Linear Signed Rank Test for Model Selection

In this article, we consider a linear signed rank test for non-nested distributions in the context of the model selection. Introducing a new test, we show that, it is asymptotically more efficient than the Vuong test and the test statistic based on B statistic introduced by Clarke. However, here, we let the magnitude of the data give a better performance to the test statistic. We have shown that this test is an unbiased one. The results of simulations show that the rank test has the greater statistical power than the Vuong test where the underline distributions is symmetric.     

Goodness of exact experimental designs with respect to a certain family of criteria

In the paper we assume to be given an approximate optimum exact design with respect to one optimality criterion. We investigate the goodness of this design in the sense of a family of criteria that includes those of A-E-, and .D-optimality.     

Impact of surviving time on tests for carcinogenicity

In tumorigenicity experiments, each animal begins in a tumor-free state and then either develops a tumor or dies before developing a tumor. Animals that develop a tumor either die from the tumor or from other competing causes. All surviving animals are sacrificed at the end of the experiment, normally two years. The two most commonly used statistical tests are the logrank test for comparing hazards of death from rapidly lethal tumors and the Hoel-Walburg test for comparing prevalences of nonlethal tumors. However, the data obtained from a carcinogenicity experiment generally contains a mixture of fatal and incidental tumors. Peto et al.(1980)suggested combining the fatal and incidental tests for a comparison of tumor onset distributions.

Extensive simulations show that the trend test for tumor onset using the Peto procedure has the proper size, under the simulation constraints, when each group has identical mortality patterns, and the test with continuity correction tends to be conservative. When the animals n the dosed groups have reduced survival rates, the type I error rate is likely to exceed the nominal level. The continuity correction is recommended for a small reduction in survival time among the dosed groups to ensure the proper size. However, when there is a large reduction in survival times in the dosed groups, the onset test does not have the proper size.     

PERMUTATION TESTS AND OTHER TEST STATISTICS FOR ILL-BEHAVED DATA: EXPERIENCE OF THE NINDS t-PA STROKE TRIAL

Permutation tests are often used to analyze data since they may not require one to make assumptions regarding the form of the distribution to have a random and independent sample selection. We initially considered a permutation test to assess the treatment effect on computed tomography lesion volume in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) t-PA Stroke Trial, which has highly skewed data. However, we encountered difficulties in summarizing the permutation test results on the lesion volume. In this paper, we discuss some aspects of permutation tests and illustrate our findings. This experience with the NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial data emphasizes that permutation tests are useful for clinical trials and can be used to validate assumptions of an observed test statistic. The permutation test places fewer restrictions on the underlying distribution but is not always distribution-free or an exact test, especially for ill-behaved data. Quasi-likelihood estimation using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach on transformed data seems to be a good choice for analyzing CT lesion data, based on both its corresponding permutation test and its clinical interpretation.     

Methods for testing subblock patterns

A number of statistical tests have been recommended over the last twenty years for assessing the randomness of long binary strings used in cryptographic algorithms. Several of these tests include methods of examining subblock patterns. These tests are the uniformity test, the universal test and the repetition test. The effectiveness of these tests are compared based on the subblock length, the limitations on data requirements, and on their power in detecting deviations from randomness. Due to the complexity of the test statistics, the power functions are estimated by simulation methods. The results show that for small subblocks the uniformity test is more powerful than the universal test, and that there is some doubt about the parameters of the hypothesised distribution for the universal test statistic. For larger subblocks the results show that the repetition test is the most effective test, since it requires far less data than either of the other two tests and is an efficient test in detecting deviations from randomness in binary strings.     

Non parametric multiple comparisons of non nested rival models

The practice for testing homogeneity of several rival models is of interest. In this article, we consider a non parametric multiple test for non nested distributions in the context of the model selection. Based on the linear sign rank test, and the known union–intersection principle, we let the magnitude of the data to give a better performance to the test statistic. We consider the sample and the non nested rival models as blocks and treatments, respectively, and introduce the extended Friedman test version to compare with the results of the test based on the linear sign rank test. A real dataset based on the waiting time to earthquake is considered to illustrate the results.     

Exact tests based on the Baumgartner-Weiß-Schindler statistic—A survey

It is the purpose of this paper to review recently-proposed exact tests based on the Baumgartner-Weiß-Schindler statistic and its modification. Except for the generalized Behrens-Fisher problem, these tests are broadly applicable, and they can be used to compare two groups irrespective of whether or not ties occur. In addition, a nonparametric trend test and a trend test for binomial proportions are possible. These exact tests are preferable to commonly-applied tests, such as the Wilcoxon rank sum test, in terms of both type I error rate and power.     

Preliminary Test Estimators Induced by Three Large Sample Tests for Stochastic Constraints in a Regression Model with Multivariate Student-t Error

In this article, we consider the preliminary test approach to the estimation of the regression parameter in a multiple regression model with multivariate Student-t distribution. The preliminary test estimators (PTE) based on the Wald (W), Likelihood Ratio (LR), and Lagrangian Multiplier (LM) tests are given under the suspicion of stochastic constraints occurring. The bias, mean square error matr ix (MSEM), and weighted mean square error (WMSE) of the proposed estimators are derived and compared. The conditions of superiority of the proposed estimators are obtained. Finally, we conclude that the optimum choice of the level of significance becomes the traditional choice by using the W test.     

Small sample power of multivariate nonparametric tests for monotone trend

Bhattacharyya and Kioiz (1966) propose two multivariate nonparametric tests for monotone trend, one involving coordinate-wise Mann statistics and the other, coordinate-wise Spearman statistics. Dietz and Killeen (1981) propose a different test statistic based on coordinate-wise Mann statistics. The Pitman asymptotic relative efficiency of all three tests with respect to a normal theory competitor equals the cube root of the efficiency of a multivariate signed rank test with respect to Hotelling's T2. In this article, the small sample power of the nonparametric tests, the normal theory test, and a Bonferroni approach involving coordinate-wise univariate Mann or Spearman tests is examined in a simulation study. The Mann statistic of Dietz and Killeen and the Spearman statistic of Bhattacharyya and Klotz are found to perform well under both null and alternative hypotheses     

非参数检验在市场调查中的应用

本文分析了非参数检验在市场调查中应用,并结合一些市场调查的数据资料对几种常用的非参数检验方法做了实征分析。     

Two-sample spatial rank test using projection

This paper explores in high-dimensional settings how to test the equality of two location vectors. We introduce a rank-based projection test under elliptical symmetry. Optimal projection direction is derived according to asymptotically and locally best power criteria. Data-splitting strategy is used to estimate optimal projection and construct test statistics. The limiting null distribution and power function of the proposed statistics are thoroughly investigated under some mild assumptions. The test is shown to keep type I error rates pretty well and outperforms several existing methods in a broad range of settings, especially in the presence of large correlation structures. Simulation studies are conducted to confirm the asymptotic results and a real data example is applied to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed procedure.     

Maximum Average-Power (MAP) Tests

The objective of this article is to propose and study frequentist tests that have maximum average power, averaging with respect to some specified weight function. First, some relationships between these tests, called maximum average-power (MAP) tests, and most powerful or uniformly most powerful tests are presented. Second, the existence of a maximum average-power test for any hypothesis testing problem is shown. Third, an MAP test for any hypothesis testing problem with a simple null hypothesis is constructed, including some interesting classical examples. Fourth, an MAP test for a hypothesis testing problem with a composite null hypothesis is discussed. From any one-parameter exponential family, a commonly used UMPU test is shown to be also an MAP test with respect to a rich class of weight functions. Finally, some remarks are given to conclude the article.     

Local power properties of some asymptotic tests in symmetric linear regression models

In this paper we obtain asymptotic expansions, up to order n^−1/2 and under a sequence of Pitman alternatives, for the nonnull distribution functions of the likelihood ratio, Wald, score and gradient test statistics in the class of symmetric linear regression models. This is a wide class of models which encompasses the t model and several other symmetric distributions with longer-than normal tails. The asymptotic distributions of all four statistics are obtained for testing a subset of regression parameters. Furthermore, in order to compare the finite-sample performance of these tests in this class of models, Monte Carlo simulations are presented. An empirical application to a real data set is considered for illustrative purposes.     

Locally minimax tests for multiple correlations

Let X be a normally distributed p-dimensional column vector with mean μ and positive definite covariance matrix σ. and let X α, α = 1,…, N, be a random sample of size N from this distribution. Partition X as ( X ₁, X ₍₂₎', X '₍₃₎)', where X₁ is one-dimension, X₍₂₎ is p₂- dimensional, and so 1 + p₁ + p₂ = p. Let ρ₁ and ρ be the multiple correlation coefficients of X₁ with X₍₂₎ and with ( X '₍₂₎, X '₍₃₎)', respectively. Write ρ2/2 = ρ² - ρ2/1. We shall cosider the following two problems     

Sample Size Determination for Logistic Regression: A Simulation Study

This article considers the different methods for determining sample sizes for Wald, likelihood ratio, and score tests for logistic regression. We review some recent methods, report the results of a simulation study comparing each of the methods for each of the three types of test, and provide Mathematica code for calculating sample size. We consider a variety of covariate distributions, and find that a calculation method based on a first order expansion of the likelihood ratio test statistic performs consistently well in achieving a target level of power for each of the three types of test.     

Homogeneity Test of Risk Differences of Marginal and Conditional Probabilities in Several Incomplete Correlated 2 × 2 Tables

This article considers K pairs of incomplete correlated 2 × 2 tables in which the interesting measurement is the risk difference between marginal and conditional probabilities. A Wald-type statistic and a score-type statistic are presented to test the homogeneity hypothesis about risk differences across strata. Powers and sample size formulae based on the above two statistics are deduced. Figures about sample size against risk difference (or marginal probability) are given. A real example is used to illustrate the proposed methods.     

Bootstrap tests: how many bootstraps?

In practice, bootstrap tests must use a finite number of bootstrap samples. This means that the outcome of the test will depend on the sequence of random numbers used to generate the bootstrap samples, and it necessarily results in some loss of power. We examine the extent of this power loss and propose a simple pretest procedure for choosing the number of bootstrap samples so as to minimize experimental randomness. Simulation experiments suggest that this procedure will work very well in practice.     

Testing the homogeneity of several two‐parameter populations

The authors extend Fisher's method of combining two independent test statistics to test homogeneity of several two‐parameter populations. They explore two procedures combining asymptotically independent test statistics: the first pools two likelihood ratio statistics and the other, score test statistics. They then give specific results to test homogeneity of several normal, negative binomial or beta‐binomial populations. Their simulations provide evidence that in this context, Fisher's method performs generally well, even when the statistics to be combined are only asymptotically independent. They are led to recommend Fisher's test based on score statistics, since the latter have simple forms, are easy to calculate, and have uniformly good level properties.     

On the Exact Size of Tests of Treatment Effects in Multi‐Arm Clinical Trials

When testing treatment effects in multi‐arm clinical trials, the Bonferroni method or the method of Simes 1986) is used to adjust for the multiple comparisons. When control of the family‐wise error rate is required, these methods are combined with the close testing principle of Marcus et al. (1976). Under weak assumptions, the resulting p‐values all give rise to valid tests provided that the basic test used for each treatment is valid. However, standard tests can be far from valid, especially when the endpoint is binary and when sample sizes are unbalanced, as is common in multi‐arm clinical trials. This paper looks at the relationship between size deviations of the component test and size deviations of the multiple comparison test. The conclusion is that multiple comparison tests are as imperfect as the basic tests at nominal size α/m where m is the number of treatments. This, admittedly not unexpected, conclusion implies that these methods should only be used when the component test is very accurate at small nominal sizes. For binary end‐points, this suggests use of the parametric bootstrap test. All these conclusions are supported by a detailed numerical study.