new test for detecting the umbrella pattern under a general non‐parametric scheme. The alternative asserts that the umbrella ordering holds while the hypothesis is its complement. The main focus is put on controlling the power function of the test outside the alternative. As a result, the asymptotic error of the first kind of the constructed solution is smaller than or equal to the fixed significance level α on the whole set where the umbrella ordering does not hold. Also, under finite sample sizes, this error is controlled to a satisfactory extent. A simulation study shows, among other things, that the new test improves upon the solution widely recommended in the literature of the subject. A routine, written in R, is attached as the Supporting Information file.     

A Diagnostic Test for the Multinomial Logit Model

I propose a Lagrange multiplier test for the multinomial logit model against the dogit model (Gaudry and Dagenais 1979) as the alternative hypothesis. In view of the well-known drawback of the restrictive property of independence from irrelevant alternatives implied by the multinomial logit model, a specification test has much to recommend it. Finite sample properties of the test are studied using a Monte Carlo experiment, and the test's power against the nested multinomial logit model and the multinomial probit model is investigated. The test is found to be sensitive to the values of the regression parameters of the linear random utility function.     

Likelihood ratio test for one-sided hypothesis of covariance matrices of two normal populations

The likelihood ratio test is derived for a one-sided hypothesis about the covariance matrices from two multivariate normal populations. In the case of equal sample sizes, the limiting distribution of -21og ?_n is given, where ?_n denotes the likelihood ratio criterion. When dimension p=2, for some alternatives, the power of -21og ?_n of size 0.05 is compared with those of several well-known test statistics using Monte Carlo Methods.     

Iso‐chi‐squared testing of 2 × k: ordered tables

The Pearson chi‐squared statistic for testing the equality of two multinomial populations when the categories are nominal is much less appropriate for ordinal categories. Test statistics typically used in this context are based on scorings of the ordinal levels, but the results of these tests are highly dependent on the choice of scores. The authors propose a test which naturally modifies the Pearson chi‐squared statistic to incorporate the ordinal information. The proposed test statistic does not depend on the scores and under the null hypothesis of equality of populations, it is asymptotically equivalent to the likelihood ratio test against the alternative of two‐sided likelihood ratio ordering.     

Extensions of empirical likelihood and chi-squared-based tests for ordered alternatives

Several methods for comparing k populations have been proposed in the literature. These methods assess the same null hypothesis of equal distributions but differ in the alternative hypothesis they consider. We focus on two important alternative hypotheses: monotone and umbrella ordering. Two new families of test statistics are proposed, including two known tests, as well as two new powerful tests under monotone ordering. Furthermore, these families are adapted for testing umbrella ordering. We compare some members of the families with respect to power and Type I errors under different simulation scenarios. Finally, the methods are illustrated in several applications to real data.     

Inference for comparing a multinomial distribution with a known standard

We propose a new type of stochastic ordering which imposes a monotone tendency in differences between one multinomial probability and a known standard one. An estimation procedure is proposed for the constrained maximum likelihood estimate, and then the asymptotic null distribution is derived for the likelihood ratio test statistic for testing equality of two multinomial distributions against the new stochastic ordering. An alternative test is also discussed based on Neyman modified minimum chi-square estimator. These tests are illustrated with a set of heart disease data.     

Likelihood ratio test against simple stochastic ordering among several multinomial populations

Stochastic ordering between probability distributions has been widely studied in the past 50 years. Because it is often easy to make valuable judgments when such orderings exist, it is desirable to recognize their existence and to model distributional structures under them. Likelihood ratio test is the most commonly used method to test hypotheses involving stochastic orderings. Among the various formally defined notions of stochastic ordering, the least stringent is simple stochastic ordering. In this paper, we consider testing the hypothesis that all multinomial populations are identically distributed against the alternative that they are in simple stochastic ordering. We construct likelihood ratio test statistic for this hypothesis test problem, provide limit form of the objective function corresponding to the test statistic and show that the test statistic is asymptotically distributed as a mixture of chi-squared distributions, i.e., a chi-bar-squared distribution.     

Goodness of fit tests with misclassified data

The most popular goodness of fit test for a multinomial distribution is the chi-square test. But this test is generally biased if observations are subject to misclassification, In this paper we shall discuss how to define a new test procedure when we have double sample data obtained from the true and fallible devices. An adjusted chi-square test based on the imputation method and the likelihood ratio test are considered, Asymptotically, these two procedures are equivalent. However, an example and simulation results show that the former procedure is not only computationally simpler but also more powerful under finite sample situations.     

A robust modification of the ordered-heterogeneity test

An ordered heterogeneity (OH) test is a test for a trend that combines a non-directional heterogeneity test with the rank-order information specified under the alternative. We propose two modifications of the OH test procedure: (1) to use the mean ranks of the groups rather than the sample means to determine the observed ordering of the groups, and (2) to use the maximum correlation out of the 2^k???1 – 1 possibilities under the alternative rather than the single ordering (1, 2, … , k), where k is the number of independent groups. A simulation study indicates that these two changes increase the power of the ordered heterogeneity test when, as common in practice, the underlying distribution may deviate from a normal distribution and the trend pattern is a priori unknown. In contrast to the original OH test, the modified OH test can detect all possible patterns under the alternative with a relatively high power.     

Permutation Approaches for Stochastic Ordering

In many application problems, when dealing with comparisons between two or more groups, the classical parametric inferential statistical methods are used, although in real problems the quite stringent assumptions required by such methods are rarely satisfied. In particular a parametric approach to the test on ordering of C > 2 populations is very difficult. In order to tackle this problem two alternative methods are proposed in the present paper. Both the methods consist in permutation combination based tests: the first is supposed to be more powerful and it is suitable when the main goal of the study is related to the global ordering of the populations; the second is useful when the interest is in the pairwise comparisons between the populations.     

Graphical displays for clarifying how allocation ratio affects total sample size for the two sample logrank test

For time‐to‐event data, the power of the two sample logrank test for the comparison of two treatment groups can be greatly influenced by the ratio of the number of patients in each of the treatment groups. Despite the possible loss of power, unequal allocations may be of interest due to a need to collect more data on one of the groups or to considerations related to the acceptability of the treatments to patients. Investigators pursuing such designs may be interested in the cost of the unbalanced design relative to a balanced design with respect to the total number of patients required for the study. We present graphical displays to illustrate the sample size adjustment factor, or ratio of the sample size required by an unequal allocation compared to the sample size required by a balanced allocation, for various survival rates, treatment hazards ratios, and sample size allocation ratios. These graphical displays conveniently summarize information in the literature and provide a useful tool for planning sample sizes for the two sample logrank test. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A fitted test for the behrens-fisher problem

In 1975, Lee and Gurland proposed a solution to the Behrens-Fisher problem. It had excellent control of size and power and was relatively simple to use. However it requires extensive special tables. This article proposes a modification of this approach. It replaces the tables with easily computed functions of the sample sizes and a standard t table. Control of size and power are equivalent to that obtained by Lee and Gurland. Furthermore, the test is also compared with the Welch's approximate t test and shows better control of size, with similar power curves when sample sizes are at least four from each of the two normal populations.     

Simultaneous tests for homogeneity of two zero-inflated (beta) populations

ABSTRACT

Motivated by an example in marine science, we use Fisher’s method to combine independent likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) and asymptotic independent score tests to assess the equivalence of two zero-inflated Beta populations (mixture distributions with three parameters). For each test, test statistics for the three individual parameters are combined into a single statistic to address the overall difference between the two populations. We also develop non parametric and semiparametric permutation-based tests for simultaneously comparing two or three features of unknown populations. Simulations show that the likelihood-based tests perform well for large sample sizes and that the statistics based on combining LRT statistics outperforms the ones based on combining score test statistics. The permutation-based tests have overall better performance in terms of both power and type I error rate. Our methods are easy to implement and computationally efficient, and can be expanded to more than two populations and to other multiple parameter families. The permutation tests are entirely generic and can be useful in various applications dealing with zero (or other) inflation.     

A more powerful unconditional exact test of homogeneity for 2 × c contingency table analysis

The classical unconditional exact p-value test can be used to compare two multinomial distributions with small samples. This general hypothesis requires parameter estimation under the null which makes the test severely conservative. Similar property has been observed for Fisher's exact test with Barnard and Boschloo providing distinct adjustments that produce more powerful testing approaches. In this study, we develop a novel adjustment for the conservativeness of the unconditional multinomial exact p-value test that produces nominal type I error rate and increased power in comparison to all alternative approaches. We used a large simulation study to empirically estimate the 5th percentiles of the distributions of the p-values of the exact test over a range of scenarios and implemented a regression model to predict the values for two-sample multinomial settings. Our results show that the new test is uniformly more powerful than Fisher's, Barnard's, and Boschloo's tests with gains in power as large as several hundred percent in certain scenarios. Lastly, we provide a real-life data example where the unadjusted unconditional exact test wrongly fails to reject the null hypothesis and the corrected unconditional exact test rejects the null appropriately.     

Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers

A disease prevalence can be estimated by classifying subjects according to whether they have the disease. When gold-standard tests are too expensive to be applied to all subjects, partially validated data can be obtained by double-sampling in which all individuals are classified by a fallible classifier, and some of individuals are validated by the gold-standard classifier. However, it could happen in practice that such infallible classifier does not available. In this article, we consider two models in which both classifiers are fallible and propose four asymptotic test procedures for comparing disease prevalence in two groups. Corresponding sample size formulae and validated ratio given the total sample sizes are also derived and evaluated. Simulation results show that (i) Score test performs well and the corresponding sample size formula is also accurate in terms of the empirical power and size in two models; (ii) the Wald test based on the variance estimator with parameters estimated under the null hypothesis outperforms the others even under small sample sizes in Model II, and the sample size estimated by this test is also accurate; (iii) the estimated validated ratios based on all tests are accurate. The malarial data are used to illustrate the proposed methodologies.     

An Adjustment to the Bartlett's Test for Small Sample Size

The Bartlett's test (1937) for equality of variances is based on the χ² distribution approximation. This approximation deteriorates either when the sample size is small (particularly < 4) or when the population number is large. According to a simulation investigation, we find a similar varying trend for the mean differences between empirical distributions of Bartlett's statistics and their χ² approximations. By using the mean differences to represent the distribution departures, a simple adjustment approach on the Bartlett's statistic is proposed on the basis of equal mean principle. The performance before and after adjustment is extensively investigated under equal and unequal sample sizes, with number of populations varying from 3 to 100. Compared with the traditional Bartlett's statistic, the adjusted statistic is distributed more closely to χ² distribution, for homogeneity samples from normal populations. The type I error is well controlled and the power is a little higher after adjustment. In conclusion, the adjustment has good control on the type I error and higher power, and thus is recommended for small samples and large population number when underlying distribution is normal.     

DETERMINATION OF DOMAINS OF ATTRACTION BASED ON A SEQUENCE OF MAXIMA

Suppose that the maximum of a random sample from a distribution F(x) may be obtained in each of k equally spaced observation periods. This paper proposes a test to determine the domain of attraction of F(x), and investigates the properties when the sample size is very large and perhaps unknown and k is fixed and small. The test statistic is a function of the spacings between the order statistics based on the sequence of maxima and is suggested by reference to one studied previously when inference was based on the largest k observations of a random sample. A Monte Carlo study shows that the proposed test is more powerful than its main competitor. The test is illustrated by two examples.     

STAR模型中的递归退势单位根检验研究

在STAR模型框架下,考虑时间序列具有线性确定性趋势成分,本文建立了一个递归退势单位根检验统计量,推导了其渐近分布;并在考虑初始条件情形下,对递归退势、OLS和GLS退势单位根检验统计量的有限样本性质进行了细致的比较研究。若忽略初始条件的影响,GLS退势和递归退势单位根检验统计量的检验势都显著高于OLS退势。随着初始条件的增大,GLS退势单位根检验统计量的检验势下降得比较厉害,递归退势单位根检验统计量的检验势较为稳定,且在样本量较大情形下更具优势。     

A certain locally most powerful test for one-way random effects model: full distribution and power considerations

We investigate the properties of the locally most powerful nonparametric criterion against logistic alternatives developed by Govindarajulu (1975) for testing one-way random effects modcls. We deduce the appropriate computational forms for the test criterion T and tabulate the critical values of T for α = .01, .05 and 0.10, and various sample sizes. Certain features of the computational methods are discussed. In the tables we retain only those sample sizes beyond which the asymptotic theory is meaningful. We also study the power comparison of the test for two populations with the classical F-test under a range of normal alternatives.