职场排斥与员工组织公民行为:组织认同与集体主义倾向的作用

本文旨在研究职场排斥对员工组织公民行为的影响,并以社会认同理论和文化价值观为基础,研究员工组织认同和集体主义倾向在以上关系中所起的中介及调节作用.研究以两家石化企业中的258名员工和102名主管为研究对象,对问卷调查所获得的匹配数据进行层级回归分析,结果表明,职场排斥对员工组织公民行为具有显著的正向影响,员工组织认同在其中起完全中介作用;员工的集体主义倾向越明显,职场排斥与员工组织认同之间的负向联系就越强.     

职场排斥对员工职外绩效的影响:组织认同和工作投入的中介效应

在中国组织情境下探讨职场排斥对员工职外绩效的影响以及组织认同和工作投入在该影响过程中的中介作用.采用问卷法,以珠三角地区企业组织的员工和直接主管为调查对象,使用结构方程模型分析职场排斥、组织认同、工作投入与职外绩效之间的关系.研究表明,职场排斥对员工职外绩效的工作奉献和人际促进两个维度均具有显著的负向影响,说明在中国组织情境下职场排斥会抑制员工的职外绩效;组织认同和工作投入在职场排斥与工作奉献之间具有完全中介效应,在职场排斥与人际促进之间起部分中介作用.研究结果有助于揭开职场排斥影响职外绩效的黑箱,对于管理实践具有较强的启示意义.     

职场排斥对员工敬业度的影响研究——情绪耗竭的中介作用

员工敬业度问题关系到企业的生存与发展。引入情绪耗竭中介变量,探讨在中国组织文化情境下职场排斥对员工敬业度的影响机制。通过研究得出:职场排斥显著负向影响员工敬业度,职场排斥正向影响员工情绪耗竭,情绪耗竭对员工敬业度有负向的消极影响,情绪耗竭在职场排斥与员工敬业度之间起部分中介作用。     

领导风格与员工目标导向对“职场囚徒”形成的影响机理探究

目前关于"职场囚徒"的研究仅停留在其表现和对策等较低研究层面,缺少对其形成机理及影响的深层次研究成果。通过文献回顾,在分析交易型领导、变革型领导、"职场囚徒"和员工目标导向等相关理论及研究成果的基础上,提出研究的概念模型及理论假设,并经实证研究发现,领导风格对"职场囚徒"形成产生显著影响,交易型领导风格正向影响"职场囚徒"形成,变革型领导风格负向影响"职场囚徒"形成;员工目标导向在领导风格与"职场囚徒"之间起调节作用,学习型目标导向负向调节"职场囚徒"形成,绩效型目标导向正向调节"职场囚徒"形成。     

资源保存理论视角下职场负面八卦对员工幸福感的影响机制研究

以资源保存理论为基础,对服务业中314名一线员工的调查数据进行分析和检验,探讨了职场负面八卦对员工幸福感的影响机制,并考察了情绪耗竭的中介作用以及主管支持感、情绪智力的调节作用。研究结果表明,职场负面八卦负向影响员工幸福感,情绪耗竭在职场负面八卦与员工幸福感之间起中介作用,主管支持感和情绪智力分别能够弱化职场负面八卦对情绪耗竭、情绪耗竭对员工幸福感的影响,并调节情绪耗竭在职场负面八卦与员工幸福感之间的中介效应,且在相对高主管支持感、相对低情绪智力的条件下更能弱化情绪耗竭的中介效应。     

职场排斥对知识型员工适应性绩效的影响:人格特质的调节作用

以知识型员工为研究视角,基于中国组织情境,探讨了职场排斥、人格特质与适应性绩效的关系,考察了人格特质在职场排斥与适应性绩效之间的调节效应。结果表明:职场排斥、领导排斥和同事排斥对适应性绩效有显著的负向影响;人格特质的外倾性、宜人性、尽责性和开放性维度对适应性绩效有显著的正向影响,神经质性对适应性绩效有显著的负向影响;宜人性和尽责性在职场排斥与适应性绩效的关系中起调节作用,高宜人性和尽责性的知识型员工,可以有效减少职场排斥对适应性绩效所带来的负面影响。     

职场八卦能带来员工创新吗? 工作繁荣与感知上级信任的作用

职场八卦普遍存在于各类组织中。现有研究主要针对职场负面八卦展开研究,忽略了职场正面八卦的积极作用。本研究结合了资源保存理论和积极情绪的拓展—建构理论,探究职场负面八卦与职场正面八卦对员工创新行为的影响机制及边界条件。通过一项两个时间点的时间滞后研究设计,本研究获取了来自某国有商业银行的241份有效的上-下级配对样本,结果表明：(1)职场负面八卦通过削弱工作繁荣负向影响员工创新,职场正面八卦通过增强工作繁荣正向影响员工创新。(2)感知上级信任对职场负面八卦与工作繁荣的作用关系具有调节作用：当员工感知到的上级信任水平较低时,职场负面八卦对工作繁荣的负向影响更强;感知上级信任对职场正面八卦与工作繁荣的作用关系具有调节作用：当员工感知到的上级信任水平较低时,职场正面八卦对工作繁荣的正向影响更强。(3)感知上级信任进一步调节职场负面八卦通过工作繁荣对员工创新的间接影响：当员工感知到的上级信任水平较低时,职场负面八卦通过工作繁荣对员工创新的负向效应相对较强;感知上级信任进一步调节职场正面八卦通过工作繁荣对员工创新的间接影响：当员工感知到的上级信任水平较低时,职场正面八卦通过工作繁荣对员工创新的正向...     

职场排斥研究述评

近年来,组织行为学逐渐关注组织生活中的负向行为。领导者的破坏性领导、虐辱性领导、家长式领导等负向行为,以及员工在工作中的负向行为,如工作欺负行为、工作报复行为等逐渐成为研究的热点。在以往的负向行为的研究中,研究者主要关注显而易见的行为表现,即热暴力行为,而忽视了员工之间微妙的心理感受,即冷暴力行为———职场排斥。     

领导排斥对员工创新绩效的影响：反馈寻求行为和神经质的作用

作为职场冷暴力的一种,领导排斥普遍存在于各类组织中,造成的负面影响十分显著。研究运用领导—成员交换理论和社会学习理论,采用分层回归法探究领导排斥对员工创新绩效的影响,并考察反馈寻求行为的中介效应和神经质的调节效应。369份两阶段追踪问卷数据表明:领导排斥显著负向预测员工创新绩效,员工反馈寻求行为在领导排斥与员工创新绩效之间起中介作用,神经质负向调节领导排斥与反馈寻求行为之间的关系,也负向调节反馈寻求行为在领导排斥与员工创新绩效关系间的中介作用。基于此,应加强对领导的监督管理与组织的文化建设,建立规范化员工反馈机制,并对高神经质员工及时进行心理辅导,进一步提高员工创新绩效。     

组织支持感中介作用下的家长式领导对员工工作疏离感的影响

以195名员工为被试,探讨了家长式领导的3个维度,即仁慈领导、德行领导与威权领导对员工工作疏离感的影响及其作用机制。研究表明,仁慈领导对员工工作疏离感有显著的负向影响,德行领导对员工工作疏离感的影响不显著,威权领导对员工工作疏离感有显著的正向影响;组织支持感在仁慈领导与员工工作疏离感之间起完全中介作用,在威权领导与员工工作疏离感之间起部分中介作用。     

孵化互动、专用性人力资本和在孵企业成功毕业

基于合作生产理论,本文以307个新创在孵企业为样本,构建生存模型研究孵化互动介入模式和创业专用性人力资本对在孵企业成功毕业的影响。研究发现,行业专用性人力资本、创业家庭背景促成了创业成功,而创业经历对创业成功没有显著影响。同时,孵化互动在促成在孵企业成功毕业方面的调节作用则表现出很大的异质性:孵化互动模式Ⅳ和Ⅴ对行业专用性人力资本有促进性调节作用,而所有孵化互动模式对家庭背景的存在都有抑制性调节作用,但是孵化互动模式对创业经历没有显著的影响。这说明,对于包含诸多隐性成分的行业专用性知识,孵化器经理的参与意愿和介入频率是影响孵化效果的关键因素;同时,孵化互动部分替代了家庭支持的作用,降低了创业者对家庭的依赖。     

Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach

Little empirical research has explored the implications of different bases and foci of trust in leadership within the same study. To rectify this substantive void in the trust literature, we conceptualized variants of employee trust in organizational leadership in terms of two bases (cognitive and affective) and two foci (management and supervisor). Using this dual perspective, we examined the effects of trust in leaders on two work-related attitudes (organizational commitment, job satisfaction) and two work-related behaviors (in-role behavior, extra-role behavior). Using data collected from 210 employees and their supervisors, we found that the four variants of trust in organizational leadership were distinguishable, and had differential effects on employee outcomes. Affective trust in supervisor was a significant predictor of in-role and extra-role behaviors. Affective trust in management and affective trust in supervisor explained variance in affective organizational commitment. Cognitive trust in management and affective trust in supervisor explained variance in job satisfaction.     

绩效考核政治性对个体知识共享行为影响的实证研究

随着组织政治和管理伦理成为理论界和实践界共同关注的热点问题,越来越多的学者开始研究管理者在绩效考核过程中的政治性操作对员工工作场所行为的影响.基于结构方程技术的实证分析发现,积极绩效考核政治性对员工知识共享行为具有显著正向作用,消极绩效考核政治性对员工知识共享行为具有显著负向作用;绩效考核政治性通过成就感知、个人兴趣、集体情感与责任动机的完全中介作用间接影响员工知识共享行为;绩效考核政治性与员工知识共享动机和行为之间的关系并不随着员工工作控制点的差异而变化.研究结论既具有理论价值,又富含管理启示.     

An empirical study on the relationship between perceived employability and employee performance

Despite the growing attention to employability in the era of job insecurity, there have been a limited number of empirical studies regarding the positive effect of employees’ perceived employability (PE) on performance. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between PE and three domains of employee performance: in-role, adaptive, and extra-role. This study also tests the moderating effect of the perceived quality of employment on these relationships. To test our hypotheses, we surveyed 334 employees and their 37 immediate supervisors working for an organization in South Korea. We utilized official performance ratings and supervisors’ ratings to measure the three domains of performance. The results show that PE is positively related to in-role, adaptive, and extra-role performance. An interaction between PE and the perceived quality of employment on extra-role performance is also evident. Implications for research and human resource development practices will be provided.     

Employee referrals: A study of ‘close ties’ and career benefits in China

This study examines the relationship between employee referrals and employees’ job tenure through the lens of social capital theory. It does so by considering the tie strength (closeness of guanxi) between referrers and referred employees in the Chinese context. In particular, we examine the mediating effect of career benefits. We theorize that close guanxi has a significant and positive impact on the job tenure of referred employees, and that career benefits (such as having a managerial role) mediate the close guanxi effect on job tenure. This highlights the critical need to recognize the tie strength as between referrers and referred employees. The support for our hypotheses comes from the use of personnel records of 4030 employees over 13 years in one large privately-owned manufacturer in China. Our study has theoretical and practical implications for the relational approach to tackling voluntary turnover in the workplace.     

分布式领导、组织支持感与新生代员工主动性-被动性创新行为:基于上下级关系和价值观匹配的交互调节效应

新生代员工正逐渐成为企业的主力军,其创新意识和行为直接影响着企业发展的前景与未来。本文基于中国文化和组织情境,从员工个体创新动机视角将新生代员工创新行为归为主动和被动,以306名新生代员工为研究对象,验证了分布式领导对新生代员工不同性质创新行为的作用机制。研究结果表明:分布式领导与新生代员工主动性创新行为呈正相关关系,与其被动性创新行为呈负相关关系;组织支持感在分布式领导与新生代员工主动性-被动性创新行为之间具有中介作用;上下级关系和价值观匹配正向调节分布式领导与新生代员工组织支持感之间的关系,并进一步检验了有调节的中介效应。此外,上下级关系和价值观匹配的交互项调节了分布式领导与新生代员工组织支持感之间的关系。本文研究为企业如何指导新生代员工进行有效的创新实践提供了经验证据。     

Is trust in leadership a mediator between transformational leadership and in-role performance among small-scale factory workers?

Globalization and the transformation of the organizational scene are increasing the pressure and threshold for employees to constantly perform maximum output. As such, the measure of success for many organizations is determined by their productivity level. Therefore, we believe that the leadership style adopted by the leader and the level of trust subordinates have in such a leader may be salient in determining the level of in-role performance of the subordinates in question. This study therefore tries to shed light on this issue by testing the hypotheses that transformational leadership and trust in leadership would significantly predict in-role performance, and that trust in leadership would further mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and in-role performance. A sample of 170 factory workers (subordinates) and 6 supervisors participated in the study. The subordinates completed measures of transformational leadership and trust in leadership while that of in-role performance of these subordinates was based on the ratings of their immediate supervisors. The results of the Hierarchical Multiple Regression showed that only transformational leadership positively predicted in-role performance, whereas trust in leadership failed to predict or even mediate this relationship. The study discussed the implications of the findings, limitations, and suggestions for prospective research.     

领导-成员关系对组织与员工间社会交换的调节作用研究

通过对256位员工和他们的主管的调查,发现主管和员工报告的领导-成员关系对组织投入与员工贡献之间的关系有一定的调节作用,这说明主管扮演的员工代言人角色的确会对组织代理人的角色产生影响.主管认为领导-成员关系较好时,可以促进组织与员工间社会交换的顺利进行,使组织的投入能得到员工较高的绩效回报;而员工认为领导-成员关系较好,也有助于提升其对组织的承诺.     

Supervisor commitment to employees: Does agreement among supervisors' and employees' perceptions matter?

Using 322 matched employee–supervisor dyads, we investigate how level and direction of employee–supervisor (dis)agreement on supervisor's affective commitment to the employee relate to organizational commitment, emotional exhaustion, leader–member exchange, and job performance. Results from polynomial regression and response surface analyses indicate that level of employee–supervisor agreement matters: the most beneficial outcomes appear when supervisors and employees agree that the supervisor is highly committed to the employee whereas the least favorable outcomes appear when dyads' members agree that the supervisor has low commitment to the employee. Direction of employee–supervisor disagreement is also important as employee overestimation of supervisor commitment is associated with more favorable outcomes than employee underestimation. However, for two of the outcomes (organizational commitment and emotional exhaustion), the effect of employee–supervisor disagreement was attributable to a main effect of employee perceptions of supervisor commitment. We discuss the implications of these findings for the understanding of employee–supervisor relationships.     

How Leaders Affect Followers’ Work Engagement and Performance: Integrating Leader−Member Exchange and Crossover Theory

Drawing on leader?member exchange and crossover theory, this study examines how leaders’ work engagement can spread to followers, highlighting the role of leader?member exchange as an underlying explanatory process. Specifically, we investigate if leaders who are highly engaged in their work have better relationships with their followers, which in turn can explain elevated employee engagement. For this purpose, we surveyed 511 employees nested in 88 teams and their team leaders in a large service organization. Employees and supervisors provided data in this multi‐source design. Furthermore, we asked the employees to report their annual performance assessment. We tested our model using multilevel path analyses in Mplus. As hypothesized, leaders’ work engagement enhanced leader?member exchange quality, which in turn boosted employee engagement (mediation model). Moreover, employee engagement was positively linked to performance and negatively linked to turnover intentions. As such, our multilevel field study connects the dots between work engagement research and the leadership literature. We identify leaders’ work engagement as a key to positive leader?follower relationships and a means for promoting employee engagement and performance. Promoting work engagement at the managerial level may be a fruitful starting point for fostering an organizational culture of engagement.