A Simple Probabilistic Proof for the Alternating Convolution of the Central Binomial Coefficients

This note presents a simple probabilistic proof of the identity for the alternating convolution of the central binomial coefficients. The proof of the identity involves the computation of moments of order n for the product of standard normal random variables.     

Conditioning out rare events for exponential families has negligible effect on inference

ABSTRACT

Suppose that we observe X ～Binomial(n, p). Inference on p is difficult if X = 0 or n. One way around this is to condition on these events not happening. We show that this has only an exponentially small effect on its cumulants. This is also true if we condition away other rare events. Our results are presented for exponential families, with applications to the binomial, multinomial and negative multinomial distributions.     

The Fate Worse than Death and other Curiosities and Stupidities

The problem of finding confidence intervals for the success parameter of a binomial experiment has a long history, and a myriad of procedures have been developed. Most exploit the duality between hypothesis testing and confidence regions and are typically based on large sample approximations. We instead employ a direct approach that attempts to determine the optimal coverage probability function a binomial confidence procedure can have from the exact underlying binomial distributions, which in turn defines the associated procedure. We show that a graphical perspective provides much insight into the problem. Both procedures whose coverage never falls below the declared confidence level and those that achieve that level only approximately are analyzed. We introduce the Length/Coverage Optimal method, a variant of Sterne's procedure that minimizes average length while maximizing coverage among all length minimizing procedures, and show that it is superior in important ways to existing procedures.     

Expectation identity for the binomial distribution and its application in the calculations of high-order binomial moments

ABSTRACT

For the exponential families normal, gamma, beta, Poisson, and negative binomial, there exists an expectation identity for each of the family. For the binomial family, we discover an expectation identity, which is useful in analytical calculations of its high-order moments.     

Charting small sample characteristics of asymptotic confidence intervals for the binomial parameterp

Small sample properties of seven confidence intervals for the binomial parameterp (based on various normal approximations) and of the Clopper-Pearson interval are compared. Coverage probabilities and expected lower and upper limits of the intervals are graphically displayed as functions of the binomial parameterp for various sample sizes.     

The search for submarine pingos in the Beaufort Sea: An unusual application of the binomial distribution

Almost all statistical estimation problems involving the binomial distribution occur with the number of independent Bernoulli trials, n, being a known parameter and the probability of success, p, being unknown. Applications in which n is unknown and p is known are extremely rare. One such application to a real problem in the physical sciences is the subject of this note.     

Power binomial exponential distribution: Modeling,simulation and application

ABSTRACT

The binomial exponential 2 (BE2) distribution was proposed by Bakouch et al. as a distribution of a random sum of independent exponential random variables, when the sample size has a zero truncated binomial distribution. In this article, we introduce a generalization of BE2 distribution which offers a more flexible model for lifetime data than the BE2 distribution. The hazard rate function of the proposed distribution can be decreasing, increasing, decreasing–increasing–decreasing and unimodal, so it turns out to be quite flexible for analyzing non-negative real life data. Some statistical properties and parameters estimation of the distribution are investigated. Three different algorithms are proposed for generating random data from the new distribution. Two real data applications regarding the strength data and Proschan's air-conditioner data are used to show that the new distribution is better than the BE2 distribution and some other well-known distributions in modeling lifetime data.     

Bayes and Empirical Bayes Estimation of the Parameter n in a Binomial Distribution

The problem of estimating the total number of trials n in a binomial distribution is reconsidered in this article for both cases of known and unknown probability of success p from the Bayesian viewpoint. Bayes and empirical Bayes point estimates for n are proposed under the assumption of a left-truncated prior distribution for n and a beta prior distribution for p. Simulation studies are provided in this article in order to compare the proposed estimate with the most familiar n estimates.     

Empirical bayes estimation of the binomial parameter n

Estimation of the prior distribution of the binomial parameter nbased on a system of orthogonal polynomials, the Poisson-Charlier polynomials, is studied. It is shown that the resulting estimator is mean squared consistent with rate O(N ^ε-1), where Nis the sample size and ε> 0 is arbitrarily small.     

A Statistical Reanalysis of the Classical Rutherford's Experiment

Modified chi-squared and some newly developed tests for the Poisson, binomial, and an approximated Feller's distribution are discussed. A reanalysis of the classical Rutherford's experimental data on alpha decay is done. Previous analyses of the data were not correct from the point of view of the theory of statistical testing. Tests used show that the data contradict to both Poisson and binomial distribution and do not contradict to a precise “binomial” approximation of Feller's distribution that takes into account a counter's dead time. This gives a plausible statistically correct confirmation of the well-established exponential law of radioactive decay.     

Improved Confidence Statements for the Binomial Parameter

In the computation of two-sided confidence intervals for the binomial parameter p (using the binomial mass function), it is known that such intervals achieve a confidence coefficient that in general is not equal to the confidence level 1 – α, say. In this article we present some general results on the confidence coefficient and tabulate them for selected pairs (α, n = number of trials). We treat only the nominal equal tail probability case because it is the most commonly taught and used.     

Interval estimation for a binomial proportion: a bootstrap approach

This paper discusses the classic but still current problem of interval estimation of a binomial proportion. Bootstrap methods are presented for constructing such confidence intervals in a routine, automatic way. Three confidence intervals for a binomial proportion are compared and studied by means of a simulation study, namely: the Wald confidence interval, the Agresti–Coull interval and the bootstrap-t interval. A new confidence interval, the Agresti–Coull interval with bootstrap critical values, is also introduced and its good behaviour related to the average coverage probability is established by means of simulations.     

Approximate Bayesianity of Frequentist Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion

The well-known Wilson and Agresti–Coull confidence intervals for a binomial proportion p are centered around a Bayesian estimator. Using this as a starting point, similarities between frequentist confidence intervals for proportions and Bayesian credible intervals based on low-informative priors are studied using asymptotic expansions. A Bayesian motivation for a large class of frequentist confidence intervals is provided. It is shown that the likelihood ratio interval for p approximates a Bayesian credible interval based on Kerman’s neutral noninformative conjugate prior up to O(n^{? 1}) in the confidence bounds. For the significance level α ? 0.317, the Bayesian interval based on the Jeffreys’ prior is then shown to be a compromise between the likelihood ratio and Wilson intervals. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.     

Exact computation of minimum sample size for estimation of binomial parameters

It is indicated by some researchers in the literature that it might be difficult to exactly determine the minimum sample size for the estimation of a binomial parameter with prescribed margin of error and confidence level. In this paper, we investigate such a very old but also extremely important problem and demonstrate that the difficulty for obtaining the exact solution is not insurmountable. Unlike the classical approximate sample size method based on the central limit theorem, we develop a new approach for computing the minimum sample size that does not require any approximation. Moreover, our approach overcomes the conservatism of existing rigorous sample size methods derived from Bernoulli's theorem or Chernoff-Hoeffding bound.Our computational machinery consists of two essential ingredients. First, we prove that the minimum of coverage probability with respect to a binomial parameter bounded in an interval is attained at a discrete set of finite many values of the binomial parameter. This allows for reducing infinite many evaluations of coverage probability to finite many evaluations. Second, a recursive bounding technique is developed to further improve the efficiency of computation.     

Another Approach to Incomplete Integrals

One usually writes the incomplete integrals as the sums of discrete probabilities by repeating the procedure of integration by parts. This work provides another approach by employing the binomial expansion.     

Application of Anbar's Approach to Hypothesis Testing to Detect the Difference between Two Proportions

In this paper, Anbar's (1983) approach for estimating a difference between two binomial proportions is discussed with respect to a hypothesis testing problem. Such an approach results in two possible testing strategies. While the results of the tests are expected to agree for a large sample size when two proportions are equal, the tests are shown to perform quite differently in terms of their probabilities of a Type I error for selected sample sizes. Moreover, the tests can lead to different conclusions, which is illustrated via a simple example; and the probability of such cases can be relatively large. In an attempt to improve the tests while preserving their relative simplicity feature, a modified test is proposed. The performance of this test and a conventional test based on normal approximation is assessed. It is shown that the modified Anbar's test better controls the probability of a Type I error for moderate sample sizes.     

Almost nonparametric inference for repeated measures in mixture models

We consider ways to estimate the mixing proportions in a finite mixture distribution or to estimate the number of components of the mixture distribution without making parametric assumptions about the component distributions. We require a vector of observations on each subject. This vector is mapped into a vector of 0s and 1s and summed. The resulting distribution of sums can be modelled as a mixture of binomials. We then work with the binomial mixture. The efficiency and robustness of this method are compared with the strategy of assuming multivariate normal mixtures when, typically, the true underlying mixture distribution is different. It is shown that in many cases the approach based on simple binomial mixtures is superior.     

Sample Size Requirements for the Back-of-the-Envelope Binomial Confidence Interval

The simplest approximate confidence interval for the binomial parameter p, based on x successes in n trials, is

where c is a suitable percentile of the normal distribution. Because I ₀ is so useful in introductory teaching and for back-of-the-envelope calculation, it is desirable to have guidelines for deciding when it provides a good answer. (It is clearly unwise to use I ₀ when x is too near 0 or n.) This article proposes such guidelines, based on the criterion that I ₀ should differ from the exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval by an amount that is small compared to the length of the interval.     

Exact Linear Restrictions on Parameters in the Classical Linear Regression Model

We consider a simple sampling scheme where after each drawing there is a “replacement” whose magnitude is a fixed real number. This gives a unified approach to a family of discrete distributions that includes the hypergeometric, binomial, and Polya distributions as well as their multivariate versions.