NON-EXISTENCE OF AN EXACT β-CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR A SCALE PARAMETER*

Abstract There are given k (≥22) independent distributions with c.d.f.'s F(x;θ_j) indexed by a scale parameter θ_j, j = 1,…, k. Let θ_[i] (i = 1,…, k) denote the ith smallest one of θ₁,…, θ_k. In this paper we wish to show that, under some regularity conditions, there does not exist an exact β-level (0≤β1) confidence interval for the ith smallest scale parameter θ_i based on k independent samples. Since the log transformation method may not yield the desired results for the scale parameter problem, we will treat the scale parameter case directly without transformation. Application is considered for normal variances. Two conservative one-sided confidence intervals for the ith smallest normal variance and the percentage points needed to actually apply the intervals are provided.     

On grouping sets of exponential populations

Suppose we have k random samples each of size n from a two parameter exponential distribution with location parameters μ _i i=1,…,k, and where each item has the same, unknown scale parameter. A multistage procedure is developed to determine t≦k groups such that in any one group the distributions have μ_i's that are not appreciably different. The method yields a unique grouping and extends the approach of the Kumar and Pate1 test.The emphasis is on the development of a procedure based on the null sampling distribution of the maximum gap of the ordered first order statistics from exponential distributions. The procedure is based on complete ordered samples or censored (of any or of all) samples.     

A One Sided Test Based on Sample Quasi Ranges

Abstract

Let the data from the ith treatment/population follow a distribution with cumulative distribution function (cdf) F _i (x) = F[(x ? μ _i )/θ _i ], i = 1,…, k (k ≥ 2). Here μ _i (?∞ < μ _i  < ∞) is the location parameter, θ _i (θ _i  > 0) is the scale parameter and F(?) is any absolutely continuous cdf, i.e., F _i (?) is a member of location-scale family, i = 1,…, k. In this paper, we propose a class of tests to test the null hypothesis H ₀ ? θ₁ = · = θ _k against the simple ordered alternative H _A  ? θ₁ ≤ · ≤ θ _k with at least one strict inequality. In literature, use of sample quasi range as a measure of dispersion has been advocated for small sample size or sample contaminated by outliers [see David, H. A. (1981). Order Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, Sec. 7.4]. Let X _i1,…, X _in be a random sample of size n from the population π _i and R _ir  = X _i:n?r  ? X _i:r+1, r = 0, 1,…, [n/2] ? 1 be the sample quasi range corresponding to this random sample, where X _i:j represents the jth order statistic in the ith sample, j = 1,…, n; i = 1,…, k and [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x. The proposed class of tests, for the general location scale setup, is based on the statistic W _r  = max_1≤i<j≤k (R _jr /R _ir ). The test is reject H ₀ for large values of W _r . The construction of a three-decision procedure and simultaneous one-sided lower confidence bounds for the ratios, θ _j /θ _i , 1 ≤ i < j ≤ k, have also been discussed with the help of the critical constants of the test statistic W _r . Applications of the proposed class of tests to two parameter exponential and uniform probability models have been discussed separately with necessary tables. Comparisons of some members of our class with the tests of Gill and Dhawan [Gill A. N., Dhawan A. K. (1999). A One-sided test for testing homogeneity of scale parameters against ordered alternative. Commun. Stat. – Theory and Methods 28(10):2417–2439] and Kochar and Gupta [Kochar, S. C., Gupta, R. P. (1985). A class of distribution-free tests for testing homogeneity of variances against ordered alternatives. In: Dykstra, R. et al., ed. Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Order Restricted Statistical Inference at Iowa city. Springer Verlag, pp. 169–183], in terms of simulated power, are also presented.     

Subset selection based on likelihood from uniform and related popupulations

Let π_i (i=1,2,…, k) be charceterized by the uniform distribution on (a_i;b_i), where exactly one of a_i and b_i is unknown. With unequal sample sizes, suppose that from the k (>=2) given populations, we wish to select a random-size subset containing the one with the smllest value of θ_i= b_i - a_i. RuleR_i selects π if a likelihood-based k-dimensional confidence region for the unknown (θ₁,… θ_k) contains at least one point having θ_i as its smallest component. A second rule, R , is derived through a likelihood ratio and turns out to be that of Barr and prabhu whenthe sample sizes are equal. Numerical comparisons are made. The results apply to the larger class of densities g ( z ; θ_i) =M(z)Q(θ_i) if a(θ_i) < z <b(θ_i). Extensions to the cases when both a_i and b_i are unknown and when θ_j isof interest are indicated. 1<=j<=k     

Some subset selection problems

Consider that we have a collection of k populations π₁, π₂…,π_k. The quality of the ith population is characterized by a real parameter θ_i and the population is to be designated as superior or inferior depending on how much the θ_i differs from θ_max = max{θ₁, θ₂,…,θ_k}. From the set {π₁, π₂,…,π_k}, we wish to select the subset of superior populations. In this paper we devise rules of selection which have the property that their selected set excludes all the inferior populations with probability at least 1?α, where a is a specified number.     

Simultaneous selection of extreme populations:a bayesian approach

The problem of simultaneously selecting two non-empty subsets, S_Land S_U, of k populations which contain the lower extreme population (LEP) and the upper extreme population (UEP), respectively, is considered. Unknown parameters θ₁,…,θ_kcharacterize the populations π₁,…,π_kand the populations associated with θ_[1]=min θ_i. and θ_[k]= max θ_i. are called the LEP and the UEP, respectively. It is assumed that the underlying distributions possess the monotone likelihood ratio property and that the prior distribution of θ= (θ₁,…,θ_k) is exchangeable. The Bayes rule with respect to a general loss function is obtained. Bayes rule with respect to a semi-additive and non-negative loss function is also determined and it is shown that it is minimax and admissible. When the selected subsets are required to be disjoint, it shown that the Bayes rule with respect to a specific loss function can be obtained by comparing certain computable integrals, Application to normal distributions with unknown means θ₁,…,θ_kand a common known variance is also considered.     

Confidence intervals for the largest mean from k correlated normal populations

Let X= (X₁,…, X_k)’ be a k-variate (k ≥ 2) normal random vector with unknown population mean vector μ = (μ₁ ,…, μ_k)’ and covariance matrix Σ of order k and let μ_[1] ≤ … ≤ μ_[k] be the ordered values of the μ ’ s. No prior knowledge of the pairing of the μ_[i] with the X_j. (or μ_[i] with the σ_j ²) is assumed for any i and j (1 ≤ i, j ≤ k). Based on a random sample of N independent vector observations on X, this paper considers both upper and lower (one-sided) and two-sided 100γ% (0 < γ < 1) confidence intervals for μ_[k] and μ_[1], the largest and the smallest mean, respectively, when Σ is known and when Σ is equal to σ²R with common unknown variance σ² > 0 and correlation matrix R known, respectively. An optimum two-sided confidence interval via finding the shortest length from this class is also considered. Necessary tables and computer program to actually apply these procedures are provided.     

A comparison of some nonparametric tests for the simple tree alternative

This paper develops a new test statistic for testing hypotheses of the form H_O M₀=M₁=…=M_k versus H_a: M₀≦M₁,M₂,…,M_k] where at least one inequality is strict. M₀ is the median of the control population and M₁ is the median of the population receiving trearment i, i=1,2,…,k. The population distributions are assumed to be unknown but to differ only in their location parameters if at all. A simulation study is done comparing the new test statistic with the Chacko and the Kruskal-Wallis when the underlying population distributions are either normal, uniform, exponential, or Cauchy. Sample sizes of five, eight, ten, and twenty were considered. The new test statistic did better than the Chacko and the Kruskal-Wallis when the medians of the populations receiving the treatments were approximately the same     

A class of fixed-width confidence intervals for a ranked normal mean

Suppose that we are given k(≥ 2) independent and normally distributed populations π₁, …, π_k where π_i has unknown mean μ_i and unknown variance σ² _i (i = 1, …, k). Let μ_[i] (i = 1, …, k) denote the i^th smallest one of μ₁, …, μ_k. A two-stage procedure is used to construct lower and upper confidence intervals for μ_[i] and then use these to obtain a class of two-sided confidence intervals on μ_[i] with fixed width. For i = k, the interval given by Chen and Dudewicz (1976) is a special case. Comparison is made between the class of two-sided intervals and a symmetric interval proposed by Chen and Dudewicz (1976) for the largest mean, and it is found that for large values of k at least one of the former intervals requires a smaller total sample size. The tables needed to actually apply the procedure are provided.     

Some locally optimal subset selection rules for comparison with a control

Let π₀,π₁,…,π_k be k+1 independent populations. For i=0,1,…,k,π_i has the densit f(x,θ_i), where the (unknown) parameter θ_i belongs to an interval of the real line. Our goal is to select from π₁,… π_k (experimental treatments) those populations, if any, that are better (suitably defined) than π₀ which is the control population. A locally optimal rule is derived in the class of rules for which Pr(π_i is selected)γ_i, i=1,…,k, when θ₀=θ₁=?=θ_k. The criterion used for local optimality amounts to maximizing the efficiency in a certain sense of the rule in picking out the superior populations for specific configurations of θ=(θ₀,…,θ_k) in a neighborhood of an equiparameter configuration. The general result is then applied to the following special cases: (a) normal means comparison — common known variance, (b) normal means comparison — common unknown variance, (c) gamma scale parameters comparison — known (unequal) shape parameters, and (d) comparison of regression slopes. In all these cases, the rule is obtained based on samples of unequal sizes.     

Minimax type procedures for nonparametric selection of the “best” population with partially classified data

Consider a sequence x ≡ (x₁,…, x_n) of n independent observations, in which each observation x_i is known to be a realization from either one of k_i given populations, chosen among k (≥ k_i) populations π₁, …, π_k Our main objective is to study the problem of the selection of the most reliable population π_j at a fixed time ξ, when no assumptions about the k populations are made. Some numerical examples are presented.     

DISTRIBUTION FREE MULTIPLE COMPARISONS FOR MONOTONICALLY ORDERED TREATMENT EFFECTS

A method of calculating simultaneous one-sided confidence intervals for all ordered pairwise differences of the treatment effects_j–_i, 1 i < j k, in a one-way model without any distributional assumptions is discussed. When it is known a priori that the treatment effects satisfy the simple ordering_1k, these simultaneous confidence intervals offer the experimenter a simple way of determining which treatment effects may be declared to be unequal, and is more powerful than the usual two-sided Steel-Dwass procedure. Some exact critical points required by the confidence intervals are presented for k= 3 and small sample sizes, and other methods of critical point determination such as asymptotic approximation and simulation are discussed.     

Lower percentage points of hartley's extremal quotient statistic and their applications

Consider K(>2) independent populations π₁,..,π _k such that observations obtained from π _k are independent and normally distributed with unknown mean µ _i and unknown variance θ _i i = 1,…,k. In this paper, we provide lower percentage points of Hartley's extremal quotient statistic for testing an interval hypothesisH ₀ θ _[k] θ _[k] > δ vs. H _a : θ _[k] θ _[1] ≤ δ , where δ ≥ 1 is a predetermined constant and θ _[k](θ _[1]) is the max (min) of the θ_i,…,θ _k . The least favorable configuration (LFC) for the test under H ₀ is determined in order to obtain the lower percentage points. These percentage points can also be used to construct an upper confidence bound for θ_[k]/θ_[1].     

Asymptotic expaxsioxs for the joint distribution of cirrelated hotellings t2 statlstics under normality

Let T² _i=z′_iS^?1z_i, i==,…k be correlated Hotelling's T² statistics under normality. where z=(z′_i,…,z′_k)′ and nS are independently distributed as N_kp((O,ρ?∑) and Wishart distribution W_p(∑, n), respectively. The purpose of this paper is to study the distribution function F(x₁,…,x_k) of (T² _i,…,T² _k) when n is large. First we derive an asymptotic expansion of the characteristic function of (T² _i,…,T² _k) up to the order n^?2. Next we give asymptotic expansions for (T² _i,…,T² _k) in two cases (i)ρ=I_k and (ii) k=2 by inverting the expanded characteristic function up to the orders n^?2 and n^?1, respectively. Our results can be applied to the distribution function of max (T² _i,…,T² _k) as a special case.     

Local asymptotic normality of intermediate and central order statistics

Consider n independent random variables Z_i,…, Z_n on R with common distribution function F, whose upper tail belongs to a parametric family F(t) = F_θ(t),t ≥ x₀, where θ ∈ ? ? R ^d. A necessary and sufficient condition for the family F_θ, θ ∈ ?, is established such that the k-th largest order statistic Z_n?k+1:n alone constitutes the central sequence yielding local asymptotic normality ( LAN ) of the loglikelihood ratio of the vector (Z_n?i+1:n)¹ _i=kof the k largest order statistics. This is achieved for k = k(n)→_n→∞∞ with k/n→_n→∞ 0.

In the case of vectors of central order statistics ( Z_r:n, Z_r+1:n,…, Z_s:n ), with r/n and s/n both converging to q ∈ ( 0,1 ), it turns out that under fairly general conditions any order statistic Z_m:n with r ≤ m ≤s builds the central sequence in a pertaining LAN expansion.These results lead to asymptotically optimal tests and estimators of the underlying parameter, which depend on single order statistics only     

Testing independence with additional information

Let X = (X^j : j = 1,…, n) be n row vectors of dimension p independently and identically distributed multinomial. For each j, X^j is partitioned as X^j = (X^j₁, X^j₂, X^j₃), where p_i is the dimension of X^j_i with p₁ = 1,p₁+p₂+p₃ = p. In addition, consider vectors Y^j_i, i = 1,2j = 1,…,n_i that are independent and distributed as X¹_i. We treat here the problem of testing independence between X¹₁ and X¹₃ knowing that X¹₁ and X¹₂ are uncorrected. A locally best invariant test is proposed for this problem.     

TESTING THE EQUALITY OF PARAMETERS IN THE DISTRIBUTIONS WHEN THE RANGE DEPENDS UPON THE PARAMETER

The authors derive the null and non-null distributions of the test statistic v=y_min/y_max (where y_min= min x_ij, y_max= max x_ij, J=1,2, …, k) connected with testing the equality of scale parameters θ₁, θ₂, …θ_k in certain, class of density functions given by      

Comparing several exponential populations with more than one control

Suppose there are k ₁ (k ₁ ≥ 1) test treatments that we wish to compare with k ₂ (k ₂ ≥ 1) control treatments. Assume that the observations from the ith test treatment and the jth control treatment follow a two-parameter exponential distribution and , where θ is a common scale parameter and and are the location parameters of the ith test and the jth control treatment, respectively, i = 1, . . . ,k ₁; j = 1, . . . ,k ₂. In this paper, simultaneous one-sided and two-sided confidence intervals are proposed for all k ₁ k ₂ differences between the test treatment location and control treatment location parameters, namely , and the required critical points are provided. Discussions of multiple comparisons of all test treatments with the best control treatment and an optimal sample size allocation are given. Finally, it is shown that the critical points obtained can be used to construct simultaneous confidence intervals for Pareto distribution location parameters.     

Maximum likelihood estimation in the presence of outiliers

This paper deals with the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters when the sample (x₁…x_n ) may heve k spuriously generated observations from another distribution, say G≠F, where F is the distribution of the target population. If G is stochastically larger than F, then these k observations may give rise to k extreme observations or ‘outliers’. This situation is often described by a so-called ‘k-outlier model’ in which in addition to the parameters involved in F and G, the set ν={ν₁,…,ν_k} of indices, for which x_νj , j=1,…,k, come from G, is also unknow.