Ordered Alternatives and the 1 1/2-Tail Test

Under proper conditions, two independent tests of the null hypothesis of homogeneity of means are provided by a set of sample averages. One test, with tail probability P ₁, relates to the variation between the sample averages, while the other, with tail probability P ₂, relates to the concordance of the rankings of the sample averages with the anticipated rankings under an alternative hypothesis. The quantity G = P ₁ P ₂ is considered as the combined test statistic and, except for the discreteness in the null distribution of P ₂, would correspond to the Fisher statistic for combining probabilities. Illustration is made, for the case of four means, on how to get critical values of G or critical values of P ₁ for each possible value of P ₂, taking discreteness into account. Alternative measures of concordance considered are Spearman's ρ and Kendall's τ. The concept results, in the case of two averages, in assigning two-thirds of the test size to the concordant tail, one-third to the discordant tail.     

Empirical bayes interval estimates involving uniform distributions

Bayesian and empirical Bayesian decision rules are exhibited for the interval estimation of the parameter 0 of a Uniform (0,θ) distribution. The estimate ?,δ>resulting in the interval [?,?+δ]suffers loss given by L(?,δ>,θ)=1-[?≦e≦?+δ]+c₁((?-θ)²+(?+δ?θ)²))+c₂δ. The solution is presented for prior distributions G which have bounded support, no point masses,∫θ^?mdG(θ)<∞ and for some integer m. An example is presented involving a particular parametric form for G and rates of risk convergence in the empirical Bayes problem for this example are calculated.     

Modified kolmogorov-smirnov tests of goodness of fit

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K–S) one-sided and two-sided tests of goodness of fit based on the test statistics D⁺ _n D^? _n and D_n are equivalent to tests based on taking the cumulative probability of the i–th order statistic of a sample of size n to be (i–.5)/n. Modified test statistics C⁺ _n, C^? _n and C_n are obtained by taking the cumulative probability to be i/(n+l). More generally, the cumula-tive probability may be taken to be (i?δ)/(n+l?2δ), as suggested by Blom (1958), where 0 less than or equal δ less than or equal .5. Critical values of the test statis-tics can be found by interpolating inversely in tables of the proba-bility integrals obtained by setting a=l/(n+l?2δ) in an expression given by Pyke (1959). Critical values for the D's (corresponding to δ=.5) have been tabulated to 5DP by Miller (1956) for n=1(1)100. The authors have made analogous tabulations for the C's (corresponding to δ=0) [previously tabulated by Durbin (1969) for n=1(1)60(2)100] and for the test statistics E⁺ _n, E^? _n and E_n corresponding to δ f.3. They have also made a Monte Carlo comparison of the power of the modified tests with that of the K–S test for several hypothetical distributions. In a number of cases, the power of the modified tests is greater than that of the K–S test, especially when the standard deviation is greater under the alternative than under the null hypo-thesis.     

Small sample distribution for a nonparametric test for trend

The exact distribution of a nonparametric test statistic for ordered alternatives, the _rank ² statistic, is computed for small sample sizes. The exact distribution is compared to an approximation.     

Lower percentage points of hartley's extremal quotient statistic and their applications

Consider K(>2) independent populations π₁,..,π _k such that observations obtained from π _k are independent and normally distributed with unknown mean µ _i and unknown variance θ _i i = 1,…,k. In this paper, we provide lower percentage points of Hartley's extremal quotient statistic for testing an interval hypothesisH ₀ θ _[k] θ _[k] > δ vs. H _a : θ _[k] θ _[1] ≤ δ , where δ ≥ 1 is a predetermined constant and θ _[k](θ _[1]) is the max (min) of the θ_i,…,θ _k . The least favorable configuration (LFC) for the test under H ₀ is determined in order to obtain the lower percentage points. These percentage points can also be used to construct an upper confidence bound for θ_[k]/θ_[1].     

Empirical bayes tests in a positive exponential family with partial information on priors

We investigate an empirical Bayes testing problem in a positive exponential family having pdf f{x/θ)=c(θ)u(x) exp(?x/θ), x>0, θ>0. It is assumed that θ is in some known compact interval [C₁, C₂]. The value C₁ is used in the construction of the proposed empirical Bayes test δ^* _n. The asymptotic optimality and rate of convergence of its associated Bayes risk is studied. It is shown that under the assumption that θ is in [C₁, C₂] δ^* _n is asymptotically optimal at a rate of convergence of order O(n^?1/n n). Also, δ^* _n is robust in the sense that δ^* _n still possesses the asymptotic optimality even the assumption that "C₁≦θ≦C₂ may not hold.     

Local asymptotic normality of intermediate and central order statistics

Consider n independent random variables Z_i,…, Z_n on R with common distribution function F, whose upper tail belongs to a parametric family F(t) = F_θ(t),t ≥ x₀, where θ ∈ ? ? R ^d. A necessary and sufficient condition for the family F_θ, θ ∈ ?, is established such that the k-th largest order statistic Z_n?k+1:n alone constitutes the central sequence yielding local asymptotic normality ( LAN ) of the loglikelihood ratio of the vector (Z_n?i+1:n)¹ _i=kof the k largest order statistics. This is achieved for k = k(n)→_n→∞∞ with k/n→_n→∞ 0.

In the case of vectors of central order statistics ( Z_r:n, Z_r+1:n,…, Z_s:n ), with r/n and s/n both converging to q ∈ ( 0,1 ), it turns out that under fairly general conditions any order statistic Z_m:n with r ≤ m ≤s builds the central sequence in a pertaining LAN expansion.These results lead to asymptotically optimal tests and estimators of the underlying parameter, which depend on single order statistics only     

On optimal tests for separate hypotheses and conditional probability integral transformations

Consider the problem of testing the composite null hypothesis that a random sample X₁,…,X_n is from a parent which is a member of a particular continuous parametric family of distributions against an alternative that it is from a separate family of distributions. It is shown here that in many cases a uniformly most powerful similar (UMPS) test exists for this problem, and, moreover, that this test is equivalent to a uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) test. It is also seen in the method of proof used that the UMPS test statistic Is a function of the statistics U₁,…,U_n?k obtained by the conditional probability integral transformations (CPIT), and thus that no Information Is lost by these transformations, It is also shown that these optimal tests have power that is a nonotone function of the null hypothesis class of distributions, so that, for example, if one additional parameter for the distribution is assumed known, then the power of the test can not lecrease. It Is shown that the statistics U₁, …, U_n?k are independent of the complete sufficient statistic, and that these statistics have important invariance properties. Two examples at given. The UMPS tests for testing the two-parameter uniform family against the two-parameter exponential family, and for testing one truncation parameter distribution against another one are derived.     

Testing the equality of variance-covariance matrices the robust way

The robust statistic T² _Dproposed by Tiku and Singh (1982) for testing the equality of mean vectors of two mu1 t ivariate populations is modified to test the equality of variance-covariance matrices.     

On the bounded regret of empirical bayes estimators

Let (θ₁,x₁),…,(θ_n,x_n) be independent and identically distributed random vectors with E(xθ) = θ and Var(x|θ) = a + bθ + cθ². Let t_i be the linear Bayes estimator of θ_i and θ~_i be the linear empirical Bayes estimator of θ_i as proposed in Robbins (1983). When Ex and Var x are unknown to the statistician. The regret of using θ~_i instead of t_i because of ignorance of the mean and the variance is r_i = E(θ_i ? θ_i)² ?E(t_i ?θ_i)². Under appropriate conditions cumulative regret R_n = r₁+…r_n is shown to have a finite limit even when n tends to infinity. The limit can be explicitly computed in terms of a,b,c and the first four moments of x.     

Non-parametric estimation of an acceleration parameter

Let X₁,… X_m be a random sample of m failure times under normal conditions with the underlying distribution F(x) and Y₁,…,Y_n a random sample of n failure times under accelerated condititons with underlying distribution G(x);G(x)=1?[1?F(x)]^θ with θ being the unknown parameter under study.Define:U_ij=1 otherwise.The joint distribution of _ijdoes not involve the distribution F and thus can be used to estimate the acceleration parameter θ.The second approach for estimating θ is to use the ranks of the Y-observations in the combined X- and Y-samples.In this paper we establish that the rank of the Y-observations in the pooled sample form a sufficient statistic for the information contained in the U_ii 's about the parameter θ and that there does not exist an unbiassed estimator for the parameter θ.We also construct several estimators and confidence interavals for the parameter θ.     

Computations of Bayesian t-values for multiple comparisons

Results from a simulation study of the power of eight statistics for testing that a sample is form a uniform distribution on the unit interval are reported. Power is given for each statistic against four classes if alternatives. The statistics studied include the discrete Pearson chi-square with ten and twenty cells, X² ₁₀ and X² ₂₀; Kolmogorov-smirov, D; Cramer-Von Mises, W²; Watson, U²; Anderson-Darling, A; Greenwood. G;and a new statistic called O A modified form of each of these statistic is also studied by first transforming the sample using a transformation given by Durbin. On the basis of the results observed in this study, the Watson U² statistic is recommended as a general test for uniformity.     

Robustness of the posterior mean in normal hierarchical models

We consider the problem of robustness in hierarchical Bayes models. Let X = (X₁,X₂, … ,X_p)^τ be a random vector, the X₁ being independently distributed as N(θ₁,σ²) random variables (σ² known), while the θ₁ are thought to be exchangeable, modelled as i.i.d, N(μ,τ²). The hyperparameter µ is given a noninformative prior distribution π(μ) = 1 and τ² is assumed to be independent of µ having a distribution g(τ²) lying in a certain class of distributions g. For several g's, including e-contaminations classes and density ratio classes we determine the range of the posterior mean of θ₁ as g ranges over g.     

Changepoint Problems Under Random Censorship

Let X ₁, …, X _[nθ], X _{[nθ] + 1}, …, X _n be a sequence of independent random variables (the “lifetimes”) such that X _j ? F ₁ for 1 ≤ j ≤ [nθ] and X _j ? F ₂ for [nθ] + 1 ≤ j ≤ n, with F ₁ ≠ F ₂ unknown. In this paper we investigate an estimator θ _n for the changepoint θ if the X's are subject to censoring. The rate of almost sure convergence of θ _n to θ is established and a test for the hypothesis θ = 0, i.e. “no change”, is proposed.     

Chi-square tests for multivariate normality with application to common stock prices

The theory of chi-square tests with data-dependent cells is applied to provide tests of fit to the family of p-variate normal distributions. The cells are bounded by hyperellipses (x-[Xbar])'S^-1 (x-[Xbar]) = c_i centered at the sample mean [Xbar] and having shape deter-mined by the sample covariance matrix S. The Pearson statistic with these cells is affine-invariant, has a null distribution not depending on the true mean and covariance, and has asymptotic critical points between those of x² (M-1) and x² (M-2) when M cells are employed. The test is insensitive to lack of symmetry, but peakedness, broad shoulders and heavy tails are easily discerned in the cell counts. Multivariate normality of logarithms of relative prices of common stocks, a common assumption in finan-cial markets theory, is studied using the statistic described here and a large data base.     

An inclusion-consistent solution to the problem of absurd confidence statements: 2. Consistent nonexact-confidence-interval estimation

Two consistent nonexact-confidence-interval estimation methods, both derived from the consistency-equivalence theorem in Plante (1991), are suggested for estimation of problematic parametric functions with no consistent exact solution and for which standard optimal confidence procedures are inadequate or even absurd, i.e., can provide confidence statements with a 95% empty or all-inclusive confidence set. A belt C(·) from a consistent nonexact-belt family, used with two confidence coefficients (γ = inf_θ P_θ [ θ ? C(X)] and γ⁺ = sup_θ P_θ[θ ? C(X)], is shown to provide a consistent nonexact-belt solution for estimating μ₂ -μ₁ in the Behrens-Fisher problem. A rule for consistent behaviour enables any confidence belt to be used consistently by providing each sample point with best upper and lower confidence levels [δ⁺(x) ≥ γ⁺, δ(x) ≤ γ], which give least-conservative consistent confidence statements ranging from practically exact through informative to noninformative. The rule also provides a consistency correction L(x) = δ⁺(x)-δ(X) enabling alternative confidence solutions to be compared on grounds of adequacy; this is demonstrated by comparing consistent conservative sample-point-wise solutions with inconsistent standard solutions for estimating μ₂/μ₁ (Creasy-Fieller-Neyman problem) and $\sqrt {\mu _1^2 + \mu _2^2 }$, a distance-estimation problem closely related to Stein's 1959 example     

Testing for normality in linear regression models

The importance of the normal distribution for fitting continuous data is well known. However, in many practical situations data distribution departs from normality. For example, the sample skewness and the sample kurtosis are far away from 0 and 3, respectively, which are nice properties of normal distributions. So, it is important to have formal tests of normality against any alternative. D'Agostino et al. [A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality, Am. Statist. 44 (1990), pp. 316–321] review four procedures Z ²(g ₁), Z ²(g ₂), D and K ² for testing departure from normality. The first two of these procedures are tests of normality against departure due to skewness and kurtosis, respectively. The other two tests are omnibus tests. An alternative to the normal distribution is a class of skew-normal distributions (see [A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scand. J. Statist. 12 (1985), pp. 171–178]). In this paper, we obtain a score test (W) and a likelihood ratio test (LR) of goodness of fit of the normal regression model against the skew-normal family of regression models. It turns out that the score test is based on the sample skewness and is of very simple form. The performance of these six procedures, in terms of size and power, are compared using simulations. The level properties of the three statistics LR, W and Z ²(g ₁) are similar and close to the nominal level for moderate to large sample sizes. Also, their power properties are similar for small departure from normality due to skewness (γ₁≤0.4). Of these, the score test statistic has a very simple form and computationally much simpler than the other two statistics. The LR statistic, in general, has highest power, although it is computationally much complex as it requires estimates of the parameters under the normal model as well as those under the skew-normal model. So, the score test may be used to test for normality against small departure from normality due to skewness. Otherwise, the likelihood ratio statistic LR should be used as it detects general departure from normality (due to both skewness and kurtosis) with, in general, largest power.     

A note on the asymptotic efficiency of the sobel–wald test

Let X₁,X₂, … be iid random variables with the pdf f(x,θ)=exp(θx?b(θ)) relative to a σ-finite measure μ, and consider the problem of deciding among three simple hypotheses H_i:θ=θ_i (1?i?3) subject to P(acceptH_i|θ_i)=1?α (1?i?3). A procedure similar to Sobel–Wald procedure is discussed and its asymptotic efficiency as compared with the best nonsequential test is obtained by finding the limit lim_a→0(E_iN(a)/n(a)), where N (a) is the stopping time of the proposed procedure and n(a) is the sample size of the best non-sequential test. It is shown that the same asymptotic limit holds for the original Sobel–Wald procedure. Specializing to N(θ,1) distribution it is found that lim_a→0$\text{(E}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{N(α)/n(α))=}\text{1}\text{4}$ (i=1,2) and lim_a→0 (E₃N(α)n(α))=δ²₁/4δ, where δ_i=(θ_i+1?θ_i) with 0<δ₁?δ₂. Also, the asymptotic efficiency evaluated when the X's have an exponential distribution.     

Adaptive parametric test in a semiparametric regression model

Consider the semiparametric regression model Y_i = x′_iβ +g(t_i)+e_i for i=1,2, …,n. Here the design points (x_i,t_i) are known and nonrandom and the e_i are iid random errors with Ee₁ = 0 and Ee² ₁ = α²<∞. Based on g(.) approximated by a B-spline function, we consider using atest statistic for testing H₀ : β = 0. Meanwhile, an adaptive parametric test statistic is constructed and a large sample study for this adaptive parametric test statistic is presented.