Minimum-volume confidence sets for normal linear regression models

In this article, we establish the minimum-volume confidence sets for normal linear regression models, extending the results in Zhang [Minimum volume confidence sets for parameters of normal distributions. Adv Stat Anal. 2017;101:309–320] on building the minimum-volume confidence sets for parameters of normal distributions. Compared with classical confidence sets, the proposed optimal confidence set is proved to have the smallest volume, for whatever confidence level, sample size and sample data.     

Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups

In the cases with three ordinal diagnostic groups, the important measures of diagnostic accuracy are the volume under surface (VUS) and the partial volume under surface (PVUS) which are the extended forms of the area under curve (AUC) and the partial area under curve (PAUC). This article addresses confidence interval estimation of the difference in paired VUS s and the difference in paired PVUS s. To focus especially on studies with small to moderate sample sizes, we propose an approach based on the concepts of generalized inference. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates that the proposed approach generally can provide confidence intervals with reasonable coverage probabilities even at small sample sizes. The proposed approach is compared to a parametric bootstrap approach and a large sample approach through simulation. Finally, the proposed approach is illustrated via an application to a data set of blood test results of anemia patients.     

Multi-sample inference for simple-tree alternatives with ranked-set samples

This paper develops a non‐parametric multi‐sample inference for simple‐tree alternatives for ranked‐set samples. The multi‐sample inference provides simultaneous one‐sample sign confidence intervals for the population medians. The decision rule compares these intervals to achieve the desired type I error. For the specified upper bounds on the experiment‐wise error rates, corresponding individual confidence coefficients are presented. It is shown that the testing procedure is distribution‐free. To achieve the desired confidence coefficients for multi‐sample inference, a nonparametric confidence interval is constructed by interpolating the adjacent order statistics. Interpolation coefficients and coverage probabilities are provided, along with the nominal levels.     

Quantile inference based on partially rank-ordered set samples

This paper develops statistical inference for population quantiles based on a partially rank-ordered set (PROS) sample design. A PROS sample design is similar to a ranked set sample with some clear differences. This design first creates partially rank-ordered subsets by allowing ties whenever the units in a set cannot be ranked with high confidence. It then selects a unit for full measurement at random from one of these partially rank-ordered subsets. The paper develops a point estimator, confidence interval and hypothesis testing procedure for the population quantile of order p. Exact, as well as asymptotic, distribution of the test statistic is derived. It is shown that the null distribution of the test statistic is distribution-free, and statistical inference is reasonably robust against possible ranking errors in ranking process.     

What Do Interpolated Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Population Quantiles Guarantee?

The interval between two prespecified order statistics of a sample provides a distribution-free confidence interval for a population quantile. However, due to discreteness, only a small set of exact coverage probabilities is available. Interpolated confidence intervals are designed to expand the set of available coverage probabilities. However, we show here that the infimum of the coverage probability for an interpolated confidence interval is either the coverage probability for the inner interval or the coverage probability obtained by removing the more likely of the two extreme subintervals from the outer interval. Thus, without additional assumptions, interpolated intervals do not expand the set of available guaranteed coverage probabilities.     

Properties of simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions

Inversion of Pearson's chi-square statistic yields a confidence ellipsoid that can be used for simultaneous inference concerning multinomial proportions. Because the ellipsoid is difficult to interpret, methods of simultaneous confidence interval construction have been proposed by Quesenberry and hurst,goodman,fitzpatrick and scott and sison and glaz . Based on simulation results, we discuss the performance of these methods in terms of empirical coverage probabilities and enclosed volume. None of the methods is uniformly better than all others, but the Goodman intervals control the empirical coverage probability with smaller volume than other methods when the sample size supports the large sample theory. If the expected cell counts are small and nearly equal across cells, we recommend the sison and glaz intervals.     

Confidence regions for Pareto parameters from a single and independent samples

[Abstract] Based on a single and on two independent samples, joint confidence regions for parameters of Pareto distributions are proposed with minimum volume properties and without assigning the confidence level to dimensions. In the one-sample case, comparisons are made to former simultaneous confidence sets for Pareto parameters by means of simulation and a real data set. The two-sample case is studied in various set-ups and comprises simultaneous confidence regions for the shape parameters, the scale parameters, and higher-dimensional vectors of these parameters, where common shape and common scale models are also considered.     

Small sample asymptotic inference for the coefficient of variation: normal and nonnormal models

In applied statistics, the coefficient of variation is widely calculated and interpreted even when the sample size of the data set is very small. However, confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation are rarely reported. One of the reasons is the exact confidence interval for the coefficient of variation, which is given in Lehmann (Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 1996), is very difficult to calculate. Various asymptotic methods have been proposed in literature. These methods, in general, require the sample size to be large. In this article, we will apply a recently developed small sample asymptotic method to obtain approximate confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation for both normal and nonnormal models. These small sample asymptotic methods are very accurate even for very small sample size. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the accuracy of the proposed method.     

Minimum volume confidence sets for parameters of normal distributions

AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis - Under a proper restriction, we establish the minimum volume confidence set (interval and region) for parameter of any normal distribution. Compared with...     

Small confidence sets for the mean of a spherically symmetric distribution

Summary.  Suppose that X has a k -variate spherically symmetric distribution with mean vector θ and identity covariance matrix. We present two spherical confidence sets for θ , both centred at a positive part Stein estimator     . In the first, we obtain the radius by approximating the upper α -point of the sampling distribution of     by the first two non-zero terms of its Taylor series about the origin. We can analyse some of the properties of this confidence set and see that it performs well in terms of coverage probability, volume and conditional behaviour. In the second method, we find the radius by using a parametric bootstrap procedure. Here, even greater improvement in terms of volume over the usual confidence set is possible, at the expense of having a less explicit radius function. A real data example is provided, and extensions to the unknown covariance matrix and elliptically symmetric cases are discussed.     

A NEW CONFIDENCE BAND FOR CONTINUOUS CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS

We consider confidence bands for continuous distribution functions. Following a review of the literature we find that previously considered confidence bands, which have exact coverage, are all step-functions jumping only at the sample points. We find that the step-function bands can be constructed through rectangular tolerance regions for an ordered sample from the uniform distribution R(0, 1). We then construct a set of new bands. Two criteria for assessing confidence bands are presented. One is the power criterion, and the other is the average-width criterion that we propose. Numerical comparisons between our new bands and the old bands are carried out, and show that our new bands perform much better than the old ones.     

Convergence rates of change-point estimators and tail probabilities of the first-passage-time process

In the classical setting of the change-point problem, the maximum-likelihood estimator and the traditional confidence region for the change-point parameter are considered. It is shown that the probability of the correct decision, the coverage probability and the expected size of the confidence set converge exponentially fast as the sample size increases to infinity. For this purpose, the tail probabilities of the first passage times are studied. General inequalities are established, and exact asymptotics are obtained for the case of Bernoulli distributions. A closed asymptotic form for the expected size of the confidence set is derived for this case via the conditional distribution of the first passage times.     

A reexamination of stein's antifiducial example

In Stein's 1959 example, for any sample with n sufficiently large, there is a confidence set embedded simultaneously within two regular confidence belts—one with coverage frequency smaller than an arbitrary positive ϵ, the other with coverage frequency larger than 1 — ϵ. Thus, Stein's example may be seen as an extreme case of mutually conflicting confidence statements, illustrating a possibility anticipated and denounced by Fisher.     

Exact uniformly most powerful postselection confidence distributions

A conditioning on the event of having selected one model from a set of possibly misspecified normal linear regression models leads to the construction of uniformly optimal conditional confidence distributions. They can be used for valid postselection inference. The constructed conditional confidence distributions are finite sample exact and encompass all information regarding the focus parameter in the selected model. This includes the construction of optimal postselection confidence intervals at all significance levels and uniformly most powerful hypothesis tests.     

Using the bootstrap in correlation analysis,with application to a longitudinal data set

The problem of constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for various measures of association is considered. Alternative bootstrap algorithms are given for approximating the sampling distributions of the quantities generating the confidence sets. The small sample performance of the procedures is illustrated using simulated data from 3- and 6-variate normal populations. The results are applied to a large multidimensional longitudinal data set from a study of the relationship between drug use and several behavioral attributes.     

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Population Cell Means,for Two-by-Two Factorial Data,that Utilize Uncertain Prior Information

Consider a two-by-two factorial experiment with more than one replicate. Suppose that we have uncertain prior information that the two-factor interaction is zero. We describe new simultaneous frequentist confidence intervals for the four population cell means, with simultaneous confidence coefficient 1 ? α, that utilize this prior information in the following sense. These simultaneous confidence intervals define a cube with expected volume that (a) is relatively small when the two-factor interaction is zero and (b) has maximum value that is not too large. Also, these intervals coincide with the standard simultaneous confidence intervals obtained by Tukey’s method, with simultaneous confidence coefficient 1 ? α, when the data strongly contradict the prior information that the two-factor interaction is zero. We illustrate the application of these new simultaneous confidence intervals to a real data set.     

Inference about the Regression Parameters Using Median-Ranked Set Sampling

The ranked set samples and median ranked set samples in particular have been used extensively in the literature due to many reasons. In some situations, the experimenter may not be able to quantify or measure the response variable due to the high cost of data collection, however it may be easier to rank the subject of interest. The purpose of this article is to study the asymptotic distribution of the parameter estimators of the simple linear regression model. We show that these estimators using median ranked set sampling scheme converge in distribution to the normal distribution under weak conditions. Moreover, we derive large sample confidence intervals for the regression parameters as well as a large sample prediction interval for new observation. Also, we study the properties of these estimators for small sample setup and conduct a simulation study to investigate the behavior of the distributions of the proposed estimators.     

QUANTILE ESTIMATION AND PROBABILITY COVERAGES

When estimating population quantiles via a random sample from an unknown continuous distribution function it is well known that a pair of order statistics may be used to set a confidence interval for any single desired, population quantile. In this paper the technique is generalized so that more than one pair of order statistics may be used to obtain simultaneous confidence intervals for the various quantiles that might be required. The generalization immediately extends to the problem of obtaining interval estimates for quantile intervals. Distributions of the ordered and unordered probability coverages of these confidence intervals are discussed as are the associated distributions of linear combinations of the coverages.     

Inference in the presence of ranking error in ranked set sampling

The author proposes inference techniques for ranked set sample data in the presence of judgment ranking errors. He bases his analysis on the models of Bohn & Wolfe (1994) and Frey (2007a, b), of which parameters are estimated by minimizing a distance measure. He then uses the fitted models to calibrate confidence intervals and tests. He shows the validity of his approach through simulation and illustrates its application through the construction of distribution‐free confidence intervals for the median area of apple tree leaves covered by a spray.     

Exact Inference for a Population Proportion Based on a Ranked Set Sample

ABSTRACT

This article develops and investigates a confidence interval and hypothesis testing procedure for a population proportion based on a ranked set sample (RSS). The inference is exact, in the sense that it is based on the exact distribution of the total number of successes observed in the RSS. Furthermore, this distribution can be readily computed with the well-known and freely available R statistical software package. A data example that illustrates the methodology is presented. In addition, the properties of the inference procedures are compared with their simple random sample (SRS) counterparts. In regards to expected lengths of confidence intervals and the power of tests, the RSS inference procedures are superior to the SRS methods.