Parameter changes in a regression model with autocorrelated errors

This study is a Bayesian analysis of a regression model with autocorrelated errors which exhibits one change in the regression parameters and where the autocorrelation parameter is unknown

Using a normal-gamma prior for all the parameters except the shift point which has a uniform distribution, the marginal posterior distribution of the regression parameters, the shift point and the precision of the errors is found. It is important to know where the shift occurred thus the main emphasis is with the posterior distribution of the shift point

A numerical study assesses the effect of the values of the shift point and the magnitude of the shift on the posterior distribution of the shift point. The posterior distribution of the shift point is more sensitive to change, which occurs in the middle of the observations than to one which occurs at an extreme of the data.     

Detecting structural change in linear models

Consider a sequence of independent observations which change their marginal distribution at most once somewhere in the sequence and one is not certain where the change has occurred. One would be interested in detecting the change and determining the two distributions which would describe the sequence. On the other hand if no change had occurred, one would want to know the common distribution of the observations. This study develops a Bayesian test for detecting a switch from one linear model to another. The test is based on the marginal posterior mass function of the switch point and the posterior probability of a stable model. This test and an informal sequential procedure of Smith are illustrated with data generated from an unstable linear regression model, which changes the linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables     

Testing for a change lit the regression matrix of a multivariate linear model

A Bayesian test procedure Is developed to test; the null hypothesis of no change In the regression matrix of a multivariate lin¬ear model against the alternative hypothesis of exactly one change The resulting test is based on the marginal posterior distribution of the change point; To illustrate the test procedure a numerical example using a bivariate regression model is considered.     

Bayesian forecasting with changing linear models

This investigation considers a general linear model which changes parameters exactly once during the observation period. Assuming all the parameters are unknown and a proper prior distribution, the Bayesian predictive distribution of the future observations is derived.

It is shown that the predictive distribution is a mixture of multivariate t distributions and that the mixing distribution is the marginal posterior mass function of the change point parameter.     

Bayesian inference for double SARMA models

In this paper, we present a Bayesian analysis of double seasonal autoregressive moving average models. We first consider the problem of estimating unknown lagged errors in the moving average part using non linear least squares method, and then using natural conjugate and Jeffreys’ priors we approximate the marginal posterior distributions to be multivariate t and gamma distributions for the model coefficients and precision, respectively. We evaluate the proposed Bayesian methodology using simulation study, and apply to real-world hourly electricity load data sets.     

Objective Bayesian analysis of spatial data with uncertain nugget and range parameters

The authors develop default priors for the Gaussian random field model that includes a nugget parameter accounting for the effects of microscale variations and measurement errors. They present the independence Jeffreys prior, the Jeffreys‐rule prior and a reference prior and study posterior propriety of these and related priors. They show that the uniform prior for the correlation parameters yields an improper posterior. In case of known regression and variance parameters, they derive the Jeffreys prior for the correlation parameters. They prove posterior propriety and obtain that the predictive distributions at ungauged locations have finite variance. Moreover, they show that the proposed priors have good frequentist properties, except for those based on the marginal Jeffreys‐rule prior for the correlation parameters, and illustrate their approach by analyzing a dataset of zinc concentrations along the river Meuse. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 40: 304–327; 2012 © 2012 Statistical Society of Canada     

Irreconcilability of P-value and Bayesian measure in two-sided hypothesis: Pareto distribution with the presence of nuisance parameter

Abstract

This article is concerned with the comparison of Bayesian and classical testing of a point null hypothesis for the Pareto distribution when there is a nuisance parameter. In the first stage, using a fixed prior distribution, the posterior probability is obtained and compared with the P-value. In the second case, lower bounds of the posterior probability of H₀, under a reasonable class of prior distributions, are compared with the P-value. It has been shown that even in the presence of nuisance parameters for the model, these two approaches can lead to different results in statistical inference.     

Bayesian analysis for a change in the intercept of simple linear regression

A Bayesian approach is considered to detect a change-point in the intercept of simple linear regression. The Jeffreys noninformative prior is employed and compared with the uniform prior in Bayesian analysis. The marginal posterior distributions of the change-point, the amount of shift and the slope are derived. Mean square errors, mean absolute errors and mean biases of some Bayesian estimates are considered by Monte Carlo methad and some numerical results are also shown.     

Dropping observations without affecting posterior and predictive distributions

Suppose in a distribution problem, the sample information W is split into two pieces W ₁ and W ₂, and the parameters involved are split into two sets, π containing the parameters of interest, and θ containing nuisance parameters. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the posterior distribution of π does not depend on the data W ₂, which can thus be ignored. This also has consequences for the predictive distribution of future (or missing) observations. In fact, under similar conditions, the predictive distributions using W or just W ₁ are identical.     

Nuisance Parameters and the Use of Exploratory Graphical Methods in a Bayesian Analysis

Consider the problem of inference about a parameter θ in the presence of a nuisance parameter v. In a Bayesian framework, a number of posterior distributions may be of interest, including the joint posterior of (θ, ν), the marginal posterior of θ, and the posterior of θ conditional on different values of ν. The interpretation of these various posteriors is greatly simplified if a transformation (θ, h(θ, ν)) can be found so that θ and h(θ, v) are approximately independent. In this article, we consider a graphical method for finding this independence transformation, motivated by techniques from exploratory data analysis. Some simple examples of the use of this method are given and some of the implications of this approximate independence in a Bayesian analysis are discussed.     

Bayesian analysis of threshold autoregressions

A nonasymptotic Bayesian approach is developed for analysis of data from threshold autoregressive processes with two regimes. Using the conditional likelihood function, the marginal posterior distribution for each of the parameters is derived along with posterior means and variances. A test for linear functions of the autoregressive coefficients is presented. The approach presented uses a posterior p-value averaged over the values of the threshold. The one-step ahead predictive distribution is derived along with the predictive mean and variance. In addition, equivalent results are derived conditional upon a value of the threshold. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the approach.     

Copula, marginal distributions and model selection: a Bayesian note

Copula functions and marginal distributions are combined to produce multivariate distributions. We show advantages of estimating all parameters of these models using the Bayesian approach, which can be done with standard Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Deviance-based model selection criteria are also discussed when applied to copula models since they are invariant under monotone increasing transformations of the marginals. We focus on the deviance information criterion. The joint estimation takes into account all dependence structure of the parameters’ posterior distributions in our chosen model selection criteria. Two Monte Carlo studies are conducted to show that model identification improves when the model parameters are jointly estimated. We study the Bayesian estimation of all unknown quantities at once considering bivariate copula functions and three known marginal distributions.     

Quantitative comparisons between finitary posterior distributions and Bayesian posterior distributions

The main object of Bayesian statistical inference is the determination of posterior distributions. Sometimes these laws are given for quantities devoid of empirical value. This serious drawback vanishes when one confines oneself to considering a finite horizon framework. However, assuming infinite exchangeability gives rise to fairly tractable a posteriori quantities, which is very attractive in applications. Hence, with a view to a reconciliation between these two aspects of the Bayesian way of reasoning, in this paper we provide quantitative comparisons between posterior distributions of finitary parameters and posterior distributions of allied parameters appearing in usual statistical models.     

Bayesian analysis of a linear model involving structural changes in either regression parameters or disturbances precision

ABSTRACT

The present paper considers the Bayesian analysis of a linear regression model involving structural change, which may occur either due to shift in disturbances precision or due to shift in regression parameters. The posterior density for the regression parameter has been derived and posterior odds ratio for testing the hypothesis that structural change is due to shift in disturbances precision against the alternative that the change is due to shift in regression parameters has been obtained. The findings of a numerical simulation have been presented. The proposed model has been applied to RBI data set on corporate sector.     

Bayesian inferences and forecasts with moving averages processes

This paper will develop Bayesian inferential and forecasting techniques which can be used with any moving average process. By employing the conditional likelihood function, at-approximation to the predictive distribution and the marginal posterior distribution of the moving average parameters is developed. Several examples demonstrate posterior and predictive inferences.     

A bayesian wls approach to generalized linear models

We use a Bayesian approach to fitting a linear regression model to transformations of the natural parameter for the exponential class of distributions. The usual Bayesian approach is to assume that a linear model exactly describes the relationship among the natural parameters. We assume only that a linear model is approximately in force. We approximate the theta-links by using a linear model obtained by minimizing the posterior expectation of a loss function.While some posterior results can be obtained analytically considerable generality follows from an exact Monte Carlo method for obtaining random samples of parameter values or functions of parameter values from their respective posterior distributions. The approach that is presented is justified for small samples, requires only one-dimensional numerical integrations, and allows for the use of regression matrices with less than full column rank. Two numerical examples are provided.     

Bayesian multivariate normal analysis with a wishart prior

This paper considers the Bayesian analysis of the multivariate normal distribution when its covariance matrix has a Wishart prior density under the assumption of a multivariate quadratic loss function. New flexible marginal posterior distributions of the mean μ and of the covariance matrix Σ are developed and univariate cases with graphical representations are given.     

The use of Jeffreys priors for the Student-t distribution

The Jeffreys-rule prior and the marginal independence Jeffreys prior are recently proposed in Fonseca et al. [Objective Bayesian analysis for the Student-t regression model, Biometrika 95 (2008), pp. 325–333] as objective priors for the Student-t regression model. The authors showed that the priors provide proper posterior distributions and perform favourably in parameter estimation. Motivated by a practical financial risk management application, we compare the performance of the two Jeffreys priors with other priors proposed in the literature in a problem of estimating high quantiles for the Student-t model with unknown degrees of freedom. Through an asymptotic analysis and a simulation study, we show that both Jeffreys priors perform better in using a specific quantile of the Bayesian predictive distribution to approximate the true quantile.     

Posterior Bayes factor analysis for an exponential regression model

In the exponential regression model, Bayesian inference concerning the non-linear regression parameter has proved extremely difficult. In particular, standard improper diffuse priors for the usual parameters lead to an improper posterior for the non-linear regression parameter. In a recent paper Ye and Berger (1991) applied the reference prior approach of Bernardo (1979) and Berger and Bernardo (1989) yielding a proper informative prior for . This prior depends on the values of the explanatory variable, goes to 0 as goes to 1, and depends on the specification of a hierarchical ordering of importance of the parameters.This paper explains the failure of the uniform prior to give a proper posterior: the reason is the appearance of the determinant of the information matrix in the posterior density for . We apply the posterior Bayes factor approach of Aitkin (1991) to this problem; in this approach we integrate out nuisance parameters with respect to their conditional posterior density given the parameter of interest. The resulting integrated likelihood for requires only the standard diffuse prior for all the parameters, and is unaffected by orderings of importance of the parameters. Computation of the likelihood for is extremely simple. The approach is applied to the three examples discussed by Berger and Ye and the likelihoods compared with their posterior densities.     

Approximate Marginal Posterior Distributions Using Asymptotic Modes

This article gives asymptotic expansions for marginal posterior distributions with asymptotic modes of order n ^?2, and shows their validity. In addition, by using the asymptotic expansion, an approximate central posterior credible interval is derived.