Variable selection via a multi-stage strategy

Variable selection for nonlinear regression is a complex problem, made even more difficult when there are a large number of potential covariates and a limited number of datapoints. We propose herein a multi-stage method that combines state-of-the-art techniques at each stage to best discover the relevant variables. At the first stage, an extension of the Bayesian Additive Regression tree is adopted to reduce the total number of variables to around 30. At the second stage, sensitivity analysis in the treed Gaussian process is adopted to further reduce the total number of variables. Two stopping rules are designed and sequential design is adopted to make best use of previous information. We demonstrate our approach on two simulated examples and one real data set.     

‘Irrationality’ of managerial judgments: Implications for information systems

Four principal factors affecting rational information processing behavior in organizations are discussed. These are: (1) the nature and attributes of the messages received from the Management Information and Decision System (MIDS); (2) The personal qualities and attitudes of the manager himself; (3) the degree of social interaction; and (4) if a collective is involved, the format and group decision function used in arriving at a group position. Ways in which information specialists and operations researchers can counter, ameliorate, and exploit managers' judgmental biases and inconsistencies are then proposed. Areas for further research are suggested.     

An Information-Maximizing Interactive Procedure for Scenario Probability Elicitation

Various approaches have been proposed for determining scenario probabilities to facilitate long-range planning and decision making. These include microlevel approaches based on the analysis of relevant underlying events and their interrelations and direct macrolevel examination of the scenarios. The determination of a unique solution demands excessive consistency and time requirements on the part of the expert and often is not guaranteed by these procedures. We propose an interactive information maximizing scenario probability query procedure (IMQP) that exploits the desirable features of existing methods while circumventing their drawbacks. The approach requires elicitation of cardinal probability assessments and bounds for only marginal and first-order conditional events, as well as ordinal probability comparisons (probability orderings or rankings) of carefully selected scenario subsets determined using concepts of information theory. Guidelines for implementation based on simulation results are also developed. A goal program for handling inconsistent ordinal probability responses is also integrated into the procedure. The results of behavioral experimentation (which compared our approach to Expert Choice and showed that the IMQP was viable) compared favorably in terms of ease of use and time requirements, and works best for problems with a large number of scenarios. Design modifications to IMQP learned from the experiments, such as incorporating interactive graphics, are also in progress.