基于加权群体AHP的企业资信评价方法

本文研究加权群体AHP方法及其在企件资信评价中的应用问题,建立了反映各专家或决策者优先权及各判断矩阵可信度的两种加权距离法,从主观和客观两方面切实有效地反映了各专家或决策者意见对最终评判结果的影响。企业资信评价是银行信贷风险管理的重要基础工作之一,各企业资信等级的正确评定取决于许多相关因素,需要各方面专家或决策者进行综合评判,合理的评判结果应反映各专家或决策者对各企业及信贷风险状况了解和认识的程度,同时应反映各专家或决策者对各企业评判所给出的判断矩阵的可信度,因此,本文建立以各专家或决策者优先权及各判断矩阵可信度为权系数的加权距离法,较好地解决了该问题。     

Problems with Needs—Where Theory Meets Practice

During the last ten years there has been an increase in the number of attempts to include the assessment of 'needs' of people with mental handicaps. There has been a shift away from previous tendencies to make statements and arrange services in terms of 'problems', 'deficits' and 'defects'; instead individual practitioners have begun to develop 'needs assessments' in order to identify services for clients by borrowing ideas from other fields. These developments have been haphazard and have not been based upon a logical or formal theory. Instead, individuals and agencies have used the term to convey different ideas with dissimilar implications for people with mental handicaps. A review of the literature on 'needs assessment' reveals a confusing and poorly-defined concept with which to plan or implement services. Suggestions are offered to clarify thinking and improve mutual understanding for a possible way forward. Some practical recommendations are identified to assist development of services for people with mental handicap.     

Constructing women's psychological health in anti-abortion rhetoric

This paper considers the ways in which anti-abortion activists construct women's psychological experience of abortion and explores the rhetorical significance of this discourse in advancing the anti-abortion project. In particular we examine how the psychological concept of 'denial' contained in the (proposed) diagnostic category of 'Post-Abortion Syndrome' allows anti-abortionists to 'psychologise' and therefore undermine alternative constructions of the experience of abortion. Further, we explore how this construction of women's experience allows particular constructions of the foetus (ie, 'unborn child') to be advanced (and naturalised) without reference to overtly political argumentation. The significance of this development of the abortion debate and its implications for the dynamics of political mobilisation are discussed.     

Accountability in action?: the case of a database purchasing decision 1

The increasing prevalence of audit in university settings has raised concerns about the potentially adverse effects of invasive measures of performance upon the conduct of research and generation of knowledge. What sustains the current commitment to audit? It is argued that in order to address this question we need to understand how and to what extent notions of accountability are played out in practice. This is illustrated through the analysis of materials from an ethnographic study of ‘good management practice’ in the deployment of technologies in university settings. The paper examines the ways in which ideas of accountability — involving considerations such as ‘value for money’— inform the practical processes of deciding about the purchase of a new database technology.     

议论的技巧--论证说

时下有关论证的说法很多 ,有过程论 ,层次论 ,方法论 ,结构论等 ,本文认为论证是技巧 ,是“统合技巧”。它统合了诸如句法、词法、语法、修辞法、逻辑法、章法等方法 ,构成篇章修辞方法 ,完成一篇议论文的表达。     

信息缺失下的应急方案选择模型及算法研究

信息缺失是应急事件处置中的一个重要特征.对于考虑信息缺失的两阶段应急处置问题,本文提出了应急方案效度的概念,构造了考虑资源约束条件下的应急方案选择模型,并给出了求解算法.数值结果表明模型及算法的有效性.     

金融危机10年来中国股市动态演化与市场稳健研究——一个基于复杂网络视角的实证

将复杂网络理论最小生成树（MST）算法和滑窗分析相结合，在2008年全球金融危机和2015年中国股市震荡的背景下，以2003年至2017年的上证A股收益率数据作为实证样本，构建股票市场动态关联网络，并从网络节点移除和连边变化两个角度出发，对其在不同时期的动态演化特征和市场稳健性质进行探讨。研究结果表明：网络结构整体上在金融危机之前和之后较为松散，而在金融危机和股市震荡期间则变得非常紧凑，节点的度分布和影响强度分布更加聚集。这意味着在金融危机和股市震荡期间，系统重要性公司的影响力持续增强，其股价的变化对其它公司将产生更为显著的影响；不同类型的事件对股市网络连通性和稳健性的影响程度不同，区域性事件（股市震荡）比全球性事件（金融危机）对市场的冲击更大；短期来看，金融危机和股市震荡对网络连边的稳健性并没有造成太大的冲击，整个研究时段网络的存活比率都维持在较高的水平。但随着步长的增加，网络的存活比率急剧下降，这意味着股市网络相关结构的长期稳健性是减弱的。     

REGULATING WORKERS COMPENSATION: THE MEDICO LEGAL EVALUATION OF INJURED WORKERS IN VICTORIA

Sociological research on occupational injury has been dominated by perspectives from the social organisation of work and the labour process. What is missing from this literature is an explanation of the actual experiences at the individual worker within the processes of legitimation of occupational injury. This study explores the experiences of injured workers as they move through the medico-legal process. Medical reports and clients perspectives were used to expose the positions of doctors, insurance companies, lawyers and workers compensation bureaucrats as they form a complex intersection of power and interest in the regulation of injured workers. In particular, the conflicting roles of doctors as both gatekeepers and service providers were highlighted in the maintenance of stigmatised damaged workers.