Better approximate confidence intervals for a binomial parameter

This paper discusses five methods for constructing approximate confidence intervals for the binomial parameter Θ, based on Y successes in n Bernoulli trials. In a recent paper, Chen (1990) discusses various approximate methods and suggests a new method based on a Bayes argument, which we call method I here. Methods II and III are based on the normal approximation without and with continuity correction. Method IV uses the Poisson approximation of the binomial distribution and then exploits the fact that the exact confidence limits for the parameter of the Poisson distribution can be found through the x² distribution. The confidence limits of method IV are then provided by the Wilson-Hilferty approximation of the x². Similarly, the exact confidence limits for the binomial parameter can be expressed through the F distribution. Method V approximates these limits through a suitable version of the Wilson-Hilferty approximation. We undertake a comparison of the five methods in respect to coverage probability and expected length. The results indicate that method V has an advantage over Chen's Bayes method as well as over the other three methods.     

Two stage fixed width confidence intervals for the common location parameter of several exponential distributins

Two stage sampling schemes are introduced for use in estimating the common location parameter (guarantee time) of two or more exponential distributions with a confidence interval of prespecified width whose coverage probability is at least a given nominal value. Exact expressions for all moments of order r ≥ 1 of the associated two stage sample sizes and for the actual coverage probabilities are derived. The performance of the procedures in a variety of two population, moderate fixed sample size cases is examined via numerical studies involving both exact calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. No new tables are needed to implement any of the proposed methods. A modified two stage procedure is recommended for practical use     

On the lengths of t-based confidence intervals

Confidence interval is a basic type of interval estimation in statistics. When dealing with samples from a normal population with the unknown mean and the variance, the traditional method to construct t-based confidence intervals for the mean parameter is to treat the n sampled units as n groups and build the intervals. Here we propose a generalized method. We first divide them into several equal-sized groups and then calculate the confidence intervals with the mean values of these groups. If we define “better” in terms of the expected length of the confidence interval, then the first method is better because the expected length of the confidence interval obtained from the first method is shorter. We prove this intuition theoretically. We also specify when the elements in each group are correlated, the first method is invalid, while the second can give us correct results in terms of the coverage probability. We illustrate this with analytical expressions. In practice, when the data set is extremely large and distributed in several data centers, the second method is a good tool to get confidence intervals, in both independent and correlated cases. Some simulations and real data analyses are presented to verify our theoretical results.     

Construction of fixed width confidence intervals for a Bernoulli success probability using sequential sampling: a simulation study

This article considers the construction of level 1?α fixed width 2d confidence intervals for a Bernoulli success probability p, assuming no prior knowledge about p and so p can be anywhere in the interval [0, 1]. It is shown that some fixed width 2d confidence intervals that combine sequential sampling of Hall [Asymptotic theory of triple sampling for sequential estimation of a mean, Ann. Stat. 9 (1981), pp. 1229–1238] and fixed-sample-size confidence intervals of Agresti and Coull [Approximate is better than ‘exact’ for interval estimation of binomial proportions, Am. Stat. 52 (1998), pp. 119–126], Wilson [Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 22 (1927), pp. 209–212] and Brown et al. [Interval estimation for binomial proportion (with discussion), Stat. Sci. 16 (2001), pp. 101–133] have close to 1?α confidence level. These sequential confidence intervals require a much smaller sample size than a fixed-sample-size confidence interval. For the coin jamming example considered, a fixed-sample-size confidence interval requires a sample size of 9457, while a sequential confidence interval requires a sample size that rarely exceeds 2042.     

Comparison of conditional and unconditional confidence intervals for the double exponential distribution

Conditional confidence intervals for the location parameter of the double exponential distribution based on maximum likelihood estimators conditioned on a set of ancillary statistics and the corresponding unconditional confidence intervals based on the maximum likelihood estimators alone are compared in two ways. Monte Carlo techniques are used and the conditional approach appears to give slightly better results although agreement as n becomes larger is noted     

Improved estimators for the location of double exponential distribution

In this paper, attention is focused on estimation of the location parameter in the double exponential case using a weighted linear combination of the sample median and pairs of order statistics, with symmetric distance to both sides from the sample median. Minimizing with respect to weights and distances we get smaller asymptotic variance in the second order. If the number of pairs is taken as infinite and the distances as null we attain the least asymptotic variance in this class of estimators. The Pitman estimator is also noted. Similarly improved estimators are scanned over their probability of concentration to investigate its bound. Numerical comparison of the estimators is shown.     

Significance levels and confidence intervals for permutation tests

A computational algorithm is given which calculates exact significance levels of a wide class of permutation tests in the one and two sample problems. This class includes the permutation test based on the means, locally most powerful permutation tests and linear rank tests. When a shift model is assumed confidence intervals can also be obtained. Approximate methods, based on asymptotic expansions, are also presented.     

Optimal confidence intervals for the geometric parameter

Abstract

This article discusses optimal confidence estimation for the geometric parameter and shows how different criteria can be used for evaluating confidence sets within the framework of tail functions theory. The confidence interval obtained using a particular tail function is studied and shown to outperform others, in the sense of having smaller width or expected width under a specified weight function. It is also shown that it may not be possible to find the most powerful test regarding the parameter using the Neyman-Pearson lemma. The theory is illustrated by application to a fecundability study.     

The performance of model averaged tail area confidence intervals

We investigate the exact coverage and expected length properties of the model averaged tail area (MATA) confidence interval proposed by Turek and Fletcher, CSDA, 2012, in the context of two nested, normal linear regression models. The simpler model is obtained by applying a single linear constraint on the regression parameter vector of the full model. For given length of response vector and nominal coverage of the MATA confidence interval, we consider all possible models of this type and all possible true parameter values, together with a wide class of design matrices and parameters of interest. Our results show that, while not ideal, MATA confidence intervals perform surprisingly well in our regression scenario, provided that we use the minimum weight within the class of weights that we consider on the simpler model.     

Randomized confidence intervals of a parameter for a family of discrete exponential type distributions

For a family of one-parameter discrete exponential type distributions, the higher order approximation of randomized confidence intervals derived from the optimum test is discussed. Indeed, it is shown that they can be asymptotically constructed by means of the Edgeworth expansion. The usefulness is seen from the numerical results in the case of Poisson and binomial distributions.     

Sequential estimation of exponential lacation parameter using an asymmetric loss function

For a two-parameter negative exponential population with both parameters unknown, the bounded risk sequential estimation problem of the location parameter is considered under an asymmetric linex loss funmction. Asymptotic second-order expansion of the risk function is derived for a general class of stopping variables. Some examples are include involving purely scquential and accelerated sequential sampling methodologies. A Monte-Carlo study is carried out to support the asymptotic results and to compare the performance of the different sampling methodologies.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals for the pareto index

In the present paper we develop second-order theory using the subsample bootstrap in the context of Pareto index estimation. We show that the bootstrap is not second-order accurate, in the sense that it fails to correct the first term describing departure from the limit distribution. Worse than this, even when the subsample size is chosen optimally, the error between the subsample bootstrap approximation and the true distribution is often an order of magnitude larger than that oi tue asymptotic approximation. To overcome this deficiency, we show that an extrapolation method, based quite literally on a mixture of asymptotic and subsample bootstrap methods, can lead to second-order correct confidence intervals for the Pareto index.     

Improved confidence intervals for the exponential mean via tail functions

Abstract

The method of tail functions is applied to confidence estimation of the exponential mean in the presence of prior information. It is shown how the “ordinary” confidence interval can be generalized using a class of tail functions and then engineered for optimality, in the sense of minimizing prior expected length over that class, whilst preserving frequentist coverage. It is also shown how to derive the globally optimal interval, and how to improve on this using tail functions when criteria other than length are taken into consideration. Probabilities of false coverage are reported for some of the intervals under study, and the theory is illustrated by application to confidence estimation of a reliability coefficient based on some survival data.     

Confidence intervals for the mean of a normal distribution with restricted parameter space

For a normal distribution with known variance, the standard confidence interval of the location parameter is derived from the classical Neyman procedure. When the parameter space is known to be restricted, the standard confidence interval is arguably unsatisfactory. Recent articles have addressed this problem and proposed confidence intervals for the mean of a normal distribution where the parameter space is not less than zero. In this article, we propose a new confidence interval, rp interval, and derive the Bayesian credible interval and likelihood ratio interval for general restricted parameter space. We compare these intervals with the standard interval and the minimax interval. Simulation studies are undertaken to assess the performances of these confidence intervals.     

Design-based confidence limits for a distribution function

A method for constructing confidence limits for a distribution function is proposed. This method is a simple modification of the common method based on a normal approximation to the distribution of the estimated distribution function. The methods differ in how the estimated standard errors are used. The coverage properties of the two methods are compared in a simulation study. Coverage probabilities for the proposed method are found to be much closer to the nominal levels, particularly in the tails of the population distribution.     

Bayesian life test sampling plans for the two parameter exponential distribution

In this paper we consider the determination of Bayesian life test acceptance sampling plans for finite lots when the underlying lifetime distribution is the two parameter exponential. It is assumed that the prior distribution is the natural conjugate prior, that the costs associated with the actions accept and reject are known functions of the lifetimes of the items, and that the cost of testing a sample is proportional to the duration of the test. Type 2 censored sampling is considered where a sample of size n is observed only until the rth failure occurs and the decision of whether to accept or reject the remainder of the lot is made on the basis of the r observed lifetimes. Obtaining the optimal sample size and the optimal censoring number are difficult problems when the location parameter of the distribution is restricted to be non-negative. The case when the positivity restriction on the location parameter is removed has been investigated. An example is provided for illustration.     

A comment on sample size calculations for binomial confidence intervals

In this article we examine sample size calculations for a binomial proportion based on the confidence interval width of the Agresti–Coull, Wald and Wilson Score intervals. We pointed out that the commonly used methods based on known and fixed standard errors cannot guarantee the desired confidence interval width given a hypothesized proportion. Therefore, a new adjusted sample size calculation method was introduced, which is based on the conditional expectation of the width of the confidence interval given the hypothesized proportion. With the reduced sample size, the coverage probability can still maintain at the nominal level and is very competitive to the converge probability for the original sample size.     

A class of confidence intervals for sequential phase II clinical trials with binary outcome

The phase II clinical trials often use the binary outcome. Thus, accessing the success rate of the treatment is a primary objective for the phase II clinical trials. Reporting confidence intervals is a common practice for clinical trials. Due to the group sequence design and relatively small sample size, many existing confidence intervals for phase II trials are much conservative. In this paper, we propose a class of confidence intervals for binary outcomes. We also provide a general theory to assess the coverage of confidence intervals for discrete distributions, and hence make recommendations for choosing the parameter in calculating the confidence interval. The proposed method is applied to Simon's [14] optimal two-stage design with numerical studies. The proposed method can be viewed as an alternative approach for the confidence interval for discrete distributions in general.