Evaluation of a method for setting confidence intervals on the common mean of two normal populations

Let X₁, , X₂, …, X be distributed N(µ, σ² _x), let Y₁, Y₂, …, Y"_n be distributed N(µ, σ² _y), and let X , X , … X_m, Y₁, Y₂, …, Y_n be mutually independent. In this paper a method for setting confidence intervals on the common mean µ is proposed and evaluated.     

On estimating the common mean in two normal distributions after a preliminary test for equality of variances

Given two random samples of equal size from two normal distributions with common mean but possibly different variances, we examine the sampling performance of the pre-test estimator for the common mean after a preliminary test for equality of variances. It is shown that when the alternative in the pretest is one-sided, the Graybill-Deal estimator is dominated by the pre-test estimator if the critical value is chosen appropriately. It is also shown that all estimators, the grand mean, the Graybill-Deal estimator and the pre-test estimator, are admissible when the alternative in the pre-test is two-sided. The optimal critical values in the two-sided pre-test are sought based on the minimax regret and the minimum average risk criteria, and it is shown that the Graybill-Deal estimator is most preferable under the minimum average risk criterion when the alternative in the pre-test is two-sided.     

A note on the common mean of two normal populations with order restricted variances

Consider the problem of estimating the common mean of two normal populations when the order of the unknown variances is known. In this article we have constructed a simple improved estimator which is better than the usual Graybill-Deal estimator in terms of stochastic domination.     

Confidence intervals for the comparison of two poisson distributions

Confidence interval construction the difference in mean event rates for two Index independent , Poisson samples is discussed. Intervals are derived by considering Bayes estimates of the mean event rates using a family of noninformative priors. The coverage probabilities of the proposed are compared to those of the standard Wald interval for of observed events. A compromise method of constructing interval based on the data is suggested and its properties are evaluated. The method is illustrated in several examples.     

Improved estimators for the common mean and ordered means of two normal distributions with ordered variances

We first consider the problem of estimating the common mean of two normal distributions with unknown ordered variances. We give a broad class of estimators which includes the estimators proposed by Nair (1982) and Elfessi et al. (1992) and show that the estimators stochastically dominate the estimators which do not take into account the order restriction on variances, including the one given by Graybill and Deal (1959). Then we propose a broad class of individual estimators of two ordered means when unknown variances are ordered. We show that in estimating the mean with larger variance, estimators which do not take into account the order restriction on variances are stochastically dominated by the proposed class of estimators which take into account both order restrictions. However, in estimating the mean with smaller variance, similar improvement is not possible even in terms of mean squared error. We also show a domination result in the simultaneous estimation problem of two ordered means. Further, improving upon the unbiased estimators of the two means is discussed.     

Interval estimation of the common mean

Brown and Cohen (1974) considered the problem of interval estimation of the common mean of two normal populations based on independent random samples. They showed that if we take the usual confidence interval using the first sample only and centre it around an appropriate combined estimate of the common mean the resulting interval would contain the true value with higher probability. They also gave a sufficient condition which such a point estimate should satisfy. Bhattacharya and Shah (1978) showed that the estimates satisfying this condition are nearly identical to the mean of the first sample. In this paper we obtain a stronger sufficient condition which is satisfied by many point estimates when the size of the second sample exceeds ten.     

Confidence intervals for the ratio of two variances

In this paper we consider confidence intervals for the ratio of two population variances. We propose a confidence interval for the ratio of two variances based on the t-statistic by deriving its Edgeworth expansion and considering Hall's and Johnson's transformations. Then, we consider the coverage accuracy of suggested intervals and intervals based on the F-statistic for some distributions.     

Bounds for the variance of the graybill-deal estimator of the common mean of two normal distributions

In this note we derive sharp lower and upper bounds for the variance of the Graybill-Deal estimator of the common mean of two normal distributions with unknown variances when the sample sizes are not necessarily equal. We also derive similar bounds for the variance of the Brown-Cohen (1974) T _a(1) class of unbiased es-timators to which the Graybill-Deal estimator belongs. Further, we illustrate the sharpness of the bounds by numerical computations in the case of the Graybill-Deal estimator.     

Classification into two normal populations with a common mean and unequal variances

The problem of classification into two univariate normal populations with a common mean is considered. Several classification rules are proposed based on efficient estimators of the common mean. Detailed numerical comparisons of probabilities of misclassifications using these rules have been carried out. It is shown that the classification rule based on the Graybill-Deal estimator of the common mean performs the best. Classification rules are also proposed for the case when variances are assumed to be ordered. Comparison of these rules with the rule based on the Graybill-Deal estimator has been done with respect to individual probabilities of misclassification.     

Estimation of the common mean of two univariate normal populations

The problem of estimating the common mean μ of two univariate normal populations with unknown and unequal variances is considered from a decision-theoretic point of view. We restrict our attention to an appropriate class C and its three subclasses C_0C1C2of un-biased estimates of μ. We consider the usual estimate μ⁰ of μ which is the weighted linear combination of the sample means with weights as reciprocals of the sample variances. Its admissibility in C₀ and extended admissibility in C is proved. Admissible estimates in C₁ and C₂are also obtained.The loss is always assumed to be squared error. The question of admissibility of μ⁰ in the class of all estimators is still open.     

A note on estimating the common mean of k normal distributions and the stein problem

An unbiased estimator for the common mean of k normal distributions is suggested. A necessary and sufficient condition for the estimator Lo have a smaller variance than each sample mean is given. In the case of estimating the common mean vector of k p-variate (p ≤ 3) normal distributions a combined unbiased estimator may be used. We give a class of estimators which are better than the combined estimator when the loss is quadratic and the restriction of unbiasedness is removed.     

Improved estimation of quantiles of two normal populations with common mean and ordered variances

Abstract

Estimation of quantiles from two normal populations is considered under the assumption of common mean and ordered variances. Several new estimators have been proposed using certain estimators of the common mean, including the plug-in type restricted MLE. A sufficient condition for improving equivariant estimators is proved and as a result improved estimators are derived. The percentage of risk improvements for each of the improved estimators have been computed numerically, which are quite significant. All the improved estimators have been compared numerically using Monte-Carlo simulation method. Finally, recommendations have been made for the use of estimators in practice.     

Confidence intervals for the length of a vector mean

Suppose we have a random sample of size n from a multivariate distribution with finite moments, for which a parametric form is not available. We wish to obtain a confidence interval (CI) for the length of its mean. The usual method is to Studentize. The resulting CIs are not exact. The error in their nominal levels is ～n ^?1/2 and ～n ^?1 in the one-sided and two-sided cases. We show how to reduce these errors to ～n ^?3/2 and ～n ^?2.     

Testing hypotheses about the common mean of normal distributions

An overview of hypothesis testing for the common mean of independent normal distributions is given. The case of two populations is studied in detail. A number of different types of tests are studied. Among them are a test based on the maximum of the two available t-tests, Fisher's combined test, a test based on Graybill–Deal's estimator, an approximation to the likelihood ratio test, and some tests derived using some Bayesian considerations for improper priors along with intuitive considerations. Based on some theoretical findings and mostly based on a Monte Carlo study the conclusions are that for the most part the Bayes-intuitive type tests are superior and can be recommended. When the variances of the populations are close the approximate likelihood ratio test does best.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals in mixtures of discrete distributions

The problem of building bootstrap confidence intervals for small probabilities with count data is addressed. The law of the independent observations is assumed to be a mixture of a given family of power series distributions. The mixing distribution is estimated by nonparametric maximum likelihood and the corresponding mixture is used for resampling. We build percentile-t and Efron percentile bootstrap confidence intervals for the probabilities and we prove their consistency in probability. The new theoretical results are supported by simulation experiments for Poisson and geometric mixtures. We compare percentile-t and Efron percentile bootstrap intervals with eight other bootstrap or asymptotic theory based intervals. It appears that Efron percentile bootstrap intervals outperform the competitors in terms of coverage probability and length.     

Data-randomized confidence intervals for discrete distributions

In practice non-randomized conservative confidence intervals for the parameter of a discrete distribution are used instead of the randomized uniformly most accurate intervals. We suggest in this paper that a part of the data be used as the random mechanism to create “data-randomized” confidence intervals. A thoughtful utilization of the data leads to intervals that are shorter than the usual conservative intervals but avoids the arbitrariness of the randomized uniformly most accurate intervals. Examples are given using the binomial, Poisson, and extended hypergeometric distributions, as well as applications to a metched case-control study and a randomized clinical trial.     

Relationships between confidence intervals for the ratio of two variances of independent normal distributions

Burk at al (1984) gave a results concerning the comparison of the length of the two different confidence intervals for variance ratio, when the construction of the intervals was based on the principle of “equal tails”11. The purpose of this paper is to be solve the similar problem in case of the principle of “minimal length”.     

Empirical Bayes confidence intervals shrinking both means and variances

Summary.  We construct empirical Bayes intervals for a large number p of means. The existing intervals in the literature assume that variances     are either equal or unequal but known. When the variances are unequal and unknown, the suggestion is typically to replace them by unbiased estimators     . However, when p is large, there would be advantage in 'borrowing strength' from each other. We derive double-shrinkage intervals for means on the basis of our empirical Bayes estimators that shrink both the means and the variances. Analytical and simulation studies and application to a real data set show that, compared with the t -intervals, our intervals have higher coverage probabilities while yielding shorter lengths on average. The double-shrinkage intervals are on average shorter than the intervals from shrinking the means alone and are always no longer than the intervals from shrinking the variances alone. Also, the intervals are explicitly defined and can be computed immediately.     

Testing hypotheses about the common mean of two normal populations

Two simple tests which allow for unequal sample sizes are considered for testing hypothesis for the common mean of two normal populations. The first test is an exact test of size a based on two available t-statistics based on single samples made exact through random allocation of α among the two available t-tests. The test statistic of the second test is a weighted average of two available t-statistics with random weights. It is shown that the first test is more efficient than the available two t-tests with respect to Bahadur asymptotic relative efficiency. It is also shown that the null distribution of the test statistic in the second test, which is similar to the one based on the normalized Graybill-Deal test statistic, converges to a standard normal distribution. Finally, we compare the small sample properties of these tests, those given in Zhou and Mat hew (1993), and some tests given in Cohen and Sackrowitz (1984) in a simulation study. In this study, we find that the second test performs better than the tests given in Zhou and Mathew (1993) and is comparable to the ones given in Cohen and Sackrowitz (1984) with respect to power..