Unbiased estimators of finite population variance using auxiliary information in sample surveys

We present some unbiased estimators of the population variance in a finite population sample survey using the knowledge of population variance of an auxiliary character.Exact variance expressions for the proposed estimators are obtained and compared with usual unbiased estimator and the ratio estimator envisaged by Isaki (1983). Generalization of the proposed estimator is also suggested.     

Estimation of Population Mean Under Non Response in Two-Occasion Rotation Patterns

The present article is an attempt to study the effect of non response at both occasions in search of good rotation patterns over two occasions. Ratio-type estimators were proposed for estimating the population mean at current occasion in presence of non response at both the occasions in two-occasion successive (rotation) sampling. Detail behaviors of proposed estimators were studied. Proposed estimators were compared with the estimator using no information from previous (first) occasion. Performances of the proposed estimators were demonstrated via empirical studies.     

A novel spatial outlier detection technique

Spatial outliers are spatially referenced objects whose non spatial attribute values are significantly different from the corresponding values in their spatial neighborhoods. In other words, a spatial outlier is a local instability or an extreme observation that deviates significantly in its spatial neighborhood, but possibly not be in the entire dataset. In this article, we have proposed a novel spatial outlier detection algorithm, location quotient (LQ) for multiple attributes spatial datasets, and compared its performance with the well-known mean and median algorithms for multiple attributes spatial datasets, in the literature. In particular, we have applied the mean, median, and LQ algorithms on a real dataset and on simulated spatial datasets of 13 different sizes to compare their performances. In addition, we have calculated area under the curve values in all the cases, which shows that our proposed algorithm is more powerful than the mean and median algorithms in almost all the considered cases and also plotted receiver operating characteristic curves in some cases.     

On Symmetrizing Transformation of the Sample Coefficient of Variation from a Normal Population

Variance-stabilizing transformation (VST) for the sample coefficient of variation is often used as a normalizing transformation and may be used for inference on the population coefficient of variation. However, for small samples, the VST may not be symmetric and hence there is a scope of improvement in its performance by seeking a symmetrizing transformation. This article investigates such a transformation that has been obtained by solving a differential equation. The solution may be complex; hence, a numerical strategy is employed in order to make the approximation practically useful. This transformation has been compared with explicitly available VST. The approach has been illustrated on real data from an agricultural experiment concentrating on inference on single samples; however, the method may be generally applicable to multiple samples when testing the homogeneity of coefficients of variation for many populations by following usual normal-theory-based methods applied on transformed statistics.     

A comparison of two randomized response survey methods with consideration for the level of respondent protection

In recent years randomized response methods have been introduced in an attempt to improve the accuracy and honesty in personalized response surveys of very sensitive questions. Two randomized response methods are compared, taking into account the protection afforded the respondent. In addition, we point out that the estimators, which previous authors have claimed to be the maximum likelihood estimators of the population proportion with the sensitive characteristic, are in fact not the maximum likelihood estimators.     

Efficient use of multi-auxiliary information in search of good rotation patterns in successive sampling

This article considers the problem of estimating the population mean on the current (second) occasion using multi-auxiliary information in successive sampling over two occasions. A general class of estimators is proposed for estimating population mean on the current occasion and expressions for bias and mean square error for these estimators are obtained up to first degree of approximation. The minimum variance bound estimator in the proposed class is discussed. Many popular estimators have been shown to belong to this class. Optimum replacement policy is also discussed. Finally, the superiority of the proposed class of estimators over multivariate version of chain type ratio estimator envisaged by Singh (2005 Singh, G.N. (2005). On the use of chain type ratio estimator in successive sampling. Stat Transition 7:21–26. [Google Scholar]) is established empirically.     

A NOTE ON SAMPLING OVER TWO OCCASIONS1

Using simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR) on both occasions, a new scheme of selecting the unmatched part of the sample on second occasion is presented. The proposed estimate of the population mean has been shown to be more efficient than the estimate of Pathak and Rao (1967) for the same expected cost. Kulldorff's estimate as considered by Rao and Ghangurde (1969), however, remains superior to the proposed estimate.     

Sequence-compound estimation in scale-exponential families and speed of convergence

This paper deals with a sequence-compound estimation. The component problem is the squared error loss estimation of θ?[a,b] based on an observation X whose p.d.f. is of the form $\text{u(x)c(θ)}\text{exp}\text{(?}\text{x}\text{θ}\text{)}$. For each $\text{0<t<}\text{1}\text{2}$ a class of sequence-compound estimators $\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{=}\text{ψ}\text{?}{}_1\text{,}\text{ψ}\text{?}{}_2\text{,…)}$ is exhibited whose compound risk (average of risks) up to stage n differs from the Bayes envelope (in the component problem) w.r.t. the empiric distribution G_n of the parameters involved up to stage n by a quantity of order O(n^?δt) for a δ>0. It is also shown that at any stage i the difference of the risk of ψ?_i and the risk of the Bayes response w.r.t. G_i?1 is O(i^?δt). Examples of the above type of families are given where δ is min{1,$\text{2a}\text{b}$} and t is arbitrarily close to $\text{1}\text{2}$. Here it may be worthwhile to mention that a rate $\text{O}\text{(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ or better has not yet been obtained even in a very special family of densities.