Does Concern‐Driven Risk Management Provide a Viable Alternative to QRA?

This article discusses a concept of concern-driven risk management, in which qualitative expert judgments about whether concerns warrant specified risk management interventions are used in preference to quantitative risk assessment (QRA) to guide risk management decisions. Where QRA emphasizes formal quantitative assessment of the probable consequences caused by the recommended actions, and comparison to the probable consequences of alternatives, including the status quo, concern-driven risk management instead emphasizes perceived urgency or severity of the situation motivating recommended interventions. In many instances, especially those involving applications of the precautionary principle, no formal quantification or comparison of probable consequences for alternative decisions is seen as being necessary (or, perhaps, possible or desirable) prior to implementation of risk management measures. Such concern-driven risk management has been recommended by critics of QRA in several areas of applied risk management. Based on case studies and psychological literature on the empirical performance of judgment-based approaches to decision making under risk and uncertainty, we conclude that, although concern-driven risk management has several important potential political and psychological advantages over QRA, it is not clear that it performs better than (or as well as) QRA in identifying risk management interventions that successfully protect human health or achieve other desired consequences. Therefore, those who advocate replacing QRA with concern-driven alternatives, such as expert judgment and consensus decision processes, should assess whether their recommended alternatives truly outperform QRA, by the criterion of producing preferred consequences, before rejecting the QRA paradigm for practical applications.     

Sequential Search and Selection Problem Under Uncertainty

This paper formulates and discusses a series of sequential decision problems of the following common structure: A decision alternative of multiple attributes‐that is, a job, an employee, or an investment alternative‐is to be selected within a certain fixed length of time. An unknown number of alternatives are presented sequentially, either deterministically or in a random manner. The decision maker can rank all the alternatives from best to worst without ties, and the decision to accept or reject an alternative is based solely on the relative ranks of those alternatives evaluated so far. The nonparametric sequential decision problem is first studied for a model involving a discrete time period and then generalized in terms of continuous time. Also considered is a variant of this problem involving a Bayesian estimation of (1) the uncertain probability of having an alternative at a given stage in the discrete‐time model and (2) the arrival rate of alternatives in the continuous‐time model. The optimal selection strategy that maximizes the probability of selecting the absolute best alternative is illustrated with the job search problem and the single‐machine job assignment problem.     

RANK GENERATION,PRESERVATION, AND REVERSAL IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY DECISION PROCESS

Decision making has the objective of finding the best alternative or set of alternatives by considering a number of goals, objectives, criteria, competitors, and other important factors. The analytic hierarchy process is a decision aid used to assist a decision maker in sorting out the complexity of a decision problem and making use of his or her judgments. A decision maker must be assured that the arithmetic operations of any such decision process are the right ones—that they surface the correct ranking and values of the alternatives and preserve or alter ranks appropriately when new alternatives are added or deleted. In this paper it will be shown that with absolute measurement, rank always is preserved, with relative measurement, rank changes with nspect to scveral criteria only because of the structural dependence (involving both numbers and measurements) of criteria on alternatives. A discussion of the effect on rank of replicas and near replicas of the alternatives also is given.     

A deterministic model for the housing decision

The decision to rent or buy housing, or to choose among various housing acquisition alternatives, represents an important and complex financial problem, which confronts virtually all individuals. This paper develops a comprehensive model (within the institutional and legislative context of the United States) which provides theoretically appropriate criteria for evaluating personal housing alternatives. Empirical results clearly indicate the economic consequences of housing alternatives, and both substantiate some and contradict other “wisdoms” concerning the housing decision.     

Assessing the risks in acquisitions—The risk-chance analysis

Every company encounters a dangerous gap of information by evaluating various decision alternatives on the base of objective achievement alone. It is at least as important to assert and quantify the expected risk of the chosen alternative. The Risk-Chance Analysis described in this article provides a goal-related and risk-related evaluation of alternatives without additional expenditures for providing information, and with the convenience of data processing. It is more comprehensive than risk analysis, which only calculates the probability of risk.     

多属性决策决问题的满意度与赋权研究

多属性决策问题的决策中,决策者往往对属性上的数值存在一定的心理预期。首先,通过心理预期与实际数据获得决策对象在每个属性上的满意度,对决策对象进行筛选过滤;其次,提出属性值信息相容关系,利用属性值之间的相容度进行赋权,信息融合对满足决策者心理预期的决策对象排序择优;再次,提出决策对象满意度,并指出传统的排序方法获取的最优决策对象与决策者总体满意度最大的决策对象并不等价。具体算例表明,该方法科学有效且可行。     

RUTA: A framework for assessing and selecting additive value functions on the basis of rank related requirements

In this paper, we present a new preference disaggregation method, called RUTA, which infers a set of additive value functions from the preference information referring to the desired ranks of some reference alternatives. Real-life experience indicates that people willingly refer to the range of allowed ranks that a particular alternative should attain, or to constraints on the final scores of the alternatives. We develop a mathematical model for incorporating such preference information via mixed-integer linear programming (MILP). Then, we discuss how decision making could be supported with the use of the already proposed extreme ranking analysis (ERA), which indicates the best and worst ranks gained by each alternative over the set of compatible preference model instances. We also introduce a new interactive UTA-like technique, which aims at selecting a single value function representing the outcomes of ERA. In the interactive process, the decision maker (DM) is assigning priorities to different pre-defined targets, which are built on results of ERA, and refer to the comparison of the best and/or worst ranks for pairs of alternatives. In particular, the DM may choose to emphasize or neglect the advantage of some alternatives over the others, in terms of results of ERA. In this way, one obtains a synthetic representation of extreme ranking analysis at a higher level of abstraction.     

A DECISION THEORY APPROACH TO PRIORITY DISPATCHING FOR JOB SHOP SCHEDULING

Recent developments in the design of job shop scheduling systems have inspired a new approach to priority dispatching. The basis for the approach is in elementary decision theory: at each decision juncture define the alternative courses of action, evaluate the consequences of each alternative according to a given criterion, and choose the best alternative. The experimental results of a simulated single machine queueing system reinforce earlier findings that a decision theory approach represents a significant advance over conventional priority dispatching.     

考虑决策者损失规避的异质信息多属性变权决策方法

现实中存在大量异质信息（或数据）和需要考虑权重随属性值变化的多属性决策问题。针对这类异质信息多属性决策问题，本文提出了一种基于前景理论的变权综合求解方法。首先，构建了异质信息的统一距离计算公式，进而计算各个决策方案的相对贴近度；然后，提出基于不同类型效用函数的变权向量构造方法；其次，以初始权重为参考点，计算变权向量相对于参考点的益损决策矩阵，进而计算考虑决策者权重损失和收益的风险态度的各个决策方案的前景综合值，据此确定方案优劣排序和最优方案。通过数值例子的计算分析说明，文中所提决策模型与方法具有较好的有效性和合理性，可为解决复杂情景的决策问题提供理论依据与方法支持。     

方案有不确定偏好的区间数相对熵群决策方法

研究了属性值是区间数并且已知方案偏好信息的多属性群决策问题。建立了每个方案客观偏好值与主观偏好值偏差的相对熵测度矩阵;基于客观信息和方案偏好信息的相对熵建立了属性权重模型;建立了一个新的区间数比较的可能度公式,基于可能度公式给出了方案排序方法,算例说明方法可行性。     

PAHAP: A Pairwise Aggregated Hierarchical Analysis of Ratio-Scale Preferences

In this paper, we present a Pairwise Aggregated Hierarchical Analysis of Ratio-Scale Preferences (PAHAP), a new method for solving discrete alternative multicriteria decision problems. Following the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), PAHAP uses pairwise preference judgments to assess the relative attractiveness of the alternatives. By first aggregating the pairwise judgment ratios of the alternatives across all criteria, and then synthesizing based on these aggregate measures, PAHAP determines overall ratio scale priorities and rankings of the alternatives which are not subject to rank reversal, provided that certain weak consistency requirements are satisfied. Hence, PAHAP can serve as a useful alternative to the original AHP if rank reversal is undesirable, for instance when the system is open and criterion scarcity does not affect the relative attractiveness of the alternatives. Moreover, the single matrix of pairwise aggregated ratings constructed in PAHAP provides useful insights into the decision maker's preference structure. PAHAP requires the same preference information as the original AHP (or, altematively, the same information as the Referenced AHP, if the criteria are compared based on average (total) value of the alternatives). As it is easier to implement and interpret than previously proposed variants of the conventional AHP which prevent rank reversal, PAHAP also appears attractive from a practitioner's viewpoint.     

Decision Making in Multiple Value Perspectives

The paper presents an operationalised model for responsible decision making in corporate context. The starting point is Kenneth E. Goodpaster's conception of moral responsibility. Basic empirical findings of decision psychology are used to arrive at a robust model of making responsible decisions. In the proposed model decision alternatives are simultaneously evaluated from different value perspectives. Responsible decision making is defined as finding the least worst alternative in the multidimensional decision space of deontological, goal-achievement, and stakeholder values. Some character traits of the responsible decision maker are also provided. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Safety Risk Analysis of an Innovative Environmental Technology

The authors describe a decision and risk analysis performed for the cleanup of a large Department of Energy mixed-waste subsurface disposal area governed by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). In a previous study, the authors worked with the site decision makers, state regulators, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regional regulators to develop a CERCLA-based multiobjective decision analysis value model and used the model to perform a screening analysis of 28 remedial alternatives. The analysis results identified an innovative technology, in situ vitrification, with high effectiveness versus cost. Since this technology had not been used on this scale before, the major uncertainties were contaminant migration and pressure buildup. Pressure buildup was a safety concern due to the potential risks to worker safety. With the help of environmental technology experts remedial alternative changes were identified to mitigate the concerns about contaminant migration and pressure buildup. The analysis results showed that the probability of an event with a risk to worker safety had been significantly reduced. Based on these results, site decision makers have refocused their test program to examine in situ vitrification and have continued the use of the CERCLA-based decision analysis methodology to analyze remedial alternatives.     

区间概率条件下属性值为不确定语言变量的风险型多属性决策研究

针对区间概率条件下属性值为不确定语言信息且属性权重未知的风险型多属性决策问题,提出了一种基于概率理论和不确定语言变量的TOPSIS决策方法。首先建立了区间概率转化为点概率的数学模型,通过期望值将风险型决策矩阵转化为确定型矩阵;然后利用方案与理想解越近方案越优,与负理想解越远方案越优的原则建立属性权重确定模型,并利用TOPSIS方法的相对优属度大小确定方案的排序;最后通过应用案例说明了本方法的决策步骤。     

A two-phase robot selection procedure

In this paper, a two-phase methodology is proposed for robot selection. In phase 1, data envelopment analysis is used as a means to determine the technically efficient robot alternatives, considering cost and technical performance parameters. Using data envelopment analysis permits us to consider the fact that the performance parameters specified by the vendors are generally unattainable in practice. In the second phase, a fuzzy robot selection algorithm is utilized to rank the technically efficient robots according to both predetermined objective criteria and additional vendor-related subjective criteria. The algorithm is based on calculating fuzzy suitability indices for the technically efficient robot alternatives, and then, ranking the fuzzy indices to select the best robot alternative. A comprehensive example is provided to illustrate the decision procedure. The algorithm proposed in here is also applicable to a broader area of decision problems, e.g. facility site selection, determination of the best CNC machine or flexible manufacturing system among a set of mutually exclusive alternatives.     

AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF SOCIAL POWER IN TERMS OF DECISION THEORY1

The paper presents an extension of decision theory to the analysis of social power. The power of a person, A, over another person, B, is viewed in terms of the effect A has on B's decision. The analysis is based on the idea that B's decision regarding the performance of alternative behaviors is a function of 1) B's utility for the consequences of the behaviors and 2) B's subjective probabilities that the behaviors will lead to these consequences. In these terms, A's power over B lies in A's ability to mediate various consequences for B, contingent upon B's compliance or noncompliance. Subjects were asked to consider eight situations in which hypothetical individuals had to make a choice between two courses of action. In each situation another person (A) was attempting to induce the hypothetical individual (B) to choose one of the alternatives, while various situational factors were influencing B to choose the other alternative. The subjects were asked to consider B's utilities and subjective probabilities in each situation and to indicate whether or not B should comply with A and to make ratings of A's power. The decision theory analysis did well in predicting whether or not subjects would indicate that B should comply with A. Also, subjects generally were able to correctly specify whether A or the situational factors had more influence over B's decision. Finally, the subjects' ratings of A's power in the eight situations were highly related to the decision theoretic measure of power.     

Screening alternatives graphically by an extended case-based distance approach

Screening is a helpful process of multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) to reduce a larger set of alternatives into a smaller one containing the best alternatives; thereby, decision makers are able to concentrate on evaluating alternatives within a smaller set. Therefore, determining how to assist decision makers in screening is an important issue for MCDA. This study proposes an extended case-based distance approach incorporating the advantages of a case-based distance method, a mixed-integer programming approach of discriminant analysis, and a multidimensional scaling technique to help decision makers screen alternatives visually in MCDA. The proposed approach can screen alternatives by evaluating sets of cases selected by decision makers, providing visual aids to observe decision context, reducing the number of misclassifications, and improving multiple solution problems. An interactive screening procedure is also developed to provide flexibility so that decision makers can check and adjust screening results iteratively.     

DECISION MAKING INVOLVING SEQUENTIAL EVENTS: SOME EFFECTS OF DISAGGREGATED DATA AND DISPOSITIONS TOWARD RISK*

This paper concerns human processing of disaggregated data in a business decision setting involving sequential events. Subjects currently employed in trust banking institutions chose between two mutually exclusive alternatives in a series of decision trials. The outcome for each alternative was the result of a two-stage process; an unsuccessful outcome resulted from failure at either the first or second stage. The probabilities of success at each stage and the overall (joint) probability of success were provided for each alternative. Participants showed strongest preferences for an optimal (expected-value) strategy in processing the data; however, significant preferences for two suboptimal strategies also were observed. Preferences for suboptimal strategies were influenced by the magnitude of differences in the alternatives' joint probabilities of success, by the magnitude of differences in the alternatives' stage probabilities of success, and by subjects' dispositions toward risk.