大学生持续性志愿服务行为影响因素

大学生志愿者的志愿服务行动已经成为服务社会主义精神文明建设、助力青年成长成才、完善社会动员机制和推动事业发展的重要创举。对沪上18所高校665名大学生的问卷调查显示,大学生志愿服务的参与度较高,但每学期平均参与时长较低、持续性参与不够或中途流失的问题普遍存在。研究发现,认知程度、参与动机等内在因素对广泛参与度影响显著,而高校和政府支持、组织管理满意度、岗位分配满意度等外在因素对深入参与度影响显著。内在因素是影响大学生是否会成为志愿者的主要因素,外在因素是影响大学生持续参加志愿服务的主要因素,推动大学生持续性志愿服务行为要依靠完善外在管理和保障,从而有效防止志愿者中途大量流失,构建志愿服务长效机制。     

大学生志愿精神培养的障碍性因素分析

大学生对志愿精神的准确把握和深刻体认是中国志愿服务事业向前发展的重要推动力。培养大学生志愿精神所面临的障碍性因素主要包括：大学生对志愿精神的理解存在一定偏差．志愿服务没有内化为大学生长期自觉的行为,大学生志愿者组织的运行模式趋于行政化,以及大学生志愿服务的社会化工作机制和激励机制不足。因此,深刻理解并广泛推广志愿精神的现代涵义、尊重大学生志愿精神培养的一般规律、加强大学生志愿者组织的专业化管理以及构建大学生志愿服务的社会化工作机制和激励机制对于培养大学生志愿精神具有重要的现实意义。     

浅析高校志愿者服务体系的构建

大学生志愿服务活动是高校精神文明建设的有效载体。大学生志愿服务活动是广大青年进行社会化活动的一种有效途径,是社会保障体系的重要补充,是社会弱势群体的重要支持因素,是一种重要的社会整合机制。随着青年志愿者服务活动的全面开展,建立完善的志愿服务体系为志愿服务活动能更好的开展就显得尤为重要,结合当前志愿服务组织体系建设等现状,笔者认为应当从以下几个方面来完善青年志愿服务体系的构建。     

大学生志愿服务体系建设路径研究——以JZ学院为例

本研究旨在摸清JZ学院大学生参与志愿服务活动的参与度、认知度、激励因素以及各系开展志愿服务的具体情况。调查结果显示大学生参与志愿服务的参与度、认知度较高,参与志愿服务活动的出发点较为理性且体现了较高的价值追求,但志愿服务的开展也存在服务对象单一、服务范围单一、服务形式单一,资金来源渠道有限、形式主义等问题。为进一步完善大学生志愿服务体系建设,应从志愿者招募-培训-评估机制建设、大学生志愿服务活动开展项目化与基地化建设、学校相关配套机制建设三个方面着手进一步完善大学生志愿服务体系建设。     

两岸大学生志愿服务动机与激励机制比较研究

20世纪70年代以来,志愿者组织在全球范围兴起并得到发展,逐渐成为现代社会发展的一支活跃力量,在全球掀起了开展志愿服务的热潮。大学生志愿者作为我国志愿服务的重要参与主体,在志愿服务中起到了举足轻重的作用。在两岸和平发展新时期,两岸出现了大交流、大合作、大发展的新局面。作为志愿服务的主力军,两岸大学生志愿服务动机和激励机制的比较,有利于促进两岸大学生志愿服务合作机制的建立。     

大学生参与社区居家养老志愿服务的问题及其对策研究——以长春市某高校为例

随着人口老龄化问题的逐渐加剧,引入社区居家养老服务多元供给主体和完善养老服务体系建设,以期解决当前的养老难题。当前,面对养老服务人才短缺的困境,引导培育大学生参与社区居家养老志愿服务具有重要意义。基于对长春市某高校大学生社区居家养老志愿服务参与现状的分析,提出旨在加强大学生志愿服务宣传力度、创新大学生志愿服务项目建设、完善大学生志愿者培训制度、健全奖惩激励机制和社会保障机制的对策。     

大学生青年志愿活动现状调查与对策分析

中文词典《现代汉语词典》对志愿者服务的也作了详细的定义:"志愿者是指愿为社会公益活动,赛事,会议等服务的人"。综合来看,我们引以界定志愿服务的概念;是以服务为主的,具有资源,公益和无偿等特征的活动。本文通过对各高校大学生进行问卷调查,调查了大学生对青年志愿者行动的认识、理解及心态、参与志愿服务的原因和影响志愿服务开展的因素、对志愿服务的看法和希望等,为社会、高校研究大学生志愿服务情况并制定相关政策法规,为志愿者活动创造良好的环境提供资料及合理化建议。     

高校学生志愿服务现状及心理研究——以河南财经政法大学志愿者为例

随着我国志愿服务活动的不断发展,在所有志愿者的行列里面,高校学生志愿者占主导地位,为了保证高校学生志愿服务活动能长期有效且优质有序地进行,需要对其志愿服务现状、存在的问题进行探讨。本文在对河南财经政法大学生的志愿服务心理进行问卷调查后,分析出大学生参与志愿服务的现状以及志愿服务存在消极心理的影响等内容,并提出了应对机制及模式创新。     

关于在校大学生志愿者活动现状的分析

现今大学生志愿者参加志愿服务活动依然成为一种社会活动的主流,各种赛事、展会到处可见大学生志愿者的身影。我校高举公益性办学的旗帜,在全校青年学生中积极倡导"奉献、友爱、互助、进步"的青年志愿者精神,使广大学生在志愿服务的社会实践中得到锻炼,促进大学生的成长成才;在学生参加志愿服务过程中,完成道德品质与社会技能的双重提升。通过大力弘扬志愿者精神、广开志愿服务渠道,磨砺学生道德品质、锤炼学生专业技能。实现志愿服务与大学精神塑造相结合、志愿服务与应用型人才培养相结合、志愿服务与参与地方社会建设相结合。     

地方高校大学生志愿服务的现状调查与对策——以L大学为例

采用自编的地方高校大学生志愿服务现状调查问卷对L大学2—4年级在校生进行抽样调查的结果表明:高校在校生对志愿精神理解不到位,参与度不高,信息来源渠道单一,志愿服务组织没有完善的管理机制等问题严重影响地方高校在校生志愿服务活动的质量。为壮大地方高校大学生志愿服务组织的队伍,必须培养大学生志愿精神,并鼓励他们参与志愿活动;加强宣传,拓宽大学生获取信息的渠道;为大学生志愿组织提供充足的资金援助;完善大学生志愿服务组织的管理体制和激励体制。     

以高校校报的创新发展加强党建育人工作

加强高校党建育人工作,筑牢抵御＂和平演变＂及思想渗透的钢铁长城,具有深远而重大的战略意义。高校校报作为党的喉舌耳目和重要宣传舆论工具,理所应当在加强党建育人工作中发挥重要而积极的作用。     

Private property and the problem of the miraculous: the kramats and the city of Cape Town

This paper seeks to explore the place of kramats the graves of Muslim saints or Auliyah – in the landscape of contemporary Cape Town. The kramat sites have been proclaimed as heritage sites because of their importance as tangible signs of Islam at the Cape. At the same time, the process of the kramats becoming heritage sites has contained moments of intense, often sensational, public contestation. Offering a reading of the discourses surrounding two contested kramats in Cape Town, this paper explores the way kramats mark out a miraculous space in the prosaic modern city and introduce into the post-apartheid evaluation of heritage, alternative conceptions of space and notions of temporality. They are sites of impossibility where, it is claimed, the laws of nature themselves are interrupted to mark the intangible particularities of the site. This paper explores what happens when this miraculous space is subject to the demands of private property and municipal law and the conflicts that arise from this collision of different conceptual and experiential modalities. It considers the effects of the entanglement of legend and history that result from the production of these sites as heritage in a market-driven economy.     

Disappointing and deviant youth and the rage of the elders

A generalized adult hostility toward youth derives from the complexities of the parent/child relationship, often mirrored in the helper/client and therapist/patient dyads. Parents derive considerable or little narcissistic gain from the accomplishments of their offspring, and conversely, are disappointed or even mortified by their failures. This is particularly true of narcissistically vulnerable parents—helpers and therapists as well—and accounts for widespread attitudes of competition, disparagement, and outright hostility toward young people. In the extreme, the pathological situations of emotional exploitation, incest, and physical abuse occur, but lesser forms of exploitation, such as personally gratifying advocacy, political gain, cultism, and enhancement of professional status, point to similar, but seemingly less destructive, forms of narcissistic gain. Youth may respond by conforming, defying, disappointing, and deviating. Adults may be either pleased, or enraged.     

On the expansion of the market and the decline of the family

Over the past two hundred years, large, modern firms have tended to replace small, family businesses. In parallel, the family has declined as a social institution. We suggest that these developments are interrelated. Because information of cheating in market transactions spreads only gradually in large markets, the reputation of the family firm could support contractual performance only in small, traditional markets. As markets grew in size, this reputational mechanism could no longer operate. The small, family firm was then replaced by the large, modern firm. This transition led to a decrease in the importance of the family.      

The Manifestation of Senses and Memory in the Obese and the Family of the Obese

No abstract available for this article.     

Modernity and the Contingency of the Public

The idea of a public contingent on its participants is the analogue of resonance to music because neither would make sense without the other. This article introduces the concept of modernity as a framing device and explains the occlusion of the private by the public. Secondly, the article illustrates the Legal-Autonomous Public Model, and the Multiple Public Model in the work of John Dewey, Walter Lippmann, and Kenneth J. Arrow. Public space is what Foucault was alleged to have called '´ecriture', which refers to a convergence of and intermixing of signifiers within a de-gendered setting (hence ´ecriture, as opposed to l'´ecriture). The great contest between Lippmann and Dewey in the 1920s signified a clashing of the two interpretations of the public with one arguing about the need for a return to a constitutionally guaranteed, left-of-centre public philosophy that would entertain the elite while taking care of the poor, and the other a plea for a rationalistic recourse that surmised and envisaged rational public discourse as only one of several possible publics. The article concludes with the notion that the constructions of public space defined by Dewey, Lippmann, and Arrow promote distinct yet related interrogations of public space that is more than an agora of resonating ideas, but includes a kind of automatic reverberation on its own axes.     

Women and the Emergence of the NAACP

This article discusses contributions of women to the emergence of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Using network analysis, the author studied affiliations between African American and White women who signed “The Call,” a petition calling for a national conference to obtain civil rights for African Americans. These links led to the origin of one of the most successful organizations in the fight for equality. Their experiences reflect the segregation and conflicts of the era. They also suggest strategies for facing cultural issues today. Teaching about social work history, its legacy of reform, and its commitment to social justice gained from the social movements of the Progressive Era can help social work students, most of whom are women, understand how social change can occur.     

Altruism and the Endurance of the Good

Egoism is a pervasive trait in modern market societies that encourages people to focus upon their own self-interest above all else. Third-sector organizations, by contrast, are frequently termed altruistic. This essay elucidates the meaning of altruism as it applies to these organizations. Moral altruism means direct concern for another's well being—whoever that person might be. This study rejects psychological egoism as a meaningful psychological theory, and ethical egoism as a coherent moral position; it discusses empirical studies of altruism in rescuers of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe as proof against the former form of egoism and Kant's moral theory against the latter. The essay then argues that altruism is a form of public action in Hannah Arendt's sense of this term. The essay concludes that third-sector organizations are altruistic insofar as they engage in public action, thereby, treating beneficiaries with respect for their individuality.     

Brexit and the Future of the Left

The referendum on British membership in the European Union divided not only the society in the UK but also the left both in Britain and all over the continent. This division however is produced not so much by this specific debate but by a deeper problem of the left capitulating ideologically and accepting neoliberalism as something objectively inevitable (even without publically recognizing it), replacing class struggle by ‘progressive’ cultural values that themselves form an essential part of the new capitalist hegemony. Leftist intelligentsia with its cultural critique of capitalism is no alternative to the current system, rather it is one of its pillars. While class division was very visible in the Brexit vote, with the working class and poor massively voting for ‘Leave’, most of the left either sided with the establishment or was wavering. Thus the success of the ‘Leave’ vote can be claimed by nationalists. Even after this political disaster instead criticizing itself leftist intelligentsia is blaming the people for being provincial and not accepting their progressive European values. However it was exactly the mass of common people in England who by voting for ‘Leave’ contributed to the formation of the new European agenda. Overcoming and unmaking bureaucratic, authoritarian, and neoliberal EU institutions is the only way to progress towards the making of a new democratic Europe.