New innovational outlier unit root test with a break at an unknown time

The Perron test which is based on a Dickey–Fuller test regression is a commonly employed approach to test for a unit root in the presence of a structural break of unknown timing. In the case of an innovational outlier (IO), the Perron test tends to exhibit spurious rejections in finite samples when the break occurs under the null hypothesis. In the present paper, a new Perron-type IO unit root test is developed. It is shown in Monte Carlo experiments that the new test does not over-reject the null hypothesis. Even for the case of a level and slope break for trending data, the empirical size is near its nominal level. The test distribution equals the case of a known break date. Furthermore, the test is able to identify the true break date very accurately even for small breaks. As an application serves the Nelson–Plosser data set.     

Testing for the Null Hypothesis of Cointegration with a Structural Break

In this paper we propose residual-based tests for the null hypothesis of cointegration with a structural break against the alternative of no cointegration. The Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test is proposed and its limiting distribution is obtained for the case in which the timing of a structural break is known. Then the test statistic is extended to deal with a structural break of unknown timing. The test statistic, a plug-in version of the test statistic for known timing, replaces the true break point by the estimated one. We show the limiting properties of the test statistic under the null as well as the alternative. Critical values are calculated for the tests by simulation methods. Finite-sample simulations show that the empirical size of the test is close to the nominal one unless the regression error is very persistent and that the test rejects the null when no cointegrating relationship with a structural break is present. We provide empirical examples based on the present-value model, the term structure model, and the money-output relationship model.     

内生结构突变下的突变点确定方法与单位根检验研究 ——基于残差平方和最小值确定突变点的比较分析

 对于内生突变情形下的单位根检验,突变点的确定方法会影响到单位根检验的功效,不同方法在确定突变点位置时的表现也不尽相同。本文首先评述了几种常用的突变点确定方法及相应的单位根检验,然后对基于各类回归式残差平方和最小值确定突变点的方法进行了比较分析,本文所设数据生成过程有别于已有研究,并首次考虑了依据可行广义最小二乘（FGLS）估计来确定突变点。在此基础上,还对比分析了几种不同突变点确定方法下的单位根检验功效和实际检验水平。结论显示,依据FGLS残差平方和最小值得到准确突变点的频率最高,且在AO模型下据此进行Perron检验具有较高的功效且不会发生较大的水平扭曲。     

Testing for the Null Hypothesis of Cointegration with a Structural Break

In this paper we propose residual-based tests for the null hypothesis of cointegration with a structural break against the alternative of no cointegration. The Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test is proposed and its limiting distribution is obtained for the case in which the timing of a structural break is known. Then the test statistic is extended to deal with a structural break of unknown timing. The test statistic, a plug-in version of the test statistic for known timing, replaces the true break point by the estimated one. We show the limiting properties of the test statistic under the null as well as the alternative. Critical values are calculated for the tests by simulation methods. Finite-sample simulations show that the empirical size of the test is close to the nominal one unless the regression error is very persistent and that the test rejects the null when no cointegrating relationship with a structural break is present. We provide empirical examples based on the present-value model, the term structure model, and the money-output relationship model.     

A robust test for autocorrelation in the presence of a structural break in variance

It has been known that when there is a break in the variance (unconditional heteroskedasticity) of the error term in linear regression models, a routine application of the Lagrange multiplier (LM) test for autocorrelation can cause potentially significant size distortions. We propose a new test for autocorrelation that is robust in the presence of a break in variance. The proposed test is a modified LM test based on a generalized least squares regression. Monte Carlo simulations show that the new test performs well in finite samples and it is especially comparable to other existing heteroskedasticity-robust tests in terms of size, and much better in terms of power.     

F-tests for seasonal differencing with a break-point

The classification between stochastic trend stationarity and deterministic broken trend stationarity is important because incorrect inferences can follow if a stationary series with a broken trend is incorrectly classified as integrated. In this paper, we consider joint tests for regular and seasonal unit roots null hypothesis against broken trend stationarity alternatives where the location of the break is known or unknown. Based on the F-test proposed by Hasza and Fuller (1982, Ann. Statist. 10, 1209–1216), we develop testing procedures for distinguishing these two types of process. The asymptotic distributions of test statistics are derived as functions of Wiener processes. A response surface regression analysis directed to relating the finite sample distributions and the breaking position is studied. Simulation experiments suggest that the power of the test is reasonable. The testing procedure is illustrated by the Canadian consumer price index series.     

Bootstrap test for a structural break under possible heteroscedasticity

In this article, we consider the Wald test statistic for testing equality between the sets of regression coefficients in two linear regression models when the disturbance variances may possibly be unequal. This test can be also used as a test for a structural break. However, it is well known that the test based on the Wald test statistic suffers from severe size distortion in small sample when the disturbance variances of the two regression models are unequal. Our simulation results show that substantial improvements are made when the bootstrap methods are applied.     

Testing the disturbance variance after a pre-test for a linear hypothesis on coefficients in a linear regression

In this paper, we examine the sampling performance of a two-stage test which consists of a pre-test for a linear hypothesis on regression coeffiecients followed by a main-test for a disturbance variance in a linear regression. It is shown that the actual size of the two-stage test can be well-controlled around the normal size if the suggested sizes presented in this paper are used in the pre-test. It is also shown that the two-stage test when the suggested sizes are used in the preferable to the usual test for the disturbance variable which incorporates no pre-test in terms of the power.     

A simulation study on the influence of ties on uniform scores test for circular data

Uniform scores test is a rank-based method that tests the homogeneity of k-populations in circular data problems. The influence of ties on the uniform scores test has been emphasized by several authors in several articles and books. Moreover, it is suggested that the uniform scores test should be used with caution if ties are present in the data. This paper investigates the influence of ties on the uniform scores test by computing the power of the test using average, randomization, permutation, minimum, and maximum methods to break ties. Monte Carlo simulation is performed to compute the power of the test under several scenarios such as having 5% or 10% of ties and tie group structures in the data. The simulation study shows no significant difference among the methods under the existence of ties but the test loses its power when there are many ties or complicated group structures. Thus, randomization or average methods are equally powerful to break ties when applying uniform scores test. Also, it can be concluded that k-sample uniform scores test can be used safely without sacrificing the power if there are only less than 5% of ties or at most two groups of a few ties.     

中国居民消费的数据生成过程研究

如果非平稳总量时序列存在结构变化，那么传统的单位根检验往往会得出错误的统计推断。在考虑经济结构变化的基础上，对中国居民消费时序列是具有单位根的非平稳还是分段趋势平稳进行研究，结果发现该时序列是围绕着1个结构断点的分段趋势平稳。分段趋势平稳的结论说明政策主导下的长期经济发展战略能够改变居民消费总量的增长路径；短期消费政策也是值得应用的。     

A simple unit root testing methodology that does not require knowledge regarding the presence of a break

We develop a simple methodology that allows practitioners to test for the presence of a unit root without a priori knowledge regarding the occurrence of a break under the null hypothesis. We use a pre-test that is readily available in the estimated regression used to calculate the unit root statistics, and so our methodology is very easy to implement. The t-statistic corresponding to the impulse dummy variables evaluated at break date estimator is used as a pre-test to ascertain whether a break exists under the null hypothesis. Finite sample simulations show that our methodology yields tests that maintain their size.     

Testing for structural changes in linear regressions with time-varying variance

Abstract

This article proposes a nonparametric test for structural changes in linear regression models that allows for serial correlation, autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and time-varying variance in error terms. The test requires no trimming of the boundary region near the end points of the sample period, and requires no prior information on the alternative, what it requires is the transformed OLS residuals under the null hypothesis. We show that the test has a limiting standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis, and is powerful against single break, multiple breaks and smooth structural changes. The Monte Carlo experiment is conducted to highlight the merits of the proposed test relative to other popular tests for structural changes.     

Logistic and neural network models for predicting a hospital admission

Feedforward neural networks are often used in a similar manner as logistic regression models; that is, to estimate the probability of the occurrence of an event. In this paper, a probabilistic model is developed for the purpose of estimating the probability that a patient who has been admitted to the hospital with a medical back diagnosis will be released after only a short stay or will remain hospitalized for a longer period of time. As the purpose of the analysis is to determine if hospital characteristics influence the decision to retain a patient, the inputs to this model are a set of demographic variables that describe the various hospitals. The output is the probability of either a short or long term hospital stay. In order to compare the ability of each method to model the data, a hypothesis test is performed to test for an improvement resulting from the use of the neural network model.     

Accounting for Uncertainty in Heteroscedasticity in Nonlinear Regression

Toxicologists and pharmacologists often describe toxicity of a chemical using parameters of a nonlinear regression model. Thus estimation of parameters of a nonlinear regression model is an important problem. The estimates of the parameters and their uncertainty estimates depend upon the underlying error variance structure in the model. Typically, a priori the researcher would not know if the error variances are homoscedastic (i.e., constant across dose) or if they are heteroscedastic (i.e., the variance is a function of dose). Motivated by this concern, in this paper we introduce an estimation procedure based on preliminary test which selects an appropriate estimation procedure accounting for the underlying error variance structure. Since outliers and influential observations are common in toxicological data, the proposed methodology uses M-estimators. The asymptotic properties of the preliminary test estimator are investigated; in particular its asymptotic covariance matrix is derived. The performance of the proposed estimator is compared with several standard estimators using simulation studies. The proposed methodology is also illustrated using a data set obtained from the National Toxicology Program.     

JACKKNIFE TESTS FOR HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN THE GENERAL LINEAR MODEL

In this paper, tests based on the Jackknife technique are proposed to test for heteroscedasticity in the linear regression model when the errors are non-normal. These are the Jackknifed Goldfeld-Quandt (GQ), and jack-knife related variations of White (H), Lagrange multiplier (LM), Glejser (GL) and Bickel (B) tests. The power of the proposed tests is compared with that of GQ, H, LM, GL and B tests; and the robustness to the error distribution is analyzed under several heteroscedastic assumptions. The GQ test is by far the best test if the error distribution is close to normal, however, GQ test is not robust against non-normal errors. By applying the jackknife technique to the regression a more robust statistic (GQJRG) is produced but the cost is a loss in power. The GQJRG statistic generally is not M powerful as the Bickel (BlOLS) and Glejser (GLlOLS) statistics.     

Heteroscedasticity diagnostics in varying-coefficient partially linear regression models and applications in analyzing Boston housing data

It is important to detect the variance heterogeneity in regression model because efficient inference requires that heteroscedasticity is taken into consideration if it really exists. For the varying-coefficient partially linear regression models, however, the problem of detecting heteroscedasticity has received very little attention. In this paper, we present two classes of tests of heteroscedasticity for varying-coefficient partially linear regression models. The first test statistic is constructed based on the residuals, in which the error term is from a normal distribution. The second one is motivated by the idea that testing heteroscedasticity is equivalent to testing pseudo-residuals for a constant mean. Asymptotic normality is established with different rates corresponding to the null hypothesis of homoscedasticity and the alternative. Some Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed tests. The test methodologies are illustrated with a real data set example.     

Estimation of structural mean breaks for long-memory data sets

In long-memory data sets such as the realized volatilities of financial assets, a sequential test is developed for the detection of structural mean breaks. The long memory, if any, is adjusted by fitting an HAR (heterogeneous autoregressive) model to the data sets and taking the residuals. Our test consists of applying the sequential test of Bai and Perron [Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica. 1998;66:47–78] to the residuals. The large-sample validity of the proposed test is investigated in terms of the consistency of the estimated number of breaks and the asymptotic null distribution of the proposed test. A finite-sample Monte-Carlo experiment reveals that the proposed test tends to produce an unbiased break time estimate, while the usual sequential test of Bai and Perron tends to produce biased break times in the case of long memory. The experiment also reveals that the proposed test has a more stable size than the Bai and Perron test. The proposed test is applied to two realized volatility data sets of the S&P index and the Korea won-US dollar exchange rate for the past 7 years and finds 2 or 3 breaks, while the Bai and Perron test finds 8 or more breaks.     

On Unit-Root Tests When the Alternative Is a Trend-Break Stationary Process

Minimum t statistics to test for a unit-root are available when the form of break under the alternative evolves according to the crash, changing growth, and mixed models. It is shown that serious power distortions occur if the form of break is misspecified, and thus the practitioner should use the mixed model as the appropriate alternative in empirical applications. The mixed model may reveal useful information regarding the location and form of break. The maximum F statistic for the joint null of a unit-root and no breaks is shown to have greater and less erratic power compared to the minimumt statistic. Stronger evidence against the unit-root is found for the Nelson-Plosser series and U.S. Postwar quarterly real gross national product.     

No-cointegration test based on fractional differencing: Some Monte Carlo results

This paper examines the use of the t-statistic in the Geweke–Porter-Hudak regression for the estimation of the fractional differencing parameter as a test for cointegration. The critical values of the test statistic are estimated using Monte Carlo methods. The results confirm that the test will over-reject the null hypothesis of no cointegration if the standard-normal critical values are used. The estimated critical values are generally robust to the nuisance parameters in the autoregressive or moving average specification of the error process of the component time series. Exceptions occur when the dependent variable in the cointegration regression follows an autoregressive process with a large positive parameter or a moving average process with a large negative parameter.     

The limiting power of point optimal autocorrelation tests

This paper considers the point optimal tests for AR(1) errors in the linear regression model. It is shown that these tests have the same limiting power characteristics as the Durbin-Watson test. . The limiting power is zero or one when the regression has no intercept, but lies strictly between these values when an intercept is included.