Exponentiality test based on Renyi distance between equilibrium distributions

ABSTRACT

On the basis of Csiszar's φ-divergence discrimination information, we propose a measure of discrepancy between equilibriums associated with two distributions. Proving that a distribution can be characterized by associated equilibrium distribution, a Renyi distance of the equilibrium distributions is constructed that made us to propose an EDF-based goodness-of-fit test for exponential distribution. For comparing the performance of the proposed test, some well-known EDF-based tests and some entropy-based tests are considered. Based on the simulation results, the proposed test has better powers than those of competing entropy-based tests for the alternatives with decreasing hazard rate function. The use of the proposed test is evaluated in an illustrative example.     

Detection of a change-point in variance by a weighted sum of powers of variances test

This paper proposes a weighted sum of powers of variances test for detecting changes in variance of a data sequence. Asymptotic critical value formulas are derived for this test. The modified weighted sum of powers of variances test is also introduced so that the accuracy of change-point detection is highly improved for a sample of small size. Simulation studies and real data analysis are presented to assess the proposed tests.     

An entropy test for the Rayleigh distribution and power comparison

In this paper, a goodness-of-fit test is proposed for the Rayleigh distribution. This test is based on the Kullback–Leibler discrimination methodology proposed by Song [2002, Goodness of fit tests based on Kullback–Leibler discrimination, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48(5), pp. 1103–1117]. The critical values and powers for some alternatives are obtained by simulation. The proposed test is compared with other tests, namely Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Kuiper, Cramer–von Mises, Watson and Anderson–Darling. The use of the proposed test is shown in a real example.     

On improving the min test for the analysis of combination drug trials

In the analysis of clinical trials of combination therapies, the min test is often used to demonstrate a combination therapy's superiority to its components. Although uniformly most powerful within a class of monotone tests, this test is excessively conservative with low power at certain alternatives. This paperdemonstrates that more powerful tests may be found outside of this class. Some such alternative tests are suggested and compared with the min tests on the basis of their actual significance levels and powers. The proposed tests are observed to be less conservative and uniformly more powerful than the min test.     

Assessing cumulative logit models via a score test in random effect models

The purpose of this article is to develop a goodness-of-fit test based on score test statistics for cumulative logit models with extra variation of random effects. Two main theorems for the proposed score test statistics are derived. In simulation studies, the powers of the proposed tests are discussed and the power curve against a variety of dispersion parameters and bandwidths is depicted. The proposed method is illustrated by an ordinal data set from Mosteller and Tukey [23].     

Empirical likelihood test via estimating equations

It has been a long history for testing whether the underlying distribution belongs to a particular one or a parametric class of distributions. In this paper, we propose some empirical likelihood ratio tests via estimating equations. The proposed new tests allow one to add more relevant constraints so as to improve the powers. A simulation study shows the effectiveness of the new tests. The new method is then used to test employer size and market value distributions of US firms.     

Likelihood ratio test for simultaneous testing of the mean and the variance of a normal distribution

In this paper, we consider the simultaneous testing of the mean and the variance of a normal distribution. The exact distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic is obtained, which is not available in the literature. The critical points of the exact test are reported. We also consider some of the other exact and asymptotic tests. The powers of these tests are compared using the Monte Carlo simulations.     

Confidence intervals and tests on the variance ratio in random models with two variance components

The LM test is modified to test any value of the ratio of two variance components in a mixed effects linear model with two variance components. The test is exact, so it can be used to construct exact confidence intervals on this ratio.Exact Neyman-Pearson (NP) tests on the variance ratio are described.Their powers provide attainable upper bounds on powers of tests on the variance ratio.Efficiencies of LM tests, which include ANOVA tests, and NP tests are compared for unbalanced, random, one-way ANOVA models.Confidence intervals corresponding to LM tests and NP tests are described.     

Efficiency of ranked set sampling in tests for normality

In this article, we consider the ranked set sampling (RSS) and investigate seven tests for normality under RSS. Each test is described and then power of each test is obtained by Monte Carlo simulations under various alternatives. Finally, the powers of the tests based on RSS are compared with the powers of the tests based on the simple random sampling and the results are discussed.     

A new large sample goodness of fit test for multivariate normality based on chi squared probability plots

Based on a chi square transform of the multivariate normal data set, we proposed a technique for testing multinormality which is the sum of interpoint squared distances between an ordered set of the transformed observations and the set of the population pth quantiles of the chi squared distribution. The critical values of the test were evaluated for different sample sizes and random vector dimensions through extensive simulations. The empirical type-I-error rates and powers of the proposed test were compared with those of some other well known tests for MVN with the proposed test showing excellent results at large sample sizes.     

The likelihood ratio test foe the homogeneity of the variances in a covariance matrix with block compound symmetry

For the problem of testing the homogeneity of the variances in a covariance matrix with a block compound symmetric structure, the likelihood ratio test is derived in this paper, A modification of the test that allows its distribution to be better approximated by the chi-square distribution is also considered, Formulae for calculating approximate sample size and power are derived, Small sample performances of these tests in the case of two dependent bivariate or trivariate normals are compared to each other and to the competing tests by simulating levels of significance and powers, and recommendation is made of the ones that have good performance, The recommended tests are then demonstrated in an illustrative example.     

A likelihood ratio test and its modifications for the homogeneity of the covariance matrices of dependent multivariate normals

For the problem of testing the homogeneity of the covariance matrices of several dependent multivariate normals, a likelihood ratio test is derived in this paper. The software SAS can be used to perform the test and the code is given and explained. Several modifications of the test that allow their distributions to be better approximated by the chi-square distribution are also considered. Formulae for calculating approximate sample size and power are derived. Small sample performances of these tests in the case of two dependent bivariate normals are compared to each other and to the competing tests by simulating levels of significance and powers, and recommendation is made of the ones that have good performance. The recommended tests are then applied to real data from a crossover bioequivalence trial.     

Estimating test power adjusted for size

Statisticians seek tests which have maximum power amongst tests of size α. In both numerical and theoretical studies, the standard approach is to compare the powers of competing tests which have the same nominal size α*. In most cases, α and α* differ; and in this case, the differing size biases of the tests contaminate any comparisons of their power. For instance, two nominal 5% tests with actual sizes 4% and 6% should not have their powers naively compared. In this paper, the basic problem of trading-off size for power is approached through the existing theory of receiver operating characteristic curves. This leads us to a simple way of estimating power adjusted for size, not only for a fixed nominal size, but also for a range of relevant nominal sizes. The calculations required are both familiar and simple. We recommend that the methods be routinely applied to simulations studies that compare alternative tests of the same hypotheses.     

Comparison of powers for the sphericity tests using both the asymptotic distribution and the bootstrap

The asymptotic distributions of two tests for sphericity:the locally most powerful invariant test and the likelihood ratio test are derived under the general alternaties ∑?σ² I. The powers of these two tests are then compared when the data are from a trivariate normal population. The bootstrap method is also used to obtain the powers and the powers obtained by this method agree with those from the asymptotic distributions.     

Smooth tests for the gamma distribution

The gamma distribution is often used to model data with right skewness. Smooth tests of goodness of fit are proposed for this distribution. Their powers are compared with powers of the Anderson–Darling test and tests based on the empirical Laplace transform, the empirical moment generating function and the independence of the mean and coefficient of variation that characterizes the gamma distribution.     

Nonparametric two-sample tests for dispersion differences based on placements

Two different two-sample tests for dispersion differences based on placement statistics are proposed. The means and variances of the test statistics are derived, and asymptotic normality is established for both. Variants of the proposed tests based on reversing the X and Y labels in the test statistic calculations are shown to have different small-sample properties; for both pairs of tests, one member of the pair will be resolving, the other nonresolving. The proposed tests are similar in spirit to the dispersion tests of both Mood and Hollander; comparative simulation results for these four tests are given. For small sample sizes, the powers of the proposed tests are approximately equal to the powers of the tests of both Mood and Hollander for samples from the normal, Cauchy and exponential distributions. The one-sample limiting distributions are also provided, yielding useful approximations to the exact tests when one sample is much larger than the other. A bootstrap test may alternatively be performed. The proposed test statistics may be used with lightly censored data by substituting Kaplan-Meier estimates for the empirical distribution functions.     

Comparing diagnostic tests: test of hypothesis for likelihood ratios

Likelihood ratios (LRs) are used to characterize the efficiency of diagnostic tests. In this paper, we use the classical weighted least squares (CWLS) test procedure, which was originally used for testing the homogeneity of relative risks, for comparing the LRs of two or more binary diagnostic tests. We compare the performance of this method with the relative diagnostic likelihood ratio (rDLR) method and the diagnostic likelihood ratio regression (DLRReg) approach in terms of size and power, and we observe that the performances of CWLS and rDLR are the same when used to compare two diagnostic tests, while DLRReg method has higher type I error rates and powers. We also examine the performances of the CWLS and DLRReg methods for comparing three diagnostic tests in various sample size and prevalence combinations. On the basis of Monte Carlo simulations, we conclude that all of the tests are generally conservative and have low power, especially in settings of small sample size and low prevalence.     

A New Test for Testing Non Inferiority in Matched-Pairs Design

Non inferiority of one diagnostic method to another is a common issue in medical research. This article proposes a new test using an approximate p-value, which is based on only one point of the two-dimension nuisance parameter space. The sizes and powers of our test, the asymptotic normal test,Sidik and Hsueh's unconditional exact tests are considered. Simulation results suggest that our test can definitely control the Type I error rates with reasonable powers under all studied conditions while the asymptotic normal test cannot for most cases. Compared to Sidik and Hsueh's tests, our test is much easier to implement.     

Modified cramer-von mises and anderson-darling tests for weibull distributions with unknown location and scale parameters

The standard Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit tests require continuous underlying distributions with known parameters. In this paper, tables of critical values are generated for both tests for Weibull distributions with unknown location and scale parameters and known shape parameters. The powers of the Cramer-von Mises, Anderson-Darling, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Chi-Square tests for this situation are investigated. The Cramer-von Mises test has most power when the shape is 1.0 and the Anderson-Darling test has most power when the shape is 3.5. Finally, a relation between critical value and inverse shape parameter is presented.     

An extension of the Anderson–Darling k-sample test to arbitrary sample space partition sizes

In this paper we first show that the k-sample Anderson–Darling test is basically an average of Pearson statistics in 2?×?k contingency tables that are induced by observation-based partitions of the sample space. As an extension, we construct a family of rank test statistics, indexed by c?∈??, which is based on similarly constructed c?×?k partitions. An extensive simulation study, in which we compare the new test with others, suggests that generally very high powers are obtained with the new tests. Finally we propose a decomposition of the test statistic in interpretable components.