On the power of the durbin-watson test under high autocorrelation

In the linear regression model without an intercept, it is known that the limiting power of the Durbin-Watson test (as correlation among errors increases) equals either one or zero, depending on the underlying regressor matrix. This paper considers the limiting power in the model with an intercept, and proves that it will never equal one or zero.     

Increasing the Power of the Test Through Pre-Test – A Robust Method

Robust test procedures are developed for testing the intercept of a simple regression model when the slope is (i) completely unspecified, (ii) specified to a fixed value, or (iii) suspected to be a fixed value. Defining (i) unrestricted (UT), (ii) restricted (RT), and (iii) pre-test test (PTT) functions for the intercept parameter under the three choices of the slope, tests are formulated using the M-estimation methodology. The asymptotic distributions of the test statistics and their asymptotic power functions are derived. The analytical and graphical comparisons of the tests reveal that the PTT achieves a reasonable dominance over the other tests.     

On tests for normality of experimental error in ridge regression

Considered are tests for normality of the errors in ridge regression. If an intercept is included in the model, it is shown that test statistics based on the empirical distribution function of the ridge residuals have the same limiting distribution as in the one-sample test for normality with estimated mean and variance. The result holds with weak assumptions on the behavior of the independent variables; asymptotic normality of the ridge estimator is not required.     

Testing base load with non-sample prior information on process load

Inference about population parameters could be improved using non- sample prior information (NSPI) from reliable sources along with the available data. This paper studies the problem of testing the intercept parameter of a simple regression model when NSPI is available on the value of the slope. The information on the slope may have the three different scenarios: (i) unknown (unspecified), (ii) known (certain or specified), and (iii) uncertain if the suspected value is unsure, for which we define the unrestricted test (UT), restricted test (RT) and pre-test test (PTT) for the intercept parameter. The test statistics, their sampling distributions, and power functions are derived. Comparison of the power functions and size of the tests are used to search and recommend a best test. The study reveals that the PTT has a reasonable dominance over the UT and RT both in terms of achieving highest power and lowest size.     

Testing for the Equality of Two Nonparametric Regression Curves with Long Memory Errors

This article discusses the problem of testing the equality of two nonparametric regression functions against two-sided alternatives for uniform design on [0,1] with long memory moving average errors. The standard deviations and the long memory parameters are possibly different for the two errors. The article adapts the partial sum process idea used in the independent observations settings to construct the tests and derives their asymptotic null distributions. The article also shows that these tests are consistent for general alternatives and obtains their limiting distributions under a sequence of local alternatives. Since the limiting null distributions of these tests are unknown, we first conducted a Monte Carlo simulation study to obtain a few selected critical values of the proposed tests. Then based on these critical values, another Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to study the finite sample level and power behavior of these tests at some alternatives. The article also contains a simulation study that assesses the effect of estimating the nonparametric regression function on an estimate of the long memory parameter of the errors. It is observed that the estimate based on direct observations is generally preferable over the one based on the estimated nonparametric residuals.     

Likelihood ratio type unit root tests for ar(1)models with nonconsecutive observations

For the nonconsecutively observed or missing data situation likelihood ratio type unit root tests in AR(1)models containing an intercept or both an intercept and a time trend are proposed and are shown to have the same limiting distributions as the likelihood ratio tests for the complete data case as tabulated by Dickey and Fuller(1981). Some simulation results on our tests in finite samples under A–B sampling schemes are also presented.     

Bootstrap methods for single structural change tests: power versus corrected size and empirical illustration

This paper assesses the performance of tests for a single structural change at unknown date when regressors are stationary, trending and when they have a break in mean. Size and power of the test procedures are compared in a simulation setup particularly aimed at autoregressive models using their limiting distribution and some bootstrap approximations. The comparisons are performed using graphical methods, namely P value discrepancy plots and size–power curves. The simulation study gives some interesting insights to the test procedures. Indeed, it documents that tests based on the conventional asymptotic distribution are oversized in small samples. The size correction is achieved by some bootstrap methods which appear to possess reasonable size properties. For the power study, the proposed bootstrap method improves on the asymptotic approximations of some tests for heteroskedastic regression errors especially when there is a mean-shift in the regressors. This result has not been found for the case of i.i.d. errors where the bootstrap tests have the same power properties as the tests based on the asymptotic approximations. We finally study the relationship between two monthly US interest rates. The results show that such relationship has been altered by a regime-shift located in May 1981.     

Power properties of the modified CUSUM tests

The CUSUM test has played an important role in theory and applications related to structural change, but its drawback is that it loses power when the break is orthogonal to the mean of the regressors. In this study, we consider two modified CUSUM tests that have been proposed, implicitly or explicitly, in the literature to detect such structural changes and investigate the limiting power properties of these tests under a fixed alternative. We demonstrate that the modified tests are superior to the classic tests in terms of both asymptotic theory and in finite samples when detecting an orthogonal structural shift.     

面板数据单位根似然比检验研究

本文采用似然比类检验统计量进行面板单位根检验（简称为LR检验）研究,在局部备择假设成立的条件下,推导了其在无确定项、仅含截距项以及存在线性时间趋势项三种模型下所对应的渐近分布与局部渐近势函数。Monte Carlo模拟结果显示,当面板数据中含确定项（截距项或时间趋势项）时,LR检验水平比LLC和IPS检验水平更接近于给定的显著性检验水平;此外,当面板数据中包含发散个体时,经水平修正后的LR检验势要远远高于经水平修正后的LLC与IPS检验势,其中,经水平修正后的LLC与IPS检验势接近于零。     

POWER FUNCTION FOR INVERSE GAUSSIAN REGRESSION MODELS

Inverse Gaussian regression models are useful for data where both the independent and dependent variable are nonnegative and the variance of the dependent variable depends on the independent variable. Zero intercept inverse Gaussian regression models are presented with nonconstant variance, constant ratio of variance to the mean and constant coefficient of variation. The power function for testing hypotheses about the slope is given for all of these models.     

A Note on Asymmetry and Robustness in Linear Regression

We discuss the assumption of symmetry in robust linear regression. It is important to distinguish between the intercept term and the slope parameters. Ordinary robust regression requires no assumption of symmetry when interest lies in slope parameters; computer programs, confidence intervals, standard errors, and so forth do not change because the errors are asymmetric. The situation is radically different for bounded-influence estimators. With the exception of the Mallows class, these estimators are inconsistent for slope when the errors are asymmetric.     

A note on millers's empirical weights for heteroscedastic linear regression

For heteroscedastic simple linear regression when the variances are proportional to a power of the mean of the response variable, Miller (1986) recommends the following procedure: do a weighted least squares regression with the weights (empirical weights) estimated by the inverse of the appropriate power of the response variable. The practical appeal of this approach is its simplicity.

In this article some of the consequences of this simple procedure are considered. Specifically, the effect of this procedure on the bias of the point estimators of the regression coefficients and on the coverage probabilities of their corresponding confidence intervals is examined. It is found that the performance of the process of employing empirical weights in a weighted least squares regression depends on : (1) the particular regression parameter (slope or intercept) of interest, (2) the appropriate power of the mean of the response variable involved, and (3) the amount of variation in the data about the true regression line.     

New Simple Tests for Panel Cointegration

In this paper, two new simple residual-based panel data tests are proposed for the null of no cointegration. The tests are simple because they do not require any correction for the temporal dependencies of the data. Yet they are able to accommodate individual specific short-run dynamics, individual specific intercept and trend terms, and individual specific slope parameters. The limiting distributions of the tests are derived and are shown to be free of nuisance parameters. The Monte Carlo results in this paper suggest that the asymptotic results are borne out well even in very small samples.     

Using local linear kernel smoothers to test the lack of fit of nonlinear regression models

Herein, we propose a data-driven test that assesses the lack of fit of nonlinear regression models. The comparison of local linear kernel and parametric fits is the basis of this test, and specific boundary-corrected kernels are not needed at the boundary when local linear fitting is used. Under the parametric null model, the asymptotically optimal bandwidth can be used for bandwidth selection. This selection method leads to the data-driven test that has a limiting normal distribution under the null hypothesis and is consistent against any fixed alternative. The finite-sample property of the proposed data-driven test is illustrated, and the power of the test is compared with that of some existing tests via simulation studies. We illustrate the practicality of the proposed test by using two data sets.     

Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models

In this article, we propose various tests for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel data regression models with a small number of time periods. First, a simplified version of the test suggested by Wooldridge (2002) and Drukker (2003) is considered. The second test is based on the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) statistic suggested by Baltagi and Li (1995), and the third test is a modification of the classical Durbin–Watson statistic. Under the null hypothesis of no serial correlation, all tests possess a standard normal limiting distribution as N tends to infinity and T is fixed. Analyzing the local power of the tests, we find that the LM statistic has superior power properties. Furthermore, a generalization to test for autocorrelation up to some given lag order and a test statistic that is robust against time dependent heteroskedasticity are proposed.     

Testing purchasing power parity: some evidence of the effects of transaction costs

Empirical tests of purchasing power parity often recognize the problems created by simultaneous equations, but seldom recognize the effects of measurement error or transaction costs. Presumably because most researchers believe that they are unimportant. We present evidence that shows that measurement error and transaction costs and create serious econometric problems for testing purchasing power parity. One effect of these problems is that conventional tests of purchasing power parity can accept PPP when predictive errors are relatively large and reject it when predictive errors are relatively small. Another effect is to bias test of cointegration toward accepting the null of no cointegration between exchange rates and relative price indexes. We also construct a simple model of the determination of exchange rates that shows how transaction costs lead to regression switiching.     

Unit root tests: the autoregressive approach in comparison with the periodogram regression

In Monte Carlo sudies we investigate unit root tests in line with Dickey/Fuller (1979). In case of positively autocorrelated MA(1) residuals their experimental power is extremely poor. Next we compare different versions of periodogram regression suggested in the literature. Their experimental behaviour is investigated with fractionally integrated processes. It is demonstrated how unit root tests may be based on periodogram regression. There is simulation evidence that those tests may do better in terms of power than the autoregressive tests, especially when testing ARMA(1,1) series against a linear time trend.     

New Simple Tests for Panel Cointegration

ABSTRACT

In this paper, two new simple residual-based panel data tests are proposed for the null of no cointegration. The tests are simple because they do not require any correction for the temporal dependencies of the data. Yet they are able to accommodate individual specific short-run dynamics, individual specific intercept and trend terms, and individual specific slope parameters. The limiting distributions of the tests are derived and are shown to be free of nuisance parameters. The Monte Carlo results in this paper suggest that the asymptotic results are borne out well even in very small samples.     

Normal probability plots with confidence for the residuals in linear regression

Normal probability plots for a simple random sample and normal probability plots for residuals from linear regression are not treated differently in statistical text books. In the statistical literature, 1 ? α simultaneous probability intervals for augmenting a normal probability plot for a simple random sample are available. The first purpose of this article is to demonstrate that the tests associated with the 1 ? α simultaneous probability intervals for a simple random sample may have a size substantially different from α when applied to the residuals from linear regression. This leads to the second purpose of this article: construction of four normal probability plot-based tests for residuals, which have size α exactly. We then compare the powers of these four graphical tests and a non-graphical test for residuals in order to assess the power performances of the graphical tests and to identify the ones that have better power. Finally, an example is provided to illustrate the methods.     

A robust approach to longitudinal data analysis

The author introduces robust techniques for estimation, inference and variable selection in the analysis of longitudinal data. She first addresses the problem of the robust estimation of the regression and nuisance parameters, for which she derives the asymptotic distribution. She uses weighted estimating equations to build robust quasi‐likelihood functions. These functions are then used to construct a class of test statistics for variable selection. She derives the limiting distribution of these tests and shows its robustness properties in terms of stability of the asymptotic level and power under contamination. An application to a real data set allows her to illustrate the benefits of a robust analysis.