On rules based on sample medians for selection of the largest location parameter

The problem of selection of a subset containing the largest of several location parameters is considered, and a Gupta-type selection rule based on sample medians is investigated for normal and double exponential populations. Numerical comparisons between rules based on medians and means of small samples are made for normal and contaminated normal populations, assuming the popula-tion means to be equally spaced. It appears that the rule based on sample means loses its superiority over the rule based on sample medians in case the samples are heavily contaminated. The asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of the medians procedure relative to the means procedure is also computed, assuming the normal means to be in a slippage configuration. The means proce-dure is found to be superior to the median procedure in the sense of ARE. As in the small sample case, the situation is reversed if the normal populations are highly contaminate.     

Designing selection experiments with bernoulli populations

This paper is concerned with a fixed size subset selection problem for Bernoulli populations in the framework of the indifference zone approach. The goal is to select s populationswhich contain at least c of those with the t largest success probabilities. In order to control the probability of correct selection over the preference zone extensive tables of exact minimum sample sizes have been prepared to implement the single-stage procedure generalized from the well-known Sobel-Huyett procedure. It is shown how the tables can also be employed to design certain closedsequential procedures. These procedures curtail the sampling process of the single-stage procedureand may differ in their sampling rules. Two procedures working with play-the-winner rules are described in detail     

Nonparametric test for the homogeneity of the overall variability

In this paper, we propose a nonparametric test for homogeneity of overall variabilities for two multi-dimensional populations. Comparisons between the proposed nonparametric procedure and the asymptotic parametric procedure and a permutation test based on standardized generalized variances are made when the underlying populations are multivariate normal. We also study the performance of these test procedures when the underlying populations are non-normal. We observe that the nonparametric procedure and the permutation test based on standardized generalized variances are not as powerful as the asymptotic parametric test under normality. However, they are reliable and powerful tests for comparing overall variability under other multivariate distributions such as the multivariate Cauchy, the multivariate Pareto and the multivariate exponential distributions, even with small sample sizes. A Monte Carlo simulation study is used to evaluate the performance of the proposed procedures. An example from an educational study is used to illustrate the proposed nonparametric test.     

On some optimal selection procedures for weibull populations

Consider k (k >(>)2) Weibull populations. We shall derive a method of constructing optimal selection procedures to select a subset of the k populations containing the best population which control the size of the selected subset and which maximises the minimum probability of making a correct selection. Procedures and results are derived for the case when sample sizes are unequal. Some tables and figures are given at the end of this paper.     

Conditional probability of correct selection under the continuum partition with applications

The problem of selecting the best population from among a finite number of populations in the presence of uncertainty is a problem one faces in many scientific investigations, and has been studied extensively, Many selection procedures have been derived for different selection goals. However, most of these selection procedures, being frequentist in nature, don't tell how to incorporate the information in a particular sample to give a data-dependent measure of correct selection achieved for this particular sample. They often assign the same decision and probability of correct selection for two different sample values, one of which actually seems intuitively much more conclusive than the other. The methodology of conditional inference offers an approach which achieves both frequentist interpret ability and a data-dependent measure of conclusiveness. By partitioning the sample space into a family of subsets, the achieved probability of correct selection is computed by conditioning on which subset the sample falls in. In this paper, the partition considered is the so called continuum partition, while the selection rules are both the fixed-size and random-size subset selection rules. Under the distributional assumption of being monotone likelihood ratio, results on least favourable configuration and alpha-correct selection are established. These re-sults are not only useful in themselves, but also are used to design a new sequential procedure with elimination for selecting the best of k Binomial populations. Comparisons between this new procedure and some other se-quential selection procedures with regard to total expected sample size and some risk functions are carried out by simulations.     

A modified least-failures sampling procedure for bernoulli subset selection

We restrict attention to a class of Bernoulli subset selection procedures which take observations one-at-a-time and can be compared directly to the Gupta-Sobel single-stage procedure. For the criterion of minimizing the expected total number of observations required to terminate experimentation, we show that optimal sampling rules within this class are not of practical interest. We thus turn to procedures which, although not optimal, exhibit desirable behavior with regard to this criterion. A procedure which employs a modification of the so-called least-failures sampling rule is proposed, and is shown to possess many desirable properties among a restricted class of Bernoulli subset selection procedures. Within this class, it is optimal for minimizing the number of observations taken from populations excluded from consideration following a subset selection experiment, and asymptotically optimal for minimizing the expected total number of observations required. In addition, it can result in substantial savings in the expected total num¬ber of observations required as compared to a single-stage procedure, thus it may be de¬sirable to a practitioner if sampling is costly or the sample size is limited.     

Robust and nonparametric subset selection procedures

Subset selection procedures based on ranks have been investigated by a number of authors previously. Their methods are based on ranking the samples from all the populations jointly. However, as was pointed out by Rizvi and Woodworth (1970), the procedures they proposed cannot control the probability of a correct selection over the entire parameter space. In this paper, we propose a subset selection procedure based on pairwise rather than joint ranking of the samples. It is shown that this procedure controls the probability of a correct selection over the entire parameter space. It is also shown that the Pitman efficiency of this nonparametric procedure relative to the multivariate t procedure of Gupta (1956, 1965) is the same as the Pitman efficiency of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test relative to the t-test.     

Exact confidence regions for scale and location parameters based on sample quartiles

In this paper we present relatively simple (ruler, paper, and pencil) nonparametric procedures for constructing joint confidence regions for (i) the median and the inner quartile range for the symmetric one-sample problem and (ii) the shift and ratio of scale parameters for the two-sample case. Both procedures are functions of the sample quartiles and have exact confidence levels when the populations are continuous. The one-sample case requires symmetry of first and third quartiles about the median.

The confidence regions we propose are always convex, nested for decreasing confidence levels and are compact for reasonably large sample sizes. Both exact small sample and approximate large sample distributions are given.     

Comparison to control in logistic regression

We are interested in comparing logistic regressions for several test treatments or populations with a logistic regression for a standard treatment or population. The research was motivated by some real life problems, which are discussed as data examples. We propose a step-down likelihood ratio method for declaring differences between the test treatments or populations and the standard treatment or population. Competitors based on the sequentially rejective Bonferroni Wald statistic, sequentially rejective exact Wald statistic and Reiers?l's statistic are also discussed. It is shown that the proposed method asymptotically controls the probability of type I error. A Monte Carlo simulation shows that the proposed method performs well for relatively small sample sizes, outperforming its competitors.     

Approximations for a fixed sample size selection procedure for negative binomial populations

A large sample approximation of the least favorable configuration for a fixed sample size selection procedure for negative binomial populations is proposed. A normal approximation of the selection procedure is also presented. Optimal sample sizes required to be drawn from each population and the bounds for the sample sizes are tabulated. Sample sizes obtained using the approximate least favorable configuration are compared with those obtained using the exact least favorable configuration. Alternate form of the normal approximation to the probability of correct selection is also presented. The relation between the required sample size and the number of populations involved is studied.     

On discrimination procedure with mixtures of continuous and categorical variables

A discrimination procedure, based on the location model is described and suggested for use in situation where the discriminating variables are mixtures of continuous and binary variables. Some procedures that have been previously employed, in a similar situation, like Fisher's linear discriminant function and the logistic regression were compared with this method using error rate (ER). Optimal ERs for these procedures are reported using real and simulated data for the case of varying sample size and number of continuous and binary variables and were used as a measure for assessing the performance of the various procedures. The suggested procedure performed considerably better in the cases considered and never did produce a result that is poor when compared with other procedures. Hence, the suggested procedure might be considered for such situations.     

Selecting the best normal population better than a standard under unequal variances

In this article we consider a problem of selecting the best normal population that is better than a standard when the variances are unequal. Single-stage selection procedures are proposed when the variances are known. Wilcox (1984) and Taneja and Dudewicz (1992) proposed two-stage selection procedures when the variances are unknown. In addition to these procedures, we propose a two-stage selection procedure based on the method of Lam (1988). Comparisons are made between these selection procedures in terms of the sample sizes.     

Robustness of subset selection procedures

The robustness (and the number of non-best populations selected) of 11 subset selection procedures is investigated by means of simulation experiments. If the underlying distributions differ only in their location parameter, the subset selection procedures are robust for symmetric distributions or distributions with negative skewness. With increasing positive skewness and increasing number of populations the considered parametric procedures fail in robustness slightly. This non-robustness is more serious in the case of unequal variances. Non-parametric subset selection rules show then an increasing non-robustness with increasing sample size.     

Combining two classical approaches for statistical selection

This paper presents a selection procedure that combines Bechhofer's indifference zone selection and Gupta's subset selection approaches, by using a preference threshold. For normal populations with common known variance, a subset is selected of all populations that have sample sums within the distance of this threshold from the largest sample sum. We derive the minimal necessary sample size and the value for the preference threshold, in order to satisfy two probability requirements for correct selection, one related to indifference zone selection, the other to subset selection. Simulation studies are used to illustrate the method.     

Pairwise testing of group mean vectors in MANOVA with small samples

Several, multivariate, pairwise, multiple comparison procedures are proposed as follow-ups for a significant multivariate analysis of variance. The Peritz procedure is generalized from univariate to several multivariate applications. Procedures are evaluated using overall power, any-pair power and all-pairs power applied to mean vectors with common sample sizes of 4, 5, and 9. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated greater power than previously proposed univariate procedures in many conditions especially for all-pairs power. The multivariate Peritz procedure based on the Lawley–Hotelling trace was found to be most powerful in many conditions.     

A step-down heteroscedastic multiple comparison procedure

All-pairs power in a one-way ANOVA is the probability of detecting all true differences between pairs of means. Ramsey (1978) found that for normal distributions having equal variances, step-down multiple comparison procedures can have substantially more all-pairs power than single-step procedures, such as Tukey’s HSD, when equal sample sizes are randomly sampled from each group. This paper suggests a step-down procedure for the case of unequal variances and compares it to Dunnett's T3 technique. The new procedure is similar in spirit to one of the heteroscedastic procedures described by Hochberg and Tamhane (1987), but it has certain advantages that are discussed in the paper. Included are results on unequal sample sizes.     

On the performance of some subset selection procedures

In this paper, we restrict attention to the problem of subset selection of normal populations. The approaches and results of some previous comparison studies of subset selection procedures are discussed briefly. And then the result of a new Monte Carlo study comparing the performance of two classical procedures and the Bayes procedure is presented.     

Distances between normal populations when covariance matrices are unequal

The definition of distance between two populations of equal covariance matrices is extended to two and more than two populations with unequal covariance matrices and Rao’s U test for testing the conditional contribution of a subset of variables to the distance is extended to this situation, even when sample sizes are not necessarily the same.     

Consistent selection of the actual model in regression analysis

SUMMARY In regression analysis, a best subset of regressors is usually selected by minimizing Mallows's C statistic or some other equivalent criterion, such as the Akaike lambda information criterion or cross-validation. It is known that the resulting procedure suffers from a lack of consistency that can lead to a model with too many variables. For this reason, corrections have been proposed that yield consistent procedures. The object of this paper is to show that these corrected criteria, although asymptotically consistent, are usually too conservative for finite sample sizes. The paper also proposes a new correction of Mallows's statistic that yields better results. A simulation study is conducted that shows that the proposed criterion performs well in a variety of situations.