On the use of the Stein variance estimator in the double <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-class estimator when each individual regression coefficient is estimated

In this paper we consider the double k-class estimator which incorporates the Stein variance estimator. This estimator is called the SVKK estimator. We derive the explicit formula for the mean squared error (MSE) of the SVKK estimator for each individual regression coefficient. It is shown analytically that the MSE performance of the Stein-rule estimator for each individual regression coefficient can be improved by utilizing the Stein variance estimator. Also, MSE’s of several estimators included in a family of the SVKK estimators are compared by numerical evaluations.     

A new method of imputation in survey sampling

In this paper, an alternative estimator of population mean in the presence of non-response has been suggested which comes in the form of Walsh's estimator. The estimator of mean obtained from the proposed technique remains better than the estimators obtained from ratio or mean methods of imputation. The mean-squared error (MSE) of the resultant estimator is less than that of the estimator obtained on the basis of ratio method of imputation for the optimum choice of parameters. An estimator for estimating a parameter involved in the process of new method of imputation has been discussed. A suggestion to form ‘warm deck’ method of imputation has been suggested. The MSE expressions for the proposed estimators have been derived analytically and compared empirically. The work has been extended to the case of multi-auxiliary information to be used for imputation. Numerical illustrations are also provided.     

Modified product estimators of finite population mean in finite sampling

With respect to random sampling from finite population, when the correlation between the auxiliary and the main characteristics is negative, the product estimator is often used to estimate the population mean. The product estimator, however, would have a large mean-squared-error (MSE) if the coefficients of variations for these two characteristics were large and the absolute value of the correlation between them was small. In this paper, we propose a general family of modified product estimators, that include the product estimator as a special case. We provide a discussion on the reduction of the MSE by using the optimal modified product estimator that has the minimal MSE in the proposed family. In certain situations, these reductions of the MSE can be significant.     

MSE performance of the weighted average estimators consisting of shrinkage estimators

In this paper, we consider a regression model and propose estimators which are the weighted averages of two estimators among three estimators; the Stein-rule (SR), the minimum mean squared error (MMSE), and the adjusted minimum mean-squared error (AMMSE) estimators. It is shown that one of the proposed estimators has smaller mean-squared error (MSE) than the positive-part Stein-rule (PSR) estimator over a moderate region of parameter space when the number of the regression coefficients is small (i.e., 3), and its MSE performance is comparable to the PSR estimator even when the number of the regression coefficients is not so small.     

An Improved Generalized Difference-Cum-Ratio-Type Estimator for the Population Variance in Two-Phase Sampling Using Two Auxiliary Variables

In this paper, an improved generalized difference-cum-ratio-type estimator for the finite population variance under two-phase sampling design is proposed. The expressions for bias and mean square error (MSE) are derived to first order of approximation. The proposed estimator is more efficient than the usual sample variance estimator, traditional ratio estimator, traditional regression estimator, chain ratio type and chain ratio-product-type estimators, and Jhajj and Walia (2011) estimator. Four datasets are also used to illustrate the performances of different estimators.     

The relative efficiency of the restricted estimators in linear regression models

This paper deals with the problem of multicollinearity in a multiple linear regression model with linear equality restrictions. The restricted two parameter estimator which was proposed in case of multicollinearity satisfies the restrictions. The performance of the restricted two parameter estimator over the restricted least squares (RLS) estimator and the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator is examined under the mean square error (MSE) matrix criterion when the restrictions are correct and not correct. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the restricted ridge regression, restricted Liu and restricted shrunken estimators, which are the special cases of the restricted two parameter estimator, to have a smaller MSE matrix than the RLS and the OLS estimators are derived when the restrictions hold true and do not hold true. Theoretical results are illustrated with numerical examples based on Webster, Gunst and Mason data and Gorman and Toman data. We conduct a final demonstration of the performance of the estimators by running a Monte Carlo simulation which shows that when the variance of the error term and the correlation between the explanatory variables are large, the restricted two parameter estimator performs better than the RLS estimator and the OLS estimator under the configurations examined.     

A balanced multi-level rotation sampling design and its efficient composite estimators

We present a multi-level rotation sampling design which includes most of the existing rotation designs as special cases. When an estimator is defined under this sampling design, its variance and bias remain the same over survey months, but it is not so under other existing rotation designs. Using the properties of this multi-level rotation design, we derive the mean squared error (MSE) of the generalized composite estimator (GCE), incorporating the two types of correlations arising from rotating sample units. We show that the MSEs of other existing composite estimators currently used can be expressed as special cases of the GCE. Furthermore, since the coefficients of the GCE are unknown and difficult to determine, we present the minimum risk window estimator (MRWE) as an alternative estimator. This MRWE has the smallest MSE under this rotation design and yet, it is easy to calculate. The MRWE is unbiased for monthly and yearly changes and preserves the internal consistency in total. Our numerical study shows that the MRWE is as efficient as GCE and more efficient than the existing composite estimators and does not suffer from the drift problem [Fuller W.A., Rao J.N.K., 2001. A regression composite estimator with application to the Canadian Labour Force Survey. Surv. Methodol. 27 (2001) 45–51] unlike the regression composite estimators.     

Minimum mean squared error estimation of each individual coefficient in a linear regression model

In this paper, we derive the exact mean squared error (MSE) of the minimum MSE estimator for each individual coefficient in a linear regression model, and show a sufficient condition for the minimum MSE estimator for each individual coefficient to dominate the OLS estimator. Numerical results show that when the number of independent variables is 2 and 3, the minimum MSE estimator for each individual coefficient can be a good alternative to the OLS and Stein-rule estimators.     

Estimating the variance in nonparametric regression—what is a reasonable choice?

The exact mean-squared error (MSE) of estimators of the variance in nonparametric regression based on quadratic forms is investigated. In particular, two classes of estimators are compared: Hall, Kay and Titterington's optimal difference-based estimators and a class of ordinary difference-based estimators which generalize methods proposed by Rice and Gasser, Sroka and Jennen-Steinmetz. For small sample sizes the MSE of the first estimator is essentially increased by the magnitude of the integrated first two squared derivatives of the regression function. It is shown that in many situations ordinary difference-based estimators are more appropriate for estimating the variance, because they control the bias much better and hence have a much better overall performance. It is also demonstrated that Rice's estimator does not always behave well. Data-driven guidelines are given to select the estimator with the smallest MSE.     

Small area estimation: the EBLUP estimator based on spatially correlated random area effects

This paper deals with small area indirect estimators under area level random effect models when only area level data are available and the random effects are correlated. The performance of the Spatial Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (SEBLUP) is explored with a Monte Carlo simulation study on lattice data and it is applied to the results of the sample survey on Life Conditions in Tuscany (Italy). The mean squared error (MSE) problem is discussed illustrating the MSE estimator in comparison with the MSE of the empirical sampling distribution of SEBLUP estimator. A clear tendency in our empirical findings is that the introduction of spatially correlated random area effects reduce both the variance and the bias of the EBLUP estimator. Despite some residual bias, the coverage rate of our confidence intervals comes close to a nominal 95%.     

Small-area estimation by combining time-series and cross-sectional data

A model involving autocorrelated random effects and sampling errors is proposed for small-area estimation, using both time-series and cross-sectional data. The sampling errors are assumed to have a known block-diagonal covariance matrix. This model is an extension of a well-known model, due to Fay and Herriot (1979), for cross-sectional data. A two-stage estimator of a small-area mean for the current period is obtained under the proposed model with known autocorrelation, by first deriving the best linear unbiased prediction estimator assuming known variance components, and then replacing them with their consistent estimators. Extending the approach of Prasad and Rao (1986, 1990) for the Fay-Herriot model, an estimator of mean squared error (MSE) of the two-stage estimator, correct to a second-order approximation for a small or moderate number of time points, T, and a large number of small areas, m, is obtained. The case of unknown autocorrelation is also considered. Limited simulation results on the efficiency of two-stage estimators and the accuracy of the proposed estimator of MSE are présentés.     

A modified bootstrap procedure for cluster sampling variance estimation of species richness

Variance estimators for probability sample-based predictions of species richness (S) are typically conditional on the sample (expected variance). In practical applications, sample sizes are typically small, and the variance of input parameters to a richness estimator should not be ignored. We propose a modified bootstrap variance estimator that attempts to capture the sampling variance by generating B replications of the richness prediction from stochastically resampled data of species incidence. The variance estimator is demonstrated for the observed richness (SO), five richness estimators, and with simulated cluster sampling (without replacement) in 11 finite populations of forest tree species. A key feature of the bootstrap procedure is a probabilistic augmentation of a species incidence matrix by the number of species expected to be ‘lost’ in a conventional bootstrap resampling scheme. In Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations, the modified bootstrap procedure performed well in terms of tracking the average MC estimates of richness and standard errors. Bootstrap-based estimates of standard errors were as a rule conservative. Extensions to other sampling designs, estimators of species richness and diversity, and estimates of change are possible.     

Estimating Mark Functions Through Spectral Analysis for Marked Point Patterns

Classical techniques for modeling numerical data associated to a regular grid have been widely developed in the literature. When a trigonometric model for the data is considered, it is possible to use the corresponding least squares (classical) estimators, but when the data are not observed on a regular grid, these estimators do not show appropriate properties. In this article we propose a novel way to model data that is not observed on a regular grid, and we establish a practical criterion, based on the mean squared error (MSE), to objectively decide which estimator should be used in each case: the inappropriate classical or the new unbiased estimator, which has greater variance. Jackknife and cross-validation techniques are used to follow a similar criterion in practice, when the MSE is not known. Finally, we present an application of the methodology to univariate and bivariate data.     

The Statistical Properties of the Equity Estimator

In this article we consider the Equity estimator proposed by Krishnamurthi and Rangaswamy. We show that this estimator is inconsistent and does not necessarily improve on the mean squared error (MSE) of the least squares (LS) estimator. We perform a Monte Carlo experiment based on the price-promotion model used in marketing research, with marketing data, comparing the MSE of the Equity estimator to that of two empirical Bayes estimators and the LS estimator. We find that the empirical Bayes estimators have substantially smaller MSE than the Equity estimator in almost every case.     

Nonparametric estimation of the survival distribution in censored data

Two nonparametric estimators o f the survival distributionare discussed. The estimators were proposed by Kaplan and Meier (1958) and Breslow (1972) and are applicable when dealing with censored data. It is known that they are asymptotically unbiased and uniformly strongly consistent, and when properly normalized that they converge weakly to the same Gaussian process. In this paper, the properties of the estimators are carefully inspected in small or moderate samples. The Breslow estimator, a shrinkage version of the Kaplan-Meier, nearly always has the smaller mean square error (MSE) whenever the truesurvival probabilityis at least 0.20, but has considerably larger MSE than the Kaplan-Meier estimator when the survivalprobability is near zero.     

On improving convergence rate of Bernstein polynomial density estimator

This paper is concerned with the Bernstein estimator [Vitale, R.A. (1975), ‘A Bernstein Polynomial Approach to Density Function Estimation’, in Statistical Inference and Related Topics, ed. M.L. Puri, 2, New York: Academic Press, pp. 87–99] to estimate a density with support [0, 1]. One of the major contributions of this paper is an application of a multiplicative bias correction [Terrell, G.R., and Scott, D.W. (1980), ‘On Improving Convergence Rates for Nonnegative Kernel Density Estimators’, The Annals of Statistics, 8, 1160–1163], which was originally developed for the standard kernel estimator. Moreover, the renormalised multiplicative bias corrected Bernstein estimator is studied rigorously. The mean squared error (MSE) in the interior and mean integrated squared error of the resulting bias corrected Bernstein estimators as well as the additive bias corrected Bernstein estimator [Leblanc, A. (2010), ‘A Bias-reduced Approach to Density Estimation Using Bernstein Polynomials’, Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 22, 459–475] are shown to be O(n^?8/9) when the underlying density has a fourth-order derivative, where n is the sample size. The condition under which the MSE near the boundary is O(n^?8/9) is also discussed. Finally, numerical studies based on both simulated and real data sets are presented.     

A New Approach to the Estimation of Inter-Variable Correlation

The use of different measures of similarity between observed vectors for the purposes of classifying or clustering them has been expanding dramatically in recent years. One result of this expansion has been the use of many new similarity measures, designed for the purpose of satisfying various criteria. A noteworthy application involves estimating the relationships between genes using microarray experimental data. We consider the class of ‘correlation-type’ similarity measures. The use of these new measures of similarity suggest that the whole problem needs to be formulated in statistical terms to clarify their relative benefits. Pursuant to this need, we define, for each given observed vector, a baseline representing the ‘true’ value common to each of the component observations. These ‘true’ values are taken to be parameters. We define the ‘true correlation’ between each two observed vectors as the average (over the distribution of the observations for given baseline parameters) of Pearson's correlation with sample means replaced by the corresponding baseline parameters. Estimators of this true correlation are assessed using their mean squared error (MSE). Proper Bayes estimators of this true correlation, being based on the predictive posterior distribution of the data, are both difficult to calculate/analyze and highly non robust. By constrast, empirical Bayes estimators are: (i) close to their Bayesian counterparts; (ii) easy to analyze; and (iii) strongly robust. For these reasons, we employ empirical Bayes estimators of correlation in place of their Bayesian counterparts. We show how to construct two different kinds of simultaneous Bayes correlation estimators: the first assumes no apriori correlation between baseline parameters; the second assumes a common unknown correlation between them. Estimators of the latter type frequently have significantly smaller MSE than those of the former type which, in turn, frequently have significantly smaller MSE than their Pearson estimator counterparts. For purposes of illustrating our results, we examine the problem of inferring the relationships between gene expression level vectors, in the context of observing microarray experimental data.     

On an adjustment of degrees of freedom in the minimim mean squared error ertimator

In this paper, we consider an adjustment of degrees of freedom in the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator, We derive the exact MSE of the adjusted MMSE (AMMSE) estimator, and compare the MSE of the AMMSE estimator with those of the Stein-(SR), positive-part Stein-rule (PSR) and MMSE estimators by numerical evaluations. It is shown that the adjustment of degrees of freedom is effective when the noncentrality parameter is close to zero, and the MSE performance of the MMSE estimator can be improved in the wide region of the noncentrality parameter by the adjustment, ft is also shown that the AMMSE estimator can have the smaller MSE than the PSR estimator in the wide region of the noncentrality parameter     

A new estimator for the unit root

We compare the ordinary least squares, weighted symmetric, modified weighted symmetric (MWS), maximum likelihood, and our new modification for least squares (MLS) estimator for first-order autoregressive in the case of unit root using Monte Carlo method. The Monte Carlo study sheds some light on how well the estimators and the predictors perform on different samples sizes. We found that MLS estimator is less biased and has less mean squared error (MSE) than any other estimators, and MWS predictor error performs well, in the sense of MSE, than any other predictors’ methods. The sample percentiles for the distribution of the τ statistic for the first, second, and third periods in the future, for alternative estimators, are reported to know if it agrees with those of normal distribution or not.     

A comparison of biased regression estimators using a pitman nearness criterion

Biased regression estimators have traditionally benn studied using the Mean Square Error (MSE) criterion. Usually these comparisons have been based on the sum of the MSE's of each of the individual parameters, i.e., a scaler valued measure that is the trace of the MSE matrix. However, since this summed MSE does not consider the covariance structure of the estimators, we propose the use of a Pitman Measure of Closeness (PMC) criterion (Keating and Gupta, 1984; Keating and Mason, 1985). In this paper we consider two versions of PMC. One of these compares the estimates and the other compares the resultant predicted values for 12 different regression estimators. These estimators represent three classes of estimators, namely, ridge, shrunken, and principal component estimators. The comparisons of these estimators using the PMC criteria are contrasted with the usual MSE criteria as well as the prediction mean square error. Included in the estimators is a relatively new estimator termed the generalized principal component estimator proposed by Jolliffe. This estimator has previously received little attention in the literature.