Tests of specification in econometrics

This survey of recent developments in testing for misspecification of econometric models reviews procedures based on a method due to Hausman. Particular attention is given to alternative forms of the test, its relationship to classical test procedures, and its role in pre-test estimation.     

Tests for the Null Hypothesis of Cointegration: A Monte Carlo Comparison

The aim of this paper is to compare the relative performance of several tests for the null hypothesis of cointegration, in terms of size and power in finite samples. This is carried out using Monte Carlo simulations for a range of plausible data-generating processes. We also analyze the impact on size and power of choosing different procedures to estimate the long run variance of the errors. We found that the parametrically adjusted test of McCabe et al. (1997) is the most well-balanced test, displaying good power and relatively few size distortions.     

A new test for multivariate normality by combining extreme and nonextreme BHEP tests

In this article, we propose a new multiple test procedure for assessing multivariate normality, which combines BHEP (Baringhaus–Henze–Epps–Pulley) tests by considering extreme and nonextreme choices of the tuning parameter in the definition of the BHEP test statistic. Monte Carlo power comparisons indicate that the new test presents a reasonable power against a wide range of alternative distributions, showing itself to be competitive against the most recommended procedures for testing a multivariate hypothesis of normality. We further illustrate the use of the new test for the Fisher Iris dataset.     

Model specification tests against non-nested alternatives

Non-nested hypothesis tests provide a way to test the specification of an econometric model against the evidence provided by one or more non-nested alternatives. This paper surveys the recent literature on non-nested hypothesis testing in the context of regression and related models. Much of the purely statistical 1iterature which has evolved from the fundamental work of Cox (1961, 1962) is discussed briefly or not at all. Instead, emphasis is placed on those techniques which are easy to employ in practice and are likely to be useful to applied workers.     

Model specification tests against non-nested alternatives

Non-nested hypothesis tests provide a way to test the specification of an econometric model against the evidence provided by one or more non-nested alternatives. This paper surveys the recent literature on non-nested hypothesis testing in the context of regression and related models. Much of the purely statistical 1iterature which has evolved from the fundamental work of Cox (1961, 1962) is discussed briefly or not at all. Instead, emphasis is placed on those techniques which are easy to employ in practice and are likely to be useful to applied workers.     

Change-Point Detection With Non-Parametric Regression

We consider the regression model y_i = ?(x_i ) + ε in which the function ? or its pth derivative ?^(p) may have a discontinuity at some unknown point τ. By fitting local polynomials from the left and right, we test the null that ?^(p) is continuous against the alternative that ?^(p)(τ?) ≠ ?^(p)(τ+). We obtain Darling-Erdös type limit theorems for the test statistics under the null hypothesis of no change, as well as their limits in probability under the alternative. Consistency of the related change-point estimators is also established.     

Cointegration and direct tests of the rational expectations hypothesis

The paper is concerned with direct tests of the rational expectations hypothesis (REH) in the presence of stationary and non-stationary variables. Alternative methods of converting qualitative survey responses into quantitative expectations series are examined. Testing of orthogonality and the issue of generated regressors for models estimated by two step methods are re-evaluated when the variable to be explained is stationary. A methodological approach for testing the REH is provided for models using qualitative response data when there are unit roots and cointegration, and alternative reasons are examined for rejecting the null hypothesis of orthogonality. The usefulness of cointegration analysis for both the probability and regression conversion procedures is also analysed. Cointegration is found to be directly applicable for the probability conversion approach with uniform, normal and logistic distributions of expectations and for the linear regressicn conversion approach. In the light of new techniques, an existing empirical example testing the REH for British manufacturing firms is re-examined and tested over an extended data set.     

Cointegration and direct tests of the rational expectations hypothesis

The paper is concerned with direct tests of the rational expectations hypothesis (REH) in the presence of stationary and non-stationary variables. Alternative methods of converting qualitative survey responses into quantitative expectations series are examined. Testing of orthogonality and the issue of generated regressors for models estimated by two step methods are re-evaluated when the variable to be explained is stationary. A methodological approach for testing the REH is provided for models using qualitative response data when there are unit roots and cointegration, and alternative reasons are examined for rejecting the null hypothesis of orthogonality. The usefulness of cointegration analysis for both the probability and regression conversion procedures is also analysed. Cointegration is found to be directly applicable for the probability conversion approach with uniform, normal and logistic distributions of expectations and for the linear regressicn conversion approach. In the light of new techniques, an existing empirical example testing the REH for British manufacturing firms is re-examined and tested over an extended data set.     

A monte carlo comparison of tests based on the durbin-watson statistic with other autocorrelation tests in dynamic models

This paper examines the sampling properties of a number of serial correlation tests in dynamic linear models which include one or two lags of the dependent variable. Among the tests considered are the Durbin-Watson (DW) bounds test, modified versions of the DW proposed recently by King and Wu and Inder, Durbin's m test, Inder's point optimal test and a Hausman type test. Sampling designs include models with one or two lags of the dependent variable. The m, Hausman, and Inder's tests have the best performance, while Inder's modified DW test appears to be better than the other DW based tests. Results also suggest that tests are less powerful and more sensitive to design parameters in models with higher dynamics, with the DW-based tests being the most sensitive.     

Reply to comments on modeling asset returns with alternative stable distributions and some extensions *

This paper examines the sampling properties of a number of serial correlation tests in dynamic linear models which include one or two lags of the dependent variable. Among the tests considered are the Durbin-Watson (DW) bounds test, modified versions of the DW proposed recently by King and Wu and Inder, Durbin's m test, Inder's point optimal test and a Hausman type test. Sampling designs include models with one or two lags of the dependent variable. The m, Hausman, and Inder's tests have the best performance, while Inder's modified DW test appears to be better than the other DW based tests. Results also suggest that tests are less powerful and more sensitive to design parameters in models with higher dynamics, with the DW-based tests being the most sensitive.     

Diagnostic tests as residual analysis

Many applied workers are strongly oriented to residual analysis for assessing model adequacy. Formal test statistics of adequacy however are frequently derived from likelihood theory, particularly through Lagrange Multipliers. In contraGt, the present paper derives the formal statistics by concentrating Upon the distribution of residuals. It is shown that most existing tests can be derived in this way from a few elementary principles of specification analysis. One advantage of this alternative methodology is that it highlights some difficulties in existing approaches and simultaneously indicates a resolution of them; a good example being testing for heteroscedasticity in simultaneous equations. Other issues such as independence and robustness of diagnostic tests are also easily explored within the proposed framework.     

Comments on “bootstrapping time series models”

Many applied workers are strongly oriented to residual analysis for assessing model adequacy. Formal test statistics of adequacy however are frequently derived from likelihood theory, particularly through Lagrange Multipliers. In contraGt, the present paper derives the formal statistics by concentrating Upon the distribution of residuals. It is shown that most existing tests can be derived in this way from a few elementary principles of specification analysis. One advantage of this alternative methodology is that it highlights some difficulties in existing approaches and simultaneously indicates a resolution of them; a good example being testing for heteroscedasticity in simultaneous equations. Other issues such as independence and robustness of diagnostic tests are also easily explored within the proposed framework.     

Optimal detection of Fechner-asymmetry

We consider a general class of skewed univariate densities introduced by Fechner [1897. Kollectivmasslehre. Engleman, Leipzig], and derive optimal testing procedures for the null hypothesis of symmetry within that class. Locally and asymptotically optimal (in the Le Cam sense) tests are obtained, both for the case of symmetry with respect to a specified location as for the case of symmetry with respect to some unspecified location. Signed-rank based versions of these tests are also provided. The efficiency properties of the proposed procedures are investigated by a derivation of their asymptotic relative efficiencies with respect to the corresponding Gaussian parametric tests based on the traditional Pearson–Fisher coefficient of skewness. Small-sample performances under several types of asymmetry are investigated via simulations.     

C55. Quick and accurate rule of thumb for determining the critical value of the coefficient of correlation

Life table analysis techniques in epidemiology depend upon the asymptotic properties of the statistical test methods employed. In some instances, the statistical procedures indicate highly significant results which are, in reality, unjustified. The phenomenon may occur when the asymptotic methods are applied in situations where the cases of interest are few in number. This situation is illustrated by the 20 multiple myeloma deaths observed in the RERF Life Span Study cohort. A permutation test is applied to the life table data, although the test requires the false assumption that the censoring distribution is independent of the radiation dose. A simulation test is developed which does not require equal censoring, which has the same asymptotics as the usual test methods, and which is less likely to overestimate significance in small samples. It is found that both of these small-sample tests provide reasonable numerical solutions. In addition, the simulation test is recommended in general for analyzing life table data with unequal censoring. Finally, by using the small-sample tests, the frequency of death from multiple myeloma is shown to be positively associated with radiation dose (P<0.01).     

Asymptotic power of tests of normality under local alternatives

Seven tests of univariate normality are studied in view of their asymptotic power under local alternatives. The procedures under consideration are either based on the empirical skewness and/or kurtosis, including the popular Jarque-Bera statistic, as well as Cramér-von Mises, Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov functionals of an empirical process with estimated parameters. The large-sample behavior of these test statistics under contiguous sequences is obtained; this allows for the computation of their associated local power curves and of their asymptotic relative efficiency in the light of a measure proposed by Berg and Quessy (2009). Comparisons are made under four classes of local alternatives, including those used by Thadewald and Büning (2007) in a recent Monte-Carlo power study. These theoretical results are related to empirical ones and many recommendations are formulated.     

Customizing Generalizations of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-fit Test

This paper presents a method of customizing goodness-of-fit tests that transforms the empirical distribution function in such a way as to create tests for certain alternatives. Using the @ , g transform described in Blom(1958), one can create non-parametric tests for an assortment of alternative distributions. As examples, three new ( f , g )-corrected Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for goodness-of-fit are discussed. One of these tests is powerful for testing whether or not the data come from an alternative that is heavier in the tails. Another test identifies whether or not the data come from an alternative which is heavier in the middle of the distribution. The last test identifies if the data come from an alternative in which the first or third quartile is far from the corresponding quartile of the hypothesized distribution. The behavior of the three new tests is investigated through a power study.     

A Test of Independence in Two-Way Contingency Tables Based on Maximal Correlation

Maximal correlation has several desirable properties as a measure of dependence, including the fact that it vanishes if and only if the variables are independent. Except for a few special cases, it is hard to evaluate maximal correlation explicitly. We focus on two-dimensional contingency tables and discuss a procedure for estimating maximal correlation, which we use for constructing a test of independence. We compare the maximal correlation test with other tests of independence by Monte Carlo simulations. When the underlying continuous variables are dependent but uncorrelated, we point out some cases for which the new test is more powerful.     

Detection of symmetry or lack of 11 and applications

Developed is a method for using a random sample to select between the model of symmetry of the sampled distribution and the model of skewness to the right. The technique is meant to be used as a preliminary step, in the analysis of data, which is to be followed by other inferential procedures. Two examples of this use, which pertain to robust regression and quantile estimation, are discussed.     

A monte carlo analysis of two spectral tests of the martingale hypothesis

Summary The size, power, and robustness properties of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises spectral tests of the martingale (difference) hypothesis are investigated by Monte Carlo methods. The results highlight a marked superiority of the Cramér-von Mises with respect to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The paper also shows that the Cramér-von Mises test is simple to compute, more general and more powerful than other converntionally used tests.     

Testing for Homogeneity in an Exponential Mixture Model

This paper studies diagnostic procedures to test for homogeneity against unobserved heterogeneity in an exponential mixture model. The procedures include a dispersion score test, a likelihood ratio test, a moment likelihood approach and several goodness-of-fit tests. The paper compares the empirical power of these tests on a broad range of alternatives and proposes a new test that combines the dispersion score test with a properly chosen goodness-of-fit procedure; its empirical power comes close to the power of the best of the other tests.