On selecting the treatment with the largest probability of survival

Suppose there are k(>= 2) treatments and each treatment is a Bernoulli process with binomial sampling. The problem of selecting a random-sized subset which contains the treatment with the largest survival probability (reliability or probability of success) is considered. Based on the ideas from both classical approaches and general Bayesian statistical decision approach, a new subset selection procedure is proposed to solve this kind of problem in both balanced and unbalanced designs. Comparing with the classical procedures, the proposed procedure has a significantly smaller selected subset. The optimal properties and performance of it were examined. The methods of selecting and fitting the priors and the results of Monte Carlo simulations on selected important cases are also studied.     

Subset selection procedures for ΔP-superior populations

In some ranking and selection problems it is reasonable to consider any population which is inferior but sufficiently close to the best (t-th best) as acceptable. Under this assumption, this paper studies classes of procedures to meet two possible goals. A and B. Goal A is to select a subset which contains only good populations, while Goal B is of a screening nature and requires selection of a subset of size not exceeding m (1 ≤ m ≤ k) and containing at least one good population. In each case results loading to the determination of the sample size required to attain the goals above with prespecified probability are obtained. Properties of the procedures are discussed.     

Subset selection of the best treatment via many-one tests

The method of Gupta (1956, 1965) was developed to select a subset from k normal populations that contains the best populations with given probability. This paper shows a duality between the general goal of selecting a subset for the best population and many-one tests. A population should be regarded as ‘candidate’ for the best population and thus retained in the subset if the samples from the other populations are not significantly better. Based on this ‘idea’ a general selection procedure is proposed using many-one tests for the comparison of each population against the remaining ones.     

On selecting a subset which contains all populations better than a control

Let π₁…, π_k denote k(≥ 2) populations with unknown means μ₁ , …, μ_k and variances σ₁ ² , …, σ_k ² , respectively and let π_o denote the control population having mean μ_o and variance σ_o ² . It is assumed that these populations are normally distributed with correlation matrix {ρ_ij}. The goal is to select a subset, of populations of π₁ , …, π_k which contains all the populations with means larger than or equal to the mean of the control one. Procedures are given for selecting such a subset so that the probability that all the populations with means larger than or equal to the mean of the control one are included in the selected subset is at least equal to a predetermined value P?(l/k < P? < 1). The goal treated here is a first step screening procedure that allows the experimenter to choose a subset and withhold judgement about which one has the largest mean. Then, if the one with the largest mean is desired it can be chosen from the selected subset on the basis of cost and other considerations. Percentage points are also included.     

Some multiple decision problems in analysis of variance

In most practical situations to which the analysis of variance tests are applied, they do not supply the information that the experimenter aims at. If, for example, in one-way ANOVA the hypothesis is rejected in actual application of the F-test, the resulting conclusion that the true means θ₁,…,θ_k are not all equal, would by itself usually be insufficient to satisfy the experimenter. In fact his problems would begin at this stage. The experimenter may desire to select the “best” population or a subset of the “good” populations; he may like to rank the populations in order of “goodness” or he may like to draw some other inferences about the parameters of interest.

The extensive literature on selection and ranking procedures depends heavily on the use of independence between populations (block, treatments, etc.) in the analysis of variance. In practical applications, it is desirable to drop this assumption or independence and consider cases more general than the normal.

In the present paper, we derive a method to construct optimal (in some sense) selection procedures to select a nonempty subset of the k populations containing the best population as ranked in terms of θ_i’s which control the size of the selected subset and which maximizes the minimum average probability of selecting the best. We also consider the usual selection procedures in one-way ANOVA based on the generalized least squares estimates and apply the method to two-way layout case. Some examples are discussed and some results on comparisons with other procedures are also obtained.     

SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR SCALE PARAMETERS USING TWO-SAMPLE U-STATISTICS

Let be k independent populations having the same known quantile of order p (0 p 1) and let F(x)=F(x/_i) be the absolutely continuous cumulative distribution function of the ith population indexed by the scale parameter ₁, i = 1,…, k. We propose subset selection procedures based on two-sample U-statistics for selecting a subset of k populations containing the one associated with the smallest scale parameter. These procedures are compared with the subset selection procedures based on two-sample linear rank statistics given by Gill & Mehta (1989) in the sense of Pitman asymptotic relative efficiency, with interesting results.     

A restricted subset selection procedure for Weibull populations

Consider k(k ≥ 2) two-parameter Weibull populations. We want to select a subset of the populations not exceeding m in size such that the subset contains at least ? of the t best populations. We have proposed a procedure which uses either the maximum likelihood estimators or ‘simplified’ linear estimators of the parameters. The estimators are based on type II censored data. The ranking of the populations is done by comparing their reliabilities at a certain fixed time. In selected cases the constants for the procedure are tabulated using Monte Carlo methods.     

Conditional probability of correct selection under the continuum partition with applications

The problem of selecting the best population from among a finite number of populations in the presence of uncertainty is a problem one faces in many scientific investigations, and has been studied extensively, Many selection procedures have been derived for different selection goals. However, most of these selection procedures, being frequentist in nature, don't tell how to incorporate the information in a particular sample to give a data-dependent measure of correct selection achieved for this particular sample. They often assign the same decision and probability of correct selection for two different sample values, one of which actually seems intuitively much more conclusive than the other. The methodology of conditional inference offers an approach which achieves both frequentist interpret ability and a data-dependent measure of conclusiveness. By partitioning the sample space into a family of subsets, the achieved probability of correct selection is computed by conditioning on which subset the sample falls in. In this paper, the partition considered is the so called continuum partition, while the selection rules are both the fixed-size and random-size subset selection rules. Under the distributional assumption of being monotone likelihood ratio, results on least favourable configuration and alpha-correct selection are established. These re-sults are not only useful in themselves, but also are used to design a new sequential procedure with elimination for selecting the best of k Binomial populations. Comparisons between this new procedure and some other se-quential selection procedures with regard to total expected sample size and some risk functions are carried out by simulations.     

Small-sample performance of a modified least-failures sampling procedure for bernoulli subset selection

We describe two sequential sampling procedures for Bernoulli subset selection which were shown to exhibit desirable behavior for large-sample problems. These procedures have identical performance characteristics in terms of the number of observations taken from any one of the populations under investigation, but one of the procedures employs one-at-a-time sampling while theother allows observations to be taken in blocks during early stages of experimentation. In this paper, a simulation study of their behavior for small-sample cases (n > 25) reveals that they canresult in a savings (sometimes substantial) in the expected total number of observations requiredto terminate the experiment as compared to single-stage procedures. Hence they may be quite usefulto a practitioner for screening purposes when sampling is limited.     

Isotonic inference for populations related to the uniform distribution

Consider the class of densities defined by Hogg and Craig (1956) and related to the uniform distribution, depending on an unknown parameter. Let there be k > 2 given populations yielding samples of unequal sizes from such densities. Now let a partial order on the set of the value defining the populations be given. we treat isotonic estimation, testing for order restrictins, and testing for homogeneity against order restrictions. The exact distrubutions of these tests turn out to be similar in structure to those for the normal distrubution case as iven in Barlow, Bartholomew, Bremner and Brunk (1972) and in Robertson and wegman (1978), in that they can be expressed as weighted chi square distributions. applications to selection and ranking methodlogy are pointed out.     

An essentially complete class of multiple decision procedures

Let π₁,…, π_k represent k(?2) independent populations. The quality of the ith population π_i is characterized by a real-valued parameter θ_i, usually unknown. We define the best population in terms of a measure of separation between θ_i's. A selection of a subset containing the best population is called a correct selection (CS). We restrict attention to rules for which the size of the selected subset is controlled at a given point and the infimum of the probability of correct selection over the parameter space is maximized. The main theorem deals with construction of an essentially complete class of selection rules of the above type. Some classical subset selection rules are shown to belong to this class.     

Combining two classical approaches for statistical selection

This paper presents a selection procedure that combines Bechhofer's indifference zone selection and Gupta's subset selection approaches, by using a preference threshold. For normal populations with common known variance, a subset is selected of all populations that have sample sums within the distance of this threshold from the largest sample sum. We derive the minimal necessary sample size and the value for the preference threshold, in order to satisfy two probability requirements for correct selection, one related to indifference zone selection, the other to subset selection. Simulation studies are used to illustrate the method.     

A two stage procedure for selecting δ∗-optimal means in the normal model

Suppose π₁,…,π_k are k normal populations with π_i having unknown mean μ_i and unknown variance σ². The population π_i will be called δ^?-optimal (or good) if μ_i is within a specified amountδ? of the largest mean. A two stage procedure is proposed which selects a subset of the k populations and guarantees with probability at least P^? that the selected subset contains only δ?-optimal π_i ’s. In addition to screening out non-good populations the rule guarantees a high proportion of sufficiently good π_i’S will be selected.     

Testing the equality of location parameters of exponential populations from censored samples

The modified Tiku test and the modified likelihood ratio test proposed by Tiku and Vaughan (1991) for k=2 exponential populations are extended to . k > 2 populations. These tests are shown to be more powerful than the test proposed by Kambo and Awad (1985). Unlike the Kambo-Awad test, the proposed tests are shown to have almost symmetric power functions. Further, these tests can be applied when there is both left or right censoring present, in contrast to the tests of Sukhatme (1937), Bain and Englehardt (1991) and Elewa et al. (1992), who assume that there is no left censoring.     

Multiple decision rules for comparing several populations with a fixed known standard

Independent observations are available from k univariate distributions indexed by a real parameter θ. It is desired to select that distribution with the largest parameter value unless this value is smaller than some fixed standard θ₀ in which case no distribution is to be selected. Various single-stage procedures for this (k+l)-decision problem are discussed, using indifference zone, decision theoretic, Bayesian, and subset selection approaches.     

On empirical Bayes simultaneous selection procedures for comparing normal populations with a standard

In this paper, we derive statistical selection procedures to partition k normal populations into ‘good’ or ‘bad’ ones, respectively, using the nonparametric empirical Bayes approach. The relative regret risk of a selection procedure is used as a measure of its performance. We establish the asymptotic optimality of the proposed empirical Bayes selection procedures and investigate the associated rates of convergence. Under a very mild condition, the proposed empirical Bayes selection procedures are shown to have rates of convergence of order close to O(k^−1/2) where k is the number of populations involved in the selection problem. With further strong assumptions, the empirical Bayes selection procedures have rates of convergence of order O(k^{−α(r−1)/(2r+1)}), where 1<α<2 and r is an integer greater than 2.     

Subset selection of the t best populations

Selection of the “best” t out of k populations has been considered in the indifferece zone formulation by Bachhofer (1954) and in the subset selection formulation by Carroll, Gupta and Huang (1975). The latter approach is used here to obtain conservative solutions for the goals of selecting (i) all the “good” or (ii) only “good” populations, where “good” means having a location parameter among the largest t. For the case of normal distributions, with common unknown variance, tables are produced for implementing these procedures. Also, for this case, simulation results suggest that the procedure may not be too conservative.     

Subset selection based on likelihood from uniform and related popupulations

Let π_i (i=1,2,…, k) be charceterized by the uniform distribution on (a_i;b_i), where exactly one of a_i and b_i is unknown. With unequal sample sizes, suppose that from the k (>=2) given populations, we wish to select a random-size subset containing the one with the smllest value of θ_i= b_i - a_i. RuleR_i selects π if a likelihood-based k-dimensional confidence region for the unknown (θ₁,… θ_k) contains at least one point having θ_i as its smallest component. A second rule, R , is derived through a likelihood ratio and turns out to be that of Barr and prabhu whenthe sample sizes are equal. Numerical comparisons are made. The results apply to the larger class of densities g ( z ; θ_i) =M(z)Q(θ_i) if a(θ_i) < z <b(θ_i). Extensions to the cases when both a_i and b_i are unknown and when θ_j isof interest are indicated. 1<=j<=k