论马克思主义时代化

2009年9月18日,中国共产党第十七届中央委员会第四次全体会议在北京召开。会议通过的《中共中央关于加强和改进新形势下党的建设若干重大问题的决定》,应基于实际状况发展马克思主义,推进马克思主义的中国化、时代化和大众化。这是中国共产党的重大举措,也是中国共产党首次提出了推进马克思主义时代化发展的重要命题。从而能有效把握马克思主义时代化的丰富内涵以及精神发展实质,由此能以中国发展实际为基础,坚持马克思主义的理论、立场和方法,推动中国特色社会主义理论体系的不断完善和发展。     

建立科学的高职院校党建工作体系

党的十六届四中全会运用马克思主义建党学说,创造性地提出了面向新世纪中国共产党建设的目标、方针、途径和手段,从战略和全局的高度为推进党的建设这一伟大工程奠定了科学的基础。同时,也为在新形势下强     

加强和改进企业党建工作的思考

党的十八大和十八届三中全会对加强和改进新形势下党的建设做出了重大部署,提出了"以改革创新精神全面推进党的建设新的伟大工程,全面提高党的建设科学化水平"的重大命题和重要任务,这对全党更加自觉地把握和运用马克思主义执政党建设规律提出了更高的要求。本文主要对新时期国有企业党的建设进行论述,努力形成具有中国特色的现代国有企业制度。     

以改革创新精神全面推进铁路基层单位党建工作

党的十八大报告对新形势下党的建设作了充分论述,提出“学习型、服务型、创新型”作为马克思主义执政党的三个重要特征.大会通过的党章修正案对以改革创新精神全面推进党的建设新的伟大工程、提高党的建设科学化水平提出了明确要求.十八大以来,中国铁路迎来了难得的发展机遇,高速铁路的建设取得了巨大成就.本论文针对如何以改革创新精神全面推进铁路企业党建工作更好更快发展进行了详细的论述.     

试论艾思奇与马克思主义中国化

十七届四中全会提出，“坚持把马克思主义作为立党立国的根本指导思想，紧密结合我国国情和时代特征大力推进理论创新，在实践中检验真理、发展真理，用发展着的马克思主义指导新的实践”。全会还提出要“推动中国特色社会主义理论体系进教材、进课堂、进头脑，增强科学理论教育引导群众作用”。学习和缅怀艾思奇这位马克思主义哲学家和党的理论战线的忠诚战士，其目的就是推动马克思主义中国化、时代化、大众化，实现中国特色社会主义理论体系的宣传普及，推进马克思主义的不断创新与发展。     

毛泽东党建思想及其当代启示

在追求民族独立、国家富强的过程中,毛泽东结合马克思主义理论与中国实践,创造性地形成了党的建设指导思想——毛泽东党建思想。毛泽东党建思想是一套具有完整体系的科学理论,它从党的思想、组织和作风三个角度进行了深刻而又详尽的论述。随着十九大的召开,毛泽东党的建设思想也有着新的时代启示,习近平新时代党建思想是富有实践性和发展性的科学思想体系,是新时代背景下对马克思主义理论及毛泽东党建思想的新拓展,为新时代党的建设提供了行动纲领和行动指南。     

从科学发展到科学建党的新视阈——兼论中国共产党民主建设的科学化取向

党的十六大以来，以胡锦涛为总书记的党中央提出了科学发展观的重要思想，为我国改革开放和社会主义现代化建设提供了新的时代坐标。科学发展观，不仅要贯穿于我国的经济社会发展，而且也要贯彻于政治发展和党的建设领域。当前，加强和改进新形势下党的建设是全党的重大政治责任，要完成好这一历史使命，以改革创新精神全面推进党的建设新的伟大工程，具有纲举目张作用的，是着眼于以科学发展观构建科学党建观，全面认识和自觉运用执政党建设规律，推进党的建设科学化、制度化、民主化。     

试论马克思主义时代化的构建路径

马克思主义时代化的本质在于把马克思主义的基本原理同不断变化发展的时代特征相结合,对变化了的时代特征做出准确的判断和说明.马克思主义时代化的构建,一方面要从时代化的内涵出发,尊重时代化的原意,同时更应该结合本国实际的具体的情况,不断推进马克思主义时代化新的发展.     

苏区精神——执政党作风建设的元基因和源动力及对当前国企党的作风建设的启示

党历来高度重视作风建设,在实践中形成了完整的党风建设理论,这是我党对马克思主义建党学说的独特贡献。作为执政党．在全面建设小康社会、加快推进社会主义现代化建设新的历史条件下,重温党在苏区时期形成的执政党作风建设的历史经验,认真学习、研究、弘扬苏区时期党的作风建设的理论和实践,以及其在党的作风建设历史中的地位和功绩,对加强和建设新时期国有企业党的建设,提高融入中心．服务大局的能力,从而促进企业科学发展．有极其重要的现实意义。     

李大钊对马克思主义中国化的贡献研究

马克思主义理论是一种科学的社会主义理论，其对中国的发展有着重大的影响，随着李大钊等先进知识分子接受并传播马克思主义．其不断被民族化并且用于指导中国革命。李大钊是传播马克思主义的第一人，在传播的过程中不断实践和发展马克思主义，把马克思主义与中国实际相结合，为党的建设和发展提供了最宝贵的经验，也为中国革命做出了杰出的贡献，更为马克思主义中国化做出了重大贡献。     

国外高职院校德育实施对我国的启示

德育成为人们越来越关注的话题，德育途径和方法等对德育的实施意义重大。文章分析了从经济、地理、政治等方面与我国都有深刻联系的美国、新加坡、日本高职院校的德育概况，以期对提高我国高职院校德育水平有所启示。     

论科学发展观的科学内涵

科学发展观理论的科学内涵至少应包括以下四个层面：科学发展观以马克思主义基本原理作为理论前提;科学发展观理论超越了当前各种社会思潮的价值旨趣;科学发展观规制了今后我国社会发展的路径;科学发展观提出了应对日益蔓延的生态危机的方略。针对这四个层面的内涵,科学发展观作为党建理论的最新成果,要求新时期党的先进性建设做到以下四个方面：实现党的理论创新时代化,实现党的意识形态超越化,实现党员领导干部知识化,实现党的发展理念责任化。     

高职院校管理类科研团队的构建

高职院校管理类专业的科研重点在于应用性研究以及企业技术服务。创新性科研团队建设能够有效整合资源,促进科研创新和企业服务,进而提升高职院校的科研能力和核心竞争力。文章分析了高职院校管理类专业团队建设的困境,并提出相应的建设对策。     

Beyond Presentism and Historicism: Understanding the History of Social Science

The revival of interest in the social scientific past has stimulated a growing literature on the methodology of the history of social science. Existing "presentist" type histories have been criticized for their "Whiggish" assumptions about scientific progress. The critique of presentism is the product of a new school of historians of social science who advocate a "historicist" historiography. My paper is addressed to this discussion and falls into three parts. First, I review the principles of presentist and historicist historiographies, relating their methodological positions to their theories of science. Second, I take up the argument of the "new historicism" in more detail, criticizing its theory of textual interpretation and its theory of social scientific development. I conclude by offering an alternative historiographic model of social scientific development based upon a theory of science that I outline.     

From consensus to credibility

The development of consensual science has greatly influenced the international environmental negotiation processes. This is not least the case for the Convention on Long‐range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). Negotiators as well as regime analysts regard CLRTAP as a successful example of how scientists have succeeded in influencing international policy making through consensus‐building strategies. Drawing on Ulrich Beck's work on reflexive scientization and the concept of ‘stage management’ from the field of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (SSK), this paper critically analyzes the role of science in the regulation of transboundary air pollution. It discusses the consensus‐building strategies developed by scientists as well as contemporary strategies for making science matter in regulative work. It is argued that scientific credibility is crucial for attracting political and public attention, but that credibility does not necessarily have to be based on scientific consensus. The challenge for science is not so much to create consensus but to strengthen its credibility by elaborating new relations with its stakeholders.     

Reply to Klein

Many “theoretical” writings in sociology and in the social sciences use conceptual frameworks (perspectives, paradigms). Developments in family sociology are used as a case study to explore the role of conceptual frameworks in the growth of scientific theory. The claim that conceptual frameworks are necessary for theory building is evaluated. Using writings in family sociology and in the philosophy of science, the claim is found wanting. Social scientists are therefore cautioned to avoid conceptual work that is only rhetorically related to the development of theory.     

Poverty Research in a Development Policy Context

This article provides an evaluation of the extent to which science is addressing worldwide poverty and hunger. It is based on the literature contained in the Thomson Reuters' Web of Science Citation Index (1980 to 2008) and focuses on the WOTRO Strategy Plan 2007–2010 of the Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research, although similar policies from other countries might also be assessed. The data show that poverty/hunger research has grown steadily over time in many disciplines, most significantly in Environmental Sciences and Technology. Much of this research is hidden; hence the construction of an internationally recognised open‐access database is recommended so that scientists can easily identify critical gaps related to scientific capacity‐building.     

Authorizing Family Science: An Analysis of the Objectifying Practices of Family Science Discourse

Contemporary objectifying practices in family science discourse, grounded in an objectivist epistemological framework, often deauthorize the scientific text and fail to frame the constructs in an explicit argumentative and theoretical context. Such practices contribute to the marginalization of theory and the acceptance of insufficiently analyzed empirical claims about families. Adopting an alternative set of objectifying practices, grounded in a constructionist epistemological framework that aims to fully authorize and advance its knowledge claims in an open, self‐reflexive, argumentative process will invigorate the importance of theory in the field and promote the production of more empirically justifiable and scientific knowledge claims about families.     

Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Resources within and between higher education and research institutions are increasingly allocated according to scientific performance. Evaluation exercises and the measurement of research performance take on a new role in this context. Third party research income is a performance indicator which is rather easy to measure and is used in most of the new performance-based evaluation procedures. This paper sets out to scrutinize the meaning and validity of third party research income. We studied research teams from three different research fields with a mixed quantitative / qualitative approach. The focus is on the causal relations between institutional / input indicators, third party research income as another input indicator, and a variety of output indicators of scientific production. An important result is that third party money has a positive effect on performance only below a certain and discipline-specific threshold. Further analysis shows that output performance is to a great extent field-specific. The context conditions for scientific production differ greatly, so that comparative performance assessments are only valid within homogeneous research fields. Another important result is that output performance is multidimensional and cannot be measured by bibliometric indicators only. These findings have implications for the rationality of the evaluation assessment exercises as well as for the funding decisions of science foundations, ministries of science and — increasingly, the heads of universities and departments. These topics are discussed in the last chapter as well as the implications for further research.     

Problems in Terminology,Concept Formation,and Theory Construction

Abstract

Satisfactory verbal theory in sociology is dependent on appropriate concept formation, which in turn must be based on precise terminology and word usage. Futhermore, such terminology should enable the theorist to communicate unambiguously with others knowledgeable in the discipline, a goal to which contemporary sociological theorists have not yet arrived. An understanding of the relationship of logic, meaning, and truth must underlay successful efforts to overcome deficiencies in theory construction. The logical positivists have pointed the way to the development of scientific theory as the basis of empirical social science.