Admissible tests for the mean with additional information

Let X be a po-normal random vector with unknown µ and unknown covariance matrix ∑ and let X be partitioned as X = (X^′ ₍₁₎, …, X^′ _(r))′ where X_(j)is a subvector of X with dimension p_jsuch that ∑^r _j=1Pj = P0. Some admissible tests are derived for testing H₀: μ = 0 versus H₁: μ ¦0 based on a sample drawn from the whole vector X of dimension p and r additional samples drawn from X₍₁₎, X₍₂₎, …, X(r) respectively, All (r+1) samples are assumed to be independent. The distribution of some of the tests' statistics involved are also derived.     

A comparison of some nonparametric tests for the simple tree alternative

This paper develops a new test statistic for testing hypotheses of the form H_O M₀=M₁=…=M_k versus H_a: M₀≦M₁,M₂,…,M_k] where at least one inequality is strict. M₀ is the median of the control population and M₁ is the median of the population receiving trearment i, i=1,2,…,k. The population distributions are assumed to be unknown but to differ only in their location parameters if at all. A simulation study is done comparing the new test statistic with the Chacko and the Kruskal-Wallis when the underlying population distributions are either normal, uniform, exponential, or Cauchy. Sample sizes of five, eight, ten, and twenty were considered. The new test statistic did better than the Chacko and the Kruskal-Wallis when the medians of the populations receiving the treatments were approximately the same     

Testing for and against a set of linear inequality constraints in a multinomial setting

There are numerous situations in categorical data analysis where one wishes to test hypotheses involving a set of linear inequality constraints placed upon the cell probabilities. For example, it may be of interest to test for symmetry in k × k contingency tables against one-sided alternatives. In this case, the null hypothesis imposes a set of linear equalities on the cell probabilities (namely p_ij = P_ji ×i > j), whereas the alternative specifies directional inequalities. Another important application (Robertson, Wright, and Dykstra 1988) is testing for or against stochastic ordering between the marginals of a k × k contingency table when the variables are ordinal and independence holds. Here we extend existing likelihood-ratio results to cover more general situations. To be specific, we consider testing H_t,0 against H₁ - H₀ and H₁ against H₂ - H ₁ when H₀:k × i=1 p_ix_ji = 0, j = 1,…, s, H₁:k × i=1 p_ix_ji × 0, j = 1,…, s, and does not impose any restrictions on p. The x_ji's are known constants, and s × k - 1. We show that the asymptotic distributions of the likelihood-ratio tests are of chi-bar-square type, and provide expressions for the weighting values.     

Optimal linear combinations using householder transformations

In pattern classification of sampled vector valued random variables it is often essential, due to computational and accuracy considerations, to consider certain measurable transformations of the random variable. These transformations are generally of a dimension-reducing nature. In this paper we consider the class of linear dimension reducing transformations, i.e., the k × n matrices of rank k where k < n and n is the dimension of the range of the sampled vector random variable.

In this connection, we use certain results (Decell and Quirein, 1973), that guarantee, relative to various class separability criteria, the existence of an extremal transformation. These results also guarantee that the extremal transformation can be expressed in the form (I_k∣ Z)U where I_k is the k × k identity matrix and U is an orthogonal n × n matrix. These results actually limit the search for the extremal linear transformation to a search over the obviously smaller class of k × n matrices of the form (I_k ∣Z)U. In this paper these results are refined in the sense that any extremal transformation can be expressed in the form (I_K∣Z)H_p … H₁ where p ≤ min{k, n?k} and H_i is a Householder transformation i=l,…, p, The latter result allows one to construct a sequence of transformations (L_K∣ Z)H₁, (I_K Z)H₂H₁ … such that the values of the class separability criterion evaluated at this sequence is a bounded, monotone sequence of real numbers. The construction of the i-th element of the sequence of transformations requires the solution of an n-dimensional optimization problem. The solution, for various class separability criteria, of the optimization problem will be the subject of later papers. We have conjectured (with supporting theorems and empirical results) that, since the bounded monotone sequence of real class separability values converges to its least upper bound, this least upper bound is an extremal value of the class separability criterion.

Several open questions are stated and the practical implications of the results are discussed.     

A RENEWAL THEOREM IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL TIME

Let Y_l, Y₂,… be i.i.d., positive, integer-valued random variables with means, μ. Let the sequences {Y_ij, j= 1,2,…}, i= 1,…, r be independent copies of {Y₁, Y₂,…}. For n={n₁,…, n_r.}, n₁≥1, let S_n=S?ⁿ¹_k1=1= 1 …S?^nr_kr=1 Y_ik1… Y_rkr. We show that S?^N_k=1S?^∞_k1=1…S?^∞_nr=1 P[[S_n= k] ? [μ^-r N log^r-1 (N)/(r-1)!] as N →∞.     

Local asymptotic normality of intermediate and central order statistics

Consider n independent random variables Z_i,…, Z_n on R with common distribution function F, whose upper tail belongs to a parametric family F(t) = F_θ(t),t ≥ x₀, where θ ∈ ? ? R ^d. A necessary and sufficient condition for the family F_θ, θ ∈ ?, is established such that the k-th largest order statistic Z_n?k+1:n alone constitutes the central sequence yielding local asymptotic normality ( LAN ) of the loglikelihood ratio of the vector (Z_n?i+1:n)¹ _i=kof the k largest order statistics. This is achieved for k = k(n)→_n→∞∞ with k/n→_n→∞ 0.

In the case of vectors of central order statistics ( Z_r:n, Z_r+1:n,…, Z_s:n ), with r/n and s/n both converging to q ∈ ( 0,1 ), it turns out that under fairly general conditions any order statistic Z_m:n with r ≤ m ≤s builds the central sequence in a pertaining LAN expansion.These results lead to asymptotically optimal tests and estimators of the underlying parameter, which depend on single order statistics only     

Order statistics from extreme value distribution,ii: best linear unbiased estimates and some other uses

Let Y_r+1:n ≤ _Y:r+2:n ≤≤… <Y_n?6:n-<: TYPE-II censored sample from an extreme value population with µ and α as the location and scale parameters, respectively. Tables of coefficients for the best linear unbiased estimators (BLUEs) of µ and α are presented for various choices of censoring and sample sizes n = 2(1)15(5)30; variances and covariance of these estimators are also presented. The computational formulae and procedure used and some checks employed are explained. We finally illustrate some uses of the tables by taking examples.     

A one-sided test for testino homogeneity of scale parameters against simple ordered alternative

In an earlier paper the authors (1997) extended the results of Hayter (1990) to the two parameter exponential probability model. This paper addressee the extention to the scale parameter case under location-scale probability model. Consider k (k≧3) treatments or competing firms such that an observation from with treatment or firm follows a distribution with cumulative distribution function (cdf) F_i(x)=F[(x-μ_i)/Q_i], where F(·) is any absolutely continuous cdf, i=1,…,k. We propose a test to test the null hypothesis H₀:θ₁=…=θ_k against the simple ordered alternative H₁:θ₁≦…≦θ_k, with at least one strict inequality, using the data X_i,j, i=1,…k; j=1,…,n₁. Two methods to compute the critical points of the proposed test have been demonstrated by talking k two parameter exponential distributions. The test procedure also allows us to construct simultaneous one sided confidence intervals (SOCIs) for the ordered pairwise ratios θ_j/θ_i, 1≦i<j≦k. Statistical simulation revealed that: 9i) actual sizes of the critical points are almost conservative and (ii) power of the proposed test relative to some existing tests is higher.     

A Characterization of probability densities with expected log likelihood

In the class of all densities with constraints E b_i(X) = c,(i = 1,....,q), it is well known that the entropy is maximized by the density belonging to the exponential family specified by b_i(x), i = 1,....,q. Our aim in this note is to generalize theresult by using expected log likelihood.     

Complete ranking procedures with quadratic loss

Suppose that one wishes to rank k normal populations, each with common variance σ² and unknown means θ_i (i=1,2,…,k). Independent samples of size n are taken from each population, and the sample averages are used to rank the populations. In this paper, we investigate what sample sizes, n, are necessary to attain “good” rankings under various loss functions. Section discusses various loss functions and their interpretation. Section 2 gives the solution for a reasonable non-parametric loss function. Section 3 gives the solution for a reasonable parameteric loss function.     

ON ASYMPTOTIC OPTIMALITY OF SOME TESTS FOR EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS

The probability density function (pdf) of a two parameter exponential distribution is given by f(x; p, s?) =s?^-1 exp {-(x - ρ)/s?} for x≥ρ and 0 elsewhere, where 0 < ρ < ∞ and 0 < s?∞. Suppose we have k independent random samples where the ith sample is drawn from the ith population having the pdf f(x; ρ_i, s?_i), 0 < ρ_i < ∞, 0 < s?_i < s?_i < and f(x; ρ, s?) is as given above. Let X_i1 < X_i2 <… < X_iri denote the first r_i order statistics in a random sample of size n_i, drawn from the ith population with pdf f(x; ρ_i, s?_i), i = 1, 2,…, k. In this paper we show that the well known tests of hypotheses about the parameters ρ_i, s?_i, i = 1, 2,…, k based on the above observations are asymptotically optimal in the sense of Bahadur efficiency. Our results are similar to those for normal distributions.     

Simplified estimation of the parameters of exponential distribution from samples censored in the middle

This paper presents the small sample optimum choice of k ≤n + r₁ ? r₂ + 1) order statistics for the best linear unbiased estimates (BLUES) of the parameters μ and σ or σ alone ( μ known) when the sample is Type II censored in the middle retaining only r₁ lower and n - r₂ + 1 upper order statistics. For n = 3(1)10, k = 2(1)4, r₁ = O(1) (n?2) and r₂ = (r₁ +2) (l)n, the optimum ranks, the coefficients of the BLUEs have been presented in Table I     

A test for the equality of k medians against the simple tree alternative under right censorship

We consider a test for the equality of k population medians, θ_i i=1,2,….,k, when it is believed a priori, that θ _i: The observations are subject to right censorhip. The distributions of the censoring variables for each population are assumed to be equal. This test is compared with the general k-sample test proposed by Breslow     

Comparisons of parameter and hypothesis definitions in a general linear model

In the context of the general linear model E(Y)=Xβ possibly subject to restrictions Rβ=r two secondary parameters may be well defined by Θ_i=G_iE(Y)-Θ_oi=C_i β-Θ_oi,i=1,2, and corresponding nonconstant hypotheses, H_i:Θ_i=0. The following possible relations are defined: Θ₁: is dependent upon /equivalent to/identical to Θ₂:H₁is a subhypothesis of/is identical to H₂. Necessary and sufficient conditions, involving straightforward matrix computations, are presented for each relation. Comparisons of secondary parameters and hypotheses are illustrated with an incomplete, unbalanced 3 × 4 factorial design from Searle in which, using a constrained version of Searle's model, parameters and hypotheses in the incomplete, unbalanced design are shown to be indentical to parameters one would define if complete balanced data were available. Techniques for computing simplified definitions are illustrated.     

On the robustness of the linear hypothesis test procedure in the singular linear model with implied restrictions

The linear hypothesis test procedure is considered in the restricted linear modelsM _r = {y, Xβ |Rβ = 0, σ ²V} andM _r ^* = {y, Xβ |ARβ = 0, σ ²V}. Necessary and sufficient conditions are derived under which the statistic providing anF-test for the linear hypothesisH ₀:Kβ=0 in the modelM _r ^* (M_r) continues to be valid in the modelM _r (M _r ^* ); the results obtained cover the case whereM _r ^* is replaced by the general Gauss-Markov modelM = {y, Xβ, σ ²V}.     

Distributions of patterns of two successes separated by a string of <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-2 failures

Let Z ₁, Z ₂, . . . be a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials with constant success and failure probabilities p = Pr(Z _t  = 1) and q = Pr(Z _t  = 0) = 1 − p, respectively, t = 1, 2, . . . . For any given integer k ≥ 2 we consider the patterns E₁{\mathcal{E}_{1}}: two successes are separated by at most k−2 failures, E₂{\mathcal{E}_{2}}: two successes are separated by exactly k −2 failures, and E₃{\mathcal{E}_{3}} : two successes are separated by at least k − 2 failures. Denote by N_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{ N_{n,k}^{(i)}} (respectively M_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{M_{n,k}^{(i)}}) the number of occurrences of the pattern E_i{\mathcal{E}_{i}} , i = 1, 2, 3, in Z ₁, Z ₂, . . . , Z _n when the non-overlapping (respectively overlapping) counting scheme for runs and patterns is employed. Also, let T_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾{T_{r,k}^{(i)}} (resp. W_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾){W_{r,k}^{(i)})} be the waiting time for the r − th occurrence of the pattern E_i{\mathcal{E}_{i}}, i = 1, 2, 3, in Z ₁, Z ₂, . . . according to the non-overlapping (resp. overlapping) counting scheme. In this article we conduct a systematic study of N_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{N_{n,k}^{(i)}}, M_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{M_{n,k}^{(i)}}, T_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾{T_{r,k}^{(i)}} and W_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾{W_{r,k}^{(i)}} (i = 1, 2, 3) obtaining exact formulae, explicit or recursive, for their probability generating functions, probability mass functions and moments. An application is given.     

On some joint distributions in fluctuation theory

For non-negative integral valued interchangeable random variables v₁, v₂,…,v_n, Takács (1967, 70) has derived the distributions of the statistics ?_n' ?¹_n' ?^(c)_n and ?^(-c)_n concerning the partial sums N_r = v₁ + v₂ + ··· + v_rr = 1,…,n. This paper deals with the joint distributions of some other statistics viz., (α^(c)_n, δ^(c)_n, Z_n), (β^(c)_n, Z_n) and (β^(-c)_n, Z_n) concerning the partial sums N_r = ε₁ + ··· + ε_rr = 1,2,…,n, of geometric random variables ε₁, ε₂,…,ε_n.