A Comparison of Some Tests for Determining the Number of Nonzero Canonical Correlations

When considering the relationships between two sets of variates, the number of nonzero population canonical correlations may be called the dimensionality. In the literature, several tests for dimensionality in the canonical correlation analysis are known. A comparison of seven sequential test procedures is presented, using results from some simulation study. The tests are compared with regard to the relative frequencies of underestimation, correct estimation, and overestimation of the true dimensionality. Some conclusions from the simulation results are drawn.     

Pairwise testing of group mean vectors in MANOVA with small samples

Several, multivariate, pairwise, multiple comparison procedures are proposed as follow-ups for a significant multivariate analysis of variance. The Peritz procedure is generalized from univariate to several multivariate applications. Procedures are evaluated using overall power, any-pair power and all-pairs power applied to mean vectors with common sample sizes of 4, 5, and 9. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated greater power than previously proposed univariate procedures in many conditions especially for all-pairs power. The multivariate Peritz procedure based on the Lawley–Hotelling trace was found to be most powerful in many conditions.     

The unbiasedness of hodges and lehman's test for a composite hypothesis of the man of a distribution with unknown variance

In 1954 Hodges and Lehmann considered the following problem: given is an i.i. normally distributed random sample with variance unknown. Under the null-hypothesis the mean is contained in a prescribed interval. Hodges and Lehmann constructed a test similar on the interval. This test is superior in power to the usual auxiliary procedure applied to this problem. Numerical calculations by Hodges and Lehmann indicated that the test is unbaised, however an analytical proof could not be given. In a recent paper the author proved unbiasedness for levels not too large, the magnitude depending on the sample size. Here the Proof is completed by establishing unbiasedness for all levels.     

An extensive power evaluation of a novel two-sample density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for paired data with an application to a treatment study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and severe mood dysregulation

In many case-control studies, it is common to utilize paired data when treatments are being evaluated. In this article, we propose and examine an efficient distribution-free test to compare two independent samples, where each is based on paired observations. We extend and modify the density-based empirical likelihood ratio test presented by Gurevich and Vexler [7] to formulate an appropriate parametric likelihood ratio test statistic corresponding to the hypothesis of our interest and then to approximate the test statistic nonparametrically. We conduct an extensive Monte Carlo study to evaluate the proposed test. The results of the performed simulation study demonstrate the robustness of the proposed test with respect to values of test parameters. Furthermore, an extensive power analysis via Monte Carlo simulations confirms that the proposed method outperforms the classical and general procedures in most cases related to a wide class of alternatives. An application to a real paired data study illustrates that the proposed test can be efficiently implemented in practice.     

The exact hypothesis test for the shape parameter of a new two-parameter distribution with the bathtub shape or increasing failure rate function under progressive censoring with random removals

This study considers the exact hypothesis test for the shape parameter of a new two-parameter distribution with the shape of a bathtub or increasing failure rate function under type II progressive censoring with random removals, where the number of units removed at each failure time follows a binomial or a uniform distribution. Several test statistics are proposed and one numerical example is provided to illustrate the proposed hypothesis test for the shape parameter. Finally, a simulation study is performed to compare the power performances of all proposed test statistics. We concluded that the test statistic w ₁ is more attractive than other methods as it has better performance than other test statistics for most cases based on the criteria of maximum power.