TESTS FOR DETECTING MORE NBU-NESS AT A SPECIFIC AGE

This paper proposes a class of non‐parametric test procedures for testing the null hypothesis that two distributions, F and G, are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that F is ‘more NBU (new better than used) at specified age t₀’ than G. Using Hoeffding's two‐sample U‐statistic theorem, it establishes the asymptotic normality of the test statistics and produces a class of asymptotically distribution‐free tests. Pitman asymptotic efficacies of the proposed tests are calculated with respect to the location and shape parameters. A numerical example is provided for illustrative purposes.     

On tests for normality of experimental error in ridge regression

Considered are tests for normality of the errors in ridge regression. If an intercept is included in the model, it is shown that test statistics based on the empirical distribution function of the ridge residuals have the same limiting distribution as in the one-sample test for normality with estimated mean and variance. The result holds with weak assumptions on the behavior of the independent variables; asymptotic normality of the ridge estimator is not required.     

Kolmogorov-type tests of goodness-of-fit against stochastic ordering

This article addresses the problem of testing the null hypothesis H₀ that a random sample of size n is from a distribution with the completely specified continuous cumulative distribution function F_n(x). Kolmogorov-type tests for H₀ are based on the statistics C⁺ _n = Sup[F_n(x)?F₀(x)] and C^? _n=Sup[F₀(x)?F_n(x)], where F_n(x) is an empirical distribution function. Let F(x) be the true cumulative distribution function, and consider the ordered alternative H₁: F(x)≥F₀(x) for all x and with strict inequality for some x. Although it is natural to reject H₀ and accept H₁ if C ⁺ _n is large, this article shows that a test that is superior in some ways rejects F₀ and accepts H₁ if C^mdash _n is small. Properties of the two tests are compared based on theoretical results and simulated results.     

A general algorithm fob,univariate and multivariate goodness of pit tests based on graphical representation

This paper presents a general algorithm tor assessing the distributional assumptions. Empirical distributions of the corresponding test statistics are obtained and examples are given to illustrate various applications of the proposed test. By using the squared radii and angles, it is shown that the problem of assessing multivariate normality can be reduced to that of testing for a univariate distribution. A limited comparison is made to investigate the power of the proposed test. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant NO.G88135. Support from the Computer Applications ami Software Engineering (CASE) Center of Syracuse University is also gratefully acknowledged     

Data-Transformation and Test of Fit for the Generalized Pareto Hypothesis

In this article, we consider Crámer–von Mises type goodness-of-fit statistics for the Generalized Pareto law. The tests involve a certain transformation of the original observations, which, at least in the case of completely specified null distribution, may be viewed as transforming to uniformity and comparing the resulting moments of arbitrary positive order to those of a uniform distribution. The method is shown to be consistent, and the asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic is derived. Simulation results indicate that the proposed test compares well with standard methods based on the empirical distribution function.     

On optimal tests for separate hypotheses and conditional probability integral transformations

Consider the problem of testing the composite null hypothesis that a random sample X₁,…,X_n is from a parent which is a member of a particular continuous parametric family of distributions against an alternative that it is from a separate family of distributions. It is shown here that in many cases a uniformly most powerful similar (UMPS) test exists for this problem, and, moreover, that this test is equivalent to a uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) test. It is also seen in the method of proof used that the UMPS test statistic Is a function of the statistics U₁,…,U_n?k obtained by the conditional probability integral transformations (CPIT), and thus that no Information Is lost by these transformations, It is also shown that these optimal tests have power that is a nonotone function of the null hypothesis class of distributions, so that, for example, if one additional parameter for the distribution is assumed known, then the power of the test can not lecrease. It Is shown that the statistics U₁, …, U_n?k are independent of the complete sufficient statistic, and that these statistics have important invariance properties. Two examples at given. The UMPS tests for testing the two-parameter uniform family against the two-parameter exponential family, and for testing one truncation parameter distribution against another one are derived.     

Testing for normality in linear regression models

The importance of the normal distribution for fitting continuous data is well known. However, in many practical situations data distribution departs from normality. For example, the sample skewness and the sample kurtosis are far away from 0 and 3, respectively, which are nice properties of normal distributions. So, it is important to have formal tests of normality against any alternative. D'Agostino et al. [A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality, Am. Statist. 44 (1990), pp. 316–321] review four procedures Z ²(g ₁), Z ²(g ₂), D and K ² for testing departure from normality. The first two of these procedures are tests of normality against departure due to skewness and kurtosis, respectively. The other two tests are omnibus tests. An alternative to the normal distribution is a class of skew-normal distributions (see [A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scand. J. Statist. 12 (1985), pp. 171–178]). In this paper, we obtain a score test (W) and a likelihood ratio test (LR) of goodness of fit of the normal regression model against the skew-normal family of regression models. It turns out that the score test is based on the sample skewness and is of very simple form. The performance of these six procedures, in terms of size and power, are compared using simulations. The level properties of the three statistics LR, W and Z ²(g ₁) are similar and close to the nominal level for moderate to large sample sizes. Also, their power properties are similar for small departure from normality due to skewness (γ₁≤0.4). Of these, the score test statistic has a very simple form and computationally much simpler than the other two statistics. The LR statistic, in general, has highest power, although it is computationally much complex as it requires estimates of the parameters under the normal model as well as those under the skew-normal model. So, the score test may be used to test for normality against small departure from normality due to skewness. Otherwise, the likelihood ratio statistic LR should be used as it detects general departure from normality (due to both skewness and kurtosis) with, in general, largest power.     

Analyzing the results of a cloud-seeding experiment in tasmania

We considered the analysis or a randomized cloud seeding experiment of lusmania, Where an distributed analysis had been specified before the experiment was carried one. We compare “classical” regression analyses, with and without transformations, with permutation tests based upon double-ratio and variance-ratio statistics. Regression residuals are used to compare the merits of various other alternative test-statistics including some based upon gamma distribution assumptions. We conclude that more attention needs to be paid to the relative weights which various rest statistics implicitly attach to low, medium and high rainfalls, and that, irrespective ot distributional assumptions and theory, significant testing should be done using permutation tests.     

Nonparametric two-sample tests for dispersion differences based on placements

Two different two-sample tests for dispersion differences based on placement statistics are proposed. The means and variances of the test statistics are derived, and asymptotic normality is established for both. Variants of the proposed tests based on reversing the X and Y labels in the test statistic calculations are shown to have different small-sample properties; for both pairs of tests, one member of the pair will be resolving, the other nonresolving. The proposed tests are similar in spirit to the dispersion tests of both Mood and Hollander; comparative simulation results for these four tests are given. For small sample sizes, the powers of the proposed tests are approximately equal to the powers of the tests of both Mood and Hollander for samples from the normal, Cauchy and exponential distributions. The one-sample limiting distributions are also provided, yielding useful approximations to the exact tests when one sample is much larger than the other. A bootstrap test may alternatively be performed. The proposed test statistics may be used with lightly censored data by substituting Kaplan-Meier estimates for the empirical distribution functions.     

Bayesian tests for matched proportions

A sample of n subjects is observed in each of two states, S₁-and S₂. In each state, a subject is in one of two conditions, X or Y. Thus, a subject may be recorded as showing a change if its condition in the two states is ‘Y,X’ or ‘X,Y’ and, otherwise, the condition is unchanged. We consider a Bayesian test of the null hypothesis that the probability of an ‘X,Y’ change exceeds that of a ‘Y,X’ change by amount k_O. That is, we develop the posterior distribution of k_O, the difference between the two probabilities and reject the null hypothesis if k lies outside the appropriate posterior probability interval. The performance of the method is assessed by Monte Carlo and other numerical studies and brief tables of exact critical values are presented     

More on testing the normality assumptionin the Tobit Model

In a recent volume of this journal, Holden [Testing the normality assumption in the Tobit Model, J. Appl. Stat. 31 (2004) pp. 521–532] presents Monte Carlo evidence comparing several tests for departures from normality in the Tobit Model. This study adds to the work of Holden by considering another test, and several information criteria, for detecting departures from normality in the Tobit Model. The test given here is a modified likelihood ratio statistic based on a partially adaptive estimator of the Censored Regression Model using the approach of Caudill [A partially adaptive estimator for the Censored Regression Model based on a mixture of normal distributions, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Auburn University, 2007]. The information criteria examined include the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), the Consistent AIC (CAIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the Akaike’s BIC (ABIC). In terms of fewest ‘rejections’ of a true null, the best performance is exhibited by the CAIC and the BIC, although, like some of the statistics examined by Holden, there are computational difficulties with each.     

Asymptotic Representations of the Multivariate Empirical Distribution Function and Applications

Often, many complicated statistics used as estimators or test statistics take the form of the (multivariate) empirical distribution function evaluated at a random vector (V_n). Denote such statistics by S_n. This paper describes methods for the study of various asymptotic properties of S_n. First, under minimal assumptions, a weak asymptotic representation for S_n is derived. This result may be used to show the asymptotic normality of S_n. Second, under slightly more stringent regularity conditions, an almost sure representation of S_n, with suitable order (as.) of the remainder term is studied and then a law of the iterated logarithm for S_n, is derived. In this context, strong convergence results from a sequential point of view are also studied. Finally, weak convergence to a Brownian motion process is established. As an application, we show the limiting normality of S_n, for a random number of summands.     

On similarity and independence properties of composite edf goodness-of-fit tests

Many test statistics for classical simple goodness-of-fit hypothesis testing problems are distancemeasures between the distribution function of the null hypothesis distributipn and the empirical distribution function sometimes called EDF tests. If a composite parametric null hypothesis is considered in place of the simple null hypothesis, then a test statistic can be obtained from each EDF test by replacing the known distribution function of the simple problem by the Rao-Blackwell estimating distribution function. In this note we use known results to show that these Rao-Blackwell-EDF test statistics have distributions that do not depend upon parameter values, and hence that these tests are independent of a complete sufficient statistic for the parameters.     

The limit distribution of a modified Shapiro–Wilk statistic for normality to Type II censored data

The Shapiro–Wilk statistic and modified statistics are widely used test statistics for normality. They are based on regression and correlation. The statistics for the complete data can be easily generalized to the censored data. In this paper, the distribution theory for the modified Shapiro–Wilk statistic is investigated when it is generalized to Type II right censored data. As a result, it is shown that the limit distribution of the statistic can be representable as the integral of a Brownian bridge. Also, the power comparison to the other procedure is performed.     

Testing the Fit of Gamma Distributions Using the Empirical Moment Generating Function

ABSTRACT

This article presents goodness-of-fit tests for two and three-parameter gamma distributions that are based on minimum quadratic forms of standardized logarithmic differences of values of the moment generating function and its empirical counterpart. The test statistics can be computed without reliance to special functions and have asymptotic chi-squared distributions. Monte Carlo simulations are used to compare the proposed test for the two-parameter gamma distribution with goodness-of-fit tests employing empirical distribution function or spacing statistics. Two data sets are used to illustrate the various tests.     

A MORE GENERAL CRITERION FOR SUBSET SELECTION IN MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION

ABSTRACT

In this article, we propose a more general criterion called S_p -criterion, for subset selection in the multiple linear regression Model. Many subset selection methods are based on the Least Squares (LS) estimator of β, but whenever the data contain an influential observation or the distribution of the error variable deviates from normality, the LS estimator performs ‘poorly’ and hence a method based on this estimator (for example, Mallows’ C_p -criterion) tends to select a ‘wrong’ subset. The proposed method overcomes this drawback and its main feature is that it can be used with any type of estimator (either the LS estimator or any robust estimator) of β without any need for modification of the proposed criterion. Moreover, this technique is operationally simple to implement as compared to other existing criteria. The method is illustrated with examples.     

Stringency-based ranking of normality tests

Many parametric statistical inferential procedures in finite samples depend crucially on the underlying normal distribution assumption. Dozens of normality tests are available in the literature to test the hypothesis of normality. Availability of such a large number of normality tests has generated a large number of simulation studies to find a best test but no one arrived at a definite answer as all depends critically on the alternative distributions which cannot be specified. A new framework, based on stringency concept, is devised to evaluate the performance of the existing normality tests. Mixture of t-distributions is used to generate the alternative space. The LR-tests, based on Neyman–Pearson Lemma, have been computed to construct a power envelope for calculating the stringencies of the selected normality tests. While evaluating the stringencies, Anderson–Darling (AD) statistic turns out to be the best normality test.     

Tests for multivariate normality based on canonical correlations

We propose new affine invariant tests for multivariate normality, based on independence characterizations of the sample moments of the normal distribution. The test statistics are obtained using canonical correlations between sets of sample moments in a way that resembles the construction of Mardia’s skewness measure and generalizes the Lin–Mudholkar test for univariate normality. The tests are compared to some popular tests based on Mardia’s skewness and kurtosis measures in an extensive simulation power study and are found to offer higher power against many of the alternatives.     

A New Goodness-of-Fit Test Based on the Empirical Characteristic Function

In this article, we present a goodness-of-fit test for a distribution based on some comparisons between the empirical characteristic function c_n(t) and the characteristic function of a random variable under the simple null hypothesis, c₀(t). We do this by introducing a suitable distance measure. Empirical critical values for the new test statistic for testing normality are computed. In addition, the new test is compared via simulation to other omnibus tests for normality and it is shown that this new test is more powerful than others.     

A Generalization of Shapiro–Wilk's Test for Multivariate Normality

A goodness-of-fit test for multivariate normality is proposed which is based on Shapiro–Wilk's statistic for univariate normality and on an empirical standardization of the observations. The critical values can be approximated by using a transformation of the univariate standard normal distribution. A Monte Carlo study reveals that this test has a better power performance than some of the best known tests for multinormality against a wide range of alternatives.