Imputation techniques for incomplete data in quadratic discriminant analysis

We have compared the efficacy of five imputation algorithms readily available in SAS for the quadratic discriminant function. Here, we have generated several different parametric-configuration training data with missing data, including monotone missing-at-random observations, and used a Monte Carlo simulation to examine the expected probabilities of misclassification for the two-class quadratic statistical discrimination problem under five different imputation methods. Specifically, we have compared the efficacy of the complete observation-only method and the mean substitution, regression, predictive mean matching, propensity score, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) imputation methods. We found that the MCMC and propensity score multiple imputation approaches are, in general, superior to the other imputation methods for the configurations and training-sample sizes we considered.     

Updating discriminant functions estimated from inverse gaussian populations

The problem of updating discriminant functions estimated from inverse Gaussian populations is investigated in situations when the additional observations are mixed (unclassified) or classified. In each case two types of discriminant functions, linear and quadratic, are considered. Using simulation experiments the performance of the updating procedures is evaluated by means of relative efficiencies.     

The studentized location linear discriminant function

The location linear discriminant function is used in a two-population classification problem when the available data are generated from both binary and continuous random variables. Asymptotic distribution of the studentized location linear discriminant function is derived directly without the inversion of the corresponding characteristic function. The resulting plug-in estimate of the overall error of misclassification consists of the estimate based on the limiting distribution of the discriminant plus a correction term up to the second order. By comparison, our estimate avoids exact knowledge of the Mahalanobis distances which is necessary when the expansions of Vlachonikolis (1985) are used in the case of an arbitrary cut-off point. An example is re-examined and analysed in the present context.     

The performance of the linear and quadratic discriminant functions for three types of non-normal distribution

The purpose of thls paper is to investlgate the performance of the LDF (linear discrlmlnant functlon) and QDF (quadratic dlscrminant functlon) for classlfylng observations from the three types of univariate and multivariate non-normal dlstrlbutlons on the basls of the mlsclasslficatlon rate. The theoretical and the empirical results are described for unlvariate distributions, and the empirical results are presented for multivariate distributions. It 1s also shown that the sign of the skewness of each population and the kurtosis have essential effects on the performance of the two discriminant functions. The variations of the populatlon speclflc mlsclasslflcatlon rates are greatly depend on the sample slze. For the large dlmenslonal populatlon dlstributlons, if the sample sizes are sufflclent, the QDF performs better than the LDF. We show the crlterla of a cholce between the two discriminant functions as an application.     

Updating a discriminant function on the basis of unclassified data

The problem of updating a discriminant function on the basis of data of unknown origin is studied. There are observations of known origin from each of the underlying populations, and subsequently there is available a limited number of unclassified observations assumed to have been drawn from a mixture of the underlying populations. A sample discriminant function can be formed initially from the classified data. The question of whether the subsequent updating of this discriminant function on the basis of the unclassified data produces a reduction in the error rate of sufficient magnitude to warrant the computational effort is considered by carrying out a series of Monte Carlo experiments. The simulation results are contrasted with available asymptotic results.     

The application of bias to discriminant analysis

When classification rules are constructed using sample estimatest it is known that the probability of misclassification is not minimized. This article introduces a biased minimum X² rule to classify items from a multivariate normal population. Using the principle of variance reduction, the probability of misclassification is reduced when the biased procedure is employed. Results of sampling experiments over a broad range of conditions are provided to demonstrate this improvement.     

Further applications of bias to discriminant analysis

This article extends the biased minimum x² rule to the unequal covariance matrix case and to the case of several populations, The biased procedure is shown to improve the performance of the commonly used classification procedures. Results of sampling experiments over a broad range of conditions are provided to demonstrate this improvement.     

Biased discriminant analysis: Evaluation of the optimum probability of misclassification

This article extends the work of DiPillo (1976) on the Biased Minimum x² Rule. The optimum value of k (the biasing factor) Is determined and the true probability of misclassification is found. The proportion improvements reported in the 1976 paper are shown to be conservative. Some suggestions for algorithms to determine the optimal value of k are presented.     

A new per-field classification method using mixture discriminant analysis

In this study, a new per-field classification method is proposed for supervised classification of remotely sensed multispectral image data of an agricultural area using Gaussian mixture discriminant analysis (MDA). For the proposed per-field classification method, multivariate Gaussian mixture models constructed for control and test fields can have fixed or different number of components and each component can have different or common covariance matrix structure. The discrimination function and the decision rule of this method are established according to the average Bhattacharyya distance and the minimum values of the average Bhattacharyya distances, respectively. The proposed per-field classification method is analyzed for different structures of a covariance matrix with fixed and different number of components. Also, we classify the remotely sensed multispectral image data using the per-pixel classification method based on Gaussian MDA.     

Qdf misclassification probabilities for known population parameters

Approximated QDF misclassification probabilities have been derived for bivariate normal populations with known parameter values. Tne effect of unequal covariances and population distance on the misclassification probabilities are examined     

A comparison of parametric conditional error-rate estimators for the two-group linear discriminant function

Using mean absolute deviation, we compare the efficay of two new parametric conditional error rate estimators with six others, four of which are well known.The performance of both new estimators is found to be superior to the six competing estimators examined in this paper, especially when the ratio of the training sample size to the feature dimensionality is small.     

Asymptotic relative efficiency of the linear discriminant function under partial nonrandom classification of the training data

This paper considers the problem where the linear discriminant rule is formed from training data that are only partially classified with respect to the two groups of origin. A further complication is that the data of unknown origin do not constitute an observed random sample from a mixture of the two under- lying groups. Under the assumption of a homoscedastic normal model, the overall error rate of the sample linear discriminant rule formed by maximum likelihood from the partially classified training data is derived up to and including terms of the first order in the case of univariate feature data. This first- order expansion of the sample rule so formed is used to define its asymptotic efficiency relative to the rule formed from a completely classified random training set and also to the rule formed from a completely unclassified random set.     

Predicting early educational program placement with discrete discriminant analysis

The purpose of this study was to predict placement and nonplacement outcomes for mildly handicapped three through five year old children given knowledge of developmental screening test data. Discrete discriminant analysis (Anderson, 1951; Cochran & Hopkins, 1961; Goldstein & Dillon, 1978) was used to classify children into either a placement or nonplacement group using developmental information retrieved from longitudinal Child Find records (1982-89). These records were located at the Florida Diagnostic and Learning Resource System (FDLRS) in Sarasota, Florida and provided usable data for 602 children. The developmental variables included performance on screening test activities from the Comprehensive Identification Process (Zehrbach, 1975), and consisted of: (a) gross motor skills, (b) expressive language skills, and (c) social-emotional skills. These three dichotomously scored developmental variables generated eight mutually exclusive and exhaustive combinations of screening data. Combined with one of three different types of cost-of-misclassification functions, each child in a random cross-validation sample of 100 was classified into one of the two outcome groups minimizing the expected cost of misclassification based on the remaining 502 children. For each cost function designed by the researchers a comparison was made between classifications from the discrete discriminant analysis procedure and actual placement outcomes for the 100 children. A logit analysis and a standard discriminant analysis were likewise conducted using the 502 children and compared with results of the discrete discriminant analysis for selected cost functions.     

On geometry of the set of admissible invariant quadratic estimators in balanced two variance components model

Two variance components model for which each invariant quadratic admissible estimator of a linear function of variance components (under quadratic loss function) is a linear combination of two quadratic forms,Z ₁,Z ₂, say, is considered. A setD={(d ₁,d ₂)′:d ₁ Z ₁+d ₂ Z ₂ is admissible} is described by giving formulae on the boundary ofD. Different forms of the setD are presented on figures.     

A comparison of the classical and the linear programming approaches to the classification problem in discriminant analysis

Several mathematical programming approaches to the classification problem in discriminant analysis have recently been introduced. This paper empirically compares these newly introduced classification techniques with Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), logit analysis, and several rank-based procedures for a variety of symmetric and skewed distributions. The percent of correctly classified observations by each procedure in a holdout sample indicate that while under some experimental conditions the linear programming approaches compete well with the classical procedures, overall, however, their performance lags behind that of the classical procedures.     

Simultaneous pseudo confidence regions for ratios of the discriminant coefficients

We consider simultaneous confidence regions for some hypotheses on ratios of the discriminant coefficients of the linear discriminant function when the population means and common covariance matrix are unknown. This problem, involving hypotheses on ratios, yields the so-called ‘pseudo’ confidence regions valid conditionally in subsets of the parameter space. We obtain the explicit formulae of the regions and give further discussion on the validity of these regions. Illustrations of the pseudo confidence regions are given.     

On linear lon-odds and estimation of discriminant coefficients

Fisher's Linear Discriminant Function Can be used to classify an individual who has sampled from one of two multivariate normal Populations. In the following, this function is viewed as the other given his data vector it is assumed that the Population means and common covariance matrix are unknown. The vector of discriminant coeffients β(p×1) is the gradient of posterior log-odds and certain of its lineqar functions are directional derivatives which have a practical meaning. Accordingly, we treat the problems of estimating several linear functions of β The usual estimatoes of these functions are scaled versions of the unbiased estmators. In this Paper, these estimators are domainated by explicit alterenatives under a quadratic loss function. we reduce the problem of estimating β to that of estimating the inverse convariance matrix.     

Moments of a ratio of two quadratic forms

In this paper, we give the exact moments of a ratio of qua- dratic forms in normal variables, where the quadratic forms are not assumed to be independent. This problem was tackled by other authors who gave approximations and partial results. Here we will give the exact moments for the general case.     

A class of distributions with the quadratic mean residual quantile function

Abstract

The present paper introduces a new family of distributions with quadratic mean residual quantile function. Various distributional properties as well as reliability characteristics are discussed. Some characterizations of the class of distributions are presented. The estimation of parameters of the model using method of L-moments is studied. The practical application of the class of models is illustrated with a real life data set.     

Asymptotic properties of the EPMC for modified linear discriminant analysis when sample size and dimension are both large

We deal with the problem of classifying a new observation vector into one of two known multivariate normal distributions when the dimension p and training sample size N   are both large with p<N$p<N$. Modified linear discriminant analysis (MLDA) was suggested by Xu et al. [10]. Error rate of MLDA is smaller than the one of LDA. However, if p and N   are moderately large, error rate of MLDA is close to the one of LDA. These results are conditional ones, so we should investigate whether they hold unconditionally. In this paper, we give two types of asymptotic approximations of expected probability of misclassification (EPMC) for MLDA as n→∞$n\to \infty$ with p=O(n^δ)$p=O(n^{\delta })$, 0<δ<1$0<\delta <1$. The one of two is the same as the asymptotic approximation of LDA, and the other is corrected version of the approximation. Simulation reveals that the modified version of approximation has good accuracy for the case in which p and N are moderately large.