Full likelihood inference in the Cox model with LTRC data when covariates are discrete

For the regression parameter β in the Cox model, there have been several estimates based on different types of approximated likelihood. For right-censored data, Ren and Zhou [Full likelihood inferences in the Cox model: an empirical approach. Ann Inst Statist Math. 2011;63:1005–1018] derive the full likelihood function for (β, F₀), where F₀ is the baseline distribution function in the Cox model. In this article, we extend their results to left-truncated and right-censored data with discrete covariates. Using the empirical likelihood parameterization, we obtain the full-profile likelihood function for β when covariates are discrete. Simulation results indicate that the maximum likelihood estimator outperforms Cox's partial likelihood estimator in finite samples.     

The minimum coverage probability of confidence intervals in regression after a preliminary F test

Consider a linear regression model with regression parameter β=(β₁,…,β_p) and independent normal errors. Suppose the parameter of interest is θ=a^Tβ, where a is specified. Define the s-dimensional parameter vector τ=C^Tβ−t, where C and t are specified. Suppose that we carry out a preliminary F test of the null hypothesis H₀:τ=0 against the alternative hypothesis H₁:τ≠0. It is common statistical practice to then construct a confidence interval for θ with nominal coverage 1−α, using the same data, based on the assumption that the selected model had been given to us a priori (as the true model). We call this the naive 1−α confidence interval for θ. This assumption is false and it may lead to this confidence interval having minimum coverage probability far below 1−α, making it completely inadequate. We provide a new elegant method for computing the minimum coverage probability of this naive confidence interval, that works well irrespective of how large s is. A very important practical application of this method is to the analysis of covariance. In this context, τ can be defined so that H₀ expresses the hypothesis of “parallelism”. Applied statisticians commonly recommend carrying out a preliminary F test of this hypothesis. We illustrate the application of our method with a real-life analysis of covariance data set and a preliminary F test for “parallelism”. We show that the naive 0.95 confidence interval has minimum coverage probability 0.0846, showing that it is completely inadequate.     

Comparison of two life distributions on the basis of their percentile residual life functions

Let F and G be life distributions with respective failure rate functions r_F and r_G and respective 100α-percentile (0 < α < 1) residual life functions q_{α, F}, and q_{α, G}. Distribution-free two-sample tests are proposed for testing H₀: F = G against H_1,α,: q_{α, F} ≥ q_{α, G} and H_{2 α}: q_{β, F} ≥ q_β,G for all β ≥ α. This class of tests includes as a special case the test of Kochar (1981) for the alternative H*₂: r_F ≤ r_G. A theorem of Govindarajulu (1976) is extended in order to obtain asymptotic normality of the test statistics. The condition q_{α, F} ≥ q_{α, G} is implied by r_F ≤ r_G and is unrelated to the stochastic ordering F≤ G; if F and G are Weibull distributions with respective shape parameters c₁ and c₂ such that 1 ≤ C₁ < C₂, then q_α,F ≥ q_{α, G} for all α larger than a function of the parameters.     

On testing more IFRA ordering-II

ABSTRACT

Suppose F and G are two life distribution functions. It is said that F is more IFRA (increasing failure rate average) than G (written by F ? _*G) if G^{? 1}F(x) is star-shaped on (0, ∞). In this paper, the problem of testing H₀: F = _*G against H₁: F ? _*G and F ≠ _*G is considered in both cases when G is known and when G is unknown. We propose a new test based on U-statistics and obtain the asymptotic distribution of the test statistics. The new test is compared with some well-known tests in the literature. In addition, we apply our test to a real data set in the context of reliability.     

A note on hazard rates of order statistics

Let F_k:m be the cumulative disribution function of the kth order statistic in a sample of size n from a distribution

F(x) with density function f(x).The primary objective of this paper is to show that F_k+1mis IHR(increasing hazard rate) if F_km(x)is IHH and that F_k-1:n(x)is DHR.(decreasing hazard rate) if F_km(x) is DHR.     

On the Mean Remaining Strength of the k-Out-of-n:F System with Exchangeable Components

In this article, we consider the mean remaining strength of a k-out-of-n:F system in the stress–strength setup for the exchangeable components. We provide some results for parallel and series systems under this setup, where X₁, X₂, …, X_n are the strengths of the components designed under the common stress. An illustrative example is given for the k-out-of- n:F system using the multivariate FGM distribution.     

Sequential estimation of the mean of NEF-PVF distributions

Let F = {F₀: 0 ϵ Θ} denote the class of natural exponential family of distributions having power variance function, (NEF-PVF). We consider the problem of sequentially estimating the mean μ of F₀ ϵ F, based on i.i.d. observations from F₀. We propose an appropriate sequential estimation procedure under a combined loss of estimation error and sampling cost. We provide expansion for the regret R_a and study its asymptotic properties. We show that R_a = cv²(μ) + o(1) as a → ∞, where c > 0 is a known constant and v(μ) denotes the coefficient of variation of F₀.     

Asymptotic properties of the GMLE in the case 1 interval-censorship model with discrete inspection times

We consider the case 1 interval censorship model in which the survival time has an arbitrary distribution function F₀ and the inspection time has a discrete distribution function G. In such a model one is only able to observe the inspection time and whether the value of the survival time lies before or after the inspection time. We prove the strong consistency of the generalized maximum-likelihood estimate (GMLE) of the distribution function F₀ at the support points of G and its asymptotic normality and efficiency at what we call regular points. We also present a consistent estimate of the asymptotic variance at these points. The first result implies uniform strong consistency on [0, ∞) if F₀ is continuous and the support of G is dense in [0, ∞). For arbitrary F₀ and G, Peto (1973) and Tumbull (1976) conjectured that the convergence for the GMLE is at the usual parametric rate n½ Our asymptotic normality result supports their conjecture under our assumptions. But their conjecture was disproved by Groeneboom and Wellner (1992), who obtained the nonparametric rate ni under smoothness assumptions on the F₀ and G.     

Precise Large Deviations for Sums of Independent Random Variables with Consistently Varying Tails

In this article, we investigate the precise large deviations for a sum of independent but not identical distributed random variables. {X _n , n ≥ 1} are independent non-negative random variables with distribution functions {F _n , n ≥ 1}. We assume that the average of right tails of distribution functions F _n is equivalent to some distribution function F with consistently varying tails. In applications, we apply our main results to a realistic example (Pareto-type distribution) and obtain a specific result.     

Bias-robust L-estimators of a scale parameter

We derive optimal bias-robust L-estimators of a scale parameter σ based on random samples from F(( ·?θ/σ), where θ and σ are unknown and F is an unknown member of a ε-contaminated neighborhood of a fixed symmetric error distribution F ₀. Within a very general class S of L-estimators which are Fisher-consistent at F, we solve for: (i) the estimator with minimax asymptotic bias over the ε-contamination neighborhood; and (ii) the estimator with minimum gross error sensitivity at F ₀ [the limiting case of (i) as ε → 0]. The solutions to problems (i) and (ii) are shown, using a generalized method of moment spaces, to be mixtures of at most two interquantile ranges. A graphical method is presented for finding the optimal bias-robust solutions, and examples are given.     

NON-EXISTENCE OF AN EXACT β-CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR A SCALE PARAMETER*

Abstract There are given k (≥22) independent distributions with c.d.f.'s F(x;θ_j) indexed by a scale parameter θ_j, j = 1,…, k. Let θ_[i] (i = 1,…, k) denote the ith smallest one of θ₁,…, θ_k. In this paper we wish to show that, under some regularity conditions, there does not exist an exact β-level (0≤β1) confidence interval for the ith smallest scale parameter θ_i based on k independent samples. Since the log transformation method may not yield the desired results for the scale parameter problem, we will treat the scale parameter case directly without transformation. Application is considered for normal variances. Two conservative one-sided confidence intervals for the ith smallest normal variance and the percentage points needed to actually apply the intervals are provided.     

On a Berry-Esséen theorem for a Studentized jackknife L-estimate

Consider a linear function of order statistics (“L-estimate”) which can be expressed as a statistical function T(F_n) based on the sample cumulative distribution function F_n. Let T*(F_n) be the corresponding jackknifed version of T(F_n), and let V²_n be the jackknife estimate of the asymptotic variance of n ^1/2T(F_n) or n ^1/2T*(F_n). In this paper, we provide a Berry-Esséen rate of the normal approximation for a Studentized jackknife L-estimate n^1/2[T*(F_n) - T(F)]/V_n, where T(F) is the basic functional associated with the L-estimate.     

Some matrix results related to a partitioned singular linear model

Consider the linear model (y, Xβ V), where the model matrix X may not have a full column rank and V might be singular. In this paper we introduce a formula for the difference between the BLUES of Xβ under the full model and the model where one observation has been deleted. We also consider the partitioned linear regression model where the model matrix is (X₁: X₂) the corresponding vector of unknown parameters being (β′₁ : β′₂)′. We show that the BLUE of X₁ β₁ under a specific reduced model equals the corresponding BLUE under the original full model and consider some interesting consequences of this result.     

A class of distributions connected to order statistics with nonintegral sample size

Newton's binomial series expansion is used to develop a (class of) distribution function(s) F_r:∝ which may be interpreted as the distribution of the r^thorder statistic with nonintegral sample size∝. It is shown that F_r:∝ has properties similar to F_r:n. Multivariate extension is considered and an elementary proof of the integral representation for the joint distribution of a subset of order statistics is given. An application is included.     

Kolmogorov-type tests of goodness-of-fit against stochastic ordering

This article addresses the problem of testing the null hypothesis H₀ that a random sample of size n is from a distribution with the completely specified continuous cumulative distribution function F_n(x). Kolmogorov-type tests for H₀ are based on the statistics C⁺ _n = Sup[F_n(x)?F₀(x)] and C^? _n=Sup[F₀(x)?F_n(x)], where F_n(x) is an empirical distribution function. Let F(x) be the true cumulative distribution function, and consider the ordered alternative H₁: F(x)≥F₀(x) for all x and with strict inequality for some x. Although it is natural to reject H₀ and accept H₁ if C ⁺ _n is large, this article shows that a test that is superior in some ways rejects F₀ and accepts H₁ if C^mdash _n is small. Properties of the two tests are compared based on theoretical results and simulated results.     

Optimality of blue's in a general linear model with incorrect design matrix

We consider the Gauss-Markoff model (Y,X₀β,σ²V) and provide solutions to the following problem: What is the class of all models (Y,Xβ,σ²V) such that a specific linear representation/some linear representation/every linear representation of the BLUE of every estimable parametric functional p'β under (Y,X₀β,σ²V) is (a) an unbiased estimator, (b) a BLUE, (c) a linear minimum bias estimator and (d) best linear minimum bias estimator of p'β under (Y,Xβ,σ²V)? We also analyse the above problems, when attention is restricted to a subclass of estimable parametric functionals.     

On Censored Bivariate Random Variables: Copula,Characterization, and Estimation

Let (X, Y) be a bivariate random vector with joint distribution function F_{X, Y}(x, y) = C(F(x), G(y)), where C is a copula and F and G are marginal distributions of X and Y, respectively. Suppose that (X_i, Y_i), i = 1, 2, …, n is a random sample from (X, Y) but we are able to observe only the data consisting of those pairs (X_i, Y_i) for which X_i ? Y_i. We denote such pairs as (X*_i, Y_i*), i = 1, 2, …, ν, where ν is a random variable. The main problem of interest is to express the distribution function F_{X, Y}(x, y) and marginal distributions F and G with the distribution function of observed random variables X* and Y*. It is shown that if X and Y are exchangeable with marginal distribution function F, then F can be uniquely determined by the distributions of X* and Y*. It is also shown that if X and Y are independent and absolutely continuous, then F and G can be expressed through the distribution functions of X* and Y* and the stress–strength reliability P{X ? Y}. This allows also to estimate P{X ? Y} with the truncated observations (X*_i, Y_i*). The copula of bivariate random vector (X*, Y*) is also derived.     

On An Intriguing Distributional Identity

For a continuous random variable X with support equal to (a, b), with c.d.f. F, and g: Ω₁ → Ω₂ a continuous, strictly increasing function, such that Ω₁∩Ω₂?(a, b), but otherwise arbitrary, we establish that the random variables F(X) ? F(g(X)) and F(g^{? 1}(X)) ? F(X) have the same distribution. Further developments, accompanied by illustrations and observations, address as well the equidistribution identity U ? ψ(U) = ^dψ^{? 1}(U) ? U for U ～ U(0, 1), where ψ is a continuous, strictly increasing and onto function, but otherwise arbitrary. Finally, we expand on applications with connections to variance reduction techniques, the discrepancy between distributions, and a risk identity in predictive density estimation.     

Asymptotic distributions of order statistics and record values arising from the class of beta-generated distributions

In this paper, we show that both the class of beta-generated distributions G_F and its base distribution F belong to the same domain of maximal (or minimal or upper record value or lower record value) attraction. Moreover, it is shown that the weak convergence of any non-extreme order statistic (central or intermediate order statistic), based on a base distribution F, to a non-degenerate limit type implies the weak convergence of G_F to a non-degenerate limit type. The relations between the two limit types are deduced.     

Identifiability of distributions under competing risks and complementary risks model

Let X₁,X₂,…,X_p be p random variables with cdf's F₁(x),F₂(x),…,F_p(x)respectively. Let U = min(X₁,X₂,…,X_p) and V = max(X₁,X₂,…,X_p).In this paper we study the problem of uniquely determining and estimating the marginal distributions F₁,F₂,…,F_p given the distribution of U or of V.

First the problem of competing and complementary risks are introduced with examples and the corresponding identification problems are considered when the X₁'s are independently distributed and U(V) is identified, as well as the case when U(V) is not identified. The case when the X₁'s are dependent is considered next. Finally the problem of estimation is considered.