基于整体效率的区间DEA方法研究

针对现有的区间DEA方法采用非统一指标数据进行效率评价的不足,本文在分析现有区间DEA方法的基础上,提出一种基于整体效率的区间DEA方法。该方法能够在多决策单元系统整体效率最大化的同时,得到统一的各决策单元投入/产出的精确数据及各指标权重,一次性求解出所有决策单元的效率。最后,采用一个算例分析说明文章所提方法的合理性和优越性。     

基于完全包络面的DEA Super效率评价方法

为了对决策单元进行公平、合理、完全的排序,提出一种考虑完全包络面的DEA Super效率评价方法.讨论包络面的选取与DEA效率值的关系,提出完全包络面的概念,并在等产出图上演示了最优前沿面、最劣前沿面与完全包络面的区别和关系;提出基于最劣前沿面的Super效率DEA模型,给出基于完全包络面的DEA Super效率评价排序模型,目标函数包含决策单元的最优效率和最劣效率两部分.该方法用于决策单元的排序,同时考虑最符合与最不符合决策单元自身偏好的权重体系;该方法用于决策单元的效率排序,能获得比较合理的排序结果,可以实际应用于各种决策单元排序中.     

一种新的基于双前沿面的交叉效率方法及其应用

本文将双前沿面效率评价的思想引入到传统交叉效率模型中，同时，针对双前沿面交叉效率方法中仁慈型和激进型交叉效率策略无法抉择，以及这两种交叉效率策略的应用范围有限的不足，提出了一种新的基于双前沿面的交叉效率方法。该方法的基本思想是选取一个理想决策单元和负理想决策单元，使用被评价决策单元的权重来计算理想决策单元和负理想决策单元的效率，并使被评价决策单元的效率尽可能接近理想解的效率，同时，尽可能远离负理想解的效率。根据该思想，分别在乐观前沿面和悲观前沿面下求解交叉效率值并进行集结，避免了由于前沿面的选择不同导致的差异以及决策者对仁慈型和激进型交叉效率策略进行抉择的困难。最后，将本文方法与现有方法进行对比分析，并将本文方法应用于我国东部地区10个省(直辖市)的创新效率评价中，以验证方法的有效性。     

区间DEA模型求解算法及其在项目投资效率评价中的应用

当决策单元的变量取值区间范围较大时,经典区间DEA求解算法求得的相对效率区间长度也可能较大,对决策单元有效性的解释力低,很难直观反映相对效率的大小。将决策单元的变量区间划分为若干个子区间,分别计算决策单元在各子区间上的DEA效率,进而求得综合效率区间,作为评价决策单元有效性的基准。综合效率区间的区间长度比经典算法的求解结果小,将新算法应用于投资项目的效率评价,便于对投资项目的效率大小进行比较,进而为项目投资决策提供科学依据。     

基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法

在数据包络分析中，大量的交叉效率模型已被提出。然而选择不同的目标模型将实现不一样的交叉效率评价。本文基于针对单个决策单元实施的对抗型和仁慈型两个交叉效率模型，用合作博弈方法来研究交叉效率模型的选取，并利用Shapley值对决策单元进行排序。最后通过实例分析显示该排序方法充分利用了最小交叉效率和最大交叉效率的信息完全排序了所有决策单元，具有一定的综合性和合理性。     

资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型

经典的数据包络分析(DEA)模型将决策单元看作"黑箱",忽视决策单元的内部过程,必然会高估决策单元的效率。本文研究了一种资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价方法,针对此类生产过程的内部过程,研究其内部运行机制对整体效率的影响。本文提出的模型实质上是一类特殊的网络DEA模型,其评价原理有别于已有的研究成果,但更有助于管理者确定生产过程的非有效来源及其效率改进方向。实例证实本文方法的合理性。     

非合作博弈两阶段生产系统的环境效率评价

本文研究了环境效率评价中广泛存在的一类典型问题:两阶段非合作博弈的效率评价问题,该问题有两个明显的特点:(1)决策单元由经济生产子系统和污染物处理子系统两个阶段的子系统构成,(2)经济生产子系统产生的污染物由污染物处理子系统进行处理,且经济生产子系统居于主导地位,而污染物处理子系统居于从属地位.文章在分析各个决策单元整体效率与其子系统效率之间关系的基础上,提出一种能够同时评价决策单元整体效率和其子系统效率的DEA方法;然后引入非合作博弈思想,提出了基于两阶段非合作博弈的环境效率评价的DEA方法;最后采用中国各地区的工业系统的环境效率评价的实例分析说明了该方法的合理性和有效性.由于文章提出的方法能够有效地分析决策单元内部子系统的有效性水平,能够反映子系统之间的主从关系,能够发掘影响决策单元效率的关键因素,因而能够给出更为有效的环境管理信息,为决策者的决策提供科学的依据.     

超效率DEA模型的模糊扩展

在输入、输出数据为模糊数而效率值为准确值的模糊DEA模型中,会出现有两个以上有效单元,从而无法对所有决策单元进行全排序的情形。本文利用模糊数的基于α-截集的比较规则,建立了模糊条件下的超效率DEA模型,有效地解决了模糊决策单元的全排序问题。文末给出了一个实例。     

两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型

数据包络分析(DEA)作为一种数学规划方法,已经被广泛用来评价一个决策单元相对于其它决策单元的效率。经典的DEA模型把决策单元看作一个“黑箱”,对决策单元的内部运行机制不作深入的研究。本文以一个两阶段生产系统为例,从生产系统的内部过程出发,提出一个基于DEA的模型以合理评估该决策单元的相对效率。本文提出的模型实质上是一类特殊的网络DEA模型,其评价原理有别于已有的研究成果,但确实有助于管理者确定生产过程(如供应链)的非有效来源及其效率改进方向。     

超效率DEA模型的区间扩展

将一种改进的DEA模型-超效率DEA(SE-DEA)模型[1]拓展到区间投入产出情形,得到区间SE-DEA模型。定义了一种反映决策者满意度的区间数序关系。当决策者给定一满意度水平,将区间SE-DEA中的区间不等式约束转化为确定型约束。研究了该满意度水平的另一层含义,即决策者对除被评价决策单元外的其它决策单元的偏好程度,据此将区间SE-DEA中的区间等式约束和区间目标函数转化为确定型。最终将区间SE-DEA转化为某一满意度水平下的确定型SE-DEA,并进行求解。最后将文中方法应用于天津市某4家科研所的效率预测问题之中。     

决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法

传统交叉效率评价方法因决策单元偏好权重不唯一而难以操作,因交叉效率有效性分值平均化集结而难以被接受。目前的学者通常围绕决策单元指标权重的确定性分配方法、交叉效率有效性分值的去平均化集结等分别开展研究。本文将交叉效率评价方法中自评互评相结合的评价模式看作群决策过程,即每个决策单元既是一个被评对象,又是一个决策"专家",提出了一种决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法,将决策单元偏好权重的确定和交叉效率有效性分值的去平均化集结作为同一个决策过程,根据每个决策单元的评价结果与群体评价结果的接近程度,同步迭代调整决策单元的"专家"权重和决策单元自评产生的、并提供给其他被评价决策单元的一组确定的偏好指标权重。实验验证与实例运用分析表明,该方法收敛效果良好,能得到客观稳定的决策单元交叉效率有效性分值及排序。     

Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems

The data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique uses the most favorable weights for each decision making unit (DMU) to calculate efficiency. The resulting efficiency scores are thus incomparable and difficult to discriminate. This phenomenon is more prominent for network systems, which involves the ranking of the component divisions, in addition to the system. This paper applies the idea of cross evaluation, which has been demonstrated to be an effective approach in ranking DMUs for systems considered as a whole-unit, to measure the efficiency of the two basic structures of network systems, series and parallel. The proposed model is able to decompose the cross efficiency measure of the system into the product of those of the divisions for the series structure and a weighted average for the parallel structure. The results from two real-world cases, one for the basic series structure and another for the parallel one, show that the cross efficiency measures proposed in this paper not only increase the discriminating power in ranking systems and divisions, but also identify the relationship between the system and division efficiencies. Which division has stronger effects on the performance of the system is reflected from this relationship.     

Stochastic efficiency analysis with a reliability consideration

Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models have been introduced in the literature to assess the performance of operating entities with random input and output data. A stochastic DEA model with a reliability constraint is proposed in this study that maximizes the lower bound of an entity׳s efficiency score with some pre-selected probability. We define the concept of stochastic efficiency and develop a solution procedure. The economic interpretations of the stochastic efficiency index are presented when the inputs and outputs of each entity follow a multivariate joint normal distribution.     

Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks

In measuring the overall efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs) in a time span covering multiple periods, the conventional approach is to use the aggregate data of the multiple periods via a data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique, ignoring the specific situation of each period. This paper proposes using a relational network model to take the operations of individual periods into account in measuring efficiencies. The overall and period efficiencies of a DMU can be calculated at the same time. Notably, the overall efficiency is a weighted average of the period efficiencies, and the weights are the most favorable ones for the DMU being evaluated. This model, together with two existing ones, is applied to measure the efficiency of 22 Taiwanese commercial banks for the period of 2009–2011. The three-year multi-period analysis shows that the proposed model is more discriminative than the existing ones in ranking the performance of the banks. The period efficiencies for the three years increased steadily, indicating that the performances of the Taiwanese banks examined in this work were improving over this period.     

Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking

Under a data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework, full ranking of a group of decision making units (DMUs) can be carried out through an adequate amalgamation of the cross-efficiency (CE henceforth) scores produced for each DMU. In this paper, we propose a ranking procedure that is based on amalgamating the weight profiles selected over the cross-evaluation rather than related CE scores. The new approach builds, for each DMU, a collective weight profile (CWP henceforth) by exploiting the preference voting system embedded within the matrix of weights, which views the assessing DMUs as voters and the input/output factors as candidates. The occurrence of zero votes is discussed as a special case and a two-level aggregation procedure is developed. The CWPs that are produced extend the concept of collective appreciation to the input/output factors of each DMU so that group dynamics is truly reflected, mainly in decision making circumstances where factor prioritization is necessary for making choices or allocating resources. The robustness of the proposed ranking approach is evaluated with three examples drawn from the literature.     

The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation

Cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective way of ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation are mainly focused on the calculation of cross-efficiency matrix, but pay little attention to the aggregation of the efficiencies in the cross-efficiency matrix. The most widely used approach is to aggregate the efficiencies in each row or column in the cross-efficiency matrix with equal weights into an average cross-efficiency score for each DMU and view it as the overall performance measurement of the DMU. This paper focuses on the aggregation process of the efficiencies in the cross-efficiency matrix and proposes the use of ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation. The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation allows the decision maker (DM)’s optimism level towards the best relative efficiencies, characterized by an orness degree, to be taken into consideration in the final overall efficiency assessment and particularly in the selection of the best DMU.     

基于主从博弈的两部门并行系统的效率评价

本文研究了一类典型并行系统的效率评价问题：（1）决策单元由两个并行的子单元组成;（2）在整个系统中,某一子单元居于主导地位,另一子单元居于从属地位;（3）两个子单元之间存在部分共享的投入资源,且无法明显区别该资源在不同子单元之间的分配比例。在分析决策单元整体效率及内部子单元效率的基础上,基于主从博弈思想,提出一种能同时确定系统整体效率及内部子单元效率的评价方法,该方法能够在评价系统效率的同时,实现共享资源的有效分配。最后,采用一个实例分析说明了所提方法的合理性和有效性。     

DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings

A number of studies have used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of the countries in Olympic games. While competition exists among the countries in Olympic games/rankings, all these DEA studies do not model competition among peer decision making units (DMUs) or countries. These DEA studies find a set of weights/multipliers that keep the efficiency scores of all DMUs at or below unity. Although cross efficiency goes a further step by providing an efficiency measure in terms of the best multiplier bundle for the unit and all the other DMUs, it is not always unique. This paper presents a new and modified DEA game cross-efficiency model where each DMU is viewed as a competitor via non-cooperative game. For each competing DMU, a multiplier bundle is determined that optimizes the efficiency score for that DMU, with the additional constraint that the resulting score should be at or above that DMU 's estimated best performance. The problem, of course, arises that we will not know this best performance score for the DMU under evaluation until the best performances of all other DMUs are known. To combat this “chicken and egg” phenomenon, an iterative approach leading to the Nash equilibrium is presented. The current paper provides a modified variable returns to scale (VRS) model that yields non-negative cross-efficiency scores. The approach is applied to the last six Summer Olympic Games. Our results may indicate that our game cross-efficiency model implicitly incorporates the relative importance of gold, silver and bronze medals without the need for specifying the exact assurance regions.