情绪对创造力影响的研究综述

系统回顾了国内外有关情绪影响创造力的文献,对当前的主要研究成果进行梳理,总结提炼出情绪具有影响个体工作记忆、信息加工方式和工作投入的功能,从而带来了情绪影响创造力的认知路径与动机路径;并进一步指出未来研究有必要结合情绪内在特征深入挖掘情绪影响创造力的动机路径,以及结合情绪事件理论界定工作场所中情绪前因变量。     

知识分享中介作用下的经验开放性与团队内聚力对员工创造力的影响

从信息处理视角,运用多层线性模型开展有关研究.研究发现,个体经验开放性和团队内聚力对于研发团队成员创造力均具有正面作用,而个体知识分享在其中起到部分中介作用.研究结果表明,相对于高内聚力团队,在低内聚力团队中,经验开放性通过个体知识分享对员工创造力的间接作用有着更强的正面导向.研究结论有助于深入理解个性特质与团队层次因素对员工创造力的作用机制,为管理者采取适当的团队管理方式、提升员工创造力提供了相关建议.     

LMX 差异化对创造力的影响: 一项多层次研究

领导―成员交换关系的差异化是近年来学术界的一个热点课题． 尽管已有研究考察了它对一些个体和团队产出的影响,但领导―成员交换关系差异化对创造力的影响一直为研究者们所忽略． 领导―成员交换关系差异化文献和社会比较理论表明领导与不同下属交换质量的差异对团队及个人创造力的发挥具有重要意义． 基于此,本研究采用社会比较的理论视角,同时从个体和团队两个层面考察领导―成员交换关系差异化对团队和个体创造力的影响,并进一步分析团队层面的差异化对个体层面效应的调节作用． 通过对中国大陆 80 个知识型团队的 367 名个体的问卷调查,结果发现: 在个体层面,相对的领导―成员交换关系( ＲLMX) 对个体创造力有显著正向影响,团队自主支持感在这两者关系中起着中介作用; 在团队层面,领导―成员交换关系差异和团队创造力之间呈 U 型关系,领导―成员交换关系差异对个体创造力有消极影响,但团队层面的关系差异化对 ＲLMX 和个体创造力关系的调节效应不显著． 总体来看,本研究发现 LMX 差异化对个体层面和团队层面的影响是不一致的． 最后讨论了本研究的不足及未来潜在的研究方向．     

LMX差异化对创造力的影响:一项多层次研究

领导—成员交换关系的差异化是近年来学术界的一个热点课题.尽管已有研究考察了它对一些个体和团队产出的影响,但领导—成员交换关系差异化对创造力的影响一直为研究者们所忽略.领导—成员交换关系差异化文献和社会比较理论表明领导与不同下属交换质量的差异对团队及个人创造力的发挥具有重要意义.基于此,本研究采用社会比较的理论视角,同时从个体和团队两个层面考察领导—成员交换关系差异化对团队和个体创造力的影响,并进一步分析团队层面的差异化对个体层面效应的调节作用.通过对中国大陆80个知识型团队的367名个体的问卷调查,结果发现:在个体层面,相对的领导—成员交换关系(RLMX)对个体创造力有显著正向影响,团队自主支持感在这两者关系中起着中介作用;在团队层面,领导—成员交换关系差异和团队创造力之间呈U型关系,领导—成员交换关系差异对个体创造力有消极影响,但团队层面的关系差异化对RLMX和个体创造力关系的调节效应不显著.总体来看,本研究发现LMX差异化对个体层面和团队层面的影响是不一致的.最后讨论了本研究的不足及未来潜在的研究方向.     

共享领导力对团队工作繁荣的影响

如何聚天下英才而用之,建设持续学习又充满活力的创新团队是国家实施人才强国战略的关键。作为一种聚贤纳才的团队领导模式,共享领导力是焕发团队工作繁荣的潜在力量。已有研究缺乏对团队工作繁荣的关注,更缺乏对共享领导力与团队工作繁荣之间作用机制的探讨。因此,亟须聚焦于团队工作繁荣,考察共享领导力对团队工作繁荣的作用路径和边界影响机制。基于工作繁荣的社会嵌入模型,从团队认知和团队情感的双重路径出发,探讨共享领导力如何以及何时促进团队工作繁荣。具体而言,探讨团队交互记忆系统(认知路径)和团队积极情绪氛围(情感路径)在共享领导力与团队工作繁荣之间的中介作用,以及团队反思在上述关系中发挥的有调节的中介作用。通过3个阶段的问卷调查,收集来自不同行业的81个知识团队524个样本数据;利用Spss 26.0和Mplus 7.4进行实证分析,采用多水平结构方程模型、蒙特卡洛模拟法、简单斜率分析进行中介效应检验和有调节的中介效应检验。研究结果表明,团队交互记忆系统和团队积极情绪氛围在共享领导力与团队工作繁荣之间起正向中介作用。团队反思显著调节共享领导力通过团队交互记忆系统和团队积极情绪氛围影响团队工作繁荣的间接效...     

团队成员学习目标导向离散化与团队创造力研究

以来自38家企业、79个团队的主管与下属配对的428套样本,基于社会共享认知和信息决策视角,构建一个有中介的调节模型,探讨团队成员学习目标导向离散化影响团队创造力的中介机制及其边界条件.研究结果表明,团队成员学习目标导向离散化抑制团队创造力,团队学习行为在团队成员学习目标导向离散化与团队创造力之间发挥中介作用;共享团队愿景显著减缓团队成员学习目标导向离散化对团队学习行为的负向作用;团队成员学习目标导向离散化通过团队学习行为对团队创造力产生负向影响.     

共享领导对团队成员创新绩效的影响:自我效能感的中介作用

团队成员创新绩效是组织获得持续竞争优势的决定性因素。本文研究结果表明:共享领导对团队成员创新绩效有显著的正向影响,且共享领导通过影响自我效能感间接作用于团队成员创新绩效。因此,团队管理者不仅要通过塑造自身的共享领导风格来提高团队成员创新绩效,而且要注重培养员工的自信心,提高员工的自我效能感,从而提高团队成员创新绩效。     

团队权力距离和集体主义对团队创造力影响:基于共享领导视角北大核心CSSCI

基于社会信息处理理论,从共享领导视角探讨具有中国文化特征的团队文化,即团队权力距离和集体主义对团队创造力的影响机制。采用来自93个团队、588份团队成员与主管配套数据为样本,研究发现:团队权力距离显著负向影响共享领导;团队集体主义显著正向影响共享领导;共享领导中介团队权力距离与团队创造力的负向关系、团队集体主义与团队创造力的正向关系。研究发现对我国企业在当前创新驱动发展战略下重视企业中团队集体主义文化建设、推进共享领导以提升团队创造力具有重要的管理启示。     

企业人力资源管理实践对跨功能团队创造力的跨层影响

企业人力资源管理是企业管理的核心,是团队发展的指导基础。实际上越来越多的企业团队开始注重人力资源管理实践的发展,只有有效的运用人力资源管理实践才能激发团队的运作能力和创作能力,特别是当下的跨功能团队的培养。现今社会跨功能团队已经是一个普遍群体,其在实现隐性知识共享的过程中发挥着核心作用,不仅能够促进团队成员的沟通与交流,还能促进跨专业化的知识的积累。那么如何在跨功能团队中激发团队的创造力,实现企业的经济效益和竞争实力,以下文章将阐述几项观点和建议。     

授权型领导对隐性知识共享行为的影响研究

知识共享已成为企业获取核心竞争力、保持长期竞争优势的重要途径。在回顾授权型领导与隐性知识共享关系的基础上,引入知识共享动机作为中介变量,重点探讨授权型领导能否通过知识共享动机对隐性知识共享行为产生影响。研究表明,授权型领导通过知识共享动机对隐性知识共享行为产生积极影响。     

Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations

We examined follower relational identification with the leader as a mediator and follower perceptions of leader creativity expectations as a moderator in the relationship between transformational leadership and follower creativity. Using a sample of 420 leader–follower dyads from an energy company in mainland China, we found that follower relational identification with the leader mediates the transformational leadership–follower creativity relationship, and this mediating relationship is conditional on the moderator variable of follower perceptions of leader creativity expectations for the path from follower relational identification to follower creativity. These results contribute to the literature by clarifying why (through relational identification) and when (high creativity expectations set by the leader) transformational leadership is positively related to follower creativity.     

市场导向对组织创造力的非线性作用机理——组织二元结构文化与创业导向的影响研究

在我国加快实施创新驱动发展战略中,如何提升企业组织创造力以促使企业创新变得至关重要。企业战略是影响组织创造力和创新的重要情境因素。市场导向和创业导向是新兴经济体国家的企业发展的战略核心。然而,现有研究对市场导向与企业创造性产出之间关系的观点却不一致。创业导向如何影响市场导向对组织创造力的作用也尚未得到关注和研究。本研究以145家企业的979份高层管理人员与核心员工的套问卷数据为样本,研究发现：市场导向对组织创造力产生倒U型影响,且倒U型影响通过二元结构文化（一致性文化与适应性文化）的不同传导机制而产生,即：一致性文化在市场导向与组织创造力之间正向中介效应随市场导向的增强而减弱,并在高度市场导向时转变为负向中介效应,而适应性文化在市场导向和组织创造力之间发挥部分中介效应。研究还发现：市场导向对组织创造力的倒U型影响受创业导向的调节作用,即：当创业导向较高时,市场导向对组织创造力的积极影响随市场导向的增强而逐渐增强,反之,则逐渐减弱。研究结论为提升企业组织创造力提供新的思路和理论参考。     

Area-based urban regeneration comparing Denmark and Japan

In this paper, we study the characteristics and results of two different approaches to urban regeneration which we have termed ‘Metagovernance’ and ‘Pluricentric coordination’ following. We studied this through a comparative study of area-based, participatory urban regeneration projects in Denmark and Japan, representing each one approach. The paper aims to clarify results of the two approaches in terms of five aspects of urban regeneration, relevant to the process and results: (1) strategic spatial improvement, (2) influence of the legal system and transparency of the processes, (3) empowerment of citizens and diversity of participants, (4) innovative capacity (diversity and creativity of the projects) and (5) continuity and flexibility of the projects. The paper concludes that each approach has strengths and weaknesses and that each country can learn from the other to strengthen future participatory urban regeneration.     

团队防御型调节焦点对新产品创造力的双刃剑效应

基于调节焦点理论和团队过程视角,构建了团队防御型调节焦点、信息共享度通过团队活力和团队反思影响新产品创造力的被调节的双通道中介模型。实证研究表明:团队活力中介了防御型调节焦点和新产品创造力的负向间接关系;团队反思中介了防御型调节焦点和新产品创造力的正向间接关系;信息共享度削弱了团队防御型调节焦点对团队活力的负向影响;信息共享度削弱了团队活力在防御型调节焦点和新产品创造力之间的中介作用;团队信息共享度增强了团队防御型调节焦点对团队反思的正向影响;团队信息共享度增强了团队反思在防御型调节焦点和新产品创造力之间的中介作用。     

Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes

In seeking to understand the factors contributing to work group creativity in Chinese organizations, we explored the roles of two different leadership styles (transformational and authoritarian) that Chinese leaders play in group creativity through influencing internal group processes, i.e., collective efficacy and knowledge sharing among group members. We tested our hypotheses with a sample of 163 work groups involving 973 employees in twelve Chinese companies. We found transformational leadership to relate positively but authoritarian leadership to relate negatively to group creativity, mediated by both collective efficacy and knowledge sharing among members within the group. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on group leadership, group creativity and cross-cultural management.     

Structural determinants of team performance: the mutual influences of learning culture,creativity, and knowledge

This study examined the effects of supportive learning culture, team creativity, and collaborative knowledge creating practices on team performance. A survey was used to collect data from a total of 228 knowledge workers from nine Korean organizations. Analyses included measuring item internal consistency, validating proposed constructs, and examining structural relationships using Structural Equation Modelling. The proposed research model was validated in terms of item internal consistency and a model-fit in the Korean business context. Supportive learning culture had a positive and direct influence on team creativity and on the teams' collaborative knowledge creation practices; however, it had an indirect influence on the team performance through the variables of team creativity and knowledge creation practices. In the conclusion, limitations, implications, and further research suggestions are discussed.     

The hypothesized effects of ability in the turnover process

Findings from studies that have investigated the relationship between task-relevant ability and turnover have been inconsistent. A process model is presented that suggests that ability may be related to turnover through the individual's perception of both the ease and desirability of movement. The potential effect of ability on the turnover process and its practical and theoretical implications are discussed.     

调节焦点视角下工作压力对员工创造力的影响

基于调节焦点理论,本研究探讨了促进型调节焦点在挑战性工作压力和员工创造力之间、防御型调节焦点在阻碍性工作压力和员工创造力之间所起的中介作用,并根据社会信息处理理论,进一步探究了参与型领导在此过程中的调节作用。通过对202份调查问卷进行统计分析,得出以下研究结论:(1)挑战性工作压力能够诱发员工的促进型调节焦点,阻碍性工作压力能够诱发员工的防御型调节焦点;(2)促进型调节焦点在挑战性工作压力与员工创造力之间起中介作用,即挑战性工作压力通过增强促进型调节焦点继而提高员工创造力,防御型调节焦点在阻碍性工作压力与员工创造力之间的没有起到中介作用;(3)参与型领导增强了挑战性工作压力与促进型调节焦点之间的正向关系,并在这个模型中起调节作用;(4)参与型领导削弱了阻碍性工作压力与防御型调节焦点之间的正向关系,但并没有在整个模型中起到调节作用。以上研究为"如何使员工在沉重的工作压力下提高创造力"等问题提供了一个新的解释,具有重要的理论和实践意义。     

Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study

Both practitioners and researchers have developed various approaches to support product development teams in their creative process of generating new and valuable product concepts. A key concern of all innovation approaches is to translate the needs, wants and aspirations of users and customers into product and service solutions that match the underlying needs. Many existing innovation approaches focus predominantly on the translation process itself by providing support for aggregating data and making trade-off decisions between user preferences traceable. For that reason, we label these approaches user preference-driven. In contrast, over the last two decades, design thinking (DT) has emerged as an approach that assumes knowledge of user needs information to be fuzzy and unreliable; it addresses this challenge by focusing on developing user experiences through empathic in-depth user research and iterative prototyping. Consequently, we label approaches such as DT user experience-driven. Although DT has generated particular interest among both practitioners and educators, the academic literature investigating the usefulness of DT remains scarce. To help close this gap, we study the performance implications of applying DT processes and tools in terms of new product concept creativity relative to applying a traditional innovation approach. Using an experimental design and collecting quantitative data from 53 teams and their projects, we find that teams applying DT outperform the control group that applies an alternative innovation approach, namely quality function deployment (QFD), in terms of the feasibility, relevance and specificity of concepts, but not the novelty. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice.