A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs

We model the performance of DMUs (decision-making units) using a two-stage network model. In the first stage of production DMUs use inputs to produce an intermediate output that becomes an input to a second stage where final outputs are produced. Previous black box DEA models allowed for non-radial scaling of outputs and inputs and accounted for slacks in the constraints that define the technology. We extend these models and build a performance measure that accounts for a network structure of production. We use our method to estimate the performance of Japanese banks, which use labor, physical capital, and financial equity capital in a first stage to produce an intermediate output of deposits. In the second stage, those deposits become an input in the production of loans and securities investments. The network estimates reveal greater bank inefficiency than do the estimates that treat the bank production process as a black box with all production taking place in a single stage.     

决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法

传统交叉效率评价方法因决策单元偏好权重不唯一而难以操作,因交叉效率有效性分值平均化集结而难以被接受。目前的学者通常围绕决策单元指标权重的确定性分配方法、交叉效率有效性分值的去平均化集结等分别开展研究。本文将交叉效率评价方法中自评互评相结合的评价模式看作群决策过程,即每个决策单元既是一个被评对象,又是一个决策"专家",提出了一种决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法,将决策单元偏好权重的确定和交叉效率有效性分值的去平均化集结作为同一个决策过程,根据每个决策单元的评价结果与群体评价结果的接近程度,同步迭代调整决策单元的"专家"权重和决策单元自评产生的、并提供给其他被评价决策单元的一组确定的偏好指标权重。实验验证与实例运用分析表明,该方法收敛效果良好,能得到客观稳定的决策单元交叉效率有效性分值及排序。     

Ranking efficient units in DEA

Super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) model can be used in ranking the performance of efficient decision making units (DMUs). Because of the infeasibility problem associated with the super-efficiency DEA model, ranking has been restricted to the model where constant returns to scale and proportional changes in all inputs or all outputs are assumed. In fact, when super-efficiency is used as an efficiency stability measure, infeasibility means the highest super-efficiency. However, if super-efficiency is interpreted as input saving or output surplus achieved by a specific efficient DMU, infeasibility does not necessarily mean the highest super-efficiency. In order to obtain a complete ranking of efficient DMUs when the two assumptions are relaxed, a modified super-efficiency DEA model is proposed to overcome the infeasibility problem and to correctly capture the super-efficiency represented by the input saving or the output surplus. The current paper suggests using both input- and output-oriented super-efficiency models to characterize the super-efficiency when infeasibility occurs. As a result, we can rank the efficient DMUs if infeasibility occurs. The approach is applied to 20 largest Japanese companies and 15 US cities, respectively.     

基于最近距离投影的DEA两阶段效率评价方法研究

数据包络分析是进行效率评价最重要的方法之一。传统的数据包络分析理论主要寻找有效前沿面上的最远距离投影，在极大化无效性指数的同时也面临着效率改进的巨大难度和高额成本。对于具有两阶段内部生产结构的决策单元，本文从考虑最小改进难度的视角出发，提出了最近距离投影的两阶段效率评价方法。该方法首先得到所有强有效决策单元的线性组合，且这些组合均占优于被评价的两阶段决策单元。然后建立了两阶段范围调整效率评价模型，在确定具有最近投影距离的占优组合的同时，得到了两阶段评价效率。最后，本文运用我国32家上市银行的年度数据对所提出方法进行了应用验证。     

考虑满意度的两阶段DEA固定成本分摊方法

考虑具有相同的投入和产出的两阶段决策单元的固定成本分摊问题。将待分摊的固定成本作为一种新的投入,建立两阶段加性DEA模型。首先证明了各决策单元从自身角度出发可以找到至少一种分摊方案,使其自身整体和阶段效率都达到Pareto有效。然后证明了在公共的权重下,至少存在一种分摊方案可以使得各决策单元整体和阶段效率都达到Pareto有效。并给出了这样的有效成本分摊方案集。为了得到公平的成本分摊方案,定义了各DMU各阶段对分摊方案的满意度,最大化最小的满意度,可以得到最终的成本分摊方案。将问题拓展到两阶段存在共享投入的生产系统中,这些性质定理同样成立。数值算例部分将本文与Yu等（2016）的研究结果进行了对比,验证了本文方法的有效性,指出了本文方法的优越性。本文的方法综合考虑了效率和公平,得到的固定成本分摊方案公平合理。     

基于交叉评价策略的DEA全局协调相对效率排序模型

在DEA(数据包络分析)研究领域,建构在交叉效率概念基础上的现有决策单元排序方法仅以定义的方式给出了用于决策单元排序的交叉效率评价值。对于这种方法构建方式,分别基于管理学的效率概念和多属性决策理论,分析指出其中的交叉效率评价值从本质上讲既与效率的管理学概念不符,也与决策单元的优劣不存在理性逻辑联系。为克服现有决策单元排序方法所存在的上述问题,基于交叉评价策略和效率的管理学概念内涵给出了DEA全局协调相对效率的新概念,在此基础上利用优化理论给出了可以用于决策单元优劣排序的DEA全局协调相对效率测度模型,并通过理论分析和数值案例验证解释了该模型相对于现有决策单元排序方法所拥有的比较优势。     

DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings

A number of studies have used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of the countries in Olympic games. While competition exists among the countries in Olympic games/rankings, all these DEA studies do not model competition among peer decision making units (DMUs) or countries. These DEA studies find a set of weights/multipliers that keep the efficiency scores of all DMUs at or below unity. Although cross efficiency goes a further step by providing an efficiency measure in terms of the best multiplier bundle for the unit and all the other DMUs, it is not always unique. This paper presents a new and modified DEA game cross-efficiency model where each DMU is viewed as a competitor via non-cooperative game. For each competing DMU, a multiplier bundle is determined that optimizes the efficiency score for that DMU, with the additional constraint that the resulting score should be at or above that DMU 's estimated best performance. The problem, of course, arises that we will not know this best performance score for the DMU under evaluation until the best performances of all other DMUs are known. To combat this “chicken and egg” phenomenon, an iterative approach leading to the Nash equilibrium is presented. The current paper provides a modified variable returns to scale (VRS) model that yields non-negative cross-efficiency scores. The approach is applied to the last six Summer Olympic Games. Our results may indicate that our game cross-efficiency model implicitly incorporates the relative importance of gold, silver and bronze medals without the need for specifying the exact assurance regions.     

Common benchmarking and ranking of units with DEA

This paper develops a common framework for benchmarking and ranking units with DEA. In many DEA applications, decision making units (DMUs) experience similar circumstances, so benchmarking analyses in those situations should identify common best practices in their management plans. We propose a DEA-based approach for the benchmarking to be used when there is no need (nor wish) to allow for individual circumstances of the DMUs. This approach identifies a common best practice frontier as the facet of the DEA efficient frontier spanned by the technically efficient DMUs in a common reference group. The common reference group is selected as that which provides the closest targets. A model is developed which allows us to deal not only with the setting of targets but also with the measurement of efficiency, because we can define efficiency scores of the DMUs by using the common set of weights (CSW) it provides. Since these weights are common to all the DMUs, the resulting efficiency scores can be used to derive a ranking of units. We discuss the existence of alternative optimal solutions for the CSW and find the range of possible rankings for each DMU which would result from considering all these alternate optima. These ranking ranges allow us to gain insight into the robustness of the rankings.     

基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法

在数据包络分析中，大量的交叉效率模型已被提出。然而选择不同的目标模型将实现不一样的交叉效率评价。本文基于针对单个决策单元实施的对抗型和仁慈型两个交叉效率模型，用合作博弈方法来研究交叉效率模型的选取，并利用Shapley值对决策单元进行排序。最后通过实例分析显示该排序方法充分利用了最小交叉效率和最大交叉效率的信息完全排序了所有决策单元，具有一定的综合性和合理性。     

评价相对效率的投入—产出型DEA

传统 DEA只能在固定投入或产出的条件下 ,从产出或投入角度测算决策单元相对效率 ,因而不能综合地反映决策单元的投入产出效果 .基于双目标规划 ,本文将提出从投入及产出角度评价决策单元相对效率的投入—产出型 DEA,并研究其相对有效性 .最后以沪市 1 6家高科技上市公司为应用实例 ,研究其相对经营效率     

评价相对效率的投入-产出型DEA

传统DEA只能在固定投入或产出的条件下,从产出或投入角度测算决策单元相对效率,因而不能综合地反映决策单元的投入产出效果.基于双目标规划,本文将提出从投入及产出角度评价决策单元相对效率的投入-产出型DEA,并研究其相对有效性.最后以沪市16家高科技上市公司为应用实例,研究其相对经营效率.     

Konsensuale Effizenzbewertung und -verbesserung mittels DEA

This contribution is a new DEA approach in as much as it permits the decision making units (DMUs) to improve their respective efficiencies from the view of a peer rather than form their own self-appraisal attitudes. These authors study the output oriented model under constant scale efficiencies and first develop how a DMU can improve its performance by radial output increase or even by free output variation??in the light of the weight system of an arbitrary peer. The results are an improved cross-efficiency matrix and a maximum cross-efficiency matrix. Either of these matrices may serve as an appropriate instrument for a consensual choice of a peer??consensual among all DMUs. Input oriented models as well as simultaneous input/output considerations amend the so far developed results. A suitable example demonstrates all aspects of the new approach.     

Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric approach for measuring the relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs). Many studies have examined DEA efficiencies of two-stage systems, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. Although single-stage DEA models with undesirable input-outputs have been extensively studied, there still lacks of more systematical investigation on two-stage DEA with undesirable variables. For instance, depending on its operating model, even whether an intermediate variable is desirable or undesirable can be questionable for a particular two-stage system. Furthermore, most of the existing studies on two-stage systems focus on the case where only the final outputs are undesirable. In this work, we try to systematically examine two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Particularly, we utilize the free-disposal axioms to construct the production possibility sets (PPS) and the corresponding DEA models with undesirable variables. The proposed models are then used to illustrate some theoretical perspectives by using the data of China׳s listed banks.     

嵌套并联结构两阶段DEA下科技创新效率测度与分解

目前有许多研究将两阶段DEA模型应用到科技创新活动当中,一般将创新活动分为研发和转化两个阶段,为了进一步探讨不同转移转化方式下科技成果的转化效率以获得更多的详细信息,本文拓展了传统的两阶段DEA模型,考虑了嵌套并联结构的两阶段网络DEA模型,将科技创新活动分为科技成果研发阶段和科技成果转化阶段,并将科技成果转化阶段分为内部转化和外部转化两个并联子系统。本文选取14家中科院院属单位作为被评价对象,应用加权加法分解方法计算整体效率和各阶段子效率。通过将本文模型与传统两阶段模型进行对比发现,传统模型会低估科技成果转化效率。结果表明：整体科技创新效率均值偏低,科技成果研发效率均值高于科技成果转化效率均值,科技成果转化效率仍有很大的提升空间。科技成果转化阶段中内部转化效率普遍较高但是外部转化效率普遍较低,较低的外部转化效率是导致科技成果转化效率低下的主要原因。最后,本文将所有被评价单位分为四类机构,分析提高科技创新效率的实现路径,可以通过重点突破模式和渐进突破模式来实现整体效率的提高。     

Goal directed benchmarking for organizational efficiency

In this paper, we extend the standard data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to include longer term top management goals. This extension is in recognition of the fact that benchmarking for decision making units (DMUs) is more than a purely monitoring process, and includes a component of future planning. The new model uses a goal programming structure to find points on the efficient frontier which are realistically achievable by DMUs, but at the same time achieving a closer approach to long term organizational goals (as distinct from the local performance of individual DMUs). Consideration is given to the possibility of adjusting constraints on the DMU by investment in extended inputs or new technologies, in which case minimization of associated investment costs becomes an additional management objective.     

基于证据推理和前景理论的交叉效率排序方法研究

针对由交叉效率评价策略和交叉效率集结方法的多样性而造成评价结果不一致的问题,提出利用证据推理方法和前景理论,综合各个交叉效率评价策略的评价结果,实现对决策单元的统一评价。首先,分别将选用的交叉效率评价策略以及各个评价策略中的他评效率设置成一级指标和二级指标,依据算数平均和前景理论分别确定一、二级指标的权重;其次,依据他评效率确定二级指标置信度,利用证据推理方法将各个交叉效率评价策略的他评效率综合转换成决策单元被评价为有效的置信度。决策者可通过比较决策单元被识别为有效的置信度的大小来判断决策单元交叉效率的大小,进而实现对决策单元的排序;最后,通过案例验证和说明本文提出方法的有效性和实用性。     

存在非期望产出的决策单元阻塞问题研究

阻塞是指企业的过量投入引起生产效益下降的经济现象,近年来已经受到实业界与学术界的广泛关注。现有的决策单元阻塞问题研究普遍假设产出均是期望指标,然而,在实际生产中很多产出属于非期望指标。本文构建了同时存在期望产出和非期望产出决策单元的阻塞度量模型,该模型不仅可以判别决策单元是否存在阻塞,而且可以测算各项投入的阻塞程度,并给出了决策单元阻塞和技术无效之间的关系。最后,运用所提出的模型对我国上市商业银行的效率和阻塞情况进行了测算与分析,验证了本文模型的实用性与可行性。     

An integrated model for slack-based measure of super-efficiency in additive DEA

As a non-radial approach, a super-efficiency model, Super SBM, was proposed by Tone [15] to rank efficient DMUs. Du et al. [7] extends the Super SBM model to the additive (slacks-based) DEA model. To obtain the super-efficiencies of the DMUs, one needs to identify the efficient DMUs first and then apply the additive super-efficiency model to those efficient DMUs. In this paper, we propose an integrated model so that the efficiencies of the inefficient DMUs and the super-efficiencies of the efficient DMUs can be obtained by a single model. The efficiency scores obtained by our integrated model are the same as those obtained by Du et al. [7] and the additive DEA model.     

Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths

The existing centralized resource allocation models often assume that all of the DMUs are efficient after resource allocation. For the DMU with a very low efficiency score, it means the dramatic reduction of the resources, which can cause the organizational resistance. In addition, in reality, it is particularly difficult for the DMUs to achieve their target efficiencies in a single step, especially when they are far from the efficient frontier. Thus, gradual progress towards benchmarking targets is gaining importance. In this paper, we present a new approach for resource allocation based on efficiency analysis under a centralized decision-making environment. Through our approach, the central decision-maker can obtain a sequence of intermediate benchmark targets based on efficiency analysis, which provide a level-wise improvement path to direct the DMUs to reach their ultimate targets on the efficient frontier in an implementable and realistic manner. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the application procedure of the proposed approach.     

超效率DEA模型的模糊扩展

在输入、输出数据为模糊数而效率值为准确值的模糊DEA模型中,会出现有两个以上有效单元,从而无法对所有决策单元进行全排序的情形。本文利用模糊数的基于α-截集的比较规则,建立了模糊条件下的超效率DEA模型,有效地解决了模糊决策单元的全排序问题。文末给出了一个实例。