Jackknife Estimation for Smooth Functions of the Parametric Component in Partially Linear Regression Models

Abstract

It is known that due to the existence of the nonparametric component, the usual estimators for the parametric component or its function in partially linear regression models are biased. Sometimes this bias is severe. To reduce the bias, we propose two jackknife estimators and compare them with the naive estimator. All three estimators are shown to be asymptotically equivalent and asymptotically normally distributed under some regularity conditions. However, through simulation we demonstrate that the jackknife estimators perform better than the naive estimator in terms of bias when the sample size is small to moderate. To make our results more useful, we also construct consistent estimators of the asymptotic variance, which are robust against heterogeneity of the error variances.     

On bias reduction estimators of skew-normal and skew-t distributions

A particular concerns of researchers in statistical inference is bias in parameters estimation. Maximum likelihood estimators are often biased and for small sample size, the first order bias of them can be large and so it may influence the efficiency of the estimator. There are different methods for reduction of this bias. In this paper, we proposed a modified maximum likelihood estimator for the shape parameter of two popular skew distributions, namely skew-normal and skew-t, by offering a new method. We show that this estimator has lower asymptotic bias than the maximum likelihood estimator and is more efficient than those based on the existing methods.     

Canonical Correlation Analysis Using Small Number of Samples

Canonical correlation assesses the relationship between two groups of variables. Although it has been a useful tool in a wide variety of research areas, it is not well known that weaker canonical correlations require larger sample sizes to be correctly inferred. In this article, we investigate small sample bias in canonical correlation analysis and apply the jackknife bias correction to the estimation of canonical correlations. We use bootstrap samples to obtain a better confidence interval for the jackknife canonical correlation estimator.     

Small sample performance of jackknife confidence intervals for the james-stein estimator

The primary goal of this paper is to examine the small sample coverage probability and size of jackknife confidence intervals centered at a Stein-rule estimator. A Monte Carlo experiment is used to explore the coverage probabilities and lengths of nominal 90% and 95% delete-one and infinitesimal jackknife confidence intervals centered at the Stein-rule estimator; these are compared to those obtained using a bootstrap procedure.     

Comments on the paper “Bias-adjustment and calibration of jackknife variance estimator in the presence of non-response”

Singh and Arnab (2010) presented a bias adjustment to the jackknife variance estimator of Rao and Sitter (1995) in the presence of non-response. In their paper, they obtained a second-order approximation of the bias of the Rao-Sitter variance estimator and then proposed a bias-adjusted estimator based on this approximation. To compare their proposed variance estimator to various other variance estimators, they performed a simulation study and showed that their variance estimator is superior to the Rao-Sitter variance estimator. In fact they showed that the Rao-Sitter variance estimator suffers from severe underestimation. These results contradict those in the literature, which indicate that the Rao-Sitter variance estimator suffers from a positive bias if the sampling fractions are not negligible; see Rao and Sitter (1995), Lee et al. (1995) and Haziza and Picard (2011). Because of this contradiction, we felt that a further investigation was warranted. In this paper, we attempt to recreate the results of Singh and Arnab (2010) and, in fact, show that their second order approximation to the bias of the Rao-Sitter variance estimator is incorrect and that their simulation results are also questionable.     

A jackknife variance estimator for unequal probability sampling

Summary.  The jackknife method is often used for variance estimation in sample surveys but has only been developed for a limited class of sampling designs. We propose a jackknife variance estimator which is defined for any without-replacement unequal probability sampling design. We demonstrate design consistency of this estimator for a broad class of point estimators. A Monte Carlo study shows how the proposed estimator may improve on existing estimators.     

A note on the bias and consistency of the jackknife variance estimator in stratified samples

Using the ANOVA decomposition, we obtain an explicit formula for the bias of the jackknife variance estimator in stratified samples drawn without replacement. For a wide class of asymptotically linear statistics, we show the consistency of the jackknife variance estimator and establish the asymptotic normality of their Studentized versions.     

The failure of meta-analytic asymptotics for the seemingly efficient estimator of the common risk difference

We consider the case of a multicenter trial in which the center specific sample sizes are potentially small. Under homogeneity, the conventional procedure is to pool information using a weighted estimator where the weights used are inverse estimated center-specific variances. Whereas this procedure is efficient for conventional asymptotics (e. g. center-specific sample sizes become large, number of center fixed), it is commonly believed that the efficiency of this estimator holds true also for meta-analytic asymptotics (e.g. center-specific sample size bounded, potentially small, and number of centers large). In this contribution we demonstrate that this estimator fails to be efficient. In fact, it shows a persistent bias with increasing number of centers showing that it isnot meta-consistent. In addition, we show that the Cochran and Mantel-Haenszel weighted estimators are meta-consistent and, in more generality, provide conditions on the weights such that the associated weighted estimator is meta-consistent.     

Estimation of the pareto shape parameter

The generalized jackknife is used to reduce the bias of an estimator, based on frequency moments, of the Pareto shape parameter. Computations of amount of bias reduction and simulations of mean-squared errors are presented.     

On using the jackknife to estimate quantile variance

We show that the jackknife technique fails badly when applied to the problem of estimating the variance of a sample quantile. When viewed as a point estimator, the jackknife estimator is known to be inconsistent. We show that the ratio of the jackknife variance estimate to the true variance has an asymptotic Weibull distribution with parameters 1 and 1/2. We also show that if the jackknife variance estimate is used to Studentize the sample quantile, the asymptotic distribution of the resulting Studentized statistic is markedly nonnormal, having infinite mean. This result is in stark contrast with that obtained in simpler problems, such as that of constructing confidence intervals for a mean, where the jackknife-Studentized statistic has an asymptotic standard normal distribution.     

Bias Correction in the Type I Generalized Logistic Distribution

Four strategies for bias correction of the maximum likelihood estimator of the parameters in the Type I generalized logistic distribution are studied. First, we consider an analytic bias-corrected estimator, which is obtained by deriving an analytic expression for the bias to order n ^?1; second, a method based on modifying the likelihood equations; third, we consider the jackknife bias-corrected estimator; and fourth, we consider two bootstrap bias-corrected estimators. All bias correction estimators are compared by simulation. Finally, an example with a real data set is also presented.     

JACKKNIFING THE GENERAL LINEAR MODEL

The aim of this paper is to investigate the problems of estimating a smooth function of the parameters in a general linear model and to clarify some of the points raised by Hinkley (1977) in connection with this problem. An example of the type of problem at hand is that of estimating the maximum (or minimum) mean value in a quadratic regression model. The estimator based on the least squares estimator of the parameters in the linear model is compared to the jackknife estimator and the weighted jackknife estimator proposed by Hinkley (1977). The asymptotic properties of the estimators are examined and their small sample properties are compared through simulation studies.     

Estimation of the mean quality-adjusted survival using a multistate model for the sojourn times

In clinical trials, it may be of interest taking into account physical and emotional well-being in addition to survival when comparing treatments. Quality-adjusted survival time has the advantage of incorporating information about both survival time and quality-of-life. In this paper, we discuss the estimation of the expected value of the quality-adjusted survival, based on multistate models for the sojourn times in health states. Semiparametric and parametric (with exponential distribution) approaches are considered. A simulation study is presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator and the jackknife resampling method is used to compute bias and variance of the estimator.     

Sharpening estimators using resampling

We study ways to improve a given estimator using resampling methods like the jackknife or the bootstrap in terms of bias and the mean square error. Our key task is to devise a method to empirically check whether the bias correction employed leads to an increase or decrease in the mean square error in terms of second-order asymptotics. We derive conditions under which we can sharpen the given estimator in terms of bias and the mean square error. One may attempt to verify the condition empirically using resampling methods.     

ON THE REDUCTION OF BIAS IN DENSITY ESTIMATES1

We propose a method for simultaneously estimating a density function and its derivatives based on a recursive reduction of bias in the usual one-step estimator—in effect, a jackknife. The procedure is computationally simple and requires only the inversion of a triangular matrix with easily-calculated elements.     

Conditional estimation using prior information in 2‐stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early

Two‐stage designs are widely used to determine whether a clinical trial should be terminated early. In such trials, a maximum likelihood estimate is often adopted to describe the difference in efficacy between the experimental and reference treatments; however, this method is known to display conditional bias. To reduce such bias, a conditional mean‐adjusted estimator (CMAE) has been proposed, although the remaining bias may be nonnegligible when a trial is stopped for efficacy at the interim analysis. We propose a new estimator for adjusting the conditional bias of the treatment effect by extending the idea of the CMAE. This estimator is calculated by weighting the maximum likelihood estimate obtained at the interim analysis and the effect size prespecified when calculating the sample size. We evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator through analytical and simulation studies in various settings in which a trial is stopped for efficacy or futility at the interim analysis. We find that the conditional bias of the proposed estimator is smaller than that of the CMAE when the information time at the interim analysis is small. In addition, the mean‐squared error of the proposed estimator is also smaller than that of the CMAE. In conclusion, we recommend the use of the proposed estimator for trials that are terminated early for efficacy or futility.     

Comparison of bias-reducing methods for estimating the parameter in dilution series

Ten different estimators of the parameter in a limiting or serial dilution assay are compared. Eight of them are constructed to reduce the bias of the commonly used maximum likelihood estimator. Extensive Monte Carlo experiments using various designs, and practical considerations, suggest that a particular jackknife version of the maximum likelihood estimator is preferred, provided that the design is not too small.     

Bias-adjustment and calibration of jackknife variance estimator in the presence of non-response

In this paper, bias-adjustment in the jackknife estimator of variance accredited to Rao and Sitter (1995) has been considered. Then the bias-adjusted Rao and Sitter (1995) estimator has been calibrated such that its expected value under the imputing superpopulation model remains the same as the expected value of the mean squared error of the ratio estimator in the presence of non-response. A simulation study has been performed to compare the six different estimators of variance: out of them four estimators belong to Rao and Sitter (1995) and the other two proposed estimators are named as bias-adjusted and bias-adjusted-cum-calibrated estimators. The empirical relative bias and empirical relative efficiency of the two proposed estimators with respect to the four existing estimators accredited to Rao and Sitter (1995) have been investigated through simulations. The bias-adjusted-cum-calibrated estimator has been found to be an efficient estimator in the case of heteroscadastic populations. The present paper considers the situation of simple random and without replacement sampling. The possibility of obtaining a negative estimate of variance by the estimator due to Kim et al. (2006) has been pointed out.     

ASYMPTOTIC DEFICIENCY OF THE JACKKNIFE ESTIMATOR

In this paper it is shown that the bias-adjusted maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) is asymptotically equivalent to the jackknife estimator in the variance up to the order n^-1 and the asymptotic deficiency of the jackknife estimator relative to the bias-adjusted MLE is equal to zero.