Some locally optimal subset selection rules for comparison with a control

Let π₀,π₁,…,π_k be k+1 independent populations. For i=0,1,…,k,π_i has the densit f(x,θ_i), where the (unknown) parameter θ_i belongs to an interval of the real line. Our goal is to select from π₁,… π_k (experimental treatments) those populations, if any, that are better (suitably defined) than π₀ which is the control population. A locally optimal rule is derived in the class of rules for which Pr(π_i is selected)γ_i, i=1,…,k, when θ₀=θ₁=?=θ_k. The criterion used for local optimality amounts to maximizing the efficiency in a certain sense of the rule in picking out the superior populations for specific configurations of θ=(θ₀,…,θ_k) in a neighborhood of an equiparameter configuration. The general result is then applied to the following special cases: (a) normal means comparison — common known variance, (b) normal means comparison — common unknown variance, (c) gamma scale parameters comparison — known (unequal) shape parameters, and (d) comparison of regression slopes. In all these cases, the rule is obtained based on samples of unequal sizes.     

Simultaneous selection of extreme populations:a bayesian approach

The problem of simultaneously selecting two non-empty subsets, S_Land S_U, of k populations which contain the lower extreme population (LEP) and the upper extreme population (UEP), respectively, is considered. Unknown parameters θ₁,…,θ_kcharacterize the populations π₁,…,π_kand the populations associated with θ_[1]=min θ_i. and θ_[k]= max θ_i. are called the LEP and the UEP, respectively. It is assumed that the underlying distributions possess the monotone likelihood ratio property and that the prior distribution of θ= (θ₁,…,θ_k) is exchangeable. The Bayes rule with respect to a general loss function is obtained. Bayes rule with respect to a semi-additive and non-negative loss function is also determined and it is shown that it is minimax and admissible. When the selected subsets are required to be disjoint, it shown that the Bayes rule with respect to a specific loss function can be obtained by comparing certain computable integrals, Application to normal distributions with unknown means θ₁,…,θ_kand a common known variance is also considered.     

Estimating the parameter of selected uniform population under the squared log error loss function

Let π₁, …, π_k be k (? 2) independent populations, where π_i denotes the uniform distribution over the interval (0, θ_i) and θ_i > 0 (i = 1, …, k) is an unknown scale parameter. The population associated with the largest scale parameter is called the best population. For selecting the best population, We use a selection rule based on the natural estimators of θ_i, i = 1, …, k, for the case of unequal sample sizes. Consider the problem of estimating the scale parameter θ_L of the selected uniform population when sample sizes are unequal and the loss is measured by the squared log error (SLE) loss function. We derive the uniformly minimum risk unbiased (UMRU) estimator of θ_L under the SLE loss function and two natural estimators of θ_L are also studied. For k = 2, we derive a sufficient condition for inadmissibility of an estimator of θ_L. Using these condition, we conclude that the UMRU estimator and natural estimator are inadmissible. Finally, the risk functions of various competing estimators of θ_L are compared through simulation.     

Lower percentage points of hartley's extremal quotient statistic and their applications

Consider K(>2) independent populations π₁,..,π _k such that observations obtained from π _k are independent and normally distributed with unknown mean µ _i and unknown variance θ _i i = 1,…,k. In this paper, we provide lower percentage points of Hartley's extremal quotient statistic for testing an interval hypothesisH ₀ θ _[k] θ _[k] > δ vs. H _a : θ _[k] θ _[1] ≤ δ , where δ ≥ 1 is a predetermined constant and θ _[k](θ _[1]) is the max (min) of the θ_i,…,θ _k . The least favorable configuration (LFC) for the test under H ₀ is determined in order to obtain the lower percentage points. These percentage points can also be used to construct an upper confidence bound for θ_[k]/θ_[1].     

An essentially complete class of multiple decision procedures

Let π₁,…, π_k represent k(?2) independent populations. The quality of the ith population π_i is characterized by a real-valued parameter θ_i, usually unknown. We define the best population in terms of a measure of separation between θ_i's. A selection of a subset containing the best population is called a correct selection (CS). We restrict attention to rules for which the size of the selected subset is controlled at a given point and the infimum of the probability of correct selection over the parameter space is maximized. The main theorem deals with construction of an essentially complete class of selection rules of the above type. Some classical subset selection rules are shown to belong to this class.     

Subset selection based on likelihood from uniform and related popupulations

Let π_i (i=1,2,…, k) be charceterized by the uniform distribution on (a_i;b_i), where exactly one of a_i and b_i is unknown. With unequal sample sizes, suppose that from the k (>=2) given populations, we wish to select a random-size subset containing the one with the smllest value of θ_i= b_i - a_i. RuleR_i selects π if a likelihood-based k-dimensional confidence region for the unknown (θ₁,… θ_k) contains at least one point having θ_i as its smallest component. A second rule, R , is derived through a likelihood ratio and turns out to be that of Barr and prabhu whenthe sample sizes are equal. Numerical comparisons are made. The results apply to the larger class of densities g ( z ; θ_i) =M(z)Q(θ_i) if a(θ_i) < z <b(θ_i). Extensions to the cases when both a_i and b_i are unknown and when θ_j isof interest are indicated. 1<=j<=k     

The parametric hypothesis test of multiple uniform populations

X₁, X₂, …, X_k are k(k ? 2) uniform populations which each X_i follows U(0, θ_i). This note shows the test statistic for the null hypothesis H₀: θ₁ = θ₂ = ??? = θ_k by using the order statistics.     

A two stage procedure for selecting δ∗-optimal means in the normal model

Suppose π₁,…,π_k are k normal populations with π_i having unknown mean μ_i and unknown variance σ². The population π_i will be called δ^?-optimal (or good) if μ_i is within a specified amountδ? of the largest mean. A two stage procedure is proposed which selects a subset of the k populations and guarantees with probability at least P^? that the selected subset contains only δ?-optimal π_i ’s. In addition to screening out non-good populations the rule guarantees a high proportion of sufficiently good π_i’S will be selected.     

Minimax type procedures for nonparametric selection of the “best” population with partially classified data

Consider a sequence x ≡ (x₁,…, x_n) of n independent observations, in which each observation x_i is known to be a realization from either one of k_i given populations, chosen among k (≥ k_i) populations π₁, …, π_k Our main objective is to study the problem of the selection of the most reliable population π_j at a fixed time ξ, when no assumptions about the k populations are made. Some numerical examples are presented.     

On selecting a subset which contains all populations better than a control

Let π₁…, π_k denote k(≥ 2) populations with unknown means μ₁ , …, μ_k and variances σ₁ ² , …, σ_k ² , respectively and let π_o denote the control population having mean μ_o and variance σ_o ² . It is assumed that these populations are normally distributed with correlation matrix {ρ_ij}. The goal is to select a subset, of populations of π₁ , …, π_k which contains all the populations with means larger than or equal to the mean of the control one. Procedures are given for selecting such a subset so that the probability that all the populations with means larger than or equal to the mean of the control one are included in the selected subset is at least equal to a predetermined value P?(l/k < P? < 1). The goal treated here is a first step screening procedure that allows the experimenter to choose a subset and withhold judgement about which one has the largest mean. Then, if the one with the largest mean is desired it can be chosen from the selected subset on the basis of cost and other considerations. Percentage points are also included.     

Estimating Average Worth of the Selected Subset from Two-Parameter Exponential Populations

ABSTRACT

Suppose independent random samples are available from k(k ≥ 2) exponential populations ∏₁,…,∏ _k with a common location θ and scale parameters σ₁,…,σ _k , respectively. Let X _i and Y _i denote the minimum and the mean, respectively, of the ith sample, and further let X = min{X ₁,…, X _k } and T _i  = Y _i  ? X; i = 1,…, k. For selecting a nonempty subset of {∏₁,…,∏ _k } containing the best population (the one associated with max{σ₁,…,σ _k }), we use the decision rule which selects ∏ _i if T _i  ≥ c max{T ₁,…,T _k }, i = 1,…, k. Here 0 < c ≤ 1 is chosen so that the probability of including the best population in the selected subset is at least P* (1/k ≤ P* < 1), a pre-assigned level. The problem is to estimate the average worth W of the selected subset, the arithmetic average of means of selected populations. In this article, we derive the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of W. The bias and risk function of the UMVUE are compared numerically with those of analogs of the best affine equivariant estimator (BAEE) and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE).     

Estimation of the Scale Parameter of the Selected Gamma Population Under the Entropy Loss Function

Let X ₁, X ₂,…, X _k be k (≥2) independent random variables from gamma populations Π₁, Π₂,…, Π _k with common known shape parameter α and unknown scale parameter θ _i , i = 1,2,…,k, respectively. Let X _(i) denotes the ith order statistics of X ₁,X ₂,…,X _k . Suppose the population corresponding to largest X _(k) (or the smallest X ₍₁₎) observation is selected. We consider the problem of estimating the scale parameter θ _M (or θ _J ) of the selected population under the entropy loss function. For k ≥ 2, we obtain the Unique Minimum Risk Unbiased (UMRU) estimator of θ _M (and θ _J ). For k = 2, we derive the class of all linear admissible estimators of the form cX ₍₂₎ (and cX ₍₁₎) and show that the UMRU estimator of θ _M is inadmissible. The results are extended to some subclass of exponential family.     

On the bounded regret of empirical bayes estimators

Let (θ₁,x₁),…,(θ_n,x_n) be independent and identically distributed random vectors with E(xθ) = θ and Var(x|θ) = a + bθ + cθ². Let t_i be the linear Bayes estimator of θ_i and θ~_i be the linear empirical Bayes estimator of θ_i as proposed in Robbins (1983). When Ex and Var x are unknown to the statistician. The regret of using θ~_i instead of t_i because of ignorance of the mean and the variance is r_i = E(θ_i ? θ_i)² ?E(t_i ?θ_i)². Under appropriate conditions cumulative regret R_n = r₁+…r_n is shown to have a finite limit even when n tends to infinity. The limit can be explicitly computed in terms of a,b,c and the first four moments of x.     

ON TESTING AGAINST RESTRICTED ALTERNATIVES FOR THE VARIANCES OF GAUSSIAN MODELS

Let π₁,…,π_p be p independent normal populations with means μ₁…, μ_p and variances σ²₁,…, σ²_p respectively. Let X(n_i) be a simple random sample of size n_i from π_i, i = 1,…,p. Given the simple random samples X(n₁),…, X(n_p) from π₁,…,π_p respectively, a test has been proposed for testing the homogeneity of variances H₀: σ²₁=…σ²_p, against the restricted alternative, H₁: σ²₁≥…≥σ²_p, with at least one strict inequality. Some properties of the test are discussed and critical values are tabulated.     

NON-EXISTENCE OF AN EXACT β-CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR A SCALE PARAMETER*

Abstract There are given k (≥22) independent distributions with c.d.f.'s F(x;θ_j) indexed by a scale parameter θ_j, j = 1,…, k. Let θ_[i] (i = 1,…, k) denote the ith smallest one of θ₁,…, θ_k. In this paper we wish to show that, under some regularity conditions, there does not exist an exact β-level (0≤β1) confidence interval for the ith smallest scale parameter θ_i based on k independent samples. Since the log transformation method may not yield the desired results for the scale parameter problem, we will treat the scale parameter case directly without transformation. Application is considered for normal variances. Two conservative one-sided confidence intervals for the ith smallest normal variance and the percentage points needed to actually apply the intervals are provided.     

Estimation of the location parameter and the average worth of the selected subset of two parameter exponential populations under LINEX loss function

Suppose a subset of populations is selected from k exponential populations with unknown location parameters θ₁, θ₂, …, θ_k and common known scale parameter σ. We consider the estimation of the location parameter of the selected population and the average worth of the selected subset under an asymmetric LINEX loss function. We show that the natural estimator of these parameters is biased and find the uniformly minimum risk-unbiased (UMRU) estimator of these parameters. In the case of k = 2, we find the minimax estimator of the location parameter of the smallest selected population. Furthermore, we compare numerically the risk of UMRU, minimax, and the natural estimators.     

A class of fixed-width confidence intervals for a ranked normal mean

Suppose that we are given k(≥ 2) independent and normally distributed populations π₁, …, π_k where π_i has unknown mean μ_i and unknown variance σ² _i (i = 1, …, k). Let μ_[i] (i = 1, …, k) denote the i^th smallest one of μ₁, …, μ_k. A two-stage procedure is used to construct lower and upper confidence intervals for μ_[i] and then use these to obtain a class of two-sided confidence intervals on μ_[i] with fixed width. For i = k, the interval given by Chen and Dudewicz (1976) is a special case. Comparison is made between the class of two-sided intervals and a symmetric interval proposed by Chen and Dudewicz (1976) for the largest mean, and it is found that for large values of k at least one of the former intervals requires a smaller total sample size. The tables needed to actually apply the procedure are provided.