The BIAS of the maximum likelihood estimators of the von mises-fisher concentration parameters

It is shown that the bias of the maximum likelihood estimators of the concentration parameters of the von Mises and Fisher distributions is considerable. New estimators which are either nearly unbiased or nearly median unbiased are proposed.     

Some computational aspects of the generalized von Mises distribution

This article deals with some important computational aspects of the generalized von Mises distribution in relation with parameter estimation, model selection and simulation. The generalized von Mises distribution provides a flexible model for circular data allowing for symmetry, asymmetry, unimodality and bimodality. For this model, we show the equivalence between the trigonometric method of moments and the maximum likelihood estimators, we give their asymptotic distribution, we provide bias-corrected estimators of the entropy, the Akaike information criterion and the measured entropy for model selection, and we implement the ratio-of-uniforms method of simulation.     

Poisson–exponential distribution: different methods of estimation

In this study, we present different estimation procedures for the parameters of the Poisson–exponential distribution, such as the maximum likelihood, method of moments, modified moments, ordinary and weighted least-squares, percentile, maximum product of spacings, Cramer–von Mises and the Anderson–Darling maximum goodness-of-fit estimators and compare them using extensive numerical simulations. We showed that the Anderson–Darling estimator is the most efficient for estimating the parameters of the proposed distribution. Our proposed methodology was also illustrated in three real data sets related to the minimum, average and the maximum flows during October at São Carlos River in Brazil demonstrating that the PE distribution is a simple alternative to be used in hydrological applications.     

Maximum likelihood vs. maximum goodness of fit estimation of the three-parameter Weibull distribution

The use of statistics based on the empirical distribution function is analysed for estimation of the scale, shape, and location parameters of the three-parameter Weibull distribution. The resulting maximum goodness of fit (MGF) estimators are compared with their maximum likelihood counterparts. In addition to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramer–von Mises, and Anderson–Darling statistics, some related empirical distribution function statistics using different weight functions are considered. The results show that the MGF estimators of the scale and shape parameters are usually more efficient than the maximum likelihood estimators when the shape parameter is smaller than 2, particularly if the sample size is large.     

Some asymptotic properties of the circular median

In this article, the asymptotic distribution of the circular median is derived for symmetric distributions on the circle. Its asymptotic relative efficienty with respect to the mean direction and to an estimator proposed by Watson (1983) is then examined. Special attention is given to the cases where the underlying distribution is von Mises and contaminated von Mises. It is seen that the circular median can perform more efficiently than both estimators in presence of outliers.     

Estimation of three-parameter exponentiated-Weibull distribution under type-II censoring

The present article obtains the point estimators of the exponentiated-Weibull parameters when all the three parameters of the distribution are unknown. Maximum likelihood estimator generalized maximum likelihood estimator and Bayes estimators are proposed for three-parameter exponentiated-Weibull distribution when available sample is type-II censored. Independent non-informative types of priors are considered for the unknown parameters to develop generalized maximum likelihood estimator and Bayes estimators. Although the proposed estimators cannot be expressed in nice closed forms, these can be easily obtained through the use of appropriate numerical techniques. The performances of these estimators are studied on the basis of their risks, computed separately under LINEX loss and squared error loss functions through Monte-Carlo simulation technique. An example is also considered to illustrate the estimators.     

C335. Some numerology for the mass ratio of proton to electron,and a partially Bayesian evaluation

Recent small sample studies of estimators for the shape parameter a of the negative binomial distribution (NBD) tend to indicate that the choice of estimator can be reduced to a choice between the method of moments estimator, maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), maximum quasi-likelihood estimator and the conditional likelihood estimator (CLE). In this paper the results of a comprehensive simulation study are reported to assist with the choice from these four estimators. The study includes a traditional procedure for assessing estimators for the shape parameter of the NBD and in addition introduces an alternative assessment procedure. Based on the traditional approach the CLE is considered to perform the best overall for the range of parameter values and sample sizes considered. The alternative assessment procedure indicates that the MLE is the preferred estimator.     

ASYMPTOTIC PROPERTIES OF RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD (REML) ESTIMATES FOR HIERARCHICAL MIXED LINEAR MODELS

This paper explores the asymptotic distribution of the restricted maximum likelihood estimator of the variance components in a general mixed model. Restricting attention to hierarchical models, central limit theorems are obtained using elementary arguments with only mild conditions on the covariates in the fixed part of the model and without having to assume that the data are either normally or spherically symmetrically distributed. Further, the REML and maximum likelihood estimators are shown to be asymptotically equivalent in this general framework, and the asymptotic distribution of the weighted least squares estimator (based on the REML estimator) of the fixed effect parameters is derived.     

Goodness—of—fit for the two—parameter weibull distribution with estimated parameters

Goodness—of—fit statistics based on the empirical distribution function (EDF) are not distribution—free when parameters for the hypothesized distribution are estimated. Tables are percentile values of several EDF statistics are available for the two—parameter Weibull distribution when parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood. To determine how these tabled values change when simpler estimators are employed, percentile scores for EDF goodness—of—fit tests were obtained by Monte—Carlo simulation for maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), good linear unbiased estimators (GLUEs), and modified Cramer—von Mises, Anderson—Darling, and Watson statistics are presented for GLUEs for both complete and censored samples. Critical values for Kolmogorov—Smirnov statistics were less affected by the method of estimation than were closer for MLEs and MGLUEs than for MGLUEs and GLUEs. On the other hand, MGLUE and GLUE results were much more similar to each other than to the MLE results when censoring was light and sample sizes were large.     

Estimating Percentiles of Time-to-Failure Distribution Obtained from a Linear Degradation Model Using Kernel Density Method

In this article, we propose a nonparametric estimator for percentiles of the time-to-failure distribution obtained from a linear degradation model using the kernel density method. The properties of the proposed kernel estimator are investigated and compared with well-known maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimators via a simulation technique. The mean squared error and the length of the bootstrap confidence interval are used as the basis criteria of the comparisons. The simulation study shows that the performance of the kernel estimator is acceptable as a general estimator. When the distribution of the data is assumed to be known, the maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimators perform better than the kernel estimator, while the kernel estimator is superior when the assumption of our knowledge of the data distribution is violated. A comparison among different estimators is achieved using a real data set.     

Minimax property of stein's estimator

Stein's estimator and some other estimators of the mean of a K-variate normal distribution are known to dominate the maximum likelihood estimator under quadratic loss for K > 3, and are therefore minimax. In this paper it is shown that the minimax property of Stein's rule is preserved with respect to a generalized loss function.     

Inadmissibility of the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator of the inverse gaussian variance

The uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of the variance of the inverse Gaussian distribution is shown to be inadmissible in terms of the mean squared error, and a dominating estimator is given. A dominating estimator to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the variance and estimators dominating the MLE's and the UMVUE's of other parameters are also given.     

An asymptotic equivalence of the cross-data and predictive estimators

Abstract

Estimators using multiplicative tuning parameters for maximum likelihood estimators in cross-validation are called cross-data estimators in this paper. Single-sample versions of the cross-data estimators have been called predictive estimators in literatures, which are given by maximizing the expected log-likelihood, where the two-fold expectations are taken over the distributions of future and current data using maximum likelihood estimators based on current data. An asymptotic equivalence of the cross-data and predictive estimators is shown, which guarantees an optimality of the predictive estimator when an unknown population parameter vector is replaced by the sample counterpart. Examples using typical statistical distributions are shown.     

A comparative evaluation of the estimators of the three-parameter generalized pareto distribution

The parameters and quantiles of the three-parameter generalized Pareto distribution (GPD3) were estimated using six methods for Monte Carlo generated samples. The parameter estimators were the moment estimator and its two variants, probability-weighted moment estimator, maximum likelihood estimator, and entropy estimator. Parameters were investigated using a factorial experiment. The performance of these estimators was statistically compared, with the objective of identifying the most robust estimator from amongst them.     

ON ESTIMATION OF LONG-MEMORY TIME SERIES MODELS

This paper discusses estimation associated with the long-memory time series models proposed by Granger & Joyeux (1980) and Hosking (1981). We consider the maximum likelihood estimator and the least squares estimator. Certain regularity conditions introduced by several authors to develop the asymptotic theory of these estimators do not hold in this model. However we can show that these estimators are strongly consistent, and we derive the limiting distribution and the rate of convergence.     

On second-order admissibilities of the estimators of gamma shape vector

Simultaneous estimation problem of gamma shape vector is considered.First, it is shown that the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), the bias corrected MLE, and the conditional MLE of shape vector are second-order inadmissible. Second, these estimators are improved up to the second order. Finally, we identify whether these improved estimators are second-order admissible or not. Simulation studies are also given.     

Mean likelihood estimators

The use of Mathematica in deriving mean likelihood estimators is discussed. Comparisons are made between the mean likelihood estimator, the maximum likelihood estimator, and the Bayes estimator based on a Jeffrey's noninformative prior. These estimators are compared using the mean-square error criterion and Pitman measure of closeness. In some cases it is possible, using Mathematica, to derive exact results for these criteria. Using Mathematica, simulation comparisons among the criteria can be made for any model for which we can readily obtain estimators.In the binomial and exponential distribution cases, these criteria are evaluated exactly. In the first-order moving-average model, analytical comparisons are possible only for n = 2. In general, we find that for the binomial distribution and the first-order moving-average time series model the mean likelihood estimator outperforms the maximum likelihood estimator and the Bayes estimator with a Jeffrey's noninformative prior. Mathematica was used for symbolic and numeric computations as well as for the graphical display of results. A Mathematica notebook which provides the Mathematica code used in this article is available: http://www.stats.uwo.ca/mcleod/epubs/mele. Our article concludes with our opinions and criticisms of the relative merits of some of the popular computing environments for statistics researchers.     

A comparison of estimation techniques for the three parameter pareto distribution

This paper compares minimum distance estimation with best linear unbiased estimation to determine which technique provides the most accurate estimates for location and scale parameters as applied to the three parameter Pareto distribution. Two minimum distance estimators are developed for each of the three distance measures used (Kolmogorov, Cramer‐von Mises, and Anderson‐Darling) resulting in six new estimators. For a given sample size 6 or 18 and shape parameter 1(1)4, the location and scale parameters are estimated. A Monte Carlo technique is used to generate the sample sets. The best linear unbiased estimator and the six minimum distance estimators provide parameter estimates based on each sample set. These estimates are compared using mean square error as the evaluation tool. Results show that the best linear unbaised estimator provided more accurate estimates of location and scale than did the minimum estimators tested.     

Estimation and hypothesis testing in multivariate linear regression models under non normality

This paper discusses the problem of statistical inference in multivariate linear regression models when the errors involved are non normally distributed. We consider multivariate t-distribution, a fat-tailed distribution, for the errors as alternative to normal distribution. Such non normality is commonly observed in working with many data sets, e.g., financial data that are usually having excess kurtosis. This distribution has a number of applications in many other areas of research as well. We use modified maximum likelihood estimation method that provides the estimator, called modified maximum likelihood estimator (MMLE), in closed form. These estimators are shown to be unbiased, efficient, and robust as compared to the widely used least square estimators (LSEs). Also, the tests based upon MMLEs are found to be more powerful than the similar tests based upon LSEs.     

Investigation of the performance of trimmed estimators of life time distributions with censoring

For the lifetime (or negative) exponential distribution, the trimmed likelihood estimator has been shown to be explicit in the form of a β‐trimmed mean which is representable as an estimating functional that is both weakly continuous and Fréchet differentiable and hence qualitatively robust at the parametric model. It also has high efficiency at the model. The robustness is in contrast to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) involving the usual mean which is not robust to contamination in the upper tail of the distribution. When there is known right censoring, it may be perceived that the MLE which is the most asymptotically efficient estimator may be protected from the effects of ‘outliers’ due to censoring. We demonstrate that this is not the case generally, and in fact, based on the functional form of the estimators, suggest a hybrid defined estimator that incorporates the best features of both the MLE and the β‐trimmed mean. Additionally, we study the pure trimmed likelihood estimator for censored data and show that it can be easily calculated and that the censored observations are not always trimmed. The different trimmed estimators are compared by a modest simulation study.